Araştırma Makalesi

Co-Diagnosing Urban Forests: Assessing Public Space Quality in İnciraltı Urban Forest

Cilt: 19 Sayı: 4 28 Nisan 2026
PDF İndir
TR EN

Co-Diagnosing Urban Forests: Assessing Public Space Quality in İnciraltı Urban Forest

Abstract

The study presents a comprehensive assessment of public space quality in the İnciraltı Urban Forest in İzmir, Türkiye, through a participatory approach known as Co-Diagnosis within the framework of Citizen Design Science. The research investigates how accessibility, safety, comfort, and sociability are perceived and experienced by diverse user groups in a major coastal green space. A mixed-methods strategy was employed, combining spatial observation, semi-structured interviews (n=26), user surveys (n=158), and a systematic behavioral mapping study (n=9.185 observed users). The findings reveal spatial inequalities in shade, seating, restrooms, and inclusive access. Elderly individuals, women, and users with special needs expressed spatial discomfort due to surface materials, insufficient lighting, and the lack of protective shelters during extreme weather events. The most commonly reported challenges included uncontrolled dog presence, limited public transportation, and poor maintenance. Despite these limitations, the area remains a popular destination for physical and recreational activities. The study highlights the underutilization of İnciraltı Open-Air Theater and the absence of cultural programming as missed opportunities to strengthen social vitality. A set of urban design strategies is proposed to enhance environmental resilience, inclusiveness, and liveability of the site. This research contributes to the urban public space literature by integrating experiential knowledge into spatial diagnosis and emphasizing co-creation as a critical tool for inclusive planning in urban green spaces.

Keywords

Urban design , Public space , Urban forest , Co-diagnosis , Public space quality

Kaynakça

  1. Isabelle Anguelovski, James J. T. Connolly, Laia Masip & Hamil Pearsall (2018) Assessing green gentrification in historically disenfranchised neighborhoods: a longitudinal and spatial analysis of Barcelona, Urban Geography, 39:3, 458-491, DOI: 10.1080/02723638.2017.1349987.
  2. Berntzen, L., & Johannessen, M. R. (2016). The role of citizen participation in municipal smart city projects: Lessons learned from. 299–314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 319-17620-8.
  3. Carmona, M. (2019). Principles For Public Space Design, Planning To Do Better. Urban Design International, 24, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-018-0070-3.
  4. Carmona, M., Tiesdell, S., Heath, T., & Oc, T. (2010). Public Places, Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. Routledge.
  5. Egercioğlu, Y., Erçoşun Ö. (2015). İzmir’de Sürdürülebilir Kentsel Planlama İçin Expo Alanının Sunduğu Riskler ve Fırsatlar, Planlama, 15(1):8–20. doi: 10.5505/planlama.2015.36855.
  6. Gehl, J. (2011). Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. Island Press.
  7. Hacıoğlu, G. (2020). A study on social sustainability in urban green spaces: The case of İnciraltı City Forest (Master’s thesis, İzmir Institute of Technology).
  8. Kayın, E. (2012). İnciraltı Boşluğu İçin Ekolojik Kentsel Bir Gelecek Modeli: Kentliler İçin Bir Kıyı, Ege Mimarlık, 38-43.
  9. König, A. (2020). Citizen Design Science: A methodological contribution to a transdisciplinary approach to participatory urban planning. Futures, 122, 102578.
  10. Low, S., Taplin, D., & Scheld, S. (2005). Rethinking Urban Parks: Public Space and Cultural Diversity. University of Texas Press.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Özden, P. (2026). Co-Diagnosing Urban Forests: Assessing Public Space Quality in İnciraltı Urban Forest. Kent Akademisi, 19(4), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1758183