Etkin Fotovoltaik Cephe Sistemlerinin Tasarım Yönetimi için Kavramsal Bir Model

Öz

Sürdürülebilir yapı ortamı için enerji yönetimi hayati önem taşır ve bu nedenle fotovoltaik cephe sistemleri, bina ve inşaat sektöründe yenilenebilir enerji üretimine stratejik bir katkı sağlayan bir unsur olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, bina ve inşaat sektöründe yenilenebilir enerji üretim potansiyeli açısından fotovoltaik cephe sistemlerinin uygulanmasını desteklemektir. Bu çalışma, fotovoltaik cephe sistemlerinin yenilenebilir enerji üretimine katkısını artırmak için ana yapılar ve bunların temel tasarım kriterleri aracılığıyla fotovoltaik cephe sistemleri için kavramsal bir tasarım yönetim modeli önermeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu nedenle, bu çalışmada, bugüne kadar yayınlanan araştırma makalelerinde PVFS tasarım yönetiminin nasıl ele alındığını belirlemek için sistematik bir literatür taraması gerçekleştirilmiştir. Literatür taraması, araştırmacıların başlangıçta doğrusal bir yaklaşıma dayalı malzeme odaklı fotovoltaik cephe sistemleri tasarım ve geliştirme çalışmaları yürüttüğünü ve daha sonra bu sistemlerin enerji verimliliğini bir veya birkaç lokasyona odaklanarak test ettiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Mevcut literatürle karşılaştırıldığında, önerilen kavramsal tasarım modeli: 1) tasarım amacı ve hedefi, 2) veri analizi, 3) PVFS seçimi ve tasarımı olarak tanımlanan üç ana veri odaklı mimari tasarım yönetim yapısından oluşan bütünsel ve döngüsel bir yaklaşım benimsemektedir. Bu yapılar, PVFS'nin tasarım yönetimini ve yenilenebilir enerji verimliliğini etkileyebilecek dinamik tasarım kriterlerini (girdi olarak) içermektedir. Bu dinamik tasarım kriterlerinin etkileşimi, önceden tanımlanmış tasarım hedefiyle tutarlı olarak fotovoltaik cephe sistemleri tasarımının optimizasyonuna katkıda bulunabilir. Bu çalışma, PVFS sisteminin ön tasarım aşamasında tasarımcının karar verme sürecini destekleyecek öncül bir kavramsal model sunmaktadır. Çalışma, herhangi bir belirli PVFS sistemine veya malzemesine odaklanmamakta ya da bunları önermemektedir. Önerilen kavramsal model, sürdürülebilir yapılı çevrede yenilenebilir enerji üretimini destekleyebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• enerji verimliliği
• enerji yönetimi
• yenilenebilir enerji
• yenilenebilir enerji verimliliği
• sürdürülebilir cephe sistemi

Destekleyen Kurum

Herhangi bir mali destek mevcut değildir. Bu çalışmada herhangi bir mali desteğe ihtiyaç duyulmamıştır.

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma için etik kurul onayı gerekmemektedir.

Teşekkür

Teşekkür edilecek kişi veya kurum bulunmamaktadır.

A Conceptual Model for Design Management of Effective Photovoltaic Facade Systems

Öz

Energy management is vital for sustainable built environment, and thus, photovoltaic facade systems (PVFS) stand out as a strategic contributor to the renewable energy production in the building and construction industry. The main motivation of this study is to support application of PVFS with respect to its renewable energy production potential in the building and construction industry. This study aims to propose a conceptual design management model for PVFS through main constructs and their main design criteria for enhancing contribution of PVFS to the renewable energy production. Therefore, this study conducted a systematic literature review to determine how PVFS design management has been addressed in research articles published to date. The literature review reveals that researchers have initially conducted material-oriented PVFS design and development studies based on linear approach, and then tested energy efficiency of these systems focusing on one or several locations. Compared to the existing literature, the proposed conceptual design model adopts a holistic and circular approach consisting of the three main data driven architectural design management constructs: (1) design purpose and objective, (2) data analysis, (3) PVFS selection and design, which incorporate dynamic design criteria (as input) that can influence the design management and renewable energy productivity of the PVFS. Interaction of these dynamic design criteria can contribute to the optimization of the PVFS design consistent with the pre-defined design objective. This study provides a preliminary conceptual model to support the designer's decision-making process in the preliminary design phase of PVFS system. This study does not focus on and does not propose any specific PVFS system or material. The proposed conceptual model can support renewable energy production in the sustainable built environment.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• energy efficiency
• energy management
• renewable energy
• renewable energy efficiency
• sustainable facade system

Destekleyen Kurum

No financial support is available. No financial support was required in this study.

Etik Beyan

Ethics committee approval is not required for this study.

Teşekkür

There is no individual or institution to thank.

Kaynakça

1. Abawi, Y., Rennhofer, M., Berger, K., Wascher, H., & Aichinger, M. (2016). Comparison of theoretical and real energy yield of direct DC-power usage of a Photovoltaic Façade system. Renewable Energy, 89, 616–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.12.033
2. Al-Jamal, M. Q., Alsarhan, A., Aljamal, Q., AlJamal, M., Khassawneh, B. S., Al Nuaim, A., & Al Nuaim, A. (2026). AI-enabled system-of-systems decision support: BIM-integrated AI-LCA for resilient and sustainable fiber-reinforced façade design. Information, 17(2), 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/info17020126
3. Bayoumi, M., & Fink, D. (2014). Maximizing the performance of an energy generating façade in terms of energy saving strategies. Renewable Energy, 64, 294–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.11.054
4. Biedrońska, J. (2020). Energy optimisation of research buildings ın Vienna with a photovoltaic façade. Architecture, Civil Engineering, Environment, 13(3), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.21307/acee-2020-020
5. Bredemeier, D., Mahner, A., Wietler, T., Niepelt, R., & Brendel, R. (2025). Falling costs for battery storages make facade photovoltaic systems more attractive for prosumers. Applied Energy, 401, 126871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126871
6. Bredemeier, D., Schinke, C., Niepelt, R., & Brendel, R. (2023). Large‐scale spatiotemporal calculation of photovoltaic capacity factors using ray tracing: A case study in urban environments. Progress in Photovoltaics, 32(4), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.3756
7. Brzezicki, M., Regucki, P., & Kasperski, J. (2021). Optimization of Useful Daylight Illuminance for Vertical Shading Fins Covered by Photovoltaic Panels for a Case Study of an Office Room in the City of Wroclaw, Poland. Buildings, 11(12), 637. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11120637
8. Cao, L., Mao, P., & Luo, Z. (2025). Energy-economy-environment comprehensive evaluation of facade-integrated photovoltaic-thermal insulation Systems: A case study of office buildings in cold regions. Journal of Building Engineering, 113, 114028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.114028

9. Chen, X., Yang, H., & Peng, J. (2019). Energy optimization of high-rise commercial buildings integrated with photovoltaic facades in urban context. Energy, 172, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.112
10. Choi, H.-S. (2024). Experimental infrastructure design for energy-independent car park building based on parametric photovoltaic facade system. Applied Sciences, 14(18), 8448–8448. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14188448
11. Del Giudice, M., Donato, A. J., Loffa, M. A., Mazzarino, P. R., Bottaccioli, L., Patti, E., & Osello, A. (2026). BIM-to-BEM Framework for Energy Retrofit in Industrial Buildings: From Simulation Scenarios to Decision Support Dashboards. Sustainability, 18(2), 1023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18021023
12. Erbach, G. (2015). Briefing Energy Union New impetus for coordination and integration of energy policies in the EU. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2015/551310/EPRS_BRI(2015)551310_EN.pdf
13. ‌European Commission. (2022). REPowerEU. European Commission. https://commission.europa.eu/topics/energy/repowereu_en
14. ‌European Commission. (2019). The European Green Deal. European Commission; European Commission. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en
15. European Commission (2023a). Energy efficiency targets. https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/energy-efficiency/energy-efficiency-targets-directive-and-rules/energy-efficiency-targets_en#ref-2020-targets
16. European Commission. (2023b). Energy Efficiency Directive. Energy.ec.europa.eu. https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/energy-efficiency/energy-efficiency-targets-directive-and-rules/energy-efficiency-directive_en
17. European Parliamentary Research Service. (2021). Energy Efficiency Directive Review and revision of Directive 2012/27/EU, amended by Directive 2018/2002/EU. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/662615/EPRS_BRI(2021)662615_EN.pdf
18. Ghoraishi, M., Hyde, T., Aggelos Zacharopoulos, Jayanta Deb Mondol, & Pugsley, A. (2023). Experimental characterization of the optical performance of concentrating photovoltaic glazing (copvg) systems. Energies, 16(6), 2891–2891. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16062891
19. Gonçalves, J. E., van Hooff, T., & Saelens, D. (2021). Simulating building integrated photovoltaic facades: Comparison to experimental data and evaluation of modelling complexity. Applied Energy, 281, 116032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116032
20. Heim, D., Talvik, M., Wieprzkowicz, A., Ilomets, S., Knera, D., Kalamees, T., & Czarny, D. (2023). European roadmap for the En-ActivETICS advancement and potential of the PV/PCM unventilated wall system application. Energy and Buildings, 294, 113207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113207
21. Iringova, A. (2022). Location of photovoltaic panels in the building envelope in terms of fire safety. Civil and Environmental Engineering, 18(2), 523–531. https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2022-0050
22. Izadpanah, S., Fazelpour, F., & Eftekhari Yazdi, M. (2023). Comparative study of simultaneous use of a double or a triple skin facade with phase change materials, green roof, and photovoltaics in residential buildings of Iran. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 42(1), e13935. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13935
23. Jahangir, M. H., Firouzabad, M. R., & Ghasempour, R. (2023). Techno-environmental assessment of outdoor glazing cover of a building with multi-passive solar systems. Energy Reports, 10, 3532–3544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.10.023
24. Joshi, S., Mittal, S., Holloway, P., Shukla, P. R., Ó Gallachóir, B., & Glynn, J. (2021). High resolution global spatiotemporal assessment of rooftop solar photovoltaics potential for renewable electricity generation. Nature Communications, 12(1), 5738. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25720-2
25. Karunyasopon, P., Park, D. Y., Le, D. M., & Chang, S. (2023). Performance analysis of transparent BIPV/T double skin façades integrated with the decision-making algorithm for mixed-mode building ventilation. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2023.2232378
26. Li, C., Xie, J., Liu, R., Tan, J., Zhu, X., Li, N., & Tang, H. (2025a). Fully exploiting solar energy with building envelops: Experimental study on an adjustable photovoltaic green facade. Energy and Buildings, 332, 115431.
27. Li, C., Wan, W., Huang, G., Chai, X., Li, C., & Tang, H. (2025b). Thermal and electrical performance assessment of a bifacial photovoltaic green facade based on CFD simulation. In Building simulation 18(9), 2227-2249.
28. Li, H., Zhang, J., Cui, X., Liu, X., Zhang, T., & Liu, X. (2025c). Multi-timescale analysis of building imbalance power and flexibility requirements under distributed photovoltaic integration. Energy Conversion and Management, 342, 120171–120171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2025.120171
29. Liang, X., Zhang, H., & Sun, B. (2024). Parametric design of photovoltaic louver integrated shading devices for west facade windows of office buildings in central China. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2024.2320326
30. Liu, X., Shen, C., Bo, R., Wang, J., & Ardabili, N. G. (2023a). Experimental investigation on the operation performance of photovoltaic double skin façade in winter. Energy, 283, 129040–129040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129040
31. Liu, Z., Liu, X., Zhang, H., & Yan, D. (2023b). Integrated physical approach to assessing urban-scale building photovoltaic potential at high spatiotemporal resolution. Journal of Cleaner Production, 388, 135979–135979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135979
32. Lu, X., Li, G., Wang, A., Xiong, Q., Lin, B., & Guonian Lv. (2021). Estimating the Photovoltaic Potential of Building Facades and Roofs Using the Industry Foundation Classes. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(12), 827–827. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10120827
33. Middelhauve, L., Girardin, L., Baldi, F., & Maréchal, F. (2021). Potential of Photovoltaic Panels on Building Envelopes for Decentralized District Energy Systems. Frontiers in Energy Research, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.689781
34. Ożadowicz, A., & Walczyk, G. (2023). Energy Performance and Control Strategy for Dynamic Façade with Perovskite PV Panels—Technical Analysis and Case Study. Energies, 16(9), 3793. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16093793
35. Preet, S., Sharma, M. K., Mathur, J., Chowdhury, A., & Mathur, S. (2023). Analytical model of semi-transparent photovoltaic double-skin façade system (STPV-DSF) for natural and forced ventilation modes. International Journal of Ventilation, 22(2), 138-167.
36. Preet S.,Mathur, S., Mathur, J., Sharma, M. K., & Chowdhury, A. (2024). Development of mathematical correlations to predict performance of forced ventilated Photovoltaic-DSF system in hot composite climate. Journal of Building Physics, 48(1), 31–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/17442591241247327
37. Shahverdian, M. H., Mohammadreza Najaftomaraei, Arash Fassadi Chimeh, Negin Yavarzadeh, Sohani, A., Ramtin Javadijam, & Hoseyn Sayyaadi. (2025). Towards Zero-Energy Buildings: A Comparative Techno-Economic and Environmental Analysis of Rooftop PV and BIPV Systems. Buildings, 15(7), 999–999. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15070999
38. Shakouri, M., Ghadamian, H., & Noorpoor, A. (2020). Quasi-Dynamic Energy Performance Analysis of Building Integrated Photovoltaic Thermal Double Skin Façade for Middle Eastern Climate Case. Applied Thermal Engineering, 115724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115724
39. Tang, Y., Ji, J., Zhang, C., Ke, W., & Xie, H. (2024). An advanced exhausting airflow photovoltaic curtain wall system coupled with an air source heat pump for outdoor air treatment: Energy-saving performance assessment. Energy Conversion and Management, 299, 117872–117872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117872
40. United Nations Environment Programme (2025) Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction 2024/2025: Not just another brick in the wall - The solutions exist. Scaling them will build on progress and cut emissions fast. Paris. https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/47214 (accessed 24 May 2026).
41. Wang, B., Xu, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, X., Chen, Y., Tang, R., Yan, A., Zhang, M., & He, Y. (2025). Utilizing a three-zone control model of adaptive concentrating photovoltaic facade to enhance visual comfort and energy benefits. Energy and Buildings, 345, 116125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116125
42. World Bank. (2024). Energy Overview. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/energy/overview (accessed 24 May 2026).
43. Yang, S., Fiorito, F., Sproul, A. B., & Prasad, D. (2023). Optimising Design Parameters of a Building-Integrated Photovoltaic Double-Skin Facade in Different Climate Zones in Australia. Buildings, 13(4), 1096–1096. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13041096
44. Zou, W., Wang, Y., Tian, E., Wei, J., Peng, J., & Mo, J. (2024). A New Dynamic and Vertical Photovoltaic Integrated Building Envelope for High-Rise Glaze-Facade Buildings. Engineering, 39, 194–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2024.01.014