Araştırma Makalesi

Examination of Participatory Approach in Urban Renewal (Ur); Example in Isparta-Karaağaç District

Cilt: 14 Sayı: 3 15 Eylül 2021
PDF İndir
EN TR

Examination of Participatory Approach in Urban Renewal (Ur); Example in Isparta-Karaağaç District

Abstract

Urban landscape and quality of life are particularly affected by factors such as intensive population growth, technological activities and spatial growth. In this context, urban renewal projects have become important in order to make urban areas more liveable. However, when urban renewal works are carried out, problems arise such as the disregarding of users' demands and their opinions, construction on a parcel scale rather than a whole, the not adoption of environment-friendly functional approaches. The aim of this study is; to draw attention to the effects that urban renewal projects have on people; to see how the local people behave towards urban renewal in the Isparta Karaağaç neighbourhood; to reveal demand and expectations from urban renewal projects and to provide the formation of a participatory approach. Therefore the data obtained as a result of the 300 questionnaire study with shareholders were evaluated by pair-wise comparison using the Person Chi-Square method in the SPSS program. In the direction of the resulting data, a participatory approach strategy plan was composed in urban renewal (UR) projects. In the conclusion and suggestions section, the social dimension in UR studies was examined and solution offers for the problems were developed.

Keywords

Urban Renewal , Social Life , Survey , Person Chi-Square Method , Isparta.

Kaynakça

  1. Ataöv, A., & Osmay, S. (2007). Türkiye'de Kentsel Dönüşüme Yöntemsel Bir Yaklaşım [A methodological approach to urban transformation in Turkey]. METU JFA, 24(2), 57-82. Retrieved from http://jfa.arch.metu.edu.tr/archive/0258-5316/2007/cilt24/sayi_2/57-82.pdf
  2. Aykal, F. D., Murt, Ö., Korkmaz, M., & Acar, B. (2007). Kentsel Dönüşüm Yaklaşımında Kullanıcı Memnuniyet Analizi [The analysis of user satisfaction in urban transformation projects]. Dicle University Journal of Ziya Gökalp Faculty of Education, 8, 95-111. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/787221
  3. Bal, Ö. H. (2008). İzmir’de Kentsel Dönüşüm Süreci’nin İzmir Cennetçeşme Mahallesi Üzerinden İrdelenmesi [Investıgatıon of Urban Transformatıon Process on İzmirçennetçeme District (Master dissertation)]. Dokuz Eylül University, Institute of Science and Technology, İzmir.
  4. Baş, T. (2013). Anket Nasıl Hazırlanır? Uygulanır? Değerlendirilir? [How to Prepare a Survey? How is the Survey Applied? How is the Survey Evaluated? (7th ed.)]. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
  5. Birik, M. (2014). Mekansal Çeşitlilik Açısından Kentin Sorgulanaması [Questioning the city in terms of urban diversity]. In N. Erdoğan (Ed), Urban transformation: economic, social and physical aspects, Proceedings vol 1, (pp. 349-361). CNR Press.
  6. Cesur, B., & Gül, A. (2017). Ülkemizde Kentsel Dönüşüm Uygulamalarında Karşılaşılan Sorunlar ve İrdeleme [Problems in Urban Renewal Implementation in Our Country and Discussion]. In K. Temurçin, M. Dulupçu (Ed), Süleyman Demirel University, Spatial and Regional Transformations in Turkey (pp. 227-242). Süleyman Demirel University Press. ISBN: 978-605-9454-04-9
  7. Çetinkaya, D. M. (2013). Kentsel Dönüşüm Alanlarında Sosyal Yaşam ve Kentsel Yeşil Alanlar Gereksiniminin Kayseri Yıldırım Beyazıt Mahallesi Örneğiyle İrdelenmesi [The study on the need for social life and urban green areas in urban transformation areas with the sample of Kayseri Yıldırım Beyazıt District (Master dissertation)]. Süleyman Demirel University, Institute of Science and Technology, Isparta. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/giris.jsp
  8. Eke, F., & Uğurlar, A. (2004). Kentsel Dönüşüm:Başarı Mı? Hata Mı? [Is urban transformation a success? mistake?] Changing, Transforming City and Region 8 November World Planning Day 28. Colloquium, Proceedings vol 1 (pp.381-389). BRC Press. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/3460196/Kentsel_D%C3%B6n%C3%BC%C5%9F%C3%BCm_Ba%C5%9Far%C4%B1_m%C4%B1_Hata_M%C4%B1
  9. Genç, F. N. (2008). Türkiye’de Kentsel Dönüşüm: Mevzuat ve Uygulamaların Genel Görünümü [Urban Transformation In Turkey: General View of Legislation and Practices]. Celal Bayar University Journal of Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 15 (1), 115-130.
  10. Göksu, A. F., Akalp Akyalçın, S., & Özkan, M. (2014). Sosyal Etki Raporu [Social impact report (Urban Vision Platform)]. August 3, 2017, Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/KentselVizyonPlatformu/sosyal-etki-deerlendirme-sed-raporu-35834385

Kaynak Göster

APA
Cesur Durmaz, B., & Gül, A. (2021). Examination of Participatory Approach in Urban Renewal (Ur); Example in Isparta-Karaağaç District. Kent Akademisi, 14(3), 748-764. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.950428