Effects of Covid-19 Pandemic on Neighborhood Perception and Satisfaction

Öz

Neighborhoods had a prominent role in cities and people’s lives during the Covid-19 pandemic. Lockdowns, social distance, self-isolation, and stay-at-home orders have increased the time people spend in their homes and neighborhoods and changed their perception and behavior towards these areas. This study aimed to measure the change in perception of and satisfaction with the neighborhood before and during the pandemic. A neighborhood perception and satisfaction survey was conducted among residents of Karşıyaka/Izmir in February 2020 and August 2020. Results showed that the mean value of perceived neighborhood borders extended during the pandemic. In addition, 9 of 48 parameters of participants’ neighborhood satisfaction evaluations were different before and during the pandemic. Some aspects of accessibility, physical environmental quality, and social relations were evaluated better after the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic. In addition, residents revealed more tendency to move out of the neighborhood during the pandemic pointing to an expected increase in urban mobility. All these findings reflect the ambiguity and obscurity of the situation during the Covid-19 period from the perspective of the neighborhood residents. This study is significant because it provides empirical evidence on the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on neighborhood perception and satisfaction.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Neighborhood satisfaction
• neighborhood perception
• Covid-19 pandemic

Covid-19 Pandemisinin Mahalle Algısı ve Memnuniyeti Üzerine Etkisi

Öz

Konut yakın çevreleri Covid-19 salgını sırasında şehirlerde ve insanların yaşamlarında önemli bir role sahip olmuştur. Sokağa çıkma yasakları, sosyal mesafe kuralları, karantina ve evde kal tedbirleri, insanların evlerinde ve mahallelerinde geçirdikleri süreyi artırmış ve bu alanlara yönelik algı ve davranışlarını değiştirmiştir. Bu çalışma, pandemi öncesi ve pandemi döneminde mahalleyle ilgili algı ve memnuniyetteki değişimi ölçmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Şubat 2020 ve Ağustos 2020'de Karşıyaka/İzmir mahalle sakinlerine “mahalle memnuniyeti” anketi uygulanmıştır. Sonuçlar, pandemi öncesine kıyasla pandemi döneminde mahalle sınırlarının daha geniş algılandığına işaret etmiştir. Aynı zamanda mahalle memnuniyetinin toplam 48 ölçütünden 9'una ilişkin değerlendirmeler pandemi öncesinde ve pandemi süresinde farklılaşmıştır. Pandeminin başlamasının ardından erişilebilirlik, fiziksel çevre kalitesi ve sosyal ilişkiler ile ilgili bazı parametreler daha olumlu değerlendirilmiştir. Ayrıca pandemi döneminde daha çok katılımcı mahalleden taşınmaya istekli olduğunu ifade ederek kent içi hareketliliğin artabileceğine işaret etmiştir. Elde edilen tüm bulgular bir arada değerlendirildiğinde, Covid-19 sürecine yönelik belirsizlik durumunun mahalle sakinlerinin mahalleye yönelik değerlendirmelerine de yansıdığı görülmüştür. Bu çalışma pandeminin mahalle algısı ve memnuniyeti üzerindeki etkisine yönelik ampirik bulgular sunması nedeniyle önemlidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Mahalle memnuniyeti
• mahalle algısı
• Covid-19 pandemisi

Kaynakça

1. Books:.............................................................................................................................................................
2. Barton, H. (2003). Shaping Neighborhoods: A Guide for Health, Sustainability and Vitality. London. Spon Press. Glass, R. (1948). The Social Background to a Plan, The Study of Middlesbrough. Preface by Max Lock. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
3. Keller, S. 1968. The Urban Neighborhood. NY: Random House
4. Journals Articles:.......................................................................................................................................
5. Abdollahi, M., Sarrafi, M. & Tavakolinia, J. (2010). Theoretical Study of the Concept of Neighborhood and its Redefinition with Emphasis on the Conditions of Urban Neighborhoods of Iran. Human Geography Research Quarterly. (72): 82-103.
6. Araldi, A., & Fusco, G. (2019). From the street to the metropolitan region: Pedestrian perspective in urban fabric analysis. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(7), 1243-1263.
7. Bereitschaft, B., & Scheller, D. (2020). How Might the COVID-19 Pandemic Affect 21st Century Urban Design, Planning, and Development?. Urban Science, 4(4), 56.
8. Bonaiuto, M., Aiello, A., Perugini, M., Bonnes, M., & Ercolani, A. P. (1999). Multidimensional perception of residential environment quality and neighbourhood attachment in the urban environment. Journal of environmental psychology, 19(4), 331-352.

9. Campbell, E., Henly, J. R., Elliott, D. S., & Irwin, K. (2009). Subjective constructions of neighborhood boundaries: lessons from a qualitative study of four neighborhoods. Journal of Urban Affairs, 31(4), 461-490.
10. Cetintahra, G. E., & Cubukcu, E. (2015). The influence of environmental aesthetics on economic value of housing: an empirical research on virtual environments. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 30(2), 331-340.
11. Cubukcu, E., Hepguzel, B., Onder, Z., & Tumer, B. (2015). Active Living for Sustainable Future: A Model to Measure ‘Walk Scores’ via Geographic Information Systems. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 168, 229-237.
12. Coulombe, S., Jutras, S., Labbé, D., & Jutras, D. (2016). Residential experience of people with disabilities: A positive psychology perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 46, 42-54.
13. Coulton, C. J., Korbin, J., Chan, T., & Su, M. (2001). Mapping residents' perceptions of neighborhood boundaries: a methodological note. American journal of community psychology, 29(2), 371-383.
14. Cook, C. C. (1988). Components of neighborhood satisfaction: Responses from urban and suburban single-parent women. Environment and Behavior, 20(2), 115-149.
15. Dassopoulos, A., & Monnat, S. M. (2011). Do perceptions of social cohesion, social support, and social control mediate the effects of local community participation on neighborhood satisfaction?. Environment and Behavior, 43(4), 546-565.
16. Eltarabily, S., & Elghezanwy, D. (2020). Post-Pandemic Cities-The Impact of COVID-19 on Cities and Urban Design. Architecture Research, 10(3), 75-84.
17. Gärling, A., & Gärling, T. (1990). Parents' residential satisfaction and perceptions of children's accident risk. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 10(1), 27-36.
18. Hosseini, S. F., & Soltani, M. (2018). A comparative investigation and analysis between the neighborhood concept in the traditional urban system in Iran and its similar patterns in contemporary period. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-E Nazar, 15(60), 15-28.
19. Hur, M., & Morrow-Jones, H. (2008). Factors that influence residents' satisfaction with neighborhoods. Environment and Behavior, 40(5), 619-635.
20. Hur, M., Nasar, J. L., & Chun, B. (2010). Neighborhood satisfaction, physical and perceived naturalness and openness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 52-59.
21. Hur, M., & Nasar, J. L. (2014). Physical upkeep, perceived upkeep, fear of crime and neighborhood satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 186-194.
22. Jefferies, T., Cheng, J., & Coucill, L. (2020). Lockdown urbanism: COVID-19 lifestyles and liveable futures opportunities in Wuhan and Manchester. Cities & Health, 1-4.
23. Lee, S. M., Conway, T. L., Frank, L. D., Saelens, B. E., Cain, K. L., & Sallis, J. F. (2017). The relation of perceived and objective environment attributes to neighborhood satisfaction. Environment and Behavior, 49(2), 136-160.
24. Loo, C. (1986). Neighborhood satisfaction and safety: a study of a low-income ethnic area. Environment and Behavior, 18(1), 109-131.
25. Lu, M. (1999). Determinants of residential satisfaction: Ordered logit vs. regression models. Growth and Change, 30(2), 264-287.
26. Minnery, J., Knight, J., Byrne, J., & Spencer, J. (2009). Bounding neighbourhoods: How do residents do it?. Planning Practice & Research, 24(4), 471-493.
27. Najafi, M., & Kamal, M. (2012). The concept of place attachment in environmental psychology. Sustainable Architecture, 45, 7637-7641.
28. Nasar, J. L. (1983). Adult viewers' preferences in residential scenes: A study of the relationship of environmental attributes to preference. Environment and Behavior, 15(5), 589-614.
29. Oktay, D., Rüstemli, A., & Marans, R. W. (2009). Neighborhood satisfaction, sense of community, and attachment: Initial findings from Famagusta quality of urban life study. ITU A/Z Journal, 6(1), 6-20.
30. Parkes, A., Kearns, A., & Atkinson, R. (2002). What makes people dissatisfied with their neighbourhoods?. Urban Studies, 39(13), 2413-2438.
31. Rice, L. (2020). After Covid-19: urban design as spatial medicine. Urban Design International, 1-6. Rioux, L., & Werner, C. (2011). Residential satisfaction among aging people living in place. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(2), 158-169.
32. Salama, A. M. (2020). Coronavirus questions that will not go away: interrogating urban and socio-spatial implications of COVID-19 measures. Emerald Open Research, 2:14. 10.35241/emeraldopenres.13561.1
33. Schoenberg, S. (1979). Criteria for the evaluation of neighborhood viability in working class and low-income areas in core cities. Social Problems, (27): 69-85.
34. Smith, G., Gidlow, C., Davey, R., & Foster, C. (2010). What is my walking neighbourhood? A pilot study of English adults' definitions of their local walking neighbourhoods. International Journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 7(1), 1-8.
35. Stamps III, A. E. (2011). Effects of area, height, elongation, and color on perceived spaciousness. Environment and Behavior, 43(2), 252-273.
36. Talen, E. (1999). Sense of community and neighbourhood form: An assessment of the social doctrine of new urbanism. Urban studies, 36(8), 1361-1379.
37. Vaske, J. J., & Kobrin, K. C. (2001). Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior. The Journal of Environmental Education, 32(4), 16-21.
38. Yang, Y., & Xiang, X. (2021). Examine the associations between perceived neighborhood conditions, physical activity, and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health & place, 102505.
39. Zecca, C., Gaglione, F., Laing, R., & Gargiulo, C. (2020). Pedestrian routes and accessibility to urban services: an urban rhythmic analysis on people's behaviour before and during the COVID-19. TeMA: journal of land use, mobility and environment, 13(2).
40. Reports: ......................................................................................................................................................................................
41. Schwirian, K. P. (1983). Models of neighborhood change. Annual review of sociology, 9(1), 83-102.
42. Semken, S. & Piburn, (2004). Place Attachment Inventory (PAI), Arizona State University: https://d32ogoqmya1dw8.cloudfront.net/files/NAGTWorkshops/assess/activities/PAI1.3.pdf
43. Turkish Statistical Institute, (n.d.). Retrieved October 12, 2021, from https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=95&locale=tr
44. Woźniak, B., & Tobiasz-Adamczyk, B. (2014). Quality of life and well-being. Jagiellonian University, Krakow.
45. Symposium Papers:........................................................................................................................................................................
46. Williams, D. R., & Roggenbuck, J. W. (1989, October). Measuring place attachment: Some preliminary results. In Abstracts: 1989 leisure research symposium (Vol. 32). Arlington, VA: National Recreation and Park Association.
47. Dissertations:..........................................................................................................................................................................................
48. Erin, I. (2022). The Influence of Urban Morphology on Neighborhood Satisfaction: A Cross-Cultural Study. Doctoral Dissertation, Dokuz Eylul University The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences.