Tarihi Alanların Ses Karakterinin Belirlenmesi: İsmailbey Külliyesi, Kastamonu

Öz

Tarihi alanları koruma çalışmalarında çoğunlukla mekânın fiziksel özelliklerine ilişkin tespitler yapılmakta, alan karakterini tanımlayan önemli unsurlardan birisi olan duyusal özellikler göz ardı edilmektedir. Bu noktada ortaya çıkan eksikliğin altını çizmek ve tarihi alanların ses özelliğine dikkat çekmek amacıyla bu çalışma ortaya konulmuştur. Hem tarihi alanın karakterini tanımlamak hem de bu karaktere uygun mekânın düzenlenmesine ve dolayısıyla da mekân kullanımına uygun bir ses ortamının oluşturulmasına dikkat çekmek amacıyla Kastamonu kenti için önemli tarihi mekânlardan birisi olan İsmailbey Külliyesi çalışma alanı olarak seçilmiştir. Çalışmada mekânın ses özelliklerinin tespiti için yaz ve kış mevsimlerinde, sabah öğle ve akşam saatlerinde belirlenen rotada yürüyüşler yapılmıştır. Yürüyüşler ile çalışma alanındaki ses düzeyleri tespit edilerek ses haritaları oluşturulmuş, ayrıca ses tipleri belirlenmiştir. Çalışma alanının geçmişteki kullanım şekli ile bugünkü kullanımının kısmen aynı olduğu, buna bağlı olarak da ses tiplerinin zaman içerisinde değişime uğramadığı, kullanım yoğunluğuna bağlı olarak ses düzeyinde değişimler olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Alanda süreklilik gösteren ön plan sesleri insan ve kuş sesi, arka plan sesi taşıt sesi, alana özgü sembol sesler ise dua (ezan) ve su sesidir. Sonuç olarak; alanın geçmişinde yer alan kullanım tipinin devamlılığının ses kaynaklarının devamlılığını sağladığı, kullanım yoğunluklarındaki artışın ve mekân çevresindeki kullanımlardan kaynaklı arka plan seslerinin ses düzeyini etkilediği, bu sebeple de mekânı karakterize eden ses özelliklerinin perdelendiği tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İşitsel peyzaj
• akustik karakter
• kültürel peyzaj
• tarihi alanlar
• koruma

Determining The Sound Character Of Historical Areas: Ismailbey Complex, Kastamonu

Öz

The physical characteristics of the space are usually taken into account, and the sensory characteristics that are one of the elements that deconstruct the character of the space are ignored in the conservation studies of historical sites. This study was put forward in order to emphasize the lack that arose at this point and to draw attention to the sound characteristics of historical areas. In order to determine the character of the historical area and to draw attention to the arrangement of the space appropriate to this character and therefore to the creation of a sound environment suitable for the use of space, Ismailbey Complex, which is one of the important historical places for Kastamonu City, were chosen as a study area. Walks were made on the designated route during the summer and winter seasons, morning and noon and evening hours. To determine the sound characteristics of the study area, sound maps were created by detecting the sound levels in the work area with walks, as well as the sound types were determined. It was determined that the past use of the study area is partially the same as its current use, and accordingly, the sound types did not change over time, there were changes in sound level depending on the intensity of use of the field. The foreground sounds that show continuity in the field were the sound of people and birds, the background sound was the sound of vehicles, and the field-specific symbol sounds were the sound of prayer (adhan) and water. As a result, it was found that the continuity of the type of use in the past of the space provides the continuity of sound sources, the increase in intensity of use and background sounds caused by use around the space affect the sound level, so the sound characteristics that characterize the space were suppressed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Soundscape
• acoustic characteristics
• cultural landscape
• historical places
• conservation

Kaynakça

1. Adams, M. (2008). Soundscapes and urban design: taking professionals out of the Office. Methods Workshop: Researching Social Relations in Sub/Urban Environments, http://www.reallifemethods.ac.uk/events/vitalsigns /programme/presentations/vital-signs-5a-adams.pdf.
2. Adams, M., Cox, T., Moore, G., Croxford, B., Refaee, M., Sharples, S. (2006). Sustainable soundscapes: noise policy and the urban experience., Urban Studies, 43, : 2385-2398.
3. Akpınar, N., Belkayalı, N., Kaymaz, I., Turan, F., Büyükşahin Sunal, A., Oğuz, D. (2013). Kent parklarında işitsel peyzaj (soundscape) algısı ve kullanıcı tercihlerinin yaşam kalitesi kapsamında değerlendirilmesi: Ankara örneği., 110Y186 nolu Tübitak projesi sonuç raporu, Ankara.
4. Antrop, M. (1998). Landscape change: Plan or caos?. Landscape and Urban Planning, 41 (1998): 155-161.
5. Bakırcı, S. (2005). Kastamonu tarihi kent merkezi’nin peyzaj mimarlığı açısından değerlendirilmesi üzerine bir araştırma. Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Peyzaj Mimarlığı Ana Bilim Dalı Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara.
6. Barrigón Morillas, J.M., Gómez Escobar, V., Rey Gozalo, G. (2013). Noise source analyses in the acoustical environment of the medieval centre of Cáceres (Spain). Applied Acoustics, 74: 526–534.
7. Bocher, E., Petit, G., Picaut, J., Fortin, N., Guillaume, G. (2017). Collaborative noise data collected from smartphones. Data Brief., 14: 498–503.
8. Brambilla, G., De Gregorio, L., Maffei, L., Can, Z. Y., & Ozcevik, A. (2007). Comparison of the soundscape in the historical centres of Istanbul and Naples. In INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, Institute of Noise Control Engineering,. (Vol. 2007 , No.( 4):, pp. 2885-2892).

9. Brambilla, G., De Gregorio, L., Maffei, L., Can, Z. Y., Ozcevik, A. (2007). Comparison of the soundscape in the historical centres of Istanbul and Naples in Proceedings of Inter-noise07 3068–3075.
10. Brambilla, G., Maffei, L. (2010). Perspective of the soundscape approach as a tool for urban space design. Noise Control Eng.. J., 58 (5): 532-539.
11. Brown, A.L., Muhar, A. (2004). An Approach to the acoustic design of outdoor space. J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 47: 827–842.
12. Cain, R., Jennings, P., Adams, M., Bruce, N., Carlyle, A., Cusack, P., Davies, W., Hume, K., Plack, C.J. (2008). Sound-Scape: A framework for characterising positive urban soundscapes., Acoustics’08 Paris, June 29-July 4, 3261- 3264.
13. Dubois, D., Guastavino, C., Raimbault, M. (2006). A cognitive approach to urban soundscapes: using verbal data to access everyday life auditory categories., Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 92, 865-874.
14. Fichera, C.R., Modica, G., Pollino, M. (2012). Land Cover classification and change-detection analysis using multi-temporal remote sensed imagery and landscape metrics. European Journal of Remote Sensing, 45(1), ): 1-18.
15. Garrioch, D. (2003). Sounds of the city: the soundscape of early modern European towns. Urban History, 30 (1): 5–25.
16. Ge, J., Hokao, K. (2005). Applying the methods of ımage evaluation and spatial analysis to study the sound environment of urban street areas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25: 455-466.
17. Google Earth. (2021). İsmailbey Külliyesi uydu görüntüsü, Image 2021 © Maxar Technologies, https://earth.google.com/web/@41.38310113,33.77797039,961.0849426 a,0d,35y,-0.1666h,29.2845t,0 r?utm_source=earth7&utm_campaign=vine&hl=tr.
18. Guillaume, G., Can, A., Petit, G., Fortin, N., Palominos, S., Gauvreau, B., Bocher E, Picaut, J. (2016). Noise mapping based on participative measurements. Noise Mapping, 3(1), ): 140-156.
19. Huang, L., Kang, J. (2015). The sound environment and soundscape preservation in historic city centres—the case study of Lhasa. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 42: 652 – 674
20. Jennings, P., Cain, R. (2013). A framework for improving urban soundscapes. Appl Acoust, 74: 293–299.
21. Kang, J. (2015). From environmental noise control to soundscape design. Int J Acoust Vibr, 20: 62.
22. Kastamonu Belediyesi. (1996). Kastamonu İmar Planı. Kastamonu Belediyesi, Kastamonu.
23. KKTB. (2020a). Tarihi evler ve konaklar: Kastamonu sivil mimarlık örnekleri ve konakları. Kastamonu İl Kültür ve Turizm Müdürlüğü. Erişim Adresi: https://kastamonu.ktb.gov.tr/TR-63867/tarihi-evler-ve-konaklar.html, Erişim Tarihi: 22/03/2020
24. KKTB. (2020b). İsmailbey Külliyesi. Kastamonu İl Kültür ve Turizm Müdürlüğü. Erişim Adresi: https://kastamonu.ktb.gov.tr/TR-93961/ismailbey-kulliyesi.html, Erişim Tarihi: 22/03/2020
25. Li, R., Ou, D., Pan, S. (2020). An improved service quality measurement model for soundscape assessment in urban public open spaces. Indoor and Built Environment, 30(7): 985-997,. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X20925527.
26. Liu, J., Kang, J., Luo, T., Behm, H., Coppack, T. (2013). Spatiotemporal variability of soundscapes in a multiple functional urban area. Landscape and Urban Planning, 115: 1–9.
27. Maffei, L. (2008). Urban and quiet areas soundscape preservation., VI Congreso Iberoamericano de Acustica- FIA 2008, Buenos Aires.
28. Nilsson, M.E., Berglund, B. (2006). Soundscape quality in suburban green areas and city parks. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 92: 857-864.
29. Raimbault, M., Dubois, D. (2005). Urban soundscapes: experiences and knowledge. Cities, 22 (5): 339-350.
30. Schulte-Fortkamp, B., Lercher, P. (2003). The importance of soundscape research for the assessment of noise annoyance at the level of the community., TecniAcustica, 2-4 October 2013, Bilbao.
31. Stimac, A. (2005). Implementation of directive 2002/49/EC in EU candidate state: experience in Croatian noise mapping projects., ForumAcusticum, Budapest.
32. Szeremeta, B., Zannin, P.H.T. (2009). Analysis and evaluation of soundscapes in public parks through interviews and measurement of noise. Science of the Total Environment, 407: 6143-6149.
33. Tardieu, J., Susini, P., Poisson, F., Lazareff, P., McAdams, S. (2008). Perceptual study of soundscapes in train stations. Apllied Acoustics, 69: 1224-1239.
34. TDV. (2020). İsmailbey Külliyesi. Erişim Adresi: https://islamansiklopedisi.org.tr/ismail-bey-kulliyesi, Erişim Tarihi: 22/03/2020.
35. Tsai, K.T., Lin, M.D., Chen, Y.H. (2009). Noise mapping in urban environments: a Taiwan study. Appl Acoust, 70 (7): 964–972
36. VBM. (2009). İsmailbey Külliyesi. Kastamonu Vakıflar Bölge Müdürlüğü, Kastamonu.
37. WHO. (1999). Guidelines for community noise, Edited by Birgitta Berglund, Thomas Lindvall, Dietrich H Schwela. World Health Organization, Geneva. https://www.who.int/docstore/peh/noise/ Comnoise-1.pdf.
38. Yang, W., Kang, J. (2005). Acoustic comfort evaluation in urban open public spaces. Applied Acoustics, 66: 211–229.
39. Yi, C., Huang, C. (2013). Residents’ perception and attitude of the tourism impact of the Global Dinosaur Town in Changzhou City. Geogr. Res. 32: 1165–1176
40. Yu, L., Kang, J. (2010). Factors influencing the sound preference in urban open spaces. Applied Acoustics, 71: 662-633.
41. Zhang, M., Kang, J. (2007). Towards the evaluation, description and creation of soundscapes in urban open spaces. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34: 68-86.
42. Zuo, L., Zhang, J., Zhang, R.J., Zhang, Y., Hu M., Zhuang, M., Liu, W. (2020). The transition of soundscapes in tourist destinations from the perspective of residents’ perceptions: a case study of the Lugu Lake Scenic Spot,, Southwestern China. Sustainability, 12 (1073): 1-15, doi:10.3390/su12031073.