Yaşlıların Mekânsal Dışlanma Sorunu: Kent Hakkı İlkeleri ve Sosyal Hizmet Yaklaşımı

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 1, 68 - 93

İmran Uzunaslan

https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1520789

Öz

Bu derleme, yaşlıların şehir yaşamındaki mekânsal dışlanma sorununu ele alarak, sosyal hizmet müdahalelerini kent hakkı ilkesi çerçevesinde değerlendirmektedir. Kamusal alanların tasarımında 'yaş' faktörünün ihmal edilmesi, yaşlılar, çocuklar ve gençler gibi gruplar için dezavantajlar doğurmakta ve yaşlı bireylerin şehir yaşamının sunduğu imkanlardan tam olarak faydalanamamalarına yol açmaktadır. Bu durum, yaşlılar arasında fiziksel, duygusal, sosyal ve ekonomik sorunlara neden olmaktadır. Çalışmada bu sorunları çözmek ve yaşlıların şehir yaşamında daha aktif ve entegre bir şekilde yer almasını sağlamak amacıyla, kent hakkı ilkesine dayanan sosyal hizmet önerileri sunulmaktadır. Sosyal hizmet, dezavantajlı gruplar arasında yer alan yaşlıların refahını öncelikli olarak ele almakta ve onların güçlenmelerini ve genel yaşam kalitelerini artırmayı hedeflemektedir. Özellikle şehirlerde, sosyal hizmet yaşlı bireylerin özel ihtiyaçlarını karşılamak için çeşitli destekler sunarak, bu grupların şehir kaynaklarına erişimini ve fırsat eşitliğini sağlamayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu yaklaşım, sosyal hizmetin şehir alanlarında etkinliğini artırmayı ve yaşlı bireylerin hakları konusunda toplumsal farkındalık ve savunuculuk çalışmalarını teşvik etmeyi amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

kent hakkı, mekânsal dışlanma, sosyal hizmet, yaşlılık

Etik Beyan

Bu makalede etik kurul iznine gerek yoktur, buna ilişkin ıslak imzalı etik kurul kararı gerekmediğine ilişkin onam formu sistem üzerindeki makale süreci dosyalarına eklenmiştir.

Destekleyen Kurum

Destekleyen herhangi bir kurum yok.

Proje Numarası

ORCID: 0000-0002-7821-5605

The Problem of Spatial Exclusion of the Aged: Urban Right Principles and Social Work Approach

Öz

This review addresses the problem of spatial exclusion of the elderly in urban life and evaluates social service interventions within the framework of the “urban right” principle. The neglect of the 'age' factor in the design of public spaces creates disadvantages for groups such as the elderly, children and youth, and leads to older people not being able to fully benefit from the opportunities offered by urban life. This situation causes physical, emotional, social and economic problems among the elderly. In this study, social service recommendations based on the principle of the “urban right” are presented in order to solve these problems and to enable the elderly to take part in urban life in a more active and integrated manner. Social work prioritizes the welfare of the elderly, who are among disadvantaged groups, and aims to empower them and improve their overall quality of life. Particularly in cities, social work offers a variety of supports to meet the specific needs of older people, aiming to ensure their access to city resources and equal opportunities. This approach aims to increase the effectiveness of social work in urban areas and promote public awareness and advocacy on the rights of older persons.

Anahtar Kelimeler

urban right, spatial exclusion, social work, ageing

Proje Numarası

ORCID: 0000-0002-7821-5605

Kaynakça

• AGE. (2016). Applying the Right to the City to older persons: the opportunity of the EU Urban Agenda. https://www.age-platform.eu/applying-the-right-to-the-city-to-older-persons-the-opportunity-of-the-eu-urban-agenda/
• Althorpe, C., & Horak, M. (2023). The End of the Right to the City: A Radical-Cooperative View. Urban Affairs Review, 59(1), 14-42, Article 10780874211057815. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874211057815
• Altun, Z. (2021). Yaşlılara yönelik sosyal politikalar ve sosyal hizmetler: Sivil toplum kuruluşları üzerinden bir değerlendirme. In (Vol. 2, pp. 30-44). Toplumsal Politika Dergisi.
• Ayalon, L., Dolberg, P., Mikulioniene, S., Perek-Bialas, J., Rapoliene, G., Stypinska, J.,…de la Fuente-Nunez, V. (2019). A systematic review of existing ageism scales [Review]. Ageing Research Reviews, 54, Article 100919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2019.100919
• Barusch, A. S. (2013). Age-Friendly Cities: A Social Work Perspective [Editorial Material]. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 56(6), 465-472. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2013.826563
• Berglund‐Snodgrass, L., Fjellfeldt, M., Högström, E., & Markström, U. (2022). A Healthy City for All? Social Services’ Roles in Collaborative Urban Development. In (Vol. 7, pp. 113-123). Urban planning.
• Brenner, N., Marcuse, P., & Mayer, M. (Eds.). (2012). Cities for people, not for profit: Critical urban theory and the right to the city. Routledge.
• Buffel, T., Phillipson, C., & Scharf, T. (2012). Ageing in urban environments: Developing 'age-friendly' cities. Critical Social Policy, 32(4), 597-617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018311430457
• Buffel, T., Rémillard-Boilard, S., Walsh, K., McDonald, B., Smetcoren, A. S., & De Donder, L. (2020). Age-friendly approaches and old-age exclusion: A cross-city analysis. In (Vol. 14, pp. 89-117). International Journal of Ageing and Later Life.
• Carr, A., Biggs, S., & Haapala, I. (2022). Dementia and Social Inclusion-Exclusion. In In Handbook of Social Inclusion: Research and Practices in Health and Social Sciences (pp. 729-746). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89594-5_37
• Chung, S., Kim, M., Auh, E. Y., & Park, N. S. (2021). Its Implications of a Discussion on Social Exclusion among Older Adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(15), Article 8027. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158027
• Chong, W. F., & Gu, D. (2022). Critical gerontology. In Encyclopedia of gerontology and population aging (pp. 1225-1246). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
• Colglazier, W. (2015). Sustainable development agenda: 2030 [Editorial Material]. Science, 349(6252), 1048-1050. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad2333
• Drilling, M., Grove, H., Ioannou, B., & Moulaert, T. (2021). Towards a structural embeddedness of space in the framework of the social exclusion of older people. . In Social Exclusion in Later Life: Interdisciplinary and Policy Perspectives (pp. 193-207). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51406-8
• Duff, C. (2017). The affective right to the city. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 42(4), 516-529.
• Fallahi, F., & Safa, A. (2023). Right to the City" theory from the perspective of geriatric nursing. . In (Vol. 12): Nursing and Midwifery Studies.
• Friendly, A. (2013). The right to the city: theory and practice in Brazil. Planning theory & practice, 14(2), 158-179.
• Gençer, Ç., Er, F., Barut, B., & Kara, Y. (2021). Koruyucu sağlık hizmetlerinin sunumunda sosyal hizmet mesleğinin önemi Koruyucu sağlık hizmetlerinin sunumunda sosyal hizmet mesleğinin önemi. In (Vol. 32, pp. 1125-1142): Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet.
• Habitat, U. N. (2018). Migration and inclusive cities: a guide for arab city leaders. In (2 ed.). United Nations Human Settlements Programme.
• Heidari, M. T., Mohamadi, S., & Rahmani, M. (2021). Monitoring the theory of the right to the City in reproducing age–friendly space of the city (case study: worn-out texture of central district of Zanjan). . In (Vol. 53, pp. 195-212): Human Geography Research.
• Jones, S. E. (2016). Ageing and the city: making urban spaces work for older people . In: HelpAge International.
• Kalayci, E., Uzunaslan, I., & Uzunaslan, S. (2023). Caregiver burden experiences of caregivers of patients with schizophrenia: A qualitative inquiry. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 69(3), 543-550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640221114564
• Kang, J. Y., & Chungsoondool. (2017). Trajectories of experiences on material hardship among mid and old age by age group [중고령층 연령집단별 물질적 결핍 궤적 및 궤적집단 비교연구] [research-article]. 55, 5-34. https://doi.org/10.17997/swry.55.1.1.
• Karakuş, B. (2018). Türkiye’de yaşlılara yönelik hizmetler, kurumsal yaşlı bakımı ve kurumsal yaşlı bakımında illerin durumu. In. Ankara: Aile ve Sosyal Hizmetler Bakanlığı.
• Kaya, B. E., & Erbas, I. (2023). The relationship between urban transformation and sustainability: a bibliometric analysis and exploring existing trends (oct, 10.1080/13467581.2023.2270033, 2023) [Correction; Early Access]. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2023.2281785
• Kneale, D. (2012). Is social exclusion still important for older people? In. UCL Discovery.
• Kuang, Y., & Lin, B. (2021). Public participation and city sustainability: Evidence from Urban Garbage Classification in China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 67, Article 102741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102741
• Labus, A. (2013). Concepts of urban renewal in an aging society in the XXI century-case studies in the Polish Cities. In. 17th International Conference on Urban Planning, Regional Development and Information Society.
• Lamprini, K. (2016). Social exclusion of elderly. . In (Vol. 1, pp. 1-3): Journal of Healthcare Communications.
• Menezes, D., Woolrych, R., Sixsmith, J., Makita, M., Smith, H., Fisher, J.,…Murray, M. (2023). 'You really do become invisible': examining older adults' right to the city in the United Kingdom. Ageing & Society, 43(11), 2477-2496, Article Pii s0144686x21001793. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x21001793
• Moffatt, S., & Glasgow, N. (2009). How useful is the concept of social exclusion when applied to rural older people in the United Kingdom and the United States? In (Vol. 43, pp. 1291-1303): Regional Studies.
• Nahar Lata, L. (2021). To whom does the city belong? Obstacles to right to the city for the urban poor in Bangladesh. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 51(4), 638-659.
• New York Tıp Akademisi. (2008). Yaşlı Dostu Bir Şehre Doğru: Bulgular Raporu.
• Ortiz, E. (2008). Towards a World Charter for the Right to the City. In (pp. 97-106). UNESCO: HIC reference center in the world.
• Phelan, A., & Ayalon, L. (2020). The intersection of ageism and elder abuse. . In (pp. 11-12): Advances in elder abuse research: Practice, legislation and policy.
• Powers, M., Rinkel, M., & Kumar, P. (2021). Co-Creating a "Sustainable New Normal" for Social Work and Beyond: Embracing an Ecosocial Worldview [Review]. Sustainability, 13(19), Article 10941. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910941.
• Romero-Ortuno, R., Cogan, L., Cunningham, C. U., & Kenny, R. A. (2010). Do older pedestrians have enough time to cross roads in Dublin? A critique of the Traffic Management Guidelines based on clinical research findings. Age and ageing, 39(1), 80-86.
• Ryser, J., & Franchini, T. (2022). Designing Inclusive Cities from the Elderly Perspective. In Mobility, Knowledge and Innovation Hubs in Urban and Regional Development. Proceedings of REAL CORP 2022, 27th International Conference on Urban Development, Regional Planning and Information Society, CORP–Competence Center of Urban and Regional Planning. https://programm.corp.at/cdrom2022/papers2022/CORP2022_8.pdf
• Salihoglu, T., Albayrak, A. N., & Eryilmaz, Y. (2021). A method for the determination of urban transformation areas in Kocaeli. Land Use Policy, 109, Article 105708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105708
• Scharlach, A. (2011). Creating aging-friendly communities. Generations. In (Vol. 32, pp. 5-11). Generations
• Schwarz, B. (2013). Environmental gerontology: What now?. In Environmental Gerontology (pp. 7-22). Routledge.
• Seixas, E. C. (2021). Urban (Digital) Play and Right to the City: A Critical Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 636111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.636111
• Sharifi, A., Khavarian-Garmsir, A. R., Allam, Z., & Asadzadeh, A. (2023). Progress and prospects in planning: A bibliometric review of literature in Urban Studies and Regional and Urban Planning, 1956-2022 [Review]. Progress in Planning, 173, Article 100740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2023.100740
• Thorpe, A. (2017). Rethinking Participation, Rethinking Planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 18(4), 566-582. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2017.1371788
• Tomanbay, İ. (2007). Yaşlılara yönelik sosyal hizmetler. In. gebam.hacettepe.edu.tr.
• Tournier, I., & Vidovićová, L. (2021). Introduction: Framing community and spatial exclusion. . In K. Walsh, T. Scharf, S. Van Regenmortel, & A. Wanka (Eds.), Social Exclusion in Later Life: Interdisciplinary and Policy Perspectives (pp. 185-191). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51406-8_14
• TÜİK. (2023). İstatistiklerle Yaşlılar, 2023. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Istatistiklerle-Yaslilar-2023-53710
• Wahl, H. W., & Oswald, F. (2010). Environmental perspectives on ageing. In The SAGE handbook of social gerontology (pp. 124 , 111).
• Wanka, A., Moulaert, T., & Drilling, M. (2018). From environmental stress to spatial expulsion-rethinking concepts of socio-spatial exclusion in later life. . In (Vol. 12, pp. 25-51). International Journal of Ageing and Later Life.
• Van Hoof, J., Marston, H. R., Kazak, J. K., & Buffel, T. (2021). Ten questions concerning age-friendly cities and communities and the built environment. Building and environment, 199, 107922.
• Zarate, L. (2015). Right to the City for All: a manifesto for social justice in an urban century. In. The Nature of Cities.
• ÖİK. (2009). Yerel Yönetimler. Katılımcılık ve Kentsel Yönetim Komisyon Raporu, Kentleşme Şurası. Ö. İ. Komisyon.
• İKK. (2022). Yaşlı Dostu Kentler Çalıştay Raporu. https://istanbulkentkonseyi.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Yasli_Dostu_Kentler_Calistayi_Raporu_web.pdf