Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks with other Machine Learning Methods in Foot Movement Classification
Öz
Modern prostheses can be controlled by using gait analysis data from Inertial Measurement Units compared to traditional prostheses. This article aims to classify foot movements for the robotic ankle system in lower limb prostheses to recognize motion intent and adapt to abnormal walking conditions. The statistical features are extracted from IMU data from 11 volunteers aged 20-34 and then the features are classified using machine learning. In this study, the classification accuracies of Naïve Bayes Classifier, Linear Discriminant Analysis, K-Nearest Neighbour Classifier and Support Vector Machines and Artificial Neural Networks in classifying foot movements are examined separately for the raw data and the processed data such as Euler angles and quaternions which estimate with Madwick Filter. Gait analysis data were obtained by using the Inemo inertial module LSM9DS1 work on an NRF52 including 9 DOF, triaxial gyroscope, triaxial accelerometer, and triaxial magnetometer in the Biomechanics Laboratory of the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Middle East Technical University from eleven subjects and achieved an highest classification accuracy rate of 90.9% on test data, 97.3% for training data.
Anahtar Kelimeler
K-Nearest Neighbor, Support Vector Machines, Accelerometers, Gyroscope
Kaynakça
- Hoile, R. (1996). Amputation: Surgical Practice and Patient Management. British Medical Journal, 312(7036), 984-985.
- Kerr, M., Barron, E., Chadwick, P., Evans, T., Kong, W. M., Rayman, G., Jeffcoate, W. J. (2019). The cost of diabetic foot ulcers and amputations to the National Health Service in England. Diabetic Medicine, 36(8): 995-1002.
- Parkka, J., Ermes, M., Korpipaa, P., Mantyjarvi, J., Peltola, J., Korhonen, I. (2006). Activity classification using realistic data from wearable sensors. In: IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed., 119-128.
- Seel, T., Raisch, J., Schauer, T. (2014). IMU-based joint angle measurement for gait analysis. Sensors, 14(4), 6891-6909.
- Haoyu, L, Derrode, S., Pieczynski, W. (2019). An adaptive and on-line IMU-based locomotion activity classification method using a triplet Markov model, Neurocomputing, 362, pp. 94-105.
- San-Segundo, R., Montero, J. M., Barra-Chicote, R., Fernandez, F., Pardo, J. M. (2016). Feature extraction from smartphones inertial signals for human activity segmentation, Signal Processing; 120, 359-372.
- Fullerton, E., Heller, B., Munoz-Organero, M. (2017). Recognizing human activity in free-living using multiple body-worn accelerometers, IEEE Sensors Journal, 17(16), 5290-5297.
- Gao, F., Liu, G., Liang, F., Liao, W-H. (2020). IMU-based locomotion mode identification for transtibial prostheses, orthoses, and exoskeletons. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering; 28(6), 1334-1343.
- Wen, J., Wang, Z., (2016). Sensor-based adaptive activity recognition with dynamically available sensors. Neurocomputing, 218, 307-317.
- Wu, D., Wang, Z., Chen, Y., Zhao, H. (2016). Mixed kernel based weighted extreme learning machine for inertial sensor based human activity recognition with imbalanced dataset. Neurocomputing, 190, 35-49.
kapsamında lisanslanmıştır.