A Comparative Study on the Performance of Freeze-Thaw Cycled Alluvial Soils Stabilized with Lime and Fly Ash
Öz
This paper presents a comparison of the stabilization of alluvial soils using lime and fly ash. It aims to draw basic inferences for these soils based on the test results obtained. In this regard, lime and fly ash were added to silty alluvial soil at different rates, and the s1amples were subjected to different curing periods. The cured samples underwent 0 and 1 freeze-thaw cycles in a closed-system cabinet by maintaining the specimens at -24°C and +24°C for 24 hours each, to evaluate the influence of temperature changes. Based on the undrained shear strength values obtained from the unconsolidated-undrained triaxial tests, the most prominent finding is that stabilization with fly ash performed better than with lime, as the alluvial soil was rich in silts. The optimal stabilization period was determined as 28 days for both stabilizers. The increased curing time was influenced by mechanisms potentially arising from the use of calcium-based stabilizers in a sulfate-containing environment, which was most evident in lime stabilization. While the most effective lime stabilization was achieved between 3% and 6%, this range increased to as much as 20% for fly ash. Although fly ash stabilization yielded better results in terms of undrained shear strength, lime stabilization demonstrated better performance against freeze-thaw cycles.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Alluvial soil, Fly ash, Freeze-thaw, Lime, Triaxial compression test
Kaynakça
- Acosta, H. A. (2002). Stabilization of soft subgrade soils using fly ash. Master Science Thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
- Arnett, S. J., Macphee, D. E., and Crammond, N. J. (2001). Solid Solutions Between Thaumasite and Ettringite and Their Role in Sulfate Attack. Journal of Concrete Science Engineering, 3, 209-215.
- Arslan, E., Develioglu, I., Pulat, H. F. (2023). The effect of curing time and freeze-thaw cycles on the undrained shear strength of lime-stabilized alluvial soils. Revista de la Construcción, 22(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.7764/rdlc.22.2.348
- Arslan, E., Ekinci, E., Garip, Z. Küçük, F., Sert, S. (2024). A sustainable solution for soil improvement: a decision tree model combined with metaheuristic optimizations for fiber reinforced clays. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05554-w
- Arora, S., and Aydilek, A. H. (2005). Class F Fly-Ash-Amended Soils as Highway Base Materials. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 17(6), 640-649.
- ASTM D1140-17 (2017). Standard Test Methods for Determining the Amount of Material Finer than 75-μm (No. 200) Sieve in Soils by Washing. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
- ASTM D2487-17 (2020). Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
- ASTM D2850 (2015). Standard test method for unconsolidated-undrained triaxial compression test on cohesive soils. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
- ASTM D4318-17e1 (2018). Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
- ASTM D4972-19 (2019). Standard Test Methods for pH of Soils., West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
kapsamında lisanslanmıştır.