Cercopis vulnerata Rossi, 1807 (Auchenorrhyncha: Cercopidae)’nın Kuzeybatı Türkiye Populasyonlarındaki Renk/Desen Varyasyonu

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 266 - 273, 15.12.2020

Rukiye Tanyeri , Ünal Zeybekoğlu

https://doi.org/10.31466/kfbd.724626

Cited By: 3

Öz

Bu çalışma Türkiye’nin kuzeybatısındaki bazı C. vulnerata populasyonlarındaki renk/desen varyasyonunu incelemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Kanatlardaki renk/desen varyasyonuna göre 3 farklı fenotip tespit edilmiştir. Tespit edilen fenotiplerden ikisi C. vulnerata var. typica and C. vulnerata var. helvetica’dır. Üçüncü fenotip ise türün bilinen tüm varyantlarından farklıdır. Bu çalışmayla C. vulnerata’nın gösterdiği renk/desen varyasyonu Türkiye’de ilk kez değerlendirilmiştir. Renk/desen varyasyonunun yanısıra boyut farklılıkları da değerlendirilmiştir. Örnekler renk/desen varyasyonuna göre gruplandırılmış ve total boyları ölçülmüştür. Varyantlar ve eşeyler arasındaki farklılıkların istatistiksel olarak önemli olup olmadığının saptanması için One-Way ANOVA ve Bağımsız T-test kullanılmıştır. Varyantlar arasındaki vücut boyutundaki fark istatistiksel olarak önemlidir (P <0.01). Bölgede, C. vulnerata var. helvetica’nın baskın olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bu varyantta ayrıca eşeysel boyut dimorfizmi tespit edilmiştir, erkekler dişilerden daha büyük boyutludur. Bu özellik istatistiksel olarak anlamlıdır (♀♀ n = 50, ♂♂ n = 50, P <0.01). Diğer varyantlarda eşeyler arasında anlamlı bir boyut farkı yoktur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cercopis vulnerata, varyant, Türkiye, renk morfları

Destekleyen Kurum

ONDOKUZ MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ

Proje Numarası

PYO.FEN.1904.16.013

Color/ Pattern Variation of Cercopis vulnerata Rossi, 1807 (Auchenorrhyncha: Cercopidae) Populations of Northwestern Turkey

Öz

This study was carried out to examine color/pattern variation in some C. vulnerata populations in northwestern of Turkey. Three different phenotypes were recognized according to wing color/pattern, two of which are C. vulnerata var. typica and C. vulnerata var. helvetica. The third phenotype has a different pattern from all known variants of this species. The data about the color/pattern variation of C. vulnerata were examined for the first time in Turkey with this study. Besides color/pattern differences, size differences were examined. The samples were classified according to their color/pattern differences and also the total length of the individuals were measured. In order to assure whether the differences are statistically significant among the variants and between sexes, One-Way ANOVA and independent t-test were used. Differences in body size among all variants were significant (P <0.01). The populations of C. vulnerata var. helvetica are overwhelmed in the region. In this variant, it was also found that there was a sexual dimorphism in size, and male individuals were larger than females. This feature was significant (♀♀ n = 50, ♂♂ n = 50, P <0.01). In the other variants, no significant difference was found between the sexes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cercopis vulnerata, variant, Turkey, color morphs

Proje Numarası

PYO.FEN.1904.16.013

Kaynakça

• Alford, D. V. (2016). Pests of fruit crops: a color handbook. (Second Edition) CRC press.
• Beldade, P., Brakefield, P. M. and Long, A.D. (2005). Generating phenotypic variation: prospects from ‘‘evo-devo’’ research on Bicyclus anynana wing pattern. Evolution & Development, 7:2, 101-107.
• Carvalho, G. S. and Webb, M. D. (2006). Cercopid Spittle Bugs of the New World (Hemiptera, Auchenorrhyncha, Cercopidae. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 99:6, 1259–1260.
• Castro-Valderrama, U., Romero-Nápoles, J., Peck, D. C., Valdez-Carrasco, J. M., Llanderal-Cázares C., Bravo-Mojica H. & Cibrián-Llanderal V. D. (2017). First report of spittlebug species (Hemiptera: Cercopidae) associated with Pinus species (Pinaceae) in Mexico. Florida Entomologist, 100(1): 206-208.
• Chown, S.L. & Gaston, K.J. (2010). Body size variations in insects: a macroecological perspective. Biological Reviews, 85: 139-169.
• Dusolier, F. (2004). Hemipteres nouveaux ou rares pou le Massif Armorican (Hexapoda, Hemiptera). Bulletin de Societe des Sciences Naturelles Quest de la France, 26: 128-137.
• Halkka, O. & Halkka, L. (1990).Population genetics of the polymorphic meadow spittlebug, Philaenus spumarius (L.). Evolutionary Biology, 24: 149–191.
• Heller, F. (1985). Cercopis vulnerata (Rossi) var. confluens var. nova (Homoptera, Cercopidae). Mitteilungen des Entomologischen Vereins Stuttgart 1869 e.V, 20: 16-18.
• Hochkirch, A., Deppermann, J. & Gröning J. (2008). Phenotypic plasticity in insects: the effects of substrate color on thecoloration of two ground-hopper species. Evolution & Development, 10(3): 350-359.
• Holzinger, W. E., Kammerlander I. & Nickel H. (2003). The Auchenorrhyncha of Central Europe. Fulgoromorpha, Cicadomorpha excl. Cicadellidae. Koninklijke Brill NV.
• Holzinger, W.E. (2008). Die Gemeine Blutzikade (Cercopis vulnerata) das Insekt des Jahres 2009 (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Cercopidae). Beitrage zur Entomofaunistik, 8: 193-203. Lodos, N. & Kalkandelen A. (1981).Preliminary list of Auchenorrhyncha with notes on distribution and importance of species in Turkey VI. Families Cercopidae and Membracidae. Türkiye Bitki Koruma Dergisi, 5 (3): 133-149.
• Melichar, L. (1896). Einige neue Homoptera-Arten und Varietäten. Verhandlungen der Zoologisch- Botanischen Gesellschaft Wien, 46: 176-180.
• Nast, J. (1933). Beiträge zur Morphologie und geographischen Verbreitung der mitteleuropäischen und mediterranen Arten aus der Subfamilie Cercopinae (Homoptera, Cercopidae). Annales Musei Zoologici Polonici, 10 (2): 7-33.
• Nast, J. (1987).The Auchenorrhyncha (Homoptera) of Europe. Annales Zoologici Warszawa, 40/15: 535–661.
• Nickel, H. (2003). The Leafhoppers and Planthoppers of Germany (Hemiptera Auchenorrhyncha): Patterns and strategies in a highly diverse group of phytophageous insects. Deutshe Entomologische Zeitschrift Banner, 50: 259-260
• Önder F., Tezcan S., Karsavuran Y. ve Zeybekoğlu Ü. (2011). Türkiye Cicadomorpha, Fulgoromorpha ve Sternorrhyncha Kataloğu. Meta Basım, İzmir.
• Parchem, R.J., Perry, M. W. & Patel, N.H. (2007). Patterns on the inseect wing. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development, 17: 300-308.
• Rodrigues, A. S., Silva, S. E., Pina-Martins, F., Loureiro, J., Castro, M., Gharbi, K., ... & Jiggins, C. D. (2016).Assessing genotype-phenotype associations in three dorsal colour morphs in the meadow spittlebug Philaenus spumarius (L.)(Hemiptera: Aphrophoridae) using genomic and transcriptomic resources. BMC genetics, 17(1), 144.
• Svensson, E.I. & Abbott, J. (2005). Evolutionary Dynamics and population biology of a polymorphic insect. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 18: 1503-1514.
• Wagner, W. (1948). Neue deutsche Homopteren und Bemerkungen über schon bekannte Arten. Verhandlungen des Vereins für naturwissenschaftliche Heimatforschung Hamburg, 29: 72-89.
• Yadav, S., Stow, A. J., Harris R. & Dudaniec, R. Y. (2018). Morphological variation tracks environmental gradients in an agricultural pest, Phaulacridium vittatum (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Journal of Insect Science, 18 (6): 13; 1-10.