Akademik Başarı ve Kişilik İlişkisi: Üniversite Öğrencileri Üzerinde Bir Araştırma

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

AKADEMİK BAŞARI VE KİŞİLİK İLİŞKİSİ: ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİ ÜZERİNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, üniversite öğrencilerinin akademik başarıları ile beş faktörlü kişilik özellikleri arasındaki olası ilişkileri incelemektir. Çalışmanın örneklemi, Ankara ve İstanbul’da bulunan iki devlet üniversitesindeki 458 öğrenciyi (284’ü erkek, 174’ü kadın) kapsamaktadır. Araştırmada incelenen kişilik özellikleri, Beş Faktörlü Kişilik Kuramı’na dayalı olarak yazında mevcut olan envanterlerden istifade edilerek geliştirilen bir ölçek vasıtasıyla, öğrencilerin akademik başarıları ise genel not ortalamaları temel alınarak ölçülmüştür. Araştırma sonucunda, beş faktörlü kişilik özelliklerinden dışa dönüklük haricinde, sorumluluk, uyumluluk, duygusal denge ve açıklık faktörlerinin akademik başarı ile olumlu yönde ilişkili olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Tüm değişkenlerin çoklu regresyon modelinde ele alınmasıyla, sorumluluğun akademik başarıyı yordayan en önemli özellik olduğu ve bunu açıklık özelliğinin izlediği görülmüştür. Buna ilave olarak, bu çalışma ile geliştirilen beş faktörlü kişilik ölçeğinin psikometrik özelliklerinin kısmen tatmin edici düzeyde olduğu ve ileriki çalışmalarda kullanılabileceği sonucuna varılmıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Beş Faktörlü Kişilik Kuramı, Akademik Başarı, Üniversite Öğrencileri

Kaynakça

1. Abu Elanain, H.M., 2007. The Five-Factor Model of Personality and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in United Arab Emirates. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 72(3), 47-57.
2. Bacanlı, H. İlhan T. ve Aslan, S., 2009., Beş Faktör Kuramına Dayalı Bir Kişilik Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi: Sıfatlara Dayalı Kişilik Testi (SDKT). Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi. 7(2), 261-279.
3. Barrick, M.R. ve Mount, M.K., 1991. The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Personnel Psychology. 44(1), 1-26
4. Basım, H.N. Çetin, F. ve Tabak, A., 2009. Beş Faktör Kişilik Özelliklerinin Kişilerarası Çatışma Çözme Yaklaşımlarıyla İlişkisi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi. 63, 20-34
5. Bernerth, J.B., Armenakis, A.A., Feild, H.S., Giles, W.F. ve Walker, H.J., 2007. Is Personality Associated with Perceptions of LMX? An Empirical Study. Leadership and Organization Development Journal. 28(7), 613–631
6. Bond, M.H. Nakazato, H.S. ve Shraishi, D., 1975. Universality and Distinctiveness in Dimensions of Japanese Person Perception. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 6, 346-355
7. Briggs, S.R., 1989. The Optimal Level of Measurement For Personality Constructs,Ed. D.M. Buss ve N. Cantor, Recent Trends and Emerging Directions, New York: Springer-Verlag, 246–260
8. Burger, J.M., 2006. Kişilik. (Çev. İnan Deniz Erguvan SARIOĞLU), Kaknüs Yayınları, İstanbul,

9. Carter, V. ve Good, E., 1973. Dictionary of Education. 4th ed., New York: McGraw Hill Book.
10. Chamorro-Premuzic, T. ve Furnham, A., 2003a. Personality Predicts Academic Performance: Evidence From Two Longitudinal Samples. Journal of Research in Personality. 37, 319–338
11. Chamorro-Premuzic, T. ve Furnham, A., 2003b. Personality Traits and Academic Psychology. 17, 237-250 Performance. European Journal of
12. Conley, J.J., 1985. Longitudinal Stability of Personality Traits: A Multitrait- Multimethod Multioccasion Analysis. Journal of Personality ve Social Psychology. 49, 1266-1282
13. Costa, Paul T., Catherine M. Busch, , Alan B. Zonderman ve Robert R. McCrae, 1986. Correlations of Mmpi Factor Scales with Measures of the Five Factor Model of Personality, Journal of Personality Assessment, 50 (4), 640-650.
14. Costa, P.T., McCrae, R.R. ve Dye, D.A., 1991. Facet Scales for Agreeableness and Conscientiousness: A Revision of the Neo Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences. 12(9), 887-898
15. Costa, P.T. ve McCrea, R.R., 1995. Domains and Facets: Personality Assessment Using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment. 64(1), 21-50
16. Costa, P.T. ve McCrea, R.R., 1988. From Catalog to Classification: Murray's Needs and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality ve Social Psychology. 55, 258-265
17. Costa, T.T. ve McCrae, R.R., 1992. Revised NEO Personality Inventory Manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources,
18. De Raad, B., 1996. Personality Traits in Learning and Education: A Review. European Journal of Personality. 10, 185-200
19. Digman, J.M. ve Takemoto-Chock, N.K., 1981. Factors in the Natural Language of Personality: Re-Analysis, Comparison, and Interpretation of Six Major Studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 16, 149-170
20. Digman, J.M., 1990. Personality Structure: Emergence of Five-Factor Model. Annual Review of Psychology. 41, 417-440
21. Diseth, A.,2003. Approaches to Learning, Cognitive Style and Academic Achievement. Educational Research. 45, 381-394
22. Erkuş, A. ve Tabak, A., 2009. Beş Faktör Kişilik Özelliklerinin Çalışanların Çatışma Yönetim Tarzlarına Etkisi: Savunma Sanayiinde Bir Araştırma. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. 23(2), 213-242
23. Furnham, A. Zhang, J. ve Chamorro-Premuzic, T., 2006. The Relationship Between Psychometric and Self Estimated Intelligence, Creativity, Personality and Academic Achievement. Imagination, Cognition and Personality. 25(2), 119-145
24. Goff, M. ve Ackerman, P.L., 1992. Personality-Intelligence Relations: Assessing Typical Intellectual Engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology. 84, 537-552
25. Goldberg, L.R., 1981. Language and Individual Differences: The Search For Universals, Ed. L. Wheeler, Review of Personality and Social Psychology. 141-166,
26. Gray, E.K. ve Watson, D., 2002. General and Specific Traits of Personality and Their Relation to Sleep and Academic Performance, Journal of Personality. 70(2), 177-206
27. Gülgöz, S., 2002. Five-Factor Model and NEO-PI-R in Turkey, in The Five- Factor Model Across Cultures, Ed. R.R. McCrae ve J. Allik, International and Cultural Psychology, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 1-23,
28. Guthrie, J.P. Coate, C.J. ve Schwoerer, C.E., 1998. Career Management Strategies: The Role of Personality. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 13(5/6), 371-386
29. Hair, J.F. Anderson, R.E. Tahtam, R.L. ve Black, W.C., 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th Ed., NJ: Prentice-Hall International, Englewood Cliffs.
30. Hirschfeld, R. Jordan, R. Thomas, M.H. Christopher, H. ve Feild, H.S., 2008. Observed Leadership Potential of Personnel in A Team Setting: Big Five Traits and Proximal Factors As Predictors. International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 16(4), 385-402.
31. Hogan, R.A., 1983. Socio-Analytic Theory of Personality, in Personality Current Theory ve Research, Ed. M. Page, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 55-89.
32. John, O.P., 1989. Towards A Taxonomy of Personality Descriptors, Ed. D.M. Buss ve N. Cantor, Recent Trends and Emerging Directions, New York: Springer- Verlag, 261-271.
33. Laidra, K. Pullmann, H. ve Allik, J., 2007. Personality and Intelligence As Predictors of Academic Achievement: A Cross-Sectional Study from Elementary to Secondary School. Personality and Individual Differences. 42(3), 441-451.
34. Leung S.L. ve Bozionelos, N., 2004. Five-Factor Model Traits and the Prototypical Image of the Effective Leader in the Confucian Culture. Employee Relations. 26(1), 62–71.
35. Lievens, F. Coetsier, P., De Fruyt, P. ve Maeseneer, J., 2002. Medical Students’ Personality Characteristics and Academic Performance: A Five-Factor Model Perspective. Medical Education, 36, 1050–1056.
36. Lim, B.C. ve Ployhart, R.E., 2004. Transformational Leadership: Relations to the Five-Factor Model and Team Performance in Typical and Maximum Contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology. 89(4), 610–621.
37. McCormack, L. ve Mellor, D., 2002. The Role of Personality in Leadership: An Application of the Five-Factor Model in the Australian Military. Military Psychology. 14(3), 179–197.
38. McCown, W. ve Johnson, J., 1991. Personality and Chronic Procrastination By University Students During an Academic Examination Period. Personality and Individual Differences. 12, 413-415
39. McCrae, R.R. Costa, P.T.,1991. The Full Five-Factor Model and Well- Being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 17(2), 227-232.
40. McCrae, R.R. ve Costa, P.T., 1987. Validation of the Five-Factor Model of Personality Across Instruments and Observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81-90.
41. McCrae, R.R., 1987. Creativity, Divergent Thinking and Openness to Experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 52, 1258-1265.
42. McCrae, R.R.. Costa P.T. ve Piedmont, R.L., 1993. Folk Concepts, Natural Language and Psychological Constructs: The California Psychological Inventory and the Five Factor Model. Journal of Personality. 61, 1-26.
43. McKenzie, J., 1989. Neuroticism and Academic Achievement: The Furneaux Factor. Personality and Individual Differences. 10, 509- 515
44. Mount, M.K. Barrick, M.R. Scullen, S.M. ve Rounds, J., 2005. Higher-Order Dimensions of the Big Five Personality Traits and the Big Six Vocational Interest Types. Personnel Psychology. 58, 447-478.
45. Musgrave-Marquart, D. Bromley, S.P. Dalley, M.B., 1997. Personality, Academic Attribution, and Substance Abuse As Predictors of Academic Achievement in College Students. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. 12, 501–511.
46. Noller, P.L. Law, H.A. ve Comrey, L.,1987. Cattell, Comrey, and Eysenck Personality Factors Compared: More Evidence for the Five Robust Factors?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 53, 775- 782.
47. Nunnally J.C., 1978. Psychometric Theory. 2nd Ed., New York: McGraw-Hill.
48. Poropat, E.A., 2009. Meta-Analysis of the Five-Factor Model of Personality and Academic Performance. Psychological Bulletin. 135(2), 322-338.
49. Robbins, S. ve Judge, T., 2007. Organizational Behavior, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
50. Shi, J. Lin, H. Wang, L. ve Wang, M., 2009. Linking the Big Five Personality Constructs Personality. 37(2), 209-222. Justice. Social Behavior and
51. Somer, O. Korkmaz, M. ve Tatar, A., 2000. Beş Faktör Kişilik Envanterinin Geliştirilmesi-I: Ölçek ve Alt Ölçeklerin Oluşturulması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi. 17(49), 21-33.
52. Somer, O. Korkmaz, M. Tatar, A., 2001. Kuramdan Uygulamaya Beş Faktör Kişilik Modeli ve Beş Faktör Kişilik Envanteri (5FKE), İzmir: Ege Üniversitesi.
53. Sung, S.Y. ve Choi, J.N., 2009. Do Big Five Personality Factors Affect Individual Creativity? The Moderating Role of Extrinsic Motivation. Social Behavior and Personality. 37(7), 941-956.
54. Tok, S. ve Moralı, S.L., 2009. Trait Emotional Intelligence, the Big Five Personality Dimensions and Academic Success in Physical Education Teacher Candidates. Social Behavior and Personality. 37(7), 921- 932.
55. Türk Dil Kurumu, Güncel Türkçe Sözlük, http://www.tdk.gov.tr, 23 Ekim 2009.
56. Vakola, M., Tsaousis I. ve Nikolaou, I., 2004. The Role of Emotional Intelligence Organizational Change. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 19(2), 88-110. Personality Variables on Attitudes Toward
57. Yelboğa, A., 2006. Kişilik Özellikleri ve İş Performansı Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. İş, Güç Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi. 8(2), 196-211.