KAR ORANLARI KONJONKTÜR YÖNLÜ MÜDÜR?

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 19, 606 - 621, 26.11.2018

Efe Can Kılınç C. Necat Berberoğlu

https://doi.org/10.20990/kilisiibfakademik.441368

Cited By: 1

Öz

İktisat teorisi, A. Smith’in yaşadığı dönemden bu yana
ekonomide konjonktür dalgalanmalarının kaynakları ile ilgili görüş birliğine
varabilmiş değildir. Konjonktür dalgalanmalarının nedenleri, ekonominin
herhangi bir müdahale olmaksızın dengeye gelip-gelmemesine göre
açıklanmaktadır. Ana akım iktisat düşüncesinin öncülük ettiği yaklaşıma göre,
genişleme ve daralma dönemlerinin ortaya çıkmasında dışsal şoklar (teknoloji ve
arz şokları gibi) etkilidir. Keynesyen çizgideki iktisat düşüncesine göre
ekonomide görülen dalgalanmaların içsel (toplam talep, yatırım, kar, bölüşüm
vb.) nedenleri vardır. Bu çalışmada, OECD ekonomilerinde, 1995-2016 dönemi
için, kâr oranlarının konjonktür yönü panel veri yöntemleri kullanılarak
araştırılmaktadır. Bulgular; OECD bölgesinde kar oranlarının konjonktür yönlü
olduğunu göstermektedir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Konjonktür Dalgalanmaları, Kâr Oranları, Panel Veri Analizi

Kaynakça

• BAGWELL, K., ve STAIGER, R. (1995). Collusion Over the Business Cycle. New York: NBER.
• BAKIR, E. (2015). Capital Accumulation, Profitability, and Crisis Neoliberalism in the United States. Review of Radical Political Economics, 47(3), 389-411.
• BILBIIE, F., GHIRONI, F., ve MELITZ, M. J., (2007). Endogenous Entry, Product Variety and Business Cycles. New York: NBER.
• BOGLIACINO, F., ve PIANTA, M., (2012). Profits, R&D, and Innovation-A Model and a Test. Seville: IRI-IPTS.
• COAD, A. (2007). Testing the Principle of ‘Growth of the Fitter’: The Relationship Between Profits And Firm Growth. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 18(3), 370-386.
• CHRISTODOULOPOULOU, S. (2007). The Determinants of Business Cycle Correlations: A Comparison Between OECD and non-OECD Economies.https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk/media/263193/christodoulopoulou-paper.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 10.03.2015).
• FELIPE, J., ve KUMAR, U. (2010). Technical Change in India’s Organized Manufacturing Sector. http://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/56953/1/637220897.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 07.03.2015).
• GOODWIN, R. M. (1967). A Growth Cycle. C. H. Feinstein (Ed.), Socialism, Capitalism and Economic Growth içinde (ss. 54-58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• GOTTFRIES, N. (1991). Customer Markets, Credit Market Imperfections And Real Price Rigidity. Economica, 58(231), 317-323.
• Green, E., ve Porter, R. (1984). Noncooperative Collusion Under Imperfect Price Information. Econometrica. 52(1), 87-100.
• HAHNEL, R., ve SHERMAN, H. (1982). The Rate of Profit Over The Business Cycle. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 6(2), 185-194.
• HEIN, E., ve TARASSOW, A. (2008). Distribution, Aggregate Demand And Productivity Growth: Theory And Empirical Results For Six OECD Countries Based On A Post-Kaleckian Model. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(4), 724-757.
• HSIAO, C., PESARAN, M., ve PICK, A. (2007). Diagnostic Tests of Cross Section Independence for Nonlinear Panel Data Models. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics. http://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/26029/1/538177373.PDF (Erişim Tarihi: 08.03.2015).
• INKLAAR, R., JONG-A-PİN, R., ve DE HAAN, J. (2008). Trade and Business Cycle Synchronization in OECD Countries-A Re-examination. European Economic Review, 52(4), 646-666.
• KALECKI, M. (1942). A Theory of Profits. The Economic Journal, 52 (206/207), 258-267.
• KİYOTA, K., NAKAJIMA, T., ve NISHIMURA, K. (2009). Measurement of the Market Power of Firms: The Japanese Case in the 1990s. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(3), 381-414.
• LAWRENCE, D., DIEWERT, E., ve FOX, K. (2006). The Contributions of Productivity, Price Changes And Firm Size To Profitability. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 26(1), 1-13.
• LEVY, D., FARNHAM, M., ve RAJAN, S. (2008). Where Profits Come From: Answering The Critical Question That Fewer Ever Ask. http://www.levyforecast.com/assets/Profits.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 21.02.2015).
• LIMA, M. A., ve RESENDE, M. (2004). Profit Margins And Business Cycles in The Brazilian Industry: A Panel Data Study. Applied Economics, 36(9), 923-930.
• MACALLAN, C., MILLARD, S., ve PARKER, M. (2008). The Cyclicality of Mark-Ups And Profit Margins For The United Kingdom: Some New Evidence. Bank of England Working Paper, No: 351.
• MACHIN, S., ve VAN REENEN, J. (1993). Profit Margins And The Business Cycle: Evidence From UK Manufacturing Firms. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 41(1), 29-50.
• MOUHAMMED, A. (2006). Instability of Capitalism Inflation, Unemployment, And Business Cycles. Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakulteta U Rijeci, 24(2), 165-184.
• NAUTZ, D., ve RONDORF, U. (2010), The (In)stability of Money Demand in the Euro Area: Lessons from a Cross-Country Analysis, SFB 649 "Economic Risk".
• ONGAN, T. H. (2011). Profit Rate of Turkish Manufacturing Sector in a Marxian Perspective. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1, 1-10.
• PESARAN, M. H. ve YAMAGATA, T. (2008) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels, Journal of Econometrics, 142(1): 50–93.
• PIANTA, M., ve TANCIONI, M. (2008). Innovations, Wages, and Profits. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 31(1), 101-123.
• PRZYBYLA, M., ve ROMA, M. (2005). Does Product Market Competition Reduce Inflation? Evidence From EU Countries and Sectors. European Central Bank Working Paper Series, No:453.
• ROTEMBERG, J., ve WOODFORD, M. (1999). The Cyclical Behavior of Prices And Costs. J. Taylor ve M. Woodford (Eds.), Handbook of Macroeconomics içinde (ss. 1051-1135). Elsevier.
• SALVATI, L. (2015). Investment and Profits in Neo-Kaleckian Models: A Critical Appraisal. http://dipeco.uniroma3.it/db/docs/Presentazione%20Luigi%20Salvati%20REV3.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 30.03.2015).
• SHERMAN, H., J. (1991), The Business Cycle: Growth and Crisis under Capitalism, New Jersey: Princeton.
• SMALL, I. (1997). The Cyclicality of Mark-Ups and Profit Margins: Some Evidence for Manufacturing and Services. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.199.9074&rep=rep1&type=pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 11.02.2015).
• SPIEGEL, Y., ve STAHL, K. (2014). Industry Structure and Pricing Over The Business Cycle: World Scientific.
• STOCK, J., ve WATSON, M. (1999). Business Cycle Fluctuations in US Macroeconomic Time Series. In J. Taylor ve M. Woodford (Eds.), Handbook of Macroeconomics içinde (ss. 3-64). Elsevier.
• SU, L., ve ZHANG, Y. (2010). Testing Cross-sectional Dependence in Nonparametric Panel Data Models. http://www.mysmu.edu/faculty/ljsu/Publications/testing%20crosssectional%20dependence%20in%20nonparametric%20panel%20data%20models20100912.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 10.07.2015).
• TAPIA, J. (2015). Profits Encourage Investment, Investment Dampens Profits, Government Spending Does Not Prime The Pump-A Dag Investigation of Business-Cycle Dynamics. Germany: University Library of Munich.
• TSOULFIDIS, L. (2005). Falling Rate of Profit and Overaccumulation in Marx and Keynes. Japan Sciety of Political Economy, 6(18), 65-77.
• VALLE E AZEVEDO, J., KOOPMAN, S. J., ve RUA, A. (2006). Tracking the Business Cycle of The Euro Area: A Multivariate Model-Based Bandpass Filter. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 24(3), 278-290.
• WARNER, E., ve BARSKY, R. (1995). The Timing And Magnitude of Retail Store Markdowns: Evidence From Weekends And Holidays. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 321-352.
• İnternet Kaynakları
• OECDstat, http://stats.oecd.org/ (Erişim Tarihi: 10.06.2018).
• TÜİK, http://www.tuik.gov.tr/Start.do (Erişim Tarihi: 10.06.2018).
• http://www.progressive-economics.ca/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/bschaufele.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 25.02.2016).