Yerel Yönetimler ve Bütçe İlişkisine Yönelik Akademik Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 24, 104 - 121, 10.05.2021

Hülya Ağcasulu İsmail Sadık Yavuz

https://doi.org/10.20990/kilisiibfakademik.890718

Cited By: 3

Öz

Amaç: Bu araştırmanın amacı, yerel yönetimler ve bütçe ilişkisini inceleyen çalışmaların ortak noktalarını bulmak ve literatürün yoğunlaştığı alanları tespit etmektir.
Tasarım/Yöntem: Araştırmada Web of Science servisinin çekirdek kataloğundan elde edilen 1980-2021 dönemine ait yerel yönetimler-bütçe ilişkisine dair 6535 makale VOSviewer yazılımı kullanılarak bibliyometrik ağ analizi ile haritalanmıştır.
Bulgular: Analizler sonucunda; ilgili literatürün Amerika Birleşik Devletleri adresli kurumlar ve yazarlar tarafından şekillendiği; Çin’in geçiş ekonomisi ile ilgili çalışmaların da sayıca fazla olduğu, çalışmaların çoğunlukla ekonomi (2159 çalışma) ve kamu yönetimi (2139 çalışma) alanlarında yoğunlaştığı ve 2004 sonrasında çalışma sayısının üstel bir fonksiyon şeklinde arttığı sonuçlarına ulaşılmıştır.
Sınırlılıklar: Çalışmada kullanılan veri tabanlarının sınırlandırılması 7086 makalenin outlier olarak dışlanması ile sonuçlanmıştır. Outlier parametreleri değiştirilerek interdisipliner karakteristiği artırılmış bir çalışmanın yapılaması mümkün kılacaktır.
Özgünlük/Değer: Çeşitli alanlarda bibliyometrik analizler kullanılmasına rağmen kamu yönetimi-maliye alanlarını birleştiren, yerel yönetimler-bütçe ilişkisini inceleyen interdisipliner ve alanında öncü bir çalışma olması araştırmanın özgün değeridir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kamu Yönetimi, Maliye, Bibliyometrik Analiz, VOSviewer

Destekleyen Kurum

-

Proje Numarası

-

A Bibliometric Analysis of Academic Studies on Local Governments and Budget Relationship

Öz

Purpose: The purpose of this research is to determine the common points and areas of focus points of paper in which examining the relationship between local governments and budget. Design/Methodology: 6535 articles on local government-budget relations for the period 1980-2021, obtained from the core catalog of the Web of Science Service, were mapped using bibliometric network analysis using VOSviewer software. Findings: As a result of the analysis; it was concluded that the relevant literature was shaped by the institutions and authors from the United States of America, there are multiple research on transition economy of China, the research is mostly focused on economics (2159 studies), and public administration (2139 studies), and the number of studies is exponentially increased after 2004. Limitations: The limitation of the databases used in the study resulted in the exclusion of 7086 articles as outlier. Changing the outlier parameters will make it possible to make a study with increased interdisciplinary characteristics. Originality/Value: Bibliometric analysis is used in many areas. However, this paper examines the relationship between local governments and the budget by uniting the fields of public administration and finance, being an interdisciplinary and pioneering work in its field are the basic building blocks that constitute its original value.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Public Administration, Public Finance, Bibliometric Analysis, VOSviewer

Proje Numarası

-

Kaynakça

• Amundsen, H., Berglund, F., & Westskog, H. (2010). Overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation question of multilevel governance?. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28, 276-289. http:// doi.org/10.1068/c0941
• Arıkboğa, E. (2008). Yerel yönetimler ve organları: Organlararası ilişkilerin üç boyutlu analizi. R. Bozlağan, & Y. Demirkaya (Ed.), Türkiye’de yerel yönetimler (ss. 157-204). Nobel Yayın & Dağıtım.
• Arıkboğa, Ü. (2008). Yerel yönetimlerin gelir kaynakları. R. Bozlağan, & Y. Demirkaya (Ed.), Türkiye’de yerel yönetimler (ss. 251-286). Nobel Yayın & Dağıtım.
• Artsın, M. (2020). Bir metin madenciliği uygulaması: VosViewer. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 8(2), 344-354. http://doi.10.20290/estubtdb.644637
• Behn, R. D. (2003). Why measure performance? Different Purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586-606. http://doi: 10.1111/1540-6210.00322
• Betsill, M. M. (2004). Transnational networks and global environmental governance: The cities for climate protection program. International Studies Quarterly, 48, 471-493. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.00310.x
• Black, D., & Henderson, V. (1999). A theory of urban growth. Journal of Political Economy, 107(2), 252-284. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1086/250060
• Blanchard, O. & Shleifer, A. (2000). Federalism with and without political centralization: China versus Russia. Cambridge. http://www.nber.org/papers/w7616
• Boyack, K. W., Klavans, R., & Börner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351-374. http:// 10.1007 / s11192-005-0255-6
• Brueckner, J. K. (2003). Strategic interaction among governments: An overview of empirical studies. International Regional Science Review, 26(2), 175-188. http://10.1177/0160017602250974
• Brueckner, J. K., & Saavedra, L. A. (2001). Do local governments engage in strategic property-tax competition?. National Tax Journal, 54(2), 203-229. http:// //doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2001.2.02
• Bulkeley, H., & Betsill, M. M. (2005). Rethinking sustainable cities: Multilevel governance and the “urban” politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 14(1), 42-63. http://10.1080/0964401042000310178
• Burby, R. J. (2006). Hurricane Katrina and the paradoxes of government disaster policy: Bringing about wise governmental decisions for Hazardous Areas. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604(1), 171-191. http://10.1177/0002716205284676
• Coursey, D., & Norris, D. F. (2008). Models of e-government: Are they correct? An empirical assessment. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 523-536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00888.x
• Çelikkaya, S., & Atila, M. (2020). Göç ve kalkınma ilişkisine yönelik bir inceleme: Web of Science veri tabanına dayalı bibliyometrik ağ analizi. Karadeniz Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(23), 67-85. http: //doi.org/10.38155/ksbd.797055
• Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2009). Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: Assessing the role of managers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 495-522. http://10.1093 / jopart / mun021
• De, D., & Price, S. (1976). A General theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, September-October. https://www.imsc.res.in/~sitabhra/teaching/sb17/Price_1976_A_general_theory_of_bibliometric_and_other_cumulative_advantage_processes.pdf
• De Lancer Julnes, P., & Holzer, M. (2001). Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review, 61(6), 693-708. http://10.1111/0033-3352.00140
• Delen, D., & Crossland, M. D. (2008). Seeding the survey and analysis of research literature with text mining. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(3), 1707-1720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.01.035
• Devereux, M. P., Lockwood, B., & Redoano, M. (2008). Do countries compete over corporate tax rates?. Journal of Public Economics, 92(5-6), 1210-1235. http://10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.09.005
• Eryılmaz, B. (2019). Kamu yönetimi düşünceler yapılar fonksiyonlar politikalar. Umuttepe.
• Gallagher, K. S., & Muehlegger, E. (2011). Giving green to get green? Incentives and consumer adoption of hybrid vehicle technology. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 61(1), 1-15. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095-0696(10)00076-8
• Gürdin, B. (2020). Yeşil pazarlamanın bilimsel haritaların görselleştirilmesi tekniğiyle bibliyometrik analizi. Econder International Academic Journal, 4(1), 203-231. https://doi.org/10.35342/econder.738473
• Ho, A. T. K. (2002). Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 434-444. http://10.1111/0033-3352.00197
• Jin, H., Qian, Y., & Weingast, B. R. (2005). Regional decentralization and fiscal incentives: Federalism, Chinese style. Journal of public economics, 89(9), 1719-1742. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047-2727(05)00022-8
• Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10-25. http://10.1002/asi.5090140103
• Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2006). Quantitative evaluation of large maps of science. Scientometrics, 68(3), 475-499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0125-x
• Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 348-362. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20967
• Montinola, G., Qian, Y., & Weingast, B. R. (1995). Federalism, Chinese style: The political basis for economic success in China. World Politics, 48(1), 50-81. http://10.7551/mitpress/9780262534246.003.0008
• Morris, S., DeYong, C., Wu, Z., Salman, S., & Yemenu, D. (2002). Diva: A visualization system for exploring document databases for technology forecasting. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 43(4), 841-862. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-8352(02)00143-2
• Norris, D. F., & Moon, M. J. (2005). Advancing e-government at the grassroots: Tortoise or hare?. Public Administration Review, 65(1), 64-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00431.x
• Oates, W. E. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), 1120-1149. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2564874
• Oates, W. E. (2005). Toward a second-generation theory of fiscal federalism. International Tax and Public Finance, 12(4), 349-373. http://10.1007/s10797-005-1619-9
• Oi, J. C. (1992). Fiscal reform and the economic foundations of local state corporatism in China. World Politics, 45(1), 99-126. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010520
• Pierre, J. (1999). Models of urban governance the institutional dimension of urban politics. Urban Affairs Review, 34(3), 372-396. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780879922183988
• Qian, B. Y., & Roland, G. (1998). Federalism and the soft budget constraint. The American Economic Review, 88(5), 1143-1162. https://www.jstor.org/stable/116864?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
• Scherf, M., Epple, A., & Werner, T. (2005). The next generation of literature analysis: Integration of genomic analysis into text mining. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 6(3), 287-297. http://10.1093/bib/6.3.287
• Schneider, M., & Teske, P. (1992). Toward a theory of the political entrepreneur: Evidence from local government. The American Political Science Review, 86(3), 737-747. https://doi.org/10.2307/1964135
• Seabright, P. (1996). Accountability and decentralisation in government: An incomplete contracts model. European Economic Review, 40, 61-89. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0014-2921(95)00055-0
• Small, H., & Sweeney, E. (1985). Clustering the Science Citation Index® using co-citations. Scientometrics, 7(3), 391-409. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017157.
• Small, H., Sweeney, E., & Greenlee, E. (1985). Clustering the science Citation Index using co-citations. II. Papping science. Scientometrics, 8(5-6), 321-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018057.
• Tabak, A., Barbak, A., & Öztürk, T. (2016). Kamu politikası disiplininin kavramsal gelişimini bibliyometri kullanarak anlamak mümkün mü?: 1980-2014 döneminin bilimsel haritalama analizi. LAÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(2), 117-143. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/263055
• Tao, R., Su, F., Liu, M., & Cao, G. (2010). Land leasing and local public finance in China’s regional development: Evidence from prefecture-level cities. Urban Studies, 47(10), 2217-2236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009357961
• Tolbert, C., & Mossberger, K. (2006). The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 354-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00594.x
• Ulusoy, A., & Akdemir, T. (2009). Yerel yöneti̇mler ve mali̇ özerkli̇k: Türki̇ye ve OECD ülkeleri̇ni̇n karşılaştırmalı analizi. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(21), 259-287. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/857114
• Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. http://10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
• Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2016). Text mining and visualization. Text Mining and Visualization, 1-5. http://10.1201/b19007
• Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. M. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629-635. http://10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002
• Wheeler, S. M. (2008). State and municipal climate change plans: The first generation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74(4), 481-496. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360802377973
• White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 32(3), 163-171. http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/hwhite/whitejasist1981.pdf
• Yenice, E. (2006). Kamu kesiminde performans ölçümü ve bütçe ilişkisi. Sayıştay Dergisi, 61, 57-68. https://doi.org/10.17218/husbed.39085
• Young, A. (2000). The Razor’s edge: Distortions and incremental reform in the people’s Republic of China. Quarterly Journal of Economics, CXV(4), 1091-1135. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2586920
• Zhang, T., & Zou, H. (1998). Fiscal decentralization, public spending, and economic growth in China. Journal of Public Economics, 67(2), 221-240. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047-2727(97)00057-1