Evaluation of Petroleum Products Consumption Performances with Improved CRITIC Weighted VIKOR Method: A Production and Logistics Perspective

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 33, 519 - 543, 09.12.2025

Osman Yakıt

https://doi.org/10.20990/kilisiibfakademik.1742284

Öz

Purpose: The aim of the study is to evaluate the petroleum product consumption performances of seven alternative regions using the Improved CRITIC Weighted VIKOR Method and to explain the relationship of the evaluation results with the World crude oil, condensate production and its logistics.

Design/Methodology: Criteria weights were determined according to Entropy, Traditional CRITIC and Improved CRITIC methods to compare with each other and the consumption performance ranking of the alternatives was performed by using the Improved CRITIC Method weight values in the VIKOR method.

Findings: As the VIKOR Method consensus solution set, were reached basis findings that to be Africa, Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and South and Central America were in the first three places, respectively, and in the rank that is obtained by using Qi values to be Europe, Middle East, North America and Asia Pacific were in the 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th places, respectively.

Limitations: Six different petroleum product groups were appreciated as sample in the study. Other petroleum product groups and other factors (price, quality, etc.) excluded from the sample will also be able to influence consumption performance. This situation can be considered a limitation of the study.

Originality/Value: The unique value of the study is that the criteria weights are determined according to three different methods, and the VIKOR Method is used in a way that would be benefit the suppliers of crude oil, condensate and petroleum products.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Production Management , Logistics Management , Multi Criteria Decision Making , Improved CRITIC Weighting Method , VIKOR Method

Petrol Ürünleri Tüketim Performanslarının Geliştirilmiş CRITIC Ağırlıklandırmalı VIKOR Yöntemi ile Değerlendirilmesi: Bir Üretim ve Lojistik Perspektifi

Öz

Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı, yedi alternatif bölgenin petrol ürünleri tüketim performanslarını Geliştirilmiş CRITIC Ağırlıklandırmalı VIKOR Yöntemi ile değerlendirmek ve değerlendirme sonuçlarının Dünya ham petrol, kondensat üretimi ve lojistiği ile ilişkisini açıklamaktır.

Tasarım/Yöntem: Kriter ağırlıkları; birbirleriyle karşılaştırmak için Entropi, Geleneksel CRITIC ve Geliştirilmiş CRITIC yöntemlerine göre belirlenmiş ve Geliştirilmiş CRITIC Yöntemi ağırlık değerleri VIKOR yönteminde kullanılarak alternatiflere ait tüketim performans sıralaması gerçekleştirilmiştir.

Bulgular: VIKOR Yöntemi uzlaşma çözüm kümesi olarak, ilk üç sırada sırasıyla Afrika’nın, Bağımsız Devletler Topluluğu (CIS)’nun ve Güney ve Orta Amerika’nın ve Qi değerleri kullanılarak elde edilen sıralamada 4.,5.,6. ve 7. sıra olarak sırasıyla Avrupa’nın, Orta Doğu’nun, Kuzey Amerika’nın ve Asya Pasifik’in yer aldığı temel bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır.

Sınırlılıklar: Çalışmada altı farklı petrol ürün grubu örneklem olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Örneklem dışında kalan diğer petrol ürün grupları ve diğer faktörler (fiyat, kalite vb.) de ilgili tüketim performansını etkileyebilecektir. Bu durum çalışmanın bir sınırlılığı olarak değerlendirilebilir.

Özgünlük/Değer: Çalışmanın özgün değeri, kriter ağırlıklarının üç farklı yönteme göre belirlenmesi ve VIKOR Yönteminin ham petrol, kondensat ve petrol ürünleri tedarikçilerine fayda sağlayacak şekilde kullanılmasıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Üretim Yönetimi , Lojistik Yönetimi , Çok Kriterli Karar Verme , Geliştirilmiş CRITIC Ağırlıklandırma Yöntemi , VIKOR Yöntemi

Kaynakça

• Abdel-Basset, M. & Mohamed, R. (2020). A novel plithogenic TOPSIS- CRITIC model for sustainable supply chain risk management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119586, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119586
• Akdamar, E., Akgül, E. F., Gögebakan, M. & Işık, E. (2024). Temporal Analysis of Factors Influencing Countries’ Maritime Trade Performance with CRITIC-based VIKOR Method. Journal of ETA Maritime Science, 12(2), 213-223. https://doi.org/10.4274/jems.2024.55798
• Alrababah, S. A. A. & Gan, K. H. (2023). Effects of the Hybrid CRITIC–VIKOR Method on Product Aspect Ranking in Customer Reviews. Applied Sciences, 13(16), 9176, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13169176
• Amin, F. u., Dong, Q.-L., Grzybowska, K., Ahmed, Z. & Yan, B.-R. (2022). A Novel Fuzzy-Based VIKOR–CRITIC Soft Computing Method for Evaluation of Sustainable Supply Chain Risk Management. Sustainability, 14(5), 2827, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052827
• Ayçin, E. (2023). Çok Kriterli Karar Verme: Bilgisayar Uygulamalı Çözümler (Genişletilmiş 3. Basım), Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Chen, Y.-L., Shen, S.-L. & Zhou, A. (2022). Assessment of red tide risk by integrating CRITIC weight method, TOPSIS-ASSETS method, and Monte Carlo simulation. Environmental Pollution, 314, 120254, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120254
• Demir, H. (2021), Irak Enerji Kaynaklarının Yönetimi: Anayasal Tartışmalar İhtilaflar Türkiye ile İlişkiler (Birinci Baskı), Anlam Yayımcılık.
• Deste, M. & Gül Savaşkan, A. (2021). E-Ticaret İşletmelerinin Kargo Firması Seçimi Üzerine VIKOR Yöntemiyle Bir Uygulama. Uluslararası Anadolu Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(1), 4-21. https://doi.org/10.47525/ulasbid.818878
• Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G. & Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H
• Elsotohy, A. M., Soliman, A. M. A., Adail, A. S., Eisa, A. A. & Othman, E.-S. A. (2023). Comprehensive power quality performance assessment for electrical system of a nuclear research reactor. Scientific Reports, Volume 13, 9915, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36692-2
• Energy Institute, (2025). 2025 ∣ 74th edition Statistical Review of World Energy. 8 Temmuz 2025 tarihinde https://www.energyinst.org/statistical-review/resources-and-data-downloads adresinden erişildi.
• Feng, Z., Li, G., Wang, W., Zhang, L., Xiang, W., He, X., Zhang, M. & Wei, N. (2023). Emergency logistics centers site selection by multi-criteria decision-making and GIS. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Volume 96, 103921, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103921
• Gao, X., Guan, Y., Sun, D., Liu, L., Yang, J., Wang, Z., Guo, Z., Wang, Y. & Gong, G. (2022). An Ecological, Power Lean, Comprehensive Marketing Evaluation System Based on DEMATEL–CRITIC and VIKOR: A Case Study of Power Users in Northeast China. Energies, 15(11), 3986, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15113986
• Ghosh, S., Raut, R. D., Cheikhrouhou, N., Sinha, S. & Ray, A. (2023). Attaining Sustainable Development Goals through embedding circular economy principles: Evidence from food processing small- and medium-sized enterprises in India. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(3), 2193–2224. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3591
• Hacıfettahoğlu, Ö. & Perçin S. (2020). Bütünleşik ÇKKV yaklaşımı ile finansal boyutta Türk inşaat firmalarının performansının değerlendirilmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22 (2), 543-567. http://dx.doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.512472
• İnanır, M., & Deste, M. (2021). KBRN Personel Koruyucu Elbise Seçimi Üzerine AHP ve VIKOR Yöntemleriyle Bir Uygulama. R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal, 4(3), 207-221. https://doi.org/10.33723/rs.958894
• Jahan, A., Mustapha, F., Ismail, M. Y., Sapuan, S. M. & Bahraminasab, M. (2011). A comprehensive VIKOR method for material selection. Materials & Design, 32(3), 1215-1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.10.015
• Karaman, B. & Çerçioğlu, H. (2015). 0-1 Hedef Programlama Destekli Bütünleşik AHP–VIKOR Yöntemi: Hastane Yatırımı Projeleri Seçimi. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(4), 567-576. Kuleli, Ö. (1981). Petrol Arıtım Teknolojisi (Birinci Baskı), Çağlayan Kitabevi.
• Kumaran, S. (2022). Financial performance index of IPO firms using VIKOR-CRITIC techniques. Finance Research Letters, Volume 47, Part A, 102542, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102542
• Li, X., Han, Z., Yazdi, M. & Chen, G. (2022). A CRITIC-VIKOR based robust approach to support risk management of subsea pipelines. Applied Ocean Research, Volume 124, 103187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2022.103187
• Mahmood, T., Ali, Z. & Naeem, M. (2023). Aggregation operators and CRITIC‐VIKOR method for confidence complex q‐rung orthopair normal fuzzy information and their applications. CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology, 8(1), 40-63. https://doi.org/10.1049/cit2.12146
• Ocampo, L., Aro, J. L., Evangelista, S. S., Maturan, F., Casinillo, L., Yamagishi, K. & Selerio Jr., E. (2023). Composite ecotourism potential index based on an integrated stochastic CRITIC-weighted sum method. Current Issues in Tourism, 26(15), 2513–2542. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2022.2090906
• Opricovic, S. & Tzeng, G.-H. (2002). Multicriteria Planning of Post-Earthquake Sustainable Reconstruction. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 17(3), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8667.00269
• Opricovic, S. & Tzeng, G.-H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
• Ou Yang, Y.-P., Shieh, H.-M. & Tzeng, G.-H. (2013). A VIKOR technique based on DEMATEL and ANP for information security risk control assessment. Information Sciences, Volume 232, 482–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.09.012
• Özsoy, O. (2014). İktisatçılar ve İşletmeciler İçin İstatistik (4. Baskı), Siyasal Kitabevi.
• Peteiro-Barral, D., Remeseiro, B., Méndez, R. & Penedo, M. G. (2017). Evaluation of an automatic dry eye test using MCDM methods and rank correlation. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, Volume 55, 527–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-016-1534-5
• Qi, Y., Han, J., Lu, X., Wang, Z., Ren, H. & Zhang, X. (2024). A study on satisfaction evaluation of Chinese mainstream short video platforms based on grounded theory and CRITIC-VIKOR. Heliyon, 10(9), e30050, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30050
• Raad, N. G. (2019). A strategic approach to tourism development barriers in Iran. Journal of Tourism & Hospitality, 8(3), 410, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.35248/2167-0269.19.8.410
• Saraji, M. K., Aliasgari, E. & Streimikiene, D. (2023). Assessment of the challenges to renewable energy technologies adoption in rural areas: A Fermatean CRITIC-VIKOR approach. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Volume 189, 122399, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122399
• Sayadi, M. K., Heydari, M. & Shahanaghi, K. (2009). Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem with interval numbers. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33(5), 2257–2262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2008.06.002
• Shekhovtsov, A. & Sałabun, W. (2020). A comparative case study of the VIKOR and TOPSIS rankings similarity. Procedia Computer Science, 176, 3730–3740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.014
• Shi, H., Li, Y., Jiang, Z. & Yan, J. (2020). Comprehensive evaluation of power quality for microgrid based on CRITIC method. 2020 IEEE 9th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (IPEMC2020-ECCE Asia), Nanjing, China, ss. 1667-1669, https://doi.org/10.1109/IPEMC-ECCEAsia48364.2020.9368175
• Tabak, Ç., Yıldız, K. & Yerlikaya, M. A. (2019). Logistic location selection with CRITIC-AHP and VIKOR integrated approach. Data Science and Applications, 2(1), 21-25.
• Tripathi, D. K., Nigam, S. K., Cavallaro, F., Rani, P., Mishra, A. R. & Hezam, I. M. (2023). A Novel CRITIC‑RS‑VIKOR Group Method with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information for Renewable Energy Sources Assessment. Group Decision and Negotiation, Volume 32, 1437–1468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-023-09849-7
• Uğur, L. O., Erdal, M. & Üçkardeşler, A. (2018). Çatı Kaplama Malzemesi Seçiminde VIKOR Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yönteminin Uygulanması. İleri Teknoloji Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 117-130.
• Wen, X., Nie, Y., Du, Z. & Huang, L. (2022). Operational safety assessment of straddle-type monorail vehicle system based on cloud model and improved CRITIC method. Engineering Failure Analysis, 139, 106463, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106463
• Weng, X. & Yang, S. (2022). Private-Sector Partner Selection for Public-Private Partnership Projects Based on Improved CRITIC-EMW Weight and GRA -VIKOR Method. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Volume 2022, Article ID 9374449, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9374449
• Yang, K., Duan, T., Feng, J. & Mishra, A. R. (2022). Internet of things challenges of sustainable supply chain management in the manufacturing sector using an integrated q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy-CRITIC-VIKOR method. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 35(4/5), 1011-1039. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-06-2021-0261
• Yupapin, P., Trabelsi, Y., Nattappan, A. & Boopathi, S. (2023). Performance Improvement of Wire‑Cut Electrical Discharge Machining Process Using Cryogenically Treated Super‑Conductive State of Monel‑K500 Alloy. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Mechanical Engineering, Volume 47, 267-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40997-022-00513-0
• Zafar, S., Alamgir, Z. & Rehman, M. H. (2021). An effective blockchain evaluation system based on entropy-CRITIC weight method and MCDM techniques. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 14(5), 3110–3123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-021-01173-8
• Zhang, Y., Yu, Z., Zhang, J. & Zhang, W. (2024). Research on China’s regional carbon quota allocation based on the entropy weight‑TOPSIS method and CRITIC‑VIKOR model. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23 pages, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04804-1
• Zhao, G., Kang, T., Guo, J., Zhang, R. & Li, L. (2019). Gray Relational Analysis Optimization for Coalbed Methane Blocks in Complex Conditions Based on a Best Worst and Entropy Method. Applied Sciences, 9(23), 5033, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9235033