COVID-19 PANDEMİSİ SIRASINDA SAĞLIK ÇALIŞANLARI ARASINDA TAMAMLAYICI VE ALTERNATİF TIP KULLANIMININ ÖNGÖRÜCÜLERİ: MODEL TABANLI BİR ÇALIŞMA

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışma, sağlık profesyonelleri arasında sadece COVID-19 pandemisi sırasında ortaya çıkan tamamlayıcı ve alternatif tıp kullanımına zemin hazırlayan, kolaylaştırıcı ve ihtiyaca dayalı faktörlerin etkilerini araştırmak amacıyla yapıldı. Yöntem: Bu çalışma tanımlayıcı bir tasarımla yürütüldü. Öz yeterliği değerlendirmek için Genel Öz-Yeterlilik Ölçeği, korkuyu değerlendirmek için Koronavirüs Korku Ölçeği, tutumu değerendirmek için Bütünsel Tamamlayıcı ve Alternatif Tıp Anketi kullanıldı. Toplamda 374 sağlık çalışanı dahil edildi. Veriler, tamamlayıcı ve alternatif tıp Sağlık Modeli'ne dayalı olarak toplandı. Verilerin analizinde nicel veriler için ortalama ve standart sapma, kategorik veriler için yüzde verildi. Ayrıca, multinomial lojistik regresyon analizi yapıldı. Bulgular: Sağlık çalışanlarının %53.2'si COVID-19 pandemisi sırasında en az bir tamamlayıcı ve alternatif tıp formu kullandığını bildirdi. Tamamlayıcı ve alternatif tıp kullanımı, zemin hazırlayan faktörlerde cinsiyet, Koronovirüs Korku Ölçeği ve Bütünsel Tamamlayıcı ve Alternatif Tıp Anketi puanları arasında bir ilişki gösterdi. Kolaylaştırıcı faktörlerde tamamlayıcı ve alternatif tıp kullanımı ile meslek arasında bir ilişki gözlendi. Tamamlayıcı ve alternatif tıp kullanımı, ihtiyaca dayalı faktörler içinde işyerinin doğasıyla ilişkili bulundu. Tamamlayıcı ve alternatif tıp kullanımı, COVID-19 kliniğinde sağlık çalışanlarının yaşı, medeni durumu, eğitim düzeyi, çalışma süresi, kronik durumları, COVID-19 tanısı, çalışma durumu ve Genel Öz-Yeterlilik Ölçeği puanları ile ilişki göstermedi. Sonuç: Bu çalışma, COVID-19 ile ilişkili korku ve tamamlayıcı ve alternatif tıbba karşı olumlu tutumun, tamamlayıcı ve alternatif tıp kullanımının artmasına neden olduğu sonucuna varıldı. Yoğun bakımda çalışan sağlık çalışanlarında, kadın sağlık çalışanlarında ve hemşirelerde tamamlayıcı ve alternatif tıp kullanımının diğerlerine göre daha fazla olduğu görüldü.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tamamlayıcı Tedaviler
• Sağlık Personeli
• COVID-19
• Öz-Yeterlilik

PREDICTORS OF COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE USE AMONG HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: A QUANTITATIVE STUDY

Öz

Objective: This research was aimed to investigate the effects of need-based, enabling, and predisposing factors on the use of complementary and alternative medicine that emerged only during the COVID-19 pandemic among healthcare professionals. Method: This study was conducted with a descriptive design. The General Self-Efficacy Scale was used to assess self-efficacy, the Coronavirus Fear Scale was used to assess fear, and the Holistic Complementary and Alternative Medicine Questionnaire was used to assess attitude. In total, 374 healthcare professionals were included. Data were collected according to the complementary and alternative medicine Healthcare Model. In the analysis of the data, mean and standard deviation (SD) are given for quantitative data and percentage is given for categorical data. In addition, multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed. Results: 53.2% of the healthcare professionals reported the use of at least one form of complementary and alternative medicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. The use of complementary and alternative medicine showed a relationship between gender, the Coronavirus Fear Scale and the Holistic Complementary and Alternative Medicine Questionnaire scores in predisposing factors. An association between the use of complementary and alternative medicine and the occupation in enabling factors was observed. The use of complementary and alternative medicine was found related to the nature of the workplace in need-based factors. The use of complementary and alternative medicine showed no association with age, marital status, education level, working time, chronic conditions, COVID-19 diagnosis, working status and General Self-Efficacy scores of the healthcare professionals in the COVID-19 clinic. Conclusion: This study concluded that fear associated with COVID-19 and a positive attitude toward complementary and alternative medicine resulted in increased use of complementary and alternative medicine. It was observed that the use of complementary and alternative medicine in health workers working in intensive care, female health workers and nurses was higher than the others.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Complementary Therapies
• Health Personnel
• COVID-19
• Self-Efficacy

Kaynakça

1. Erdem H, Lucey DR. Healthcare worker infections and deaths due to COVID-19: A survey from 37 nations and a call for WHO to post national data on their website. Int J Infect Dis. 2021;102:239-241.
2. Jung J, Kim SK, Lee Y, Park S, Lim YJ, Kim EO, Kim SH. Rates of COVID-19 Infection Among Healthcare Workers in Designated COVID-19 Wards and General Wards. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2022;37(43):e308.
3. Gallasch, C, Cunha MLD, Pereira LDS, Silva-Junior JS. Prevention related to the occupational exposure of health professionals workers in the COVID-19 scenario. Rev enferm UERJ. 2020;28:e49596.
4. Tariq R, Hamid H, Mashood S, et al. Common misconceptions regarding COVID-19 among health care professionals: an online global cross-sectional survey. Journal of Oral Research. 2020;(2):36-45.
5. Lindquist R, Tracy MF, Snyder M. Complementary & alternative therapies in nursing. 8th ed. Springer Publishing Company, 2018.
6. Pal SK. Complementary and alternative medicine: an overview. Current Science. 2002:518-524.
7. Eardley S, Bishop FL, Prescott P, Cardini F, Brinkhaus B, Santos-Rey K, et al. A systematic literature review of complementary and alternative medicine prevalence in EU. Complementary Medicine Research. 2012;19(S2):18-28.
8. Fouladbakhsh JM, Stommel M. Gender, symptom experience, and use of complementary and alternative medicine practices among cancer survivors in the US cancer population. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2010;37(1):E7-E15.

9. Montazeri A, Sajadian A, Ebrahimi M, et al. Factors predicting the use of complementary and alternative therapies among cancer patients in Iran. Eur J Cancer Care. 2007;16(2):144-149.
10. Broche-Pérez Y, Fernández-Fleites Z, Jiménez-Puig E, et al. Gender and fear of COVID-19 in a Cuban population sample. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022;20(1):83-91.
11. Mertens G, Gerritsen L, Duijndam S, et al. Fear of the coronavirus (COVID-19): Predictors in an online study conducted in March 2020. J Anxiety Disord. 2020;74:102258.
12. Doshi D, Karunakar P, Sukhabogi JR, et al. Assessing coronavirus fear in Indian population using the fear of COVID-19 scale. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2021;19:2383-2391.
13. Bakioğlu F, Korkmaz O, Ercan H. Fear of COVID-19 and positivity: Mediating role of intolerance of uncertainty, depression, anxiety, and stress. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2021;19;2369-2382.
14. Salman M, Mustafa Z, Asif N, et al. Knowledge, attitude and preventive practices related to COVID-19 among health professionals of Punjab province of Pakistan. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2020;14(07):707-712.
15. Ayre M, Tyson G. The role of self-efficacy and fear-avoidance beliefs in the prediction of disability. Aust Psychol. 2001:36(3):250-253.
16. Ho SM, Kwong-Lo RS, Mak CW, Wong JS. Fear of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) among health care workers. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005;73(2):344.
17. Eller LS, Lev EL, Yuan C, Watkins AV. Describing self‐care self‐efficacy: Definition, measurement, outcomes, and implications. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2018;29(1):38-48.
18. Sun Y, Song H, Liu H, et al. Occupational stress, mental health, and self-efficacy among community mental health workers: A cross-sectional study during COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2021;67(6):737-746.
19. Clayton K, Luxford Y, Stupans I. Decision-making factors of pharmacy customers purchasing over-the-counter complementary and alternative medicine for stress. Adv Integr Med. 2017;4(3):103-108.
20. Fouladbakhsh JM, Stommel M. Using the behavioral model for complementary and alternative medicine: The CAM healthcare model. J Complement Integr Med. 2007;4(1):1-19.
21. Aypay A. The Adaptation Study of General Self-Efficacy (GSE) Scale to Turkish. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education (INUJFE). 2010;11(2):113-131.
22. Erci B. Attitudes towards holistic complementary and alternative medicine: a sample of healthy people in Turkey. J Clin Nurs. 2007;16(4):761-768.
23. Şengün F, Üstün B, Bademli K. Exploration of Theory/Model Based Nursing Research In Turkey. Journal of Nursology. 2013;16:132-139.
24. Murphy F, Williams A, Pridmore JA. Nursing models and contemporary nursing 1: their development, uses and limitations. Nursing Times. 2010;106(23):18-20.
25. Jeon SR, Kang JW, Ang L, Lee HW, Lee MS, Kim TH. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) interventions for COVID-19: an overview of systematic reviews. Integrative medicine research. 2022;11(3):100842.
26. Paudyal V, Sun S, Hussain R, Abutaleb MH, Hedima EW. Complementary and alternative medicines use in COVID-19: A global perspective on practice, policy and research. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 2022;18(3):2524-2528.
27. Dehghan M, Ghanbari A, Heidari FG, Shahrbabaki PM, Zakeri MA. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in general population during COVID-19 outbreak: A survey in Iran. Journal of integrative medicine. 2022;20(1):45-51.
28. Teke N, Özer Z, Bahçecioğlu Turan G. Analysis of health care personnel's attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine and life satisfaction due to COVID-19 pandemic. Holist Nurs Pract. 2021;35(2):98-107.
29. Fan Y, Gu S, Alemi SF. Chinese herbal medicine for COVID-19: Current evidence with systematic review and meta-analysis. J Integr Med. 2020;18(5):385-394.
30. Ang L, Song E, Lee HW, Lee MS. Herbal medicine for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Med. 2020;9(5):1583.
31. Zhang Y, Leach MJ, Hall H, et al. Differences between male and female consumers of complementary and alternative medicine in a national US population: a secondary analysis of 2012 NIHS data. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015:1-10.
32. Awad A, Al-Ajmi S, Waheedi M. Knowledge, perceptions and attitudes toward complementary and alternative therapies among Kuwaiti medical and pharmacy students. Med Princ Pract. 2012;21(4):350-354.
33. Muller J. Forms of knowledge and curriculum coherence. Journal of Education and work. 2009;22(3):205-226.
34. Alyami HS, Orabi MA, Aldhabbah FM, Alturki HN, Aburas WI, Alfayez AI, et al. Knowledge about COVID-19 and beliefs about and use of herbal products during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, 2020;28(11):1326-1332.
35. Yılmaz MÇ, Uysal N. Klinisyen hemşirelerde COVID-19 korkusu ve mesleğe bağlılık düzeyinin belirlenmesi. Ordu Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Çalışmaları Dergisi, 2021;4(3):316-325.
36. Taspinar B, Taspinar F, Gulmez H, Kizilirmak AS. Fizyoterapistlerde COVID-19 Korkusu ve Yaşam Kalitesi Arasındaki İlişki. Forbes Journal of Medicine. 2021;2(2).
37. Yıldırım M, Geçer E, Akgül Ö. The impacts of vulnerability, perceived risk, and fear on preventive behaviours against COVID-19. Psychol Health Med. 2021;26(1):35-43.
38. Caycho-Rodríguez T, Valencia PD, Vilca LW, et al. Cross-cultural measurement invariance of the fear of COVID-19 scale in seven Latin American countries. Death Stud. 2021:1-15.
39. Shaukat R, Asghar A, Naveed MA. Impact of health literacy on fear of covid-19, protective behavior, and conspiracy beliefs: university students’ perspective. Library Philosophy and Practice. 2021;4620:1-14.
40. Gör F, Duru Aşiret G. Hemşirelerin COVID-19’a Yönelik Tamamlayıcı ve Alternatif Tedavi Kullanım Durumu ve Tutumu. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 2022;15(2):117-127.
41. Shorofi SA, Arbon P. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among Australian hospital-based nurses: knowledge, attitude, personal and professional use, reasons for use, CAM referrals, and socio-demographic predictors of CAM users. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2017;27:37-45.
42. Wallston BS, Wallston KA. Social psychological models of health behavior: An examination and integration, Handbook of Psychology and Health (Volume IV). Routledge, 2020.
43. Özkan ÜF. Covid-19 Salgını Sürecinde İntörn Hemşirelerde Genel Özyeterlilik ve Mesleki Hazıroluşluk Durumu. Sosyal Araştırmalar ve Davranış Bilimleri. 2022;8(16):79-92.
44. Chang HYA, Wallis M, Tiralongo E. Predictors of complementary and alternative medicine use by people with type 2 diabetes. J Adv Nurs. 2012;68(6):1256-1266.
45. Gómez-Ochoa SA, Franco OH, Rojas LZ, et al. COVID-19 in health-care workers: a living systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence, risk factors, clinical characteristics, and outcomes. Am J Epidemiol. 2021;190(1):161-175.
46. Balouchi A, Mahmoudirad G, Hastings-Tolsma M, et al. Knowledge, attitude and use of complementary and alternative medicine among nurses: A systematic review. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2018;31:146-157.
47. Cutshall S, Derscheid D, Miers AG, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and use of complementary and alternative therapies among clinical nurse specialists in an academic medical center. Clin Nurse Spec. 2010;24(3):125-131.
48. Tracy MF, Lindquist R, Savik K, et al. Use of complementary and alternative therapies: a national survey of critical care nurses. Am J Crit Care. 2005;14(5):404-415.