Stories that trigger challenging experiences of failure, abandonment, rejection, and criticism in romantic relationships

Yıl 2023, , 351 - 368, 25.12.2023

Gamze Şen

https://doi.org/10.57127/kpd.26024438.1274739

Öz

Kiesler's (1983) Interpersonal Cycle Model has become a powerful tool for conceptualizing, organizing, and evaluating interpersonal tendencies in recent years. Accordingly, the Interpersonal Cyclical Model provides a theoretical basis for the nature of relationships and thus facilitates an understanding of 'self' and 'the others’' relationships. The first of the two main purposes of our study was to create valid and reliable stories about the four themes (failure, abandonment, rejection, and criticism) that we define as challenging life events. The second one offered a theoretical example of these stories in interpersonal relations, based on the model. For this purpose, two different samples were defined. In the first, twelve stories were created, inspired by sample situations of failure, abandonment, rejection, and criticism, received from a total of 40 people aged between 18-35 (age: M = 25.46, SD = 1.66). The level of representation of the target theme of the stories was examined by three judges and ten reviewers who are experts in clinical psychology. To test the effectiveness of the scenarios, five judges with theoretical knowledge on Interpersonal Schemas. Secondly, three separate judges were involved to evaluate their codability in accordance with the model. At this stage, the intraclass correlation coefficient of reliability for all stories was found to be high and significant (ICC = .84 to .99, p = .025) according to the results of the pilot study, which was performed on 15 people (age: M = 22.43, SD = 3.87), seven of whom were male. It was decided that the psychometric properties of the Story Completion Inventory in Romantic Relationships were at levels that could be studied within the framework of Cognitive Interpersonal Theory and could be used in the literature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cognitive Interpersonal Model, failure, abandonment, rejection, criticism

Etik Beyan

This study was approved by Hacettepe University Ethics Committee (Date: 11.03.2016; Decision No: 35853178/433-464).

Teşekkür

This article is based on Gamze Şen's PhD dissertation titled “Narcissistic patterns and responses to distressing interpersonal experiences: An investigation on university sample based on cognitive interpersonal theory.”

Romantik ilişkilerde başarısızlık, terk edilme, reddedilme ve eleştirilmeye ilişkin zorlayıcı yaşantıları tetikleyen hikayeler

Öz

Kişilerarası Döngü Modeli son yıllarda kişilerarası eğilimleri kavramsallaştırmak, düzenlemek ve değerlendirmek için güçlü bir araç hâline gelmiştir. Buna göre, kişilerarası döngüsel model, ilişkilerin doğasına yönelik kuramsal bir zemin oluşturmayı ve bu yolla ‘ben’ ve ‘diğeri’ ilişkilerine ilişkin bir kavrayış sunmayı kolaylaştırmaktadır. Mevcut çalışmanın iki temel amacından ilki, zorlayıcı yaşam olayları olarak tanımladığımız dört temaya (başarısızlık, terk edilme, reddedilme ve eleştirilme) ilişkin geçerli ve güvenilir hikâyeler oluşturmaktır. İkincisi ise bu hikâyelerin kişilerarası ilişkilerde, Kutuplu Döngü Modeli temel alınarak, kuramsal çerçevede incelebilir bir örneğini sunmaktır. Bu amaca uygun olarak iki ayrı örneklem tanımlanmıştır. İlkinde, yaşları 18-35 arasında değişen toplamda 40 kişiden (yaş: Ort. = 25.46, SS = 1.66) alınan başarısızlık, terk edilme, reddedilme ve eleştirilmeye yönelik örnek durumlardan esinlenilerek on iki hikâye oluşturulmuştur. Hikâyelerin hedef temayı temsil etme düzeyi klinik psikoloji alanında uzman üç yargıcı ve on değerlendirici tarafından incelenmiştir. Bu aşamada hikâyelerin etkililiğini test etmek amacıyla, Kişilerarası Şemalar konusunda kuramsal bilgiye sahip beş yargıcı bulunmuştur. İkinci olarak, hikâyelere verilen yanıtların Kiesler’in (1983) Kutuplu Döngü Modeline uygun şekilde kodlanabilirliğinin değerlendirilmesi amacıyla üç ayrı yargıcıyla pilot uygulama yapılmıştır. Bu aşamada yedisi erkek 15 kişiye (yaş: Ort. = 22.43, SS = 3.87) yapılan pilot uygulama sonuçları ve yargıcılar arası tutarlılık değerlerine göre tüm hikâyeler için güvenirlik katsayısı yüksek ve anlamlı bulunmuştur (Sınıf İçi Korelasyon Katsayısı [SİKK] = .84 ile .99, p = .025). Romantik İlişkilerde Hikâye Tamamlama Envanterinin psikometrik özelliklerinin, Bilişsel Kişilerarası Kuram çerçevesinde incelenebilir düzeylerde olduğuna ve alanyazında kullanılabileceğine karar verilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bilişsel Kişilerarası Model, başarısızlık, terk edilme, reddedilme, eleştirilme

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma Hacettepe Üniversitesi Etik Komisyonu tarafından uygun bulunmuştur (11.03.2016; Karar No: 35853178/433-464).

Teşekkür

Bu makale, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Klinik Psikoloji Anabilim Dalına bağlı olarak Gamze Şen’in “Narsistik Örüntüler ve Zorlayıcı Kişile-rarası Deneyimlere Verilen Tepkiler: Bilişsel Kişilerarası Kuram Çerçevesinde Üniversite Öğrencileri Örnekleminde Bir İnceleme” başlıklı doktora tezinden üretilmiştir.

Kaynakça

• Akyunus, M. ve Gençöz, T. (2016). Kişilik bozukluğu inanışlarının Kişilerarası Döngüsel Model üzerindeki temsili. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 31(77) 1-7.
• Ayduk, O., May, D., Downey, G. ve Higgins, E. T. (2003). Tactical differences in coping with rejection sensitivity: The role of prevention pride. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(4), 435-448.
• Baldwin, M. W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 461-484.
• Besser, A. ve Priel, B. (2010). Grandiose narcissism versus vulnerable narcissism in threatening situations: Emotional reactions to achievement failure and interpersonal rejection. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29(8), 874-902.
• Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss, Vol. 1: Attachment. Basic Books.Boyacıoğlu, G. ve Savaşır, I. (1995). Kişilerarası Şemalar Ölçeği’nin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 10(35), 40-58.
• Brugnera, A., Coco, G. L., Salerno, L., Sutton, R., Gullo, S., Compare, A. ve Tasca, G. A. (2018). Patients with binge eating disorder and obesity have qualitatively different interpersonal characteristics: Results from an interpersonal circumplex study. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 85, 36-41.
• Cassidy, J. (1986). The ability to negotiate the environment: An aspect of infant competence related to quality of attachment. Child Development, 57, 121-135.
• Danziger, K. (2013). Interpersonal communication: Pergamon general psychology series (Vol. 53). Elsevier.
• de Vries, M. F. K. ve Miller, D. (1985). Narcissism and leadership: An object relations perspective. Human Relations, 38(6), 583-601.
• Dowgwillo, E. A., Roche, M. J. ve Pincus, A. L. (2018). Examining the interpersonal nature of Criterion A of the DSM–5 Section III Alternative Model for Personality Disorders using bootstrapped confidence intervals for the interpersonal circumplex. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(6), 581-592.
• Erdley, C. A., Loomis, C. C., Cain, K. M. ve Dumas-Hines, F. (1997). Relations among children's social goals, implicit personality theories, and responses to social failure. Developmental Psychology, 33(2), 263-272.
• Erickson, T. M., Newman, M. G., Peterson, J. ve Scarsella, G. (2015). Ambivalence about interpersonal problems and traits predicts cross‐situational variability of social behavior. Journal of Personality, 83(4), 429-440.
• Falconer, C. J., King, J. A. ve Brewin, C. R. (2015). Demonstrating mood repair with a situation‐based measure of self‐compassion and self‐criticism. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 88(4), 351-365.
• Gazelle, H. ve Druhen, M. J. (2009). Anxious solitude and peer exclusion predict social helplessness, upset affect, and vagal regulation in response to behavioral rejection by a friend. Developmental Psychology, 45(4), 1077-1096.
• Gibson, J. J. (2014). The ecological approach to visual perception: Classic edition. Psychology Press.
• Gould, D. (1996). Using vignettes to collect data for nursing research studies: How valid are the findings? Journal of Clinical Nursing, 5, 207-212.
• Gredecki, N. ve Ireland, J. L. (2012). Applications of interpersonal circumplex and complementarity theory to staff‐prisoner relationships. The British Journal of Forensic Practice. 14 (3), 180-191.
• Gurtman, M. B. (1992). Construct validity of interpersonal personality measures: The interpersonal circumplex as a nomological net. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(1), 105-118.
• Hammen, C. (2006). Stress generation in depression: Reflections on origins, research, and future directions. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(9), 1065-1082.
• Heerdink, M. W., van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C. ve Fischer, A. H. (2015). Emotional expressions as social signals of rejection and acceptance: Evidence from the affect misattribution paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 60-68.
• Hill, C. R. ve Safran, J. D. (1994). Assessing interpersonal schemas: Anticipated responses of significant others. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 13(4), 366-379.
• Hopwood, C. J., Ansell, E. B., Pincus, A. L., Wright, A. G., Lukowitsky, M. R. ve Roche, M. J. (2011). The circumplex structure of interpersonal sensitivities. Journal of Personality, 79(4), 707-740.
• Horn, S. A. (2016). The social and psychological costs of peer review: Stress and coping with manuscript rejection. Journal of Management Inquiry, 25(1), 11-26.
• Horowitz, L. M. ve Vitkus, J. (1986). The interpersonal basis of psychiatric symptoms. Clinical Psychology Review, 6(5), 443-469.
• Karaaziz, M. ve Atak, İ. E. (2013). Narsisizm ve narsisizmle ilgili araştırmalar üzerine bir gözden geçirme. Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi, 1(2), 44-55.
• Kiesler, D. J. (1983). The 1982 Interpersonal Circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. Psychological Review, 90(3), 185-214.
• Kiesler, D. J. (1996). Contemporary interpersonal theory and research: Personality, psychopathology, and psychotherapy. John Wiley & Sons.
• Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., Matsumoto, H. ve Norasakkunkit, V. (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6), 1245-1267.
• Klein, S. R., Renshaw, K. D. ve Curby, T. W. (2016). Emotion regulation and perceptions of hostile and constructive criticism in romantic relationships. Behavior Therapy, 47(2), 143-154.
• Koo, T. K. ve Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155-163.
• Leitenberg, H. (Ed.). (2013). Handbook of social and evaluation anxiety. Springer Science & Business Media.
• Lewin, K. (1958). Psychology of success and failure. C. L. Stacey ve M. DeMartino (Ed.), Understanding human motivation içinde (s. 223-228). Howard Allen Publishers.
• Liu, R. T. ve Alloy, L. B. (2010). Stress generation in depression: A systematic review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future study. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(5), 582-593.
• Markey, P. M. ve Markey, C. N. (2007). Romantic ideals, romantic obtainment, and relationship experiences: The complementarity of interpersonal traits among romantic partners. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24(4), 517-533.
• McArthur, L. Z. ve Baron, R. M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90(3), 215-238.
• Miller, J. D., Price, J., Gentile, B., Lynam, D. R. ve Campbell, W. K. (2012). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism from the perspective of the interpersonal circumplex. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(4), 507-512.
• Nygren, L. ve Oltedal, S. (2015). Constructing a vignette for qualitative comparative family research. Journal of Comparative Social Work, 10(1), 1-14.
• O’Brien, C. (2011). Young people’s comparisons of cross-gender and same-gender bullying in British secondary schools. Educational Research, 53(3), 257-301.
• Paulhus, D. L. ve Martin, C. L. (1988). Functional flexibility: A new conception of interpersonal flexibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(1), 88-101.
• Pincus, A. L. ve Gurtman, M. B. (2006). Interpersonal Theory and the interpersonal circumplex: Evolving perspectives on normal and abnormal personality. S. Strack (Ed.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality içinde (s. 83-111). Springer Publishing Company.
• Pincus, A. L. ve Hopwood, C. F. (2012). A contemporary interpersonal model of personality pathology and personality disorder. T. A. Widiger (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of personality disorders içinde (s. 372-398). Oxford University Press.
• Renshaw, K. D., Blais, R. K. ve Caska, C. M. (2010). Distinctions between hostile and nonhostile forms of perceived criticism from others. Behavior Therapy, 41(3), 364-374.
• Rygaard, N. P. (2020). Improving the mental health of abandoned children: Experiences from a global online intervention. American Psychologist, 75(9), 1376-1388.
• Safran, J. D. (1990). Towards a refinement of cognitive therapy in light of Interpersonal Theory: I. Theory. Clinical Psychology Review, 10(1), 87-105.
• Schoenberg, N. E. ve Ravdal, H. (2000). Using vignettes in awareness and attitudinal research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3(1), 63-74.
• Shaver, P. R. ve Mikulincer, M. (2006). Attachment theory, individual psychodynamics, and relationship functioning. A. L. Vangelisti ve D. Perlman (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships içinde (s. 251-271). Cambridge University Press.Simard, V., Moss, E. ve Pascuzzo, K. (2011). Early maladaptive schemas and child and adult attachment: A 15‐year longitudinal study. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 84(4), 349-366.
• Simpson, J. A. ve Rholes, W. S. (2012). Adult attachment orientations, stress, and romantic relationships. Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 45) içinde (s. 279-328). Academic Press.
• Soygüt, G. ve Türkçapar, H. (2001). Antisosyal kişilik bozukluğunda kişilerarası şema örüntüleri: Bilişsel kişilerarası bir bakış. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 16(47), 55-69.
• Stravakou, P. A. ve Lozgka, E. C. (2018). Vignettes in qualitative educational research: Investigating Greek school principals' values. Qualitative Report, 23(5), 1188-1207.
• Stecher, B., Le, V., Hamilton, L., Ryan, G., Robyn, A. ve Lockwood, J. R. (2006). Using structured classroom vignettes to measure instructional practices in mathematics. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(2), 101-130.
• Sullivan, H. S. (1953) Conceptions of Modern Psychiatry: The First William Alanson White Memorial Lectures. W. W. Norton & Co, NewYork
• Şen, G. (2019). Narsistik örüntüler ve zorlayıcı kişilerarası deneyimlere verilen tepkiler: Bilişsel Kişilerarası Kuram çerçevesinde üniversite öğrencileri örnekleminde bir inceleme (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Uhmann, S., Beesdo-Baum, K., Becker, E. S. ve Hoyer, J. (2010). Specificity of interpersonal problems in generalized anxiety disorder versus other anxiety disorders and depression. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 198(11), 846-851.
• Uluç, S. ve Öktem, F. (2009). Okul öncesi çocuklarda güvenli yer senaryolarının değerlendirilmesi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 24(63), 69-83.
• Vangelisti, A. L. ve Young, S. L. (2000). When words hurt: The effects of perceived intentionality on interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(3), 393-424.
• Whisman, M. A. ve Beach, S. R. H. (2010). Models for understanding interpersonal processes and relationships in anxiety disorders. J. G. Beck (Ed.), Interpersonal processes in the anxiety disorders: Implications for understanding psychopathology and treatment içinde (s. 9-35). American Psychological Association.
• Widiger, T. A. (2010). Personality, interpersonal circumplex, and DSM–5: A commentary on five studies. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92(6), 528-532.
• Yakın, D. (2014). Bağımlı kişilik örüntüsü ve terapötik işbirliği: Şema odaklı bilişsel davranışçı terapi uygulaması, Ayna Klinik Psikoloji Dergisi, 1(2), 1-13.