Media Literacy and Digital Citizenship: A Rationality of Exclusion by Inclusion

Yıl 2023, , 163 - 180, 29.09.2023

O. Özgür Güven

https://doi.org/10.53306/klujfeas.1343251

Öz

In today’s ever-expanding digital space, media literacy debates revolve around the question of information quality and the “appropriate” use of technology. These debates incorporate discursive constructs such as analytical thinking, informed citizenship, and cultural participation. The research question of this study is what this discourse signifies in neoliberal socio-economic order, where digital industries are aggressively promoted, and how to comprehend the rationales of media literacy for expressing the digital self. The analysis of the research question is rooted in Foucault's discussion of governmentality, which he uses to illustrate the mechanisms through which liberal doctrines organize the population based on economic processes. Media literacy has evolved into a hegemonic indicator of professional competence and social skills in today's world, where digitalization has taken on a fetishistic role. In this sense, it is assumed that media literacy, with its dominant discourses and practices, is linked to the objective of constructing subjectivity that provides internal coherence to the logic of neoliberal social and economic organization. An individual's economic and social cohesion relies on developing their literacy skills, i.e., enhancing their online experience. This perspective, viewing media literacy as the acquisition of a skill set, is founded on the notion that technology is a neutral category that individuals can employ to attain their objectives. Consequently, the political and economic agenda, wherein the utilization of digital technology becomes a citizen's responsibility, is affirmed; digitalization processes are excluded from discussions on inequality and injustice. As a result, within the power dynamics of the digital space that extends economic and social control, forms of relationships emerge in which subjects are marginalized despite their inclusion in the digital realm.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Media literacy, Digital citizenship, Governmentality, Neoliberal subjectivity, Digitalization

Medya Okuryazarlığı ve Dijital Vatandaşlık: Bir İçererek Dışlama Rasyonalitesi

Öz

Dijital uzamın giderek genişlediği günümüzde, medya okuryazarlığı tartışmaları analitik düşünme, bilinçli vatandaş, kültürel katılım gibi söylemsel yapılar üzerinden, bilginin niteliği sorununa ve teknolojinin “uygun” kullanımı meselesine odaklanmaktadır. Dijital endüstrilerin agresif bir şekilde teşvik edildiği neoliberal sosyo-ekonomik düzende bu söylemin ne anlama geldiği ve medya okuryazarlığının dijital benliği ifade etmeye dair rasyonellerini nasıl anlamak gerektiği bu çalışmanın sorunsalını oluşturmaktadır. Sorunsalın analizinde, Foucault’nun liberal doktrinlerin nüfusu ekonomik süreçlere göre düzenleme mekanizmalarını anlatmak için kullandığı yönetimsellik (governmentality) tartışması eksen alınmaktadır. Medya okuryazarlığı, dijitalleşmenin fetiş bir unsura dönüştüğü günümüzde, mesleki yeterlilik ve sosyal becerilerin hegemonik bir göstergesi haline gelmektedir. Bu anlamda, medya okuryazarlığının baskın söylem ve pratikleriyle, neoliberal sosyal ve ekonomik örgütlenme mantığına içsel tutarlılık sağlayan bir öznellik inşası hedefine bağlı olduğu varsayılmaktadır. Bireyin ekonomik ve sosyal uyumu, okuryazarlık becerilerini geliştirmesine, yani çevrimiçi deneyimini güncellemesine bağlıdır. Medya okuryazarlığını bir dizi beceri kazandırma meselesi olarak ele alan bu yaklaşım, teknolojinin insanların amaçlarına ulaşmak için kullanılabilecekleri nötr bir kategori olduğu varsayımına dayanmaktadır. Böylece, dijital teknoloji kullanımının bir vatandaşlık görevi haline getirildiği siyasi ve ekonomik gündem teyit edilmekte; dijitalleşme süreçleri, eşitsizlik ve adaletsizlikle ilgili tartışmaların dışında tutulmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, dijital uzamın ekonomik ve toplumsal kontrolü genişleten güç ilişkileri düzeninde, uyrukların dijital uzama dahil edilmek suretiyle dışlandıkları ilişki biçimleri mümkün hale gelmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Medya okuryazarlığı, Dijital vatandaşlık, Yönetimsellik, Neoliberal öznellik, Dijitalleşme

Kaynakça

• ALA. (1989). Final report. ALA Presidential Committee on Information Literacy. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
• Arke, E.T. (2012). Media literacy: History, Progress, and Future Hopes. K.E. Dill (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Media Psychology içinde (96-108). Oxford University Press.
• Aufderheide, P. (1993). Media Literacy: A Report of the National Leadership Conference on Media Literacy. Queenstown, MD: Aspen Institute. Çevrimiçi, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED365294 (Erişim: 28 Nisan 2023).
• Bejaković, P. & Mrnjavac, Ž. (2020). The İmportance Of Digital Literacy On The Labour Market. Employee Relations, 42(4), 921-932.
• Bromley, P., Meyer, J. W., & Jia, R. (2022). Entrepreneurship As Cultural Theme In Neoliberal Society. Entrepreneurialism and Society: New Theoretical Perspectives, 81, 55-75.
• Brown, W. (2018). Halkın Çözülüşü. (B.E. Aksoy, Çev.). Metis.
• Bulger, M. & Davison, P. (2018). The Promises, Challenges, and Futures of Media Literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 10(1), 1-21.
• Celot, P. (2012). EAVI Studies on Media Literacy in Europe. Medijske Studije, 3(6), 76-82.
• Commission For The European Communities. (2000). A Memorandum on Lifelong Learning, Brüksel. Çevrimiçi https://tinyurl.com/ebs75t3w (Erişim: 10 Mayıs 2023).
• Cordes, S. (2009, 23-27 Ağustos). Broad Horizons: The Role of Multimodal Literacy in 21st Century Library Instruction. World Library and Information Congress, 75th IFLA General Conference and Assembly. Milan, Italy.
• Davies, B. & Bansel, P. (2007). Neoliberalism and Education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(3), 247–259.
• Dean, M. (1995). Governing the Unemployed Self In An Active Society. Economy and Society, 24(4), 559–583.
• Druick, Z. (2016). The Myth of Media Literacy. International Journal Of Communication, 10, 20.
• Emejulu, A. & McGregor, C. (2019). Towards a Radical Digital Citizenship In Digital Education. Critical Studies in Education, 60(1), 131-147.
• European Commission. (2007). A European Approach to Media Literacy in the Digital Environment. Çevrimiçi https://tinyurl.com/4hv74es5 (Erişim: 02 Mayıs 2023).
• Foucault, M. (2000). Entelektüelin Siyasi İşlevi. I. Ergüden, O. Akınhay & F. Keskin (Çev.). Ayrıntı.
• Foucault, M. (2001). The Subject and Power. J. Faubion (Ed.) Michel Foucault: Power Essential Works içinde (326-348). New Press.
• Foucault, M. (2016). Güvenlik, Toprak, Nüfus. (F. Taylan, Çev.). İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• Fuchs, C. (2014). Digital Labour and Karl Marx. Routledge.
• Gorwa, R. (2019). What is Platform Governance? Information, Communication & Society, 22(6), 854–871.
• Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level Digital Divide: Differences in People’s Online Skills. First Monday, 7(4).
• Harvey, D. (2015). Neoliberalizmin Kısa Tarihi. (A. Onacak, Çev.). Sel.
• Hintz, A., Dencik, L., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2017). Digital Citizenship and Surveillance Society - Introduction. International Journal of Communication, 11, 731-739.
• Hobbs, R. (1998). The Seven Great Debates İn The Media Literacy Movement. Journal of Communication, 48(1), 16-32.
• Hobbs, R. (2017). Create to Learn: Introduction to Digital Literacy. Wiley.
• Hobbs, R. & Jensen, A. (2009). The Past, Present, and Future of Media Literacy Education. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 1(1), 1-11.
• Jarrett, K. (2016). Feminism, Labour and Digital Media: The Digital Housewife. Routledge.
• Knox, J. & Bayne, S. (2013). Multimodal profusion in the literacies of the Massive Open Online Course. Research in Learning Technology, 21.
• Koltay, T. (2011). The Media And The Literacies: Media Literacy, İnformation Literacy, Digital Literacy. Media, Culture & Society, 33(2), 211-221.
• Lemke, T. (2000, 21-24 Eylül). Foucault, Governmentality and Critique. Paper presented at the Rethinking Marxism Conference, University of Amherst (MA).
• Lemke, T. (2001). ‘The Birth of Bio-Politics’: Michel Foucault’s Lecture at the Collège de France on Neo-Liberal Governmentality. Economy and Society, 30(2), 190-207.
• Livingstone, S. (2004). Media Literacy And The Challenge Of New İnformation And Communication Technologies. Communication Review 7(1), 3–14.
• Marshall, T. H. (1992). Citizenship and Social Class. Pluto
• Martin, A. (2006). Literacies for the digital age. A. Martin & D. Madigan (Eds.), Digital Literacies for Learning içinde (3-25). Facet.
• Mihailidis, P. & Thevenin, B. (2013). Media Literacy As A Core Competency For Engaged Citizenship İn A Participatory Democracy. American Behavioral Scientist 57(11), 1611-1622.
• Milenkova, V. & Lendzhova, V. (2021). Digital Citizenship and Digital Literacy in the Conditions of Social Crisis. Computers, 10(4), 40.
• Olssen, M. (2006). Understanding The Mechanisms Of Neoliberal Control: Lifelong Learning, Flexibility And Knowledge Capitalism. International Journal of Lifelong education, 25(3), 213-230.
• Pangrazio, L. (2016). Reconceptualising Critical Digital Literacy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(2), 163-174.
• Pangrazio, L. & Sefton-Green, J. (2021). Digital Rights, Digital Citizenship and Digital Literacy: What’s the Difference?. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(1), 15-27.
• Pekman, C. (2004). Avrupa Birliği’nde Medya Okuryazarlığı. N. Türkoğlu (Ed.), Medya Okuryazarlığı içinde (16-25). Marmara Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Yayınları.
• Petranová, D., Hossová, M. & Velický, P. (2017). Current Development Trends Of Media Literacy in European Union Countries. Communication Today, 8(1), 52.
• Potter, W. J. (2010). The State of Media Literacy. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54(4), 675–696.
• Potter, W. J. (2018). Media literacy. Sage Publications.
• Rantala, L. & Suoranta, J. (2008). Digital Literacy Policies in the EU- Inclusive Partnership as the Final Stage of Governmentality?. Lankshare, C. & Knobel, M. (Eds), Digital Literacies içinde (91-117).
• Read,J. (2009). A Genealogy of Homo-Economicus: Neoliberalism and the Production of Subjectivity. Foucault Studies, 6, 25-36.
• Rose, N. (1999). Powers of Freedom, Cambridge University Press.
• Sanchez, C. & Dunning, D. (2018). Overconfidence among beginners: Is a little learning a dangerous thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(1), 10-28.
• Seale, J. & Dutton, W. (2012). Empowering the digitally excluded: Learning initiatives for (in)visible groups. Research in Learning Technology, 20.
• Share, J., Mamikonyan, T., & Lopez, E. (2019). Critical Media Literacy in Teacher Education, Theory, and Practice. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education.
• Shepherd, T. & Henderson, M. (2019). Digital literacy in digital strategy. Canadian Journal of Communication, 44(2), 51-56.
• Terranova, T. (2000). Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy. Social Text 63, 18(2), 33-58.
• The Economist. (2017). Fuel of the Future. The Economist, Mayıs 2017, 14-17.
• Tomasello, F. (2023). From İndustrial To Digital Citizenship: Rethinking Social Rights İn Cyberspace. Theory and Society, 52, 463–486.
• Wilson, C., Grizzle, A., Tuazon, R., Akyempong, K., & Cheung, C.K. (2011). Media and İnformation Literacy: Curriculum For Teachers. UNESCO.
• Zuboff, S. (2015). Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 75-89.