Uygulamalı Mühendislik Projelerinde Öğrenci Kabulü için AHP, TOPSIS ve MARCOS yöntemlerinin kullanıldığı Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yaklaşımı: Endüstri Mühendisliğinde Bir Vaka Çalışması

Öz

Uygulamalı mühendislik projeleri, mühendislik öğrencilerinin eğitimine ve profesyonel gelişimine katkıda bulunmaktadır. Projelerin başarısı ve tüm paydaşların yararı için, uygun öğrencilerin kabulü önemlidir. Bu çalışma, bu amaç için AHP, TOPSIS ve MARCOS metotlarının birleşimiyle etkili, sistemli ve adil bir yaklaşım öneriyor. Altı değerlendirme kriteri belirlendi: GNO, iletişim becerileri, birlikte çalışma kabiliyeti, devamlılık taahhüdü ve proje deneyimi. Kriter ağırlıkları AHP ile belirlenir. Daha sonra proje için aday öğrenciler TOPSIS ve MARCOS kullanılarak sıralanır. MARCOS, TOPSIS’I alternatifleri fayda-bazlı sıralayarak tamamlar. Önerilen yaklaşımın etkinliğini ve uygulanabilirliğini göstermek için yazar tarafından verilen “Endüstri Uygulamaları” dersine öğrenci seçimine yönelik vaka çalışması yapılmıştır. Duyarlılık analizleri yapıldı. TOPSIS ve MARCOS’un tutarlı sonuçları, duyarlılık sonuçları ile birlikte çalışmanın geçerliliğini ve gürbüzlüğünü göstermiştir. Bu çalışma, uygulamalı mühendislik projeleri için en uygun öğrencilerin kabulü için pratik ve kanıta dayalı bir yaklaşım öneriyor.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çok Kriterli Karar Verme
• AHP
• TOPSIS
• Öğrenci Kabulü
• Uygulamalı Mühendislik Projeleri

A Multi-Criteria Decision Making Framework for Student Admission in Applied Engineering Projects Using AHP, TOPSIS and MARCOS: A Case Study in the Industrial Engineering Department

Öz

Applied engineering projects contribute to the education and professional development of engineering students. For the success of projects and benefit of all stakeholders, admission of suitable students is essential. This study offers an effective, structured and fair approach by combining Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to Compromise Solution (MARCOS) methods for this purpose. Six evaluation criteria are determined: GPA, communication skills, collaborative working ability, attendance commitment, compatibility of student with project and project experience. The weights of the criteria are determined using AHP. Then candidate students for the projects are ranked using TOPSIS and MARCOS. MARCOS complements TOPSIS by providing a utility-based ranking of alternatives. The case study was conducted for student admission for “Industry Applications” project-based elective course taught by the author to illustrate the practicality and effectiveness of the proposed approach. Sensitivity analyses were conducted. The consistent ranking results of TOPSIS and MARCOS along with the sensitivity analysis results demonstrate the robustness and the validity of the proposed approach. This study presents a practical and evidence-based framework for the admission of the most appropriate students for applied engineering projects.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Multi Criteria Decision Making
• AHP
• TOPSIS
• Student Admission
• MARCOS
• Applied Engineering Projects

Kaynakça

1. Abd Aziz, K. A., Idris, M. F. I. M., Daud, W. S. W., & Fauzi, M. M. (2023). Application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) for the selection of best student award. Journal of Computing Research and Innovation, 8(2), 80-90.
2. Aczél, J., & Saaty, T. L. (1983). Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgements. Journal of mathematical Psychology, 27(1), 93-102.
3. Almulla, M. A. (2020). The effectiveness of the project-based learning (PBL) approach as a way to engage students in learning. Sage Open, 10(3), 2158244020938702.
4. Arslantaş, O., Gümüş, M., & Özder, E. H. (2023). Scholarship recipient selection for higher education with AHP, SAW and TOPSIS. Journal of Turkish Operations Management, 7(2), 1685-1700.
5. Aydoğan, R., & Yıldız, Y. (2023). Lisansüstü eğitimde öğrenci özelliklerinin analitik hiyerarşi süreci (AHP) ile analizi. Mediterranean Journal of Sport Science, 6(1-Cumhuriyet'in 100. Yılı Özel Sayısı), 1177-1193.
6. Badi, I., Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., & Muhammad, L. J. (2023). Wind farm site selection using BWM-AHP-MARCOS method: A case study of Libya. Scientific African, 19, e01511.
7. Bagi, Y. S., Suyono, S., & Tomatala, M. F. (2020, October). Decision support system for high achieving students selection using AHP and TOPSIS. In 2020 2nd international conference on cybernetics and intelligent system (ICORIS) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
8. Baki, N. A., Norddin, N. I., & Azaman, W. A. W. (2017). Application of analytic hierarchy process for selecting best student. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences, 7(1), 69-73.

9. Chavira, D. A. G., Lopez, J. C. L., Noriega, J. J. S., & Retamales, J. L. P. (2017, July). A multicriteria outranking modeling approach for personnel selection. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (fuzz-IEEE) (pp. 1-6).
10. Dachi, S. W. (2022). Design of Decision Support System for Selection of Outstanding Students Using AHP and Promethee Methods. Al'adzkiya International of Computer Science and Information Technology (AIoCSIT) Journal, 3(2), 46-57.
11. Gelgör, E., & Can, S. P. (2025). Decision making in bank personnel selection using the analytical hierarchy process. Information Technology in Economics and Business, 2(1), 12-17.
12. Lia Hananto, A., Priyatna, B., Fauzi, A., Yuniar Rahman, A., Pangestika, Y., & Tukino. (2021, June). Analysis of the best employee selection decision support system using analytical hierarchy process (ahp). In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1908, No. 1, p. 012023). IOP Publishing.
13. Hidayat, A., Rahmayanti, S. N., & Amalya, F. (2026). Leadership Support System for the Selection of Outstanding Students Using the MAUT Method. Bulletin of Computer Science Research, 6(2), 594-604.
14. Indarso, T. P., & Taurusta, C. (2025). Application Decision support System for superior and high Achieving using the Analytical Hierarchy Process Method. Journal of Informatics Information System Software Engineering and Applications (INISTA), 7(2), 213-222.
15. Mynit, K. K. (2019). Multi Criteria Decision Making Methodology On Selection Of A Student For All Round Excellent Award. Published In International Journal Of Trend In Scientific Research And Development, (5), 711-717.
16. Nasri, M. H., Hammad, R., & Irfan, P. (2024). Selection of Outstanding Students Using AHP and Profile Matching. Paradigma-Jurnal Komputer dan Informatika, 26(1), 38-43.
17. Nguyen, H. Q., Nguyen, V. T., Phan, D. P., Tran, Q. H., & Vu, N. P. (2022). Multi-criteria decision making in the PMEDM process by using MARCOS, TOPSIS, and MAIRCA methods. Applied sciences, 12(8), 3720.
18. Norddin, N. I., Ahmad, N., & Yusof, Z. M. (2015). Selecting best employee of the year using analytical hierarchy process. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 5(11), 72-76.
19. Nugroho, A., Winardi, B., & ZM, A. A. (2023). Integration of AHP method in best employee selection: a multi-criteria decision analysis approach for decision making. International Journal of Mechanical Computational and Manufacturing Research, 12(2), 40-45.
20. Paçacı, B., Erol, S., & Çubuk, M. K. (2026). AHP–MARCOS–TOPSIS Approach in Logistics Center Site Selection: Türkiye Example. Sustainability, 18(2), 604.
21. Pajić, V., Andrejić, M., Jolović, M., & Kilibarda, M. (2024). Strategic warehouse location selection in business logistics: A novel approach using imf SWARA–MARCOS—A case study of a Serbian logistics service provider. Mathematics, 12(5), 776.
22. Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Mathematical modelling, 9(3-5), 161-176.
23. Siahaan, I., Mesran, M., Lubis, R. M. F., & Rohayani, H. (2024). Comparative Analysis of OCRA and MAUT Method in Decision Support System for Determining Outstanding Students. International Journal of Informatics and Data Science, 2(1), 1-10.
24. Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Puška, A., & Chatterjee, P. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of alternatives and ranking according to COmpromise solution (MARCOS). Computers & industrial engineering, 140, 106231.
25. Telaumbanua, L. Y., & Siregar, R. A. (2025). Decision Support System for Selecting the Best Graduates of Undergraduate Students Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method. International Journal of Informatics and Data Science, 2(2), 79-90.
26. Utami, D. R. (2023). AHP-based Selection of Outstanding Students. Jurnal Sistem Informasi dan Teknik Informatika (JAFOTIK), 1(2), 47-53.
27. Uziak, J. (2016). A project-based learning approach in an engineering curriculum. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 18(2), 119-123.
28. Varghese, B., & Karande, P. (2022). AHP-MARCOS, a hybrid model for selecting gears and cutting fluids. Materials Today: Proceedings, 52, 1397-1405.