HOW IS INNOVATION AND DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION SHAPING MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION RESEARCH IN TURKIYE? A LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS ON UYOK PROCEEDINGS

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 49, 1104 - 1139, 29.08.2025

Umut Çil

https://doi.org/10.18493/kmusekad.1569901

Öz

This study examines the academic reflections of innovation and digital transformation in the management and organization field in Türkiye, based on the papers presented at the National Management and Organization Congress (UYOK) between 2013 and 2024. Through content analysis, 1,236 papers were analyzed using 93 keywords within the main topics of the knowledge economy, digitalization and innovation. The findings indicate that traditional topics such as entrepreneurship and innovation are well-represented in UYOK papers, while topics like digital platforms, data analytics, and cybersecurity have gained increasing attention in recent years. However, it has been observed that critical areas such as co-creation, servitization, business model innovation and digital workforce remain underexplored. This study provides a comprehensive perspective on how digital transformation is academically addressed in the management and organization field in Türkiye and offers valuable insights into future research directions and gaps.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Knowledge Economy , Digital Transformation , Innovation , UYOK , Management and Organization

İNOVASYON VE DİJİTAL DÖNÜŞÜM TÜRKİYE'DEKİ YÖNETİM VE ORGANİZASYON ARAŞTIRMALARINI NASIL ŞEKİLLENDİRİYOR? UYOK BİLDİRİLERİ ÜZERİNE BOYLAMSAL BİR ANALİZ

Öz

Bu çalışma, Türkiye'de yönetim ve organizasyon alanında inovasyon ve dijital dönüşümün akademik yansımalarını, 2013-2024 yılları arasında düzenlenen ve yönetim alanının başat kongresi olan Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi (UYOK) bildirileri üzerinden incelemektedir. İçerik analizi yöntemi kullanılarak, 93 anahtar kelime aracılığıyla 1236 bildiri, bilgi ekonomisi, dijitalleşme ve inovasyon ana konuları çerçevesinde analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, girişimcilik ve inovasyon gibi geleneksel temaların UYOK bildirilerinde kapsamlı bir şekilde ele alındığını gösterirken, dijital platformlar, veri analitiği ve siber güvenlik gibi konuların son yıllarda artan bir ilgi gördüğünü ortaya koymaktadır. Ancak, ortak yaratım, hizmetleştirme, iş modeli inovasyonu ve dijital iş gücü gibi bazı kritik alanların hala araştırılmadığı dikkat çekmektedir. Bu çalışma, Türkiye'deki yönetim ve organizasyon alanında dijital dönüşümün akademik olarak nasıl ele alındığına dair geniş bir perspektif sunmakta ve gelecekteki araştırmalar için önemli eksiklikler ve araştırma yönleri hakkında değerli bilgiler sağlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bilgi Ekonomisi , Dijital Dönüşüm , İnovasyon , UYOK , Yönetim ve Organizasyon

Etik Beyan

“İnovasyon & Dijital Dönüşüm, Türkiye'de Yönetim ve Organizasyon Araştırmalarını Nasıl Şekillendiriyor? UYOK Bildirileri Üzerine Boylamsal Bir Analiz” başlıklı çalışmanın yazılması ve yayınlanması süreçlerinde Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği kurallarına riayet edilmiş ve çalışma için elde edilen verilerde herhangi bir tahrifat yapılmamıştır. Çalışma için etik kurul izni gerekmemektedir.

Destekleyen Kurum

Bulunmamaktadır

Kaynakça

• Abubakr, M., Abbas, A. T., Tomaz, I., Soliman, M. S., Luqman, M. ve Hegab, H. (2020). Sustainable and smart manufacturing: An integrated approach. Sustainability, 12(6), 2280. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062280
• Amabile, T. M. (2018). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Routledge.
• Amit, R. ve Zott, C. (2012). Creating value through business model innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(3), 41-49.
• Autio, E., Nambisan, S., Thomas, L. D. ve Wright, M. (2014). Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8(3), 209-225. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1158
• Aytar, O. (2020). İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi, Üniversiteler ve İnovasyon Etkileşimi. İçinde O. Yılmaz, S. S. Aktuğ ve S. Erat (Ed.), İnovasyonun Kökenleri (ss. 177-193). Gazi Kitapevi.
• Barney, J. B. (2007). Resource-Based Theory: Creating and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. Oxford University Press.
• Barua, A., Konana, P., Whinston, A. B. ve Yin, F. (2001). Driving e-business excellence. MIT Sloan Management Review, 43(1), 36-44.
• Bay, M. ve Çil, U. (2016). How well do companies manage innovation? An analysis on low-tech industries. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 709–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.072
• Belkhir, L., ve Elmeligi, A. (2018). Assessing ICT global emissions footprint: Trends to 2040 ve recommendations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 177, 448-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.239
• Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A. ve Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital Business Strategy: Toward a Next Generation of Insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471-482. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.13
• Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J. ve Ying, Z. J. (2015). Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1), 165-218. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju032
• Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H. ve Moedas, C. (2018). Open innovation: Research, practices, and policies. California Management Review, 60(2), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125617745086
• Bolisani, E. ve Bratianu, C. (2018). The Emergence of Knowledge Management. İçinde: Emergent Knowledge Strategies. Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning, vol 4. Springer, Cham. (ss. 23-47). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60657-6_2
• Bozeman, B., Rimes, H. ve Youtie, J. (2015). The evolving state-of-the-art in technology transfer research: Revisiting the contingent effectiveness model. Research Policy, 44(1), 34-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.06.008
• Brynjolfsson, E. ve McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton ve Company.
• Bughin, J., Catlin, T., Hirt, M. ve Willmott, P. (2018). Why digital strategies fail. McKinsey Quarterly, 1(1), 14-25.
• Cai, L., ve Zhu, Y. (2015). The challenges of data quality and data quality assessment in the big data era. Data Science Journal, 14(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2015-002
• Calderon-Monge, E. ve Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2024). The role of digitalization in business and management: A systematic literature review. Review of Managerial Science, 18(2), 449-491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022- 00565-3
• Cao, G. ve Duan, Y. (2014). A path model linking business analytics, data-driven culture, and competitive advantage. Industrial Management ve Data Systems, 114(3), 443-456.
• Chan, L., Hogaboam, L. ve Cao, R. (2022). Applied artificial intelligence in business: Concepts and cases. Springer.
• Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
• Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M. ve McDonald, R. (2015). Disruptive innovation. Harvard Business Review, 93(12), 44-53.
• Ciampi, F., Faraoni, M., Ballerini, J. ve Meli, F. (2022). The co-evolutionary relationship between digitalization and organizational agility: Ongoing debates, theoretical developments and future research perspectives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, 121383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121383
• Cohen, W. M. ve Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
• Cui, T., Pan, S. L., Newell, S. ve Cui, L. (2017). Strategy, resource orchestration and e-commerce enabled social innovation in rural China. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 26(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2016.06.001
• Cusumano, M. A., Gawer, A. ve Yoffie, D. B. (2019). The business of platforms: Strategy in the age of digital competition, innovation, and power. Harper Business.
• Dal Bianco, V., Myllärniemi, V., Komssi, M. ve Raatikainen, M. (2014, April). The role of platform boundary resources in software ecosystems: A case study. In 2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (ss. 11- 20). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/WICSA.2014.11
• Davenport, T. H. ve Harris, J. G. (2017). Competing on analytics: The new science of winning. Harvard Business School Press.
• Del Giudice, M. ve Maggioni, V. (2014). Managerial practices and operative directions of knowledge management within inter-firm networks: A global view. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(5), 841-846. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2014-0231
• Dionisio, J. D., Burns, W. G. ve Gilbert, R. (2013). 3D virtual worlds and the metaverse: Current status and future possibilities. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 45(3), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1145/2480741.2480751
• Dodgson, M., Gann, D. M. ve Salter, A. (2008). The management of technological innovation: Strategy and practice. Oxford University Press.
• Duque, J. (2024). Data mining for knowledge management. Procedia Computer Science, 239, 257-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.003
• Eisenmann, T., Parker, G. ve Van Alstyne, M. W. (2006). Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(10), 92-101.
• Evans, D. S. ve Schmalensee, R. (2016). Matchmakers: The new economics of multisided platforms. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Foss, N. J. ve Saebi, T. (2017). Fifteen years of research on business model innovation: How far have we come, and where should we go? Journal of Management, 43(1), 200-227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316675927
• Fosso Wamba, S., Queiroz, M. M., Wu, L. ve Sivarajah, U. (2024). Big data analytics-enabled sensing capability and organizational outcomes: Assessing the mediating effects of business analytics culture. Annals of Operations Research, 333(2), 559-578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04597-0
• Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. ve Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy–A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757-768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
• Godin, B. (2006). The knowledge-based economy: Conceptual framework or buzzword?. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-5010-x
• Gomber, P., Kauffman, R. J., Parker, C. ve Weber, B. W. (2018). On the fintech revolution: Interpreting the forces of innovation, disruption, and transformation in financial services. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(1), 220-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1440766
• Güney, T. (2019). Renewable energy, non-renewable energy and sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development ve World Ecology, 26(5), 389-397. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2019.1595214
• Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S. ve Smits, R. E. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 413-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002
• Henriette, E., Feki, M. ve Boughzala, I. (2015). The shape of digital transformation: A systematic literature review. MCIS 2015 Proceedings, Paper 431. https://aisel.aisnet.org/mcis2015/431
• Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A. ve Sokolov, B. (2019). The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics. International Journal of Production Research, 57(3), 829-846. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1488086
• Jordan, M. I. ve Mitchell, T. M. (2015). Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science, 349(6245), 255-260. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8415
• Kaplan, A. M. ve Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
• Karadayı Usta, S. (2022). Sürdürülebilir dijital hizmetleştirme: Araç paylaşım iş modelinin kavramsal modellenmesi. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 17(67), 754-775. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyasar.999147
• Kayikci, Y. (2018). Sustainability impact of digitization in logistics. Procedia Manufacturing, 21, 782-789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.184
• Kenney, M. ve Zysman, J. (2016). The rise of the platform economy. Issues in Science and Technology, 32(3), 61-69.
• Khan, N., Ray, R. L., Sargani, G. R., Ihtisham, M., Khayyam, M. ve Ismail, S. (2021). Current progress and future prospects of agriculture technology: Gateway to sustainable agriculture. Sustainability, 13(9), 4883. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094883
• Kohtamäki, M., Parida, V., Oghazi, P., Gebauer, H. ve Baines, T. (2019). Digital servitization business models in ecosystems: A theory of the firm. Journal of Business Research, 104, 380-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.027
• Koohang, A., Nord, J. H., Ooi, K. B., Tan, G. W. H., Al-Emran, M., Aw, E. C. X. ve Wong, L. W. (2023). Shaping the metaverse into reality: A holistic multidisciplinary understanding of opportunities, challenges, and avenues for future investigation. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 63(3), 735-765. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2022.2148055
• Kouhizadeh, M., Saberi, S. ve Sarkis, J. (2021). Blockchain technology and the sustainable supply chain: Theoretically exploring adoption barriers. International Journal of Production Economics, 233, 107984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107984
• Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4. Baskı). SAGE Publications.
• Kumar, M. J., Sampradeepraj, T., Sivajothi, E. ve Singh, G. (2024). An efficient hybrid technique for energy management system with renewable energy system and energy storage system in smart grid. Energy, 306, 132454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.132454
• Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H. G., Feld, T. ve Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industry 4.0. Business ve Information Systems Engineering, 6(4), 239-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4
• Laudon, K. C. ve Laudon, J. P. (2020). Management information systems: Managing the digital firm (16. Baskı). Pearson.
• Laudon, K. C. ve Traver, C. G. (2020). E-commerce 2020: Business, technology and society (16. Baskı). Pearson.
• Lee, N., Lee, H. ve Garrett, T. C. (2019). Synergy effects of innovation on firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 99, 507-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.09.020
• Leonardi, P. M., Huysman, M. ve Steinfield, C. (2013). Enterprise social media: Definition, history, and prospects for the study of social technologies in organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(1), 1- 19. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12029
• Lu, Y. (2017). Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 6, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005
• Manyika, J., Chui, M., Brown, B., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Roxburgh, C. ve Byers, A. H. (2011). Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/big-data-the-next-frontier- for-innovation
• Marston, S., Li, Z., Bandyopadhyay, S., Zhang, J. ve Ghalsasi, A. (2011). Cloud computing—The business perspective. Decision Support Systems, 51(1), 176-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.12.006
• Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution. SAGE Publications.
• McAfee, A. ve Brynjolfsson, E. (2012). Big data: The management revolution. Harvard Business Review, 90(10), 60-68.
• Meng, Y., Yang, Y., Chung, H., Lee, P. H. ve Shao, C. (2018). Enhancing sustainability and energy efficiency in smart factories: A review. Sustainability, 10(12), 4779. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124779
• Mian, S., Lamine, W. ve Fayolle, A. (2016). Technology business incubation: An overview of the state of knowledge. Technovation, 50-51, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.005
• Miles, M. B. ve Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2. Baskı). SAGE Publications.
• Nambisan, S. (2017). Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6), 1029-1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12254
• Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A. ve Song, M. (2017). Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 223-238. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41:1.03
• Nambisan, S., Wright, M. ve Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Research Policy, 48(8), 103773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018
• OECD. (1996). The knowledge-based economy. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook. Paris: OECD.
• O'Reilly, T. (2007). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications ve Strategies, 65(1), 17-37.
• Ostrom, A. L., Parasuraman, A., Bowen, D. E., Patricio, L., ve Voss, C. A. (2015). Service research priorities in a rapidly changing context. Journal of Service Research, 18(2), 127-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670515576315
• Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W. ve Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy—and how to make them work for you. W. W. Norton ve Company.
• Peter, O., Pradhan, A. ve Mbohwa, C. (2023). Industrial internet of things (IIoT): Opportunities, challenges, and requirements in manufacturing businesses in emerging economies. Procedia Computer Science, 217, 856- 865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.03.117
• Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
• Pouresmaieli, M., Ataei, M. ve Taran, A. (2023). Future mining based on internet of things (IoT) and sustainability challenges. International Journal of Sustainable Development ve World Ecology, 30(2), 211-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2023.2179875
• Powell, W. W. ve Grodal, S. (2005). Networks of innovators. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, ve R. R. Nelson (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (ss. 56-85). Oxford University Press.
• Powell, W. W., ve Snellman, K. (2004). The knowledge economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), 199-220. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100037
• Prahalad, C. K. ve Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20015
• Rajasekharaiah, K. M., Dule, C. S. ve Sudarshan, E. (2020, December). Cyber security challenges and its emerging trends on latest technologies. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 981, No. 2, s. 022062). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/981/2/022062
• Rammer, C., ve Schubert, T. (2018). Concentration on the few: Mechanisms behind a falling share of innovative firms in Germany. Research Policy, 47(2), 379-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.11.008
• Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Saura, J. R. ve Palacios-Marqués, D. (2021). Towards a new era of mass data utilization: A systematic review of digital platform-driven value creation in big data, internet of things and blockchain- based business models. Journal of Business Research, 131, 100-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.051
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5. Baskı). Free Press.
• Roy, T. ve George K. J. (2020). Precision farming: A step towards sustainable, climate-smart agriculture. In A. S. Vichaparamthu (Ed.), Global climate change: Resilient and smart agriculture (ss. 199-220). Springer.
• Russell, S., ve Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial İntelligence: A Modern Approach (3. Baskı). Essex: Pearson.
• Sajadieh, S. M. M., Son, Y. H. ve Noh, S. D. (2022). A conceptual definition and future directions of urban smart factory for sustainable manufacturing. Sustainability, 14(3), 1221. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031221
• Sarnıç, A. ve Acar, S. (2024). Dördüncü endüstri devrinde işletmelerde yapay zekâ uygulamaları: Örnekleri üzerine nitel bir araştırma. İşletme, 5(2), 155-181. https://doi.org/10.57116/isletme.1521169
• Schilling, M. A. (2020). Strategic management of technological innovation (6. Baskı). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Schneider, S. ve Sunyaev, A. (2016). Determinant factors of cloud-sourcing decisions: Reflecting on the IT outsourcing literature in the era of cloud computing. Journal of Information Technology, 31(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.25
• Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE Publications.
• Schuh, G., Potente, T., Wesch-Potente, C., Weber, A. R. ve Prote, J. P. (2014). Collaboration mechanisms to increase productivity in the context of Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 17, 184-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.107
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
• Silverman, D. (2024). Interpreting qualitative data (6. Baskı). SAGE Publications.
• Srinivasan, R. ve Swink, M. (2018). An investigation of visibility and flexibility as complements to supply chain analytics: An organizational information processing theory perspective. Production and Operations Management, 27(10), 1849-1867. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12808
• Stock, T., Obenaus, M., Kunz, S. ve Kohl, H. (2018). Industry 4.0 as enabler for a sustainable development: A qualitative assessment of its ecological and social potential. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 118, 254-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.06.026
• Strielkowski, W., Rausser, G. ve Kuzmin, E. (2022). Digital revolution in the energy sector: Effects of using digital twin technology. İçinde W. Strielkowski, G. Rausser, ve E. Kuzmin (Ed.), Digital transformation in industry: Digital twins and new business models (ss. 43-55). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90137-9_4
• Stucke, M. E. ve Ezrachi, A. (2020). Digitalisation and its impact on innovation. RveI paper series.
• Svadberg, S., Holand, A. ve Breunig, K. J. (2019). Beyond the hype: A bibliometric analysis deconstructing research on digitalization. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(10), 38-50. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1280
• Tajudeen, F. P., Nadarajah, D., Jaafar, N. I. ve Sulaiman, A. (2022). The impact of digitalisation vision and information technology on organisations' innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(2), 607-629.
• Talafidaryani, M., Jalali, S. M. J. ve Moro, S. (2021). Digital transformation: Toward new research themes and collaborations yet to be explored. Business Information Review, 38(2), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/02663821211015116
• Teece, D. J. (2018a). Dynamic Capabilities As (Workable) Management Systems Theory. Journal of Management ve Organization, 24(3), 359-368. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2018.20
• Teece, D. J. (2018b). Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Research Policy, 47(8), 1367-1387.
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., ve Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID- SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
• Teoh, T. T. ve Goh, Y. J. (2023). Artificial intelligence in business management. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23316-2
• Tidd, J. ve Bessant, J. (2020). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change (7. Baskı). Wiley.
• Tyrväinen, O., Karjaluoto, H. ve Saarijärvi, H. (2020). Personalization and hedonic motivation in creating customer experiences and loyalty in omnichannel retail. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 57, 102233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102233
• Van Dijk, J. (2020). The Digital Divide (3. Baskı). John Wiley ve Sons.
• Vandermerwe, S., ve Rada, J. (1988). Servitization of business: Adding value by adding services. European Management Journal, 6(4), 314-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-2373(88)90033-3
• Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
• Von Krogh, G. (2018). Artificial intelligence in organizations: New opportunities for phenomenon-based theorizing. Academy of Management Discoveries, 4(4), 404-409. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2018.0084
• Wang, G., Gunasekaran, A., Ngai, E. W. ve Papadopoulos, T. (2016). Big data analytics in logistics and supply chain management: Certain investigations for research and applications. International Journal of Production Economics, 176, 98-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.03.014
• West, J., ve Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging external sources of innovation: A review of research on open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 814-831. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12125
• Westerman, G., Bonnet, D. ve McAfee, A. (2014). Leading digital: Turning technology into business transformation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
• William, P., Tidake, V. M., Thorat, S. R. ve Verma, A. (2023). Future of digital workforce in robotic process automation. In P. William, V. M. Tidake, S. R. Thorat, ve A. Verma (Ed.), Robotic process automation (ss. 297- 314). Springer.
• Wolfert, S., Ge, L., Verdouw, C. ve Bogaardt, M. J. (2017). Big data in smart farming: A review. Agricultural Systems, 153, 69-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.023
• World Economic Forum. (2020). Harnessing Technology for the Global Goals: A frameworks for corporate action. Geneva:World Economic Forum.
• Wulfert, T. (2023). Boundary resource management in innovation ecosystems: The case of e-commerce. Electronic Markets, 33(1), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00488-0
• Wylde, V., Rawindaran, N., Lawrence, J., Balasubramanian, R., Prakash, E., Jayal, A., ... ve Platts, J. (2022). Cybersecurity, data privacy and blockchain: A review. SN Computer Science, 3(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01267-7
• Yalçın, A. ve Çil, U. (2023). Bir Bakışta KOBİ'ler. İçinde: A. Yalçın ve U. Çil (Ed.), A'dan Z'ye KOBİ'ler (ss. 1-14). Gazi Kitapevi.
• Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O. ve Lyytinen, K. (2010). Research commentary: The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 724-735. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0322
• Zhang, K., Feng, L., Wang, J., Lin, K. Y. ve Li, Q. (2023). Servitization in business ecosystem: A systematic review and implications for business-to-business servitization research. Technology Analysis ve Strategic Management, 35(11), 1480-1496. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2023.2195873
• Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H., Chen, X. ve Wang, H. (2018). Blockchain challenges and opportunities: A survey. International Journal of Web and Grid Services, 14(4), 352-375. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWGS.2018.095647