ENDOSKOPİK CERRAHİ İÇİN OLFAKTÖR FOSSANIN BİLGİSAYARLI TOMOGRAFİ İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Yıl 2023, , 426 - 432, 09.10.2023

Mehmet Serindere

https://doi.org/10.18229/kocatepetip.1174611

Öz

AMAÇ: Bu vaka-kontrol çalışmasının amacı, klinik ve radyolojik olarak sinüzit tanısı alan hastalar ve kontrol grubunun bilgisayarlı tomografi (BT) görüntülerinde olfaktor fossa (OF) anatomisinin değerlendirilmesidir.
GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: BT taraması için sevk edilen klinik ve radyolojik kronik sinüzit tanılı 100 hasta ile sinüzit tanısı olmayan 100 hasta dahil edildi. OF tipleri Keros sınıflamasına göre kaydedildi. Medial etmoid çatı noktası (MEÇN) yüksekliği, kribriform plate (KP) yüksekliği ve genişliği, OF derinliği ve genişliği, lateral lamel-Kribriform plate açısı (LLKPA) da ölçüldü.
BULGULAR: Ortalama OF derinliği sağ ve sol tarafta sırasıyla 5,9 mm ve 6,1 mm idi. Sağ ve sol tarafta en sık görülen tip Tip 2 idi. MEÇN'nin ortalama yüksekliği sağ ve sol tarafta 27,9 mm idi. Ortalama KP yüksekliği sağ ve sol tarafta sırasıyla 22,0 mm ve 21,8 mm idi. Ortalama OF genişliği sağ ve sol tarafta sırasıyla 4,1 mm ve 3,4 mm idi. Ortalama KP genişliği sağ ve sol tarafta sırasıyla 2.8 mm ve 2.4 mm idi. Ortalama sağ ve sol LLKPA sırasıyla 77.6° ve 79.1° olarak bulundu. Sinüziti olan ve olmayan hasta gruplarında parametreler arasında anlamlı fark yoktu.
SONUÇ: Sonuçlara göre, sinüzit varlığının OF anatomisine herhangi bir etkisi yoktur. Ancak bu bölgenin anatomisinin preoperatif değerlendirilmesi fonksiyonel endoskopik sinüs cerrahisi (FESC) sırasında oluşabilecek komplikasyonları en aza indirmede çok önemlidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Anatomi, Bilgisayarlı tomografi, Kafa tabanı, Etmoid sinüs

Proje Numarası

-

EVALUATION OF THE OLFACTORY FOSSA WITH COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY FOR ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY

Öz

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this case-control study is to assess the olfactory fossa (OF) anatomy in computed tomography (CT) images of patients with clinical and radiological diagnoses of sinusitis as well as those of patients of a control group.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 100 patients without sinusitis and 100 patients with a clinical and radiological diagnosis of chronic sinusitis who were referred for CT scans were included. The OF types were recorded according to the Keros classification. Medial ethmoid roof point (MERP) height, cribriform plate (CP) height and width, OF depth and width, and angle of lateral lamella-cribriform plate (ALLCP) were also measured.
RESULTS: The mean depth of OF was 5.9 mm and 6.1 mm on the right and left sides, respectively. The most common type was type 2 on the right (51%) and left (45.5%) sides. The mean height of the MERP was 27.9 mm in both the right and left sides. The mean height of CP was 22.0 mm and 21.8 mm on the right and left sides, respectively. The mean width of the OF was 4.1 mm and 3.4 mm on the right and left sides, respectively. The mean width of CP was 2.8 mm and 2.4 mm on the right and left sides, respectively.The mean right and left ALLCP were 77.6° and 79.1°, respectively. No significant difference was found between the parameters in the case and control groups.
CONCLUSIONS: According to the results, the presence of sinusitis has no effect on the anatomy of the OF. However, preoperative evaluation of the OF anatomy is very important in minimizing complications that may occur during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS).

Anahtar Kelimeler

Anatomy, Computed tomography, Cranial base, Ethmoid sinus

Destekleyen Kurum

-

Proje Numarası

-

Teşekkür

None.

Kaynakça

• 1. McMains KC. Safety in endoscopic sinus surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;16(3):247-51.
• 2. Kaplanoglu H, Kaplanoglu V, Dilli A, et al. An analysis of the anatomic variations of the paranasal sinuses and ethmoid roof using computed tomography. Eurasian J Med. 2013;45(2):115-25.
• 3. Moradi M, Dalili B. Variations of Ethmoid Roof in the Iranian Population-A Cross-Sectional Study. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;32(110):169.
• 4. Karatay E, Avcı H. Evaluation of olfactory fossa anatomy by computed tomography and the place of Keros classification in functional endoscopic sinus surgery. South Clin Ist Euras. 2021;32(1):47-52.
• 5. Keros P. On the practical value of differences in the level of the lamina cribrosa of the ethmoid. Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol. 1962;41:809−13.
• 6. Jacob TG, Kaul JM. Morphology of the olfactory fossa – A new look. J Anatomic Soc India. 2014;63:30–5.
• 7. Savvateeva DM, Güldner C, Murthum T, et al. Digital volume tomography (DVT) measurements of the olfactory cleft and olfactory fossa. Acta Otolaryngol. 2010;130:398‑404.
• 8. Özeren Keşkek C, Aytuğar E. Radiological Evaluation of Olfactory Fossa with Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2021;12(3):e3.
• 9. Rathnakar P, Shrinath D, Kamath P. Computed tomographic study of depth of anterior skull base in dakshina kannada population. Int J Anat Res. 2016;4(3):2738-42.
• 10. Shrestha BL, Karmacharya S, Shrestha KS. Radiological Analysis of Olfactory Fossa Depth: A Tertiary Care Hospital Based Study. BJHS. 2018;3(3)7: 575 - 9.
• 11. Erdem G, Erdem T, Miman MC, et al. radiological anatomic study of the cribriform plate compared with constant structures. Rhinology. 2004;42(4):225-9.
• 12. Lakhani M, Raza I, Khan RN, et al. Assessment of Olfactory Fossa Depth based on Keros Classification using Computerised tomography (Ct) in Age Groups of Both Genders. J Rawalpindi Med Coll. 2022;26(1):78- 82.
• 13. Fleiss JL. Reliability of measurement. In: Fleiss JL, editor. The design and analysis of clinical experiments, 1986 edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc, 1986:1–31.
• 14. Costa ALF, Paixão AK, Gonçalves BC, et al. Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Based Anatomical Assessment of the Olfactory Fossa. Int J Dent. 2019;2019:4134260.
• 15. Kayabasi S, Hizli O, Ozkan D. Does paranasal sinus development affect olfactory fossa depth and lateral lamella length? Laryngoscope. 2019;129(11):2458–63.
• 16. Adeel M, Ikram M, Rajput MSA, et al. Asymmetry of lateral lamella of the cribriform plate: a softwarebased analysis of coronal computed tomography and its clinical relevance in endoscopic sinus surgery. Surg Radiol Anat. 2013;35(9):843–7.
• 17. Asal N, Muluk NB, Inal M, et al. Olfactory fossa and new angle measurements: lateral lamella-cribriform plate angle. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(6):1911-4.
• 18. Elwany S, Medanni A, Eid M, et al. Radiological observations on the olfactory fossa and ethmoid roof. J Laryngol Otol. 2010;124(12):1251-6.
• 19. Basti RS, Braggs AV, Mynalli S, et al. Anatomical variations of olfactory fossa according to Kero’s classification in Dakshin Karnataka: a comparison study with other races. International Journal of Contemporary Medicine Surgery and Radiology. 2018;3(1):19-22.
• 20. Sancar B, Duman SB. Olfactory Fossa Evaluation as a Maxillary Sinus Development Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021;1-5.
• 21. Shama SA, Montaser M. Variations of the height of the ethmoid roof among Egyptian adult population: MDCT study. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2015; 46(4): 929-36.
• 22. Alazzawi S, Omar R, Rahmat K, Alli K. Radiological analysis of the ethmoid roof in the Malaysian population. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2012;39(4):393-6.
• 23. Nouraei SA, Elisay AR, Dimarco A, et al. Variations in paranasal sinus anatomy: implications for the pathophysiology of chronic rhinosinusitis and safety of endoscopic sinus surgery. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;38(1):32-7.
• 24. Güldner C, Diogo I, Windfuhr J, et al. Analysis of the fossa olfactoria using cone beam tomography (CBT). Acta oto-laryngologica. 2011;131(1):72-8.
• 25. Babu AC, Nair MR, Kuriakose AM. Olfactory fossa depth: CT analysis of 1200 patients. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2018;28:395-400.
• 26. Patil DT, Ullas LY, Chaithanya A, et al. Evaluation of olfactory fossa depth using computed tomography in South Indian population: A retrospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Radiol. 2021;9:40-4.
• 27. Salroo IN, Dar NH, Yousuf A, et al. Computerised tomographic profile of ethmoid roof on basis of keros classification among ethnic Kashmiri’s. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;2:1-5.
• 28. Periyasamy V, Bhat S, Mamatha H, et al. Anterior skull base variations and its implications using CT scan imaging for safer Endoscopic surgeries. J Anat Soc India. 2018;67(2):153-7.
• 29. Murhty A, Santosh B. A Study of Clinical Significance of the Depth of Olfactory Fossa in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;69(4):514-22.
• 30. Naidu L, Sibiya LA, Aladeyelu OS, Rennie CO. A computed tomography assessment of olfactory fossa depth in relation to Functional endoscopic sinus surgery in a South African population. Transl Res Anat.
• 2022;28: 100219.
• 31. Abdulhadi BN, Shyaa AI, ALTamimi L. Computed tomography assessment of the ethmoid roof based on Keros classification in Iraqi patients undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery. JID Health. 2021;4(2):365-70.
• 32. Gauba V, Saleh GM, Dua G, et al. Radiological classification of anterior skull base anatomy prior to performing medial orbital wall decompression. Orbit. 2006;25(2):93-6.
• 33. Belgin CA, Bayrak S, Orhan K. Evaluation of The Ethmoid Bone Using by Cone Beam Computed Tomography In Turkish Subpopulation. Clin Exp Health Sci. 2021;11(4):679-82.
• 34. Erdogan S, Keskin IG, Topdag M, et al. Ethmoid roof radiology; analysis of lateral lamella of cribriform plate. Otolaryngol Pol. 2015;69:53-7.
• 35. Muñoz-Leija MA, Yamamoto-Ramos M, Barrera-Flores FJ, et al. Anatomical variations of the ethmoidal roof: differences between men and women. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;275:1831-6.
• 36. Skorek A, Tretiakow D, Szmuda T, Przewozny T. Is the Keros classification alone enough to identify patients with the ‘dangerous ethmoid’? An anatomical study. Acta Otolaryngol. 2017;137(2):196-201.
• 37. Coelho DH, Pence TS, Abdel-Hamid M, Costanzo RM. Cribriform plate width is highly variable within and between subjects. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2018;45(5):1000-5.
• 38. Abdullah B, Chew SC, Aziz ME, et al. A new radiological classification for the risk assessment of anterior skull base injury in endoscopic sinus surgery. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):4600.
• 39. Alsaied AS. Paranasal sinus anatomy: what the surgeon needs to know, in: B.S. Gendeh (Ed.), Paranasal Sinuses, Intech Open, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5772/ intechopen.6908.
• 40. Hosemann W, Draf C. Danger points, complications and medico-legal aspects in endoscopic sinus surgery. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;12:Doc06.
• 41. Al-Abri R, Bhargava D, Al-Bassam W, Al-Badaai Y, Sawhney S. Clinically significant anatomical variants of the paranasal sinuses. Oman Med J. 2014;29 (2):110–3.