Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

YÜKSEK CERRAHİ RİSKLİ AKUT KOLESİSTİT HASTALARINDA PERKÜTAN SAFRA KESESİ DRENAJI: TEK MERKEZ DENEYİMİ

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 2 , 157 - 162 , 16.04.2026
https://doi.org/10.18229/kocatepetip.1623923
https://izlik.org/JA52AK73MK

Öz

AMAÇ: Yüksek cerrahi riski bulunan akut kolesistit hastalarında perkütan safra kesesi drenajının etkinliği araştırılmıştır.
GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Ocak 2021 ile Eylül 2023 tarihleri arasında görüntüleme rehberliğinde perkütan safra kesesi drenajı yapılan toplam 51 hastanın elektronik kayıtları retrospektif olarak incelendi.
BULGULAR: Perkütan safra kesesi drenajı (PSD) işlemi, 51 hastanın tamamında başarılı bir şekilde gerçekleştirildi. İşlem sonrası, 43 hastada (%84,3) akut kolesistit semptomları geriledi. PSD prosedürü ile ilişkili mortalite veya majör komplikasyon bildirilmedi. PSD sonrası kateterizasyon süresi ortalama 23,6 gün (aralık 3-47 gün), hastanede kalış süresi ise ortalama 22 gün olarak tespit edildi. Çoğunluğu işlem öncesi sepsis nedeniyle takip edilen 7 hasta (%13,7), drenaj kateteri çekilmeden 30 gün içinde kaybedildi. PSD sonrası cerrahi risklerin en aza indirilmesini takiben 6-8 hafta içinde 27 hastaya (%52,9) kolesistektomi uygulandı.
SONUÇ: Görüntüleme rehberliğinde gerçekleştirilen perkütan safra kesesi drenajı, düşük komplikasyon oranlarına sahip güvenli bir prosedür olup, yüksek cerrahi riski bulunan hastalarda akut kolesistit ile ilişkili inflamatuar sürecin çözümünde etkili bir yöntemdir.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Knab LM, Boller AM, Mahvi DM. Cholecystitis. Surg Clin North Am. 2014;94(2):455-70.
  • 2. Gallaher JR, Charles A. Acute Cholecystitis: A Review. Jama. 2022;327:965-75.
  • 3. Okamoto K, Suzuki K, Takada T, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis. Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. 2018;25:55-72.
  • 4. Palanivelu C, Jani K, Maheshkumar GS. Single-center experience of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2007;17(5):608-14.
  • 5. Leveau P, Andersson E, Carlgren I, et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy: a bridge to surgery or definite management of acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients? Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43(5):593-6.
  • 6. Lucocq J, Patil P, Scollay J. Acute cholecystitis: Delayed cholecystectomy has lesser perioperative morbidity compared to emergency cholecystectomy. Surgery. 2022;172:16-22.
  • 7. Hanbidge AE, Buckler PM, O'malley ME, et al. From the RSNA refresher courses: Imaging evaluation for acute pain in the right upper quadrant. Radiographics 2004;24:1117-35.
  • 8. Yeo CS, Tay VW, Low JK, et al. Outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy and predictors of eventual cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016;23:65-73.
  • 9. Jang WS, Lim JU, Joo KR, Cet al. Outcome of conservative percutaneous cholecystostomy in high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis and risk factors leading to surgery. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(8):2359-64.
  • 10. Di Martino M, Miguel Mesa D, Lopesino González JM, et al. Safety of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Early Removal: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020;30(5):410-5.
  • 11. Cooper S, Donovan M, Grieve DA. Outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy and predictors of subsequent cholecystectomy. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 2018;88(7-8):598-601.
  • 12. Pang KW, Tan CHN, Loh S, et al. Outcomes of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy for Acute Cholecystitis. World J Surg. 2016;40(11):2735-44.
  • 13. Bundy J, Srinivasa RN, Gemmete JJ, et al. Percutaneous Cholecystostomy: Long-Term Outcomes in 324 Patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018;41(6):928-34.
  • 14. Stanek, A, Dohan, A, Barkun, J, et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy: A simple bridge to surgery or an alternative option for the management of acute cholecystitis? Am J Surg. 2018;216:595-603.
  • 15. Colonna AL, Gri iths TM, Robison DC, et al. Cholecystostomy: Are we using it correctly? Am J Surg. 2019;217(6):1010-5.
  • 16. Hultman CS, Herbst CA, McCall JM, et al. The efficacy of percutaneous cholecystostomy in critically ill patients. Am Surg.1996; 62: 263-9.
  • 17. Little MW, Briggs JH, Tapping CR, et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy: the radiologist’s role in treating acute cholecystitis. Clin Radiol. 2013;68(7):654-60.
  • 18. Chou C K, Lee K C, Chan C C, et al. Early percutaneous cholecystostomy in severe acute cholecystitis reduces the complication rate and duration of hospital stay. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e1096.
  • 19. Winbladh A, Gullstrand P, Svanvik J, Sandström P. Systematic review of cholecystostomy as a treatment option in acute cholecystitis. HPB (Oxford). 2009;11(3):183-93.
  • 20. Yildirim M, Yildirim UM, Özyer U. Akut kolesistit tedavisinde perkütan kolesistostomi: 10-yıllık tek merkez deneyimi. Cukurova Med. J. 2017;42(3):465-9.
  • 21. McKay A, Abulfaraj M, Lipschitz J. Short- and long-term outcomes following percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients. Surg Endosc 2012;26:1343-51.

PERCUTANEOUS GALLBLADDER DRAINAGE IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH SURGICAL RISK ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 2 , 157 - 162 , 16.04.2026
https://doi.org/10.18229/kocatepetip.1623923
https://izlik.org/JA52AK73MK

Öz

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effectiveness of percutaneous gallbladder drainage (PGD) in a group of patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) who were at high surgical risk.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The electronic records of a total of 51 patients who underwent percutaneous gallbladder drainage under imaging guidance between January 2021 and September 2023 were retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTS: The PGD procedure was successfully performed in all 51 patients. After the procedure, symptoms of AC regressed in 43 patients (84.3%). There were no reports of mortality or major complications associated with the PGD procedure. The average duration of catheterization post-PGD was 23.6 days (range 3-47 days), and the average hospital stay was 22 days. Seven patients (13.7%), mostly monitored due to pre-procedural sepsis, were lost within 30 days without catheter removal. Cholecystectomy was performed on 27 patients (52.9%) in the 6-8 weeks following PGD, after minimizing surgical risks.
CONCLUSIONS: Under imaging guidance, PGD is a safe procedure with low complication rates in patients at high surgical risk and is an effective method for resolving the inflammatory process associated with AC.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Knab LM, Boller AM, Mahvi DM. Cholecystitis. Surg Clin North Am. 2014;94(2):455-70.
  • 2. Gallaher JR, Charles A. Acute Cholecystitis: A Review. Jama. 2022;327:965-75.
  • 3. Okamoto K, Suzuki K, Takada T, et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis. Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. 2018;25:55-72.
  • 4. Palanivelu C, Jani K, Maheshkumar GS. Single-center experience of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2007;17(5):608-14.
  • 5. Leveau P, Andersson E, Carlgren I, et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy: a bridge to surgery or definite management of acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients? Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43(5):593-6.
  • 6. Lucocq J, Patil P, Scollay J. Acute cholecystitis: Delayed cholecystectomy has lesser perioperative morbidity compared to emergency cholecystectomy. Surgery. 2022;172:16-22.
  • 7. Hanbidge AE, Buckler PM, O'malley ME, et al. From the RSNA refresher courses: Imaging evaluation for acute pain in the right upper quadrant. Radiographics 2004;24:1117-35.
  • 8. Yeo CS, Tay VW, Low JK, et al. Outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy and predictors of eventual cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016;23:65-73.
  • 9. Jang WS, Lim JU, Joo KR, Cet al. Outcome of conservative percutaneous cholecystostomy in high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis and risk factors leading to surgery. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(8):2359-64.
  • 10. Di Martino M, Miguel Mesa D, Lopesino González JM, et al. Safety of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Early Removal: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020;30(5):410-5.
  • 11. Cooper S, Donovan M, Grieve DA. Outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy and predictors of subsequent cholecystectomy. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 2018;88(7-8):598-601.
  • 12. Pang KW, Tan CHN, Loh S, et al. Outcomes of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy for Acute Cholecystitis. World J Surg. 2016;40(11):2735-44.
  • 13. Bundy J, Srinivasa RN, Gemmete JJ, et al. Percutaneous Cholecystostomy: Long-Term Outcomes in 324 Patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018;41(6):928-34.
  • 14. Stanek, A, Dohan, A, Barkun, J, et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy: A simple bridge to surgery or an alternative option for the management of acute cholecystitis? Am J Surg. 2018;216:595-603.
  • 15. Colonna AL, Gri iths TM, Robison DC, et al. Cholecystostomy: Are we using it correctly? Am J Surg. 2019;217(6):1010-5.
  • 16. Hultman CS, Herbst CA, McCall JM, et al. The efficacy of percutaneous cholecystostomy in critically ill patients. Am Surg.1996; 62: 263-9.
  • 17. Little MW, Briggs JH, Tapping CR, et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy: the radiologist’s role in treating acute cholecystitis. Clin Radiol. 2013;68(7):654-60.
  • 18. Chou C K, Lee K C, Chan C C, et al. Early percutaneous cholecystostomy in severe acute cholecystitis reduces the complication rate and duration of hospital stay. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e1096.
  • 19. Winbladh A, Gullstrand P, Svanvik J, Sandström P. Systematic review of cholecystostomy as a treatment option in acute cholecystitis. HPB (Oxford). 2009;11(3):183-93.
  • 20. Yildirim M, Yildirim UM, Özyer U. Akut kolesistit tedavisinde perkütan kolesistostomi: 10-yıllık tek merkez deneyimi. Cukurova Med. J. 2017;42(3):465-9.
  • 21. McKay A, Abulfaraj M, Lipschitz J. Short- and long-term outcomes following percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients. Surg Endosc 2012;26:1343-51.
Toplam 21 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Genel Cerrahi, Radyoloji ve Organ Görüntüleme
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

İsmail Dilek 0000-0002-5398-7035

Emre Utkan Büyükceran 0000-0001-6912-7737

Görkem Atasoy 0000-0003-3776-6950

Erbil Arık 0000-0002-5976-860X

Hüsnü Ozan Şevik 0000-0001-6381-6726

Alaaddin Nayman 0000-0003-3213-8576

Gönderilme Tarihi 20 Ocak 2025
Kabul Tarihi 27 Mayıs 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 16 Nisan 2026
DOI https://doi.org/10.18229/kocatepetip.1623923
IZ https://izlik.org/JA52AK73MK
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2026 Cilt: 27 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Dilek, İ., Büyükceran, E. U., Atasoy, G., Arık, E., Şevik, H. O., & Nayman, A. (2026). PERCUTANEOUS GALLBLADDER DRAINAGE IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH SURGICAL RISK ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi, 27(2), 157-162. https://doi.org/10.18229/kocatepetip.1623923
AMA 1.Dilek İ, Büyükceran EU, Atasoy G, Arık E, Şevik HO, Nayman A. PERCUTANEOUS GALLBLADDER DRAINAGE IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH SURGICAL RISK ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE. KTD. 2026;27(2):157-162. doi:10.18229/kocatepetip.1623923
Chicago Dilek, İsmail, Emre Utkan Büyükceran, Görkem Atasoy, Erbil Arık, Hüsnü Ozan Şevik, ve Alaaddin Nayman. 2026. “PERCUTANEOUS GALLBLADDER DRAINAGE IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH SURGICAL RISK ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE”. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi 27 (2): 157-62. https://doi.org/10.18229/kocatepetip.1623923.
EndNote Dilek İ, Büyükceran EU, Atasoy G, Arık E, Şevik HO, Nayman A (01 Nisan 2026) PERCUTANEOUS GALLBLADDER DRAINAGE IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH SURGICAL RISK ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi 27 2 157–162.
IEEE [1]İ. Dilek, E. U. Büyükceran, G. Atasoy, E. Arık, H. O. Şevik, ve A. Nayman, “PERCUTANEOUS GALLBLADDER DRAINAGE IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH SURGICAL RISK ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE”, KTD, c. 27, sy 2, ss. 157–162, Nis. 2026, doi: 10.18229/kocatepetip.1623923.
ISNAD Dilek, İsmail - Büyükceran, Emre Utkan - Atasoy, Görkem - Arık, Erbil - Şevik, Hüsnü Ozan - Nayman, Alaaddin. “PERCUTANEOUS GALLBLADDER DRAINAGE IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH SURGICAL RISK ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE”. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi 27/2 (01 Nisan 2026): 157-162. https://doi.org/10.18229/kocatepetip.1623923.
JAMA 1.Dilek İ, Büyükceran EU, Atasoy G, Arık E, Şevik HO, Nayman A. PERCUTANEOUS GALLBLADDER DRAINAGE IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH SURGICAL RISK ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE. KTD. 2026;27:157–162.
MLA Dilek, İsmail, vd. “PERCUTANEOUS GALLBLADDER DRAINAGE IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH SURGICAL RISK ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE”. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi, c. 27, sy 2, Nisan 2026, ss. 157-62, doi:10.18229/kocatepetip.1623923.
Vancouver 1.İsmail Dilek, Emre Utkan Büyükceran, Görkem Atasoy, Erbil Arık, Hüsnü Ozan Şevik, Alaaddin Nayman. PERCUTANEOUS GALLBLADDER DRAINAGE IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH SURGICAL RISK ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE. KTD. 01 Nisan 2026;27(2):157-62. doi:10.18229/kocatepetip.1623923

88x31.png
Bu Dergi Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari-AynıLisanslaPaylaş 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.