Biyoelektrik Empedans Analizi ve Antropometrik Yontemler ile Olçülen Vücut Yag Yiüzdelerinin Karsilastırılması (Viicut Yag Yüzdesini Belirlemede Empedans ve Skinfold Yontemlerln Karsilastılması)

Yıl 2006, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, - , 01.08.2006

Hakan Mollaoglu Kagan Ocok , Lutfi Akgon Orhan Bas

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Biyoelektrik Empedans Analizi ve Antropometrik Yontemler ile Olçülen Vücut Yag Yiüzdelerinin Karsilastırılması (Viicut Yag Yüzdesini Belirlemede Empedans ve Skinfold Yontemlerln Karsilastılması)

Öz

Amaç: Biyoelektrik empedans analiz (BEA) yönte— miyle ölçülen “vücut yağ yüzdesi” (VYY) ile skinfold deri kıvrım kalınlığı ölçüm ve hesaplama yöntemleriyle bulunan vücut yağ yüzdelerini karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve yöntem: Çalışmaya 18%0 yaş arası 90 kadın ve 1855 yaş arası 90 erkek olmak üzere toplam 180 katılımcı alındı ve iki yöntemle VYY ölçümleri yapıldı. Katılımcıların ilk olarak BEA yöntemiyle (Bodystat 1500) VYY ölçüldü. Kişi sırt üstü yatar pozisyondayken cihazın elektrotları sağ el ve sağ ayağa yerleştirilerek VYY ölçümü gerçekleştirildi. İkinci olarak antropometrik yöntemler uygulandı. Skinfold aletiyle (Holtain) ölçülen deri kıvrım kalırılığından hesaplama yön— temleri ile VYY saptandı. Skinfold aleti ile karın (abdomen), kol (triceps), uyluk (thigh) ve Sirt (subscapular) deri kıvrım kalınlığı ölçümleri yapıldı. Kadın ve erkeklerde uygulanan Behnke Wilmore, Dumin Womersley formülleri kullanılarak, deri kıvrım kalınlığı ölçümlerinden vücut yoğunlukları hesap— landı. Bulunan vücut yoğunluklarından Siri veya Brozek formülleri ile katılımcılara ait VYY hesaplandı. Farklı yöntem— lerle bulunan VYY ölçümleri arasında Pearson korelasyon analizi uygulandı. Bulgular: Vücut kitle indeksi (BMI) ortalaması kadınlar (258160) ile erkekler (24.2133) arasında farklı değildi (p=0.27). Katılımcılarda ortalama VYY biyoelektrik empedans analiz yöntemiyle 21.8110.9, Behnke Wilmore ile 23.0186, Dumin Womersley ile 23.616.9 bulundu. BEA ile Behnke Wilmore arasında (r= 0.835, p

Anahtar Kelimeler

vücut yağ yüzdesi, empedans, Skinfold

Kaynakça

• Olszanecka-Glinianowicz M, Zahorska-Markiewicz B, Janowska J, Zurakowski A. Serum concentrations of nitric oxide, tumor necrosis factor (TNF )-alpha and TNF soluble receptors in women with overweight and obesity. Metabolism, 2004; 53: 1268—1273.
• Daniska J, Sramkova K, Kopcekova J. Prevalence of the overweight and obesity in the random selected group of young females and their clinical-somatic parameters. Cas Lek Cesk, 2005; 144: 399—404.
• Jurimae T, Sudi K, Jurimae J, Payerl D, Ruutel K. Relationships between plasma leptin levels and body composition parameters measured by different methods in postmenopausal women. Am J Hum Biol, ; 15: 628—636. Murray RD, Adams JE, Shalet SM. Adults with partial growth hormone deficiency have an adverse body composition. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2004; : 1586—1591.
• Armanini D, De Palo CB, Mattarello MJ, et al. Effect of licorice on the reduction of body fat mass in Korma/7:: T ı/ı Dergisi, Cil 7 No: _7, May/s Jil/16. healthy subjects. J Endocrinol Invest, 2003; 26: 646—
• Wu TJ, Huang SM, Taylor RL, Kao PC. Thyroxine effects on serum insulin-like growth factor 1 levels, anthropometric measures, and body composition in patients after thyroidectomy. Ann Clin Lab Sci, 2003; : 423—428.
• Faisy C, Rabbat A, Kouchakji B, Laaban JP. Bioelectrical impedance analysis in estimating nutritional status and outcome of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and acute respiratory failure. Intensive Care Med, 2000; 26: —525.
• Larciprete G, Valensise H, Vasapollo B, et al. Body composition during normal pregnancy: reference ranges. Acta Diabetol, 2003; 40: 225—232.
• McCarthy EA, Strauss BJ, Walker SP, Perrnezel M. Determination of maternal body composition in pregnancy and its relevance to perinatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 2004; 59: 73 l—742.
• Holecki M, Zahorska—Markiewicz B, Nieszporek T, et al. The influence of a 3-month weight reduction therapy with Orlistat on serum vitamin B12 and folic acid concentration in obese women. Int J Obes (Lond), 2006; 30: 1017—1018.
• Ozcakar L, Cetin A, Kunduracıoglu B, Ulkar B. Comparative body fat assessment in elite footballers. Br J Sports Med, 2003; 37: 278—279.
• Huygens W, Claessens AL, Thomis M, et al. Body composition estimations by BIA versus anthropometric equations in body builders and other power athletes. J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 2002; 42: —55.
• Haapala I, Hirvonen A, Niskanen L, et al. Anthropometry, bioelectrical impedance and dual— energy X-ray absorptiometry in the assessment of body composition in elderly Finnish women. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging, 2002; 22: 383—391.
• Yaman H (Editör). Cerit M (Çeviri). Fox, Bowers, Foss. Beden Eğitimi ve Sporun Fizyolojik Temelleri. Ankara: Kırali Matbaası, Bağırgan Yayımevi, 1999:
• Tamer K. Sporda Fiziksel Performansm Ölçülmesi ve Değerlendirilmesi. Ankara: Türkerler Kitabevi, 1995: —163.
• Segal KR, Van Loan M, Fitzgerald Pl, Hodgdon JA, Van ltallie TB. Lean body mass estimation by bioelectrical impedance analysis: a four-site cross— validation study. Am J Clin Nutr, 1988; 47: 7—14.
• Segal KR, Gutin B, Presta E, Wang J, Van ltallie TB. Estimation of human body composition by electrical impedance methods: a comparative study. J Appl Physiol, 1985; 58: 1565—1571.
• Comparison of Body Fat Percentage Measured by Bioelectrt'cal Impedance Analysis and Anthropometric Methods Ross R, Leger L, Martin P, Roy R. Sensitivity of bioelectrical impedance to detect changes in human body composition. J Appl Physiol, 1989; 67: 1643—
• Fukagawa NK, Bandini LG, Young JB. Effect of age on body composition and resting metabolic rate. Am J Physiol, 1990; 259: 233—238.
• Mok E, Beghin L, Gachon P, et al. Estimating body composition in children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: comparison of bioelectrical impedance analysis and skinfold—thickness measurement. Am J Clin Nutr, 2006; 83: 65—69.
• Elberg J, McDufŞe JR, Sebring NG, et al. Comparison of methods to assess change in children's body composition. Am J Clin Nutr, 2004; 80: 64—69.
• Ferrante E, Pitzalis G, Vania A, et al. Nutritional status, obesity, and metabolic balance in pediatric patients with type l diabetes mellitus. Minerva Endocrinol, 1999; 24: 69—76.
• Demura S, Yamaji S, Goshi F, et al. The validity and reliability of relative body fat estimates and the construction of new prediction equations for young Japanese adult males. J Sports Sci, 2002; 20: 153—
• Deurenberg P, Deurenberg—Yap M. Validity of body composition methods across ethnic population groups. Forum Nutr, 2003; 56: 299—301.
• Wattanapenpaiboon N, Lukito W, Strauss BJ, et al. Agreement of skinfold measurement and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) methods with dual energy X~ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in estimating total body fat in Anglo-Celtic Australians. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 1998; 22: 854—860.
• Bhat DS, Yajnik CS, Sayyad MG, et al. Body fat measurement in Indian men: comparison of three methods based on a two—compartment model. lnt J Obes (Lond), 2005; 29: 842—848.
• Stolarczyk LM, Heyward VH, Hicks VL, Baumgartner RN. Predictive accuracy of bioelectrical impedance in estimating body composition of Native American women. Am J Clin Nutr, 1994; 59: 964—
• Eckerson JM, Stout JR, Housh TJ, Johnson GO. Validity of bioelectrical impedance equations for estimating percent fat in males. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 1996; 28: 523—530.
• Pecoraro P, Guida B, Caroli M, et al. Body mass index and skinfold thickness versus bioimpedance analysis: fat mass prediction in children. Acta Diabetol, 2003; 40: 278—281.
• Han TS, Carter R, Currall JE, Lean ME. The influence of fat free mass on prediction of densitometric body composition by bioelectrical impedance analysis and by anthropometry. Eur J Clin Nutr, 1996; 50: 542—548.
• Goran MI, Khaled MA. Cross-validation of fat-free mass estimated from body density against bioelectrical resistance: effects of obesity and gender. Obes Res, 1995; 3: 531-539.
• Daniel JA, Sizer PS Jr, Latman NS. Evaluation of body composition methods for accuracy. Biomed Instrum Technol, 2005; 39: 397—405.
• Leppik A, Jurimae T, Jurimae J. Inşuence of anthropometric parameters on the body composition measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis or DXA in children. Acta Paediatr, 2004; 93: 1036—
• Üçok K, Gökbel H, Okudan N. The load of the Wingate test: According to the body weight or lean body mass. European Journal of General Medicine, ; 2: 10—13. Segal KR. Use of bioelectrical impedance analysis measurements as an evaluation for participating in sports. Am J Clin Nutr, 1996; 64: 469—471.
• Jurimae T, Jurimae J. Anthropometric and health- related Ştness characteristics in middle-aged obese women. Coll Antropol, 1998; 22: 97—106.
• Di Pietro M, Campanaro P, D'Angelo G, et al. Role of camping in the treatment of childhood obesity. Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense, 2004; 75: 1 18—121.
• Das SK, Roberts SB, Kehayias JJ, et al. Body composition assessment in extreme obesity and after massive weight loss induced by gastric bypass surgery. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, 2003; 284: —1088.
• Kamimura MA, Avesani CM, Cendoroglo M, et al. Comparison of skinfold thicknesses and bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of body fat in patients on long-term haemodialysis therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2003; 18: 101—105.
• Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi, Cilt 7 No: 2, Mayıs 2006,