Bilişim Ekosisteminin Dönüşümü Üzerine Bir Model Önerisi: Bilişim Vadisi Örneği

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 45, 49 - 65, 21.07.2023

Ahmet Serdar İbrahimcioğlu Halit Keskin

https://doi.org/10.35343/kosbed.1270388

Öz

Bu çalışmada, Teknoloji Geliştirme Alanı olarak Bilişim Vadisi’nin, bilişim ekosistemindeki rolüne ilişkin bir model önerisi sunulmuştur. Bu model çerçevesinde pazar çalkantıları, teknolojik çalkantılar, veri güdümlü inovasyon kapasitesi ve yönelimi, ekosistem liderliği ile bilişim ekosistemi dönüşümü arasındaki ilişkiler ele alınırken, mega teknoloji koridoru ve network etkisi moderatör değişken olarak incelenmiştir. Bilişim Vadisi örneğinde bilişim ekosistemi dönüşümünde kullanılan bileşenler duvarsız teknopark, ekosistem çevikliği ve dijital girişimciliktir. Önerilen model doğrultusunda, teknolojik çalkantılar ile pazar çalkantılarının, veri güdümlü inovasyon kapasitesi ve yönelimi ile pozitif ilişkisinin olduğu; veri güdümlü inovasyon kapasitesinin, ekosistem dönüşümü üzerindeki etkisinde, ekosistem liderliğinin rolünün olduğu belirtilmiştir. Kavramsal model çerçevesinde, Bilişim Vadisi’nden yönetici düzeyinde 5 katılımcı ile mülakatlar yapılmıştır. Mülakatlar neticesinde elde edilen nitel veriler doğrultusunda, kavramsal modeli destekler nitelikte Bilişim Vadisinde veri güdümlü inovasyon kapasitesinin kaynakları, mega teknoloji koridoru ve ekosistem dönüşümünde duvarsız teknopark, çeviklik ve dijital girişimcilik kavramları ön plana çıkmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Veri güdümlü inovasyon kapasitesi, mega teknoloji koridoru, ekosistem liderliği, ekosistem dönüşümü

Kaynakça

• Ahmed, Adeel., Sabeen Hussain Bhatti, Ismail Gölgeci ve Ahmad Arslan (2022). “Digital Platform Capability and Organizational Agility Of Emerging Market Manufacturing SMEs: The Mediating Role Of Intellectual Capital And The Moderating Role Of Environmental Dynamism”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 177, 121513.
• Autio, Erkko. (2022). “Orchestrating ecosystems: a multi-layered framework”. Innovation, 24(1): 96-109
• Autio, Erkko. ve Llewellyn D.W. Thomas (2020). “Value co-creation in ecosystems: Insights and research promise from three disciplinary perspectives”. Şu kitapta: Ed. Satish Nambisan, Kalle Lyytinen ve Youngjin Yoo. Handbook of digital innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing, 107-132.
• Aygün, Helin (25.05.2021). Erişim: Duvarsız Teknopark.https://www.arsiv.sanayigazetesi.com.tr/kocaeli/duvarsiz-teknopark-h27051.html/20.01.2023.
• Babu, Mujahid Mohiuddin., Mahfuzur Rahman, Ashraful. Alam ve Bidit Lal. Dey (2021). “Exploring Big Data-Driven Innovation In The Manufacturing Sector: Evidence From UK Firms”. Annals of Operations Research: 1-28. Bilişim Vadisi. (2023). https://bilisimvadisi.com.tr/20.01.2023.
• Chavez, Roberto., Wantao Yu, Mark Jacobs, Brian Fynes, Frank Wiengarten, ve Antonio Lecuna (2015). “Internal Lean Practices and Performance: The Role of Technological Turbulence”. International Journal of Production Economics, 160: 157-171.
• Chavez, R., Wantao Yu, Mark A. Jacobs ve Mengying Feng (2017). “Data-Driven Supply Chains, Manufacturing Capability and Customer Satisfaction”. Production Planning & Control, 28(11-12): 906-918.
• Chen, K. H., Wang, Chun-Hsien Wang, Shi-Zheng Huang ve George C. Shen (2016). “Service Innovation and New Product Performance: The Influence Of Market-Linking Capabilities And Market Turbulence”. International Journal of Production Economics, 172: 54-64.
• Chen, Tingting., Fuli Li, Xiao-Ping Chen ve Zhanying Ou (2018). “Innovate or die: How should knowledge-worker teams respond to technological turbulence?”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 149: 1-16.
• Corbett, Lawrie M. ve Gordon S. Claridge (2002). “Key manufacturing capability elements and business performance”. International Journal of Production Research, 40(1), 109-131.
• De Almeida Ribeiro, Marcelo Bronzo Ladeira, Adriana Ferreira de Faria ve Marcelo Werneck Barbosa (2021). “A reference model for science and technology parks strategic performance management: An emerging economy perspective”. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 59, 101612.
• Durão, Diamantino., Manuela. Sarmento, Vasco Varela ve Luis Maltez (2005). “Virtual and real-estate science and technology parks: a case study of Taguspark”. Technovation, 25(3): 237-244.
• Fernandes, Cristina., João J. Ferreira, Pedro Mota Veiga, Sascha Kraus ve Marina Dabić (2022). “Digital entrepreneurship platforms: Mapping the field and looking towards a holistic approach”. Technology in Society, 101979.
• Fukuda, Kayano (2020). “Science, technology and innovation ecosystem transformation toward society 5.0.” International Journal of Production Economics, 220, 107460.
• Gregory, Robert Wayne, Ola Henfridsson, Evgeny Kaganer ve Harris Kyriakou (2022). “Data network effects: Key conditions, shared data, and the data value duality”. Academy of Management Review, 47(1): 189-192.
• Hewett, Kelly, G. Tomas M. Hult, Murali. K. Mantrala, Nandini. Nim ve Kiran Pedada (2022). “Cross-border marketing ecosystem orchestration: A conceptualization of its determinants and boundary conditions”. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 39(2): 619-638.
• Hull, Clyde Eirkur., Yu-Ting Caisy Hung, Neil Hair, Victor Perotti ve Richard DeMartino (2007). “Taking advantage of digital opportunities: a typology of digital entrepreneurship”. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, 4(3): 290-303.
• Huo, Baofeng, Beifen Wang ve Zhibao Li (2022). “How to deal with technological turbulence for improving innovation performance”. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1-14.
• İbrahimcioğlu, Ahmet Serdar. (2022), “Küresel Rekabette Milli Teknoloji Hamlesinin Önemi ve Bilişim Vadisi’nin Rolü”. TÜBA Yayınları, 10.53478/TUBA.978-625-8352-16-0.ch35
• Jin, Chenglin., Along Liu, Hefu Liu, Jibao Gu ve Meng Shao (2022). “How business model design drives innovation performance: The roles of product innovation capabilities and technological turbulence”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 178, 121591.
• Katz, Michael. L. ve Carl Shapiro (1994). “Systems competition and network effects”. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(2): 93-115.
• Keskin, Halit (2006). “Market orientation, learning orientation, and innovation capabilities in SMEs: An extended model”. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(4): 396-417.
• Kohli, Ajay K. ve Bernard J. Jaworski (1990), “Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications”, Journal of Marketing, 54: 1-18.
• Kraus, Sascha, Carolin Palmer, Norbert Kailer, Friedrich Lukas Kallinger ve Jonathan Spitzer (2019). “Digital entrepreneurship: A research agenda on new business models for the twenty-first century”. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 25(2): 353-375.
• Lawson, Benn ve Danny Samson (2001). “Developing innovation capability in organisations: a dynamic capabilities approach”. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(03): 377-400.
• Li, Lixu (2022). “Digital transformation and sustainable performance: The moderating role of market turbulence”. Industrial Marketing Management, 104: 28-37.
• Mann, Geoffrey, Stan Karanasios ve Christoph F. Breidbach (2022). “Orchestrating the digital transformation of a business ecosystem”. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 31(3), 101733.
• Nambisan, Satish (2017). “Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6): 1029-1055.
• OECD (2015). Data-Driven Innovation Big Data for Growth and Well-Being. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264229358-en
• Oghazi, Pejvak, Vinit Parida, Joakim Wincent ve Rana Mostaghel (2022). “Ecosystems transformation through disruptive innovation: A definition, framework and outline for future research”. Journal of Business Research, 147: 16-26.
• Papadonikolaki, Eleni, Algan Tezel, Ibrahim Yitmen ve Per Hilletofth (2023). “Blockchain innovation ecosystems orchestration in construction”. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 123(2): 672-694.
• Pitelis, Christos N. ve David J. Teece (2018). “The new MNE:‘ Orchestration’ theory as envelope of ‘Internalisation’ theory”. Management International Review, 58: 523-539.
• Santos-Vijande, María Leticia, ve Luis Ignacio Álvarez-González (2007). “Innovativeness and organizational innovation in total quality oriented firms: The moderating role of market turbulence”. Technovation, 27(9): 514-532.
• Reiche, B. Sebastian (2006). “The inpatriate experience in multinational corporations: An exploratory case study in Germany”. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(9): 1572-1590.
• Roberts, Nicholas ve Varun Grover (2012). “Leveraging information technology infrastructure to facilitate a firm's customer agility and competitive activity: An empirical investigation”. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(4): 231-270.
• Slater, Stanley F. ve John C.. Narver (1994). “Does competitive environment moderate the market orientation-performance relationship?”. Journal of Marketing, 58(1): 46-55.
• Sultana, Saida, Shahriar Akter ve Elias Kyriazis (2022a).” How data-driven innovation capability is shaping the future of market agility and competitive performance?”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121260.
• Sultana, S., Shahriar Akter ve Elias Kyriazis (2022b). “Theorising data-driven innovation capabilities to survive and thrive in the digital economy”. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 1-27.
• Teece, David J., Gary Pisano ve Amy Schuen (1997). “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management”. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 509–533
• Teece, David J. (2007). “Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance”. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13): 1319-1350.
• Terjesen, Siri, Pankaj C. Patel, and Jeffrey G. Covin (2011). Alliance diversity, environmental context and the value of manufacturing capabilities among new high technology ventures. Journal of Operations Management, 29(1-2), 105-115.
• Trabucchi, Daniel ve Tommaso Buganza (2019). “Data-driven innovation: switching the perspective on Big Data”. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(1): 23-40.
• Tsai, Kuen-Hung ve Shu-Yi Yang (2013). “Firm innovativeness and business performance: The joint moderating effects of market turbulence and competition”. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(8): 1279-1294.
• Van Alstyne, Marshall W., Geoffrey G. Parker ve Sangeet Paul Choudary (2016). “Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy”. Harvard Business Review, 94(4): 54-62.
• Visvizi, Anna, Orlando Troisi, Mara Grimaldi ve Francesca Loia (2022). “Think human, act digital: activating data-driven orientation in innovative start-ups”. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(6): 452-478.
• Waller, Matthew A. ve Stanley E. Fawcett (2013). “Data science, predictive analytics, and big data: a revolution that will transform supply chain design and management”. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(2): 77-84.
• Wang, Catherine L. ve Pervaiz K. Ahmed (2007). “Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda”. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1): 31-51.
• Wang, Guangping, Wenyu Dou, Weichun Zhu ve Nan Zhou (2015). “The effects of firm capabilities on external collaboration and performance: The moderating role of market turbulence”. Journal of Business Research, 68(9): 1928-1936.
• Wong, David T.W. ve Eric W.T. Ngai (2022). “Linking data-driven innovation to firm performance: a theoretical framework and case analysis”. Annals of Operations Research, 1-20.
• Wu, Liang, Heng Liu ve Jianqi Zhang (2017). “Bricolage effects on new-product development speed and creativity: The moderating role of technological turbulence”. Journal of Business Research, 70, 127-135.
• Zhou, Jing, Felix T. Mavondo ve Stephen Graham Saunders (2019). “The relationship between marketing agility and financial performance under different levels of market turbulence”. Industrial Marketing Management, 83: 31-41.