AR-GE HARCAMALARINDA PATENT STOĞUNUN ÖNEMİ: İMALAT SANAYİ ÜZERİNE BİR UYGULAMA

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 49, 40 - 51, 25.07.2025

Zeynep Karaca

https://doi.org/10.35343/kosbed.1598515

Cited By: 1

Öz

Özet
Bilgiye dayalı ekonomilerin büyümesinin Ar-Ge ve teknolojik yeniliklerle desteklendiği yaygın olarak kabul edilmektedir. Gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan ülkelerin Ar-Ge'ye büyük oranlarda yatırım yapmasıyla birlikte, bilimsel verimliliğe ve Ar-Ge sürecine olan ilgi giderek artmaktadır. Birçok firma patent alarak pazarda rekabet gücü elde etmek için Ar-Ge çalışmaları yapmaktadır.
Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı, imalat sanayinde faaliyet gösteren firmaların Ar-Ge harcamaları yapmasında bilgi stoğunun öneminin araştırılmasıdır.
Yöntem: Çalışma kapsamında bağımlı değişkenin tüm değerlerine ulaşılamaması sebebiyle Tobit model kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada kullanılan değişkenler; Ar-Ge harcamaları, patent sayısı, patent stoğu ve ciro değişkenleridir.
Bulgular: Elde edilen tahmin sonuçlarına göre Ar-Ge harcamalarının artmasında patent stoğu ve ciro pozitif etkiye sahipken patent sayısı ise negatif etkiye sahiptir.
Özgünlük: Literatür taraması yapıldığında patentleri konu alan akademik çalışma sayısının çok fazla olduğu görülmektedir. Patent stoğunun önemine dikkat çeken çalışmaların nispeten genel patent sayıları çalışmalarına göre daha az olması ve bu konuda Türkiye imalat sanayiye yönelik bir araştırma yapılmamış olmasından dolayı bu çalışmanın literatüre katkı sunacağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Patent , patent stoğu , Ar-ge harcamaları , bilgi stoğu , Tobit model

THE IMPORTANCE OF PATENT STOCK IN R&D EXPENDITURES: AN APPLICATION ON TURKISH MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY

Öz

Abstract
It is widely recognized that the growth of knowledge-based economies is supported by R&D and technological innovation. With developed and developing countries investing heavily in R&D, there is growing interest in scientific productivity and the R&D process. Many firms carry out R&D activities in order to gain competitive power in the market by obtaining patents. In this study, a Tobit model was estimated using the variables of R&D expenditures, number of patents, patent stock and turnover for the years 2003-2021. According to the estimation results obtained, patent stock and turnover have a positive effect on the increase in R&D expenditures, while the number of patents has a negative effect.
Objective: The aim of the study is to investigate the importance of stock of knowledge in R&D expenditures of firms operating in the manufacturing industry.
Method: Within the scope of the study, Tobit model was used since all values of the dependent variable could not be reached. The variables used in the study are R&D expenditures, number of patents, patent stock and turnover.
Findings: According to the estimation results obtained, patent stock and turnover have a positive effect on the increase in R&D expenditures, while the number of patents has a negative effect.
Originality: A literature review reveals that the number of academic studies on patents is very high. This study is thought to contribute to the literature since the studies emphasizing the importance of patent stock are relatively fewer than the studies on the number of patents in general and no research has been conducted on the Turkish manufacturing industry.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Patent , patent stock , R&D expenditures , knowledge stock , Tobit model

Kaynakça

• Ahmed, K., Jinan, M. (2011). The association between research and development expenditure and firm performance: testing a life cycle hypothesis, International Journal Of Accounting, Auditing And Performance Evaluation, 7(4), 267-286.
• Altuzarra, A. (2019). R&d and patents: ıs ıt a two way street?, Economics of Innovation And New Technology, 28(2), 180-196.
• Anakpo, G., Oyenubi, A. (2022). Technological innovation and economic growth in southern africa: application of panel dynamic ols regression, Development Southern Africa, 39(4), 543-557.
• Appio, F. P., De Luca, L. M., Morgan, R., Martini, A. (2019). Patent portfolio diversity and firm profitability: a question of specialization or diversification, Journal of Business Research, 101, 255-267.
• Arora, A., Ceccagnoli, M., Cohen, W. M. (2008). R&d and the patent premium, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26, 1153-1179.
• Becker, W., Dietz, J. (2004). R&d cooperation and innovation activities of firms – evidence for the German manufacturing industry, Research Policy, 33, 209-223.
• Bointner, R. (2014). Innovation in the energy sector: lessons learnt from r&d expenditures and patents in selected IEA countries, Energy Policy, 73, 733-747.
• Bound, J., Cummins, C., Griliches, Z., Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. (1982). Who does r&d and who patents?, NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper No.908.
• Bozkurt, K. (2008). Türk imalat sanayinde teknolojik gelişme ve ihracat performansı, Finans Politik& Ekonomik Yorumlar, 45(522), 91-103.
• Coad, A. Rao, R. (2010). Firm growth and r&d expenditure, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19(2), 127-145.
• Curtis, A., McVay, S., Toynbee, S. (2020). The changing implications of research and development expenditures for future profitability, Review of Accounting Studies, 25, 405-437.
• Czarnitzki, D., Toole, A. A. (2011). Patent production, market uncertainty, and r&d investment, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(1), 147-159.
• Çütcü, İ. (2017). İnovasyonun ihracat performansına etkisi: yatay kesit analizi uygulaması, Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 10(48), 586-597.
• Dai, X., Guo, Y., Wang, L. (2020). Composition of r&d expenditures and firm performance, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(6), 739-752.
• Dereli, D. D. (2019). The relationship between high-technology exports, patent and economic growth in Turkey (1990-2015), Journal of Business, Economics and Finance, 8(3), 173-180.
• Ferdaus, J., Rahman, M. M. (2017). The effects of research and development expenditure on firm performance: an examination of pharmaceuticals industry in Bangladesh, Business& Entrepreneurship, 6(2), 1-20.
• Gambardella, A. (2023). Private and social functions of patents: innovation, markets, and new firms. Research Policy, 52, 1-14.
• Ghaffar, A., Khan, W. A. (2014). Impact of research and development on firm performance, International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 4(1), 357-367.
• Gu, W., Tang, J. (2004). Link between innovation and productivity in Canadian manufacturing ındustries, Economics of Innovation And New Technology, 13(7), 671-686.
• Hall, B. H., Thoma, G., Torrisi, S. (2007). The market value of patents and r&d: evidence from European firms, NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 13426.
• Kim, J., Marschke, G. (2004). Accounting for the recent surge in U.S. patenting: changes in r&d expenditures, patent yields, and the high tech sector, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13(6), 543-558.
• Kim, K., Jung, S., Hwang, J. (2019). Technology convergence capability and firm innovation in the manufacturing sector: an approach based on patent network analysis, R&D Management, 49(4), 397-697.
• Koç, Ş., Şahin, M. (2018). Tobit model ve bir uygulama, KSÜ Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 21(1), 73-80.
• Kondo, M. (1999). R&d dynamics of creating patents in the Japanese ındustry. Research Policy, 28, 587-600.
• Koschatzky, K., Bross, U., Stanovnik, P. (2001). Development and innovation potential in the Slovene manufacturing industry: analysis of an industrial innovstion survey, Technovation, 21, 311-324.
• Lee, J. Y., Swink, M., Pandejpong, T. (2011). The roles of worker expertise, information sharing quality, and psychological safety in manufacturing process innovation: an intellectual capital perspective, Production and Operations Management, 20(4), 556-570.
• Lee, S., Kim, D. H. (2022). Knowledge stocks, government r&d, institutional factors and innovation: evidence from biotechnology patent data, Innovation and Development, 12(3), 459-477.
• López, A. (2008). Determinants of r&d cooperation: evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26, 113-136.
• Mabrouki, M. (2022). Patent, education, human capital, and economic growth in Scandinavian countries: a dynamic panel cs-ardl analysis, Journal of the Knowlede Economy, 1-16.
• Marín-Vinuesa, L. M., Portillo-Tarragona, P., Scarpellini, S. (2023). Firms’ capabilities management for waste patents in a circular economy, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(5), 1368-1391.
• Milani, S., Neumann, R. (2022). R&d, patents, and financing constraints of the top global innovative firms. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 196, 546-567.
• Nguyen, C. P., Doytch, N. (2022). The impact of ıct patents on economic growth: an international evidence, Telecommunications Policy, 46, 1-19.
• Özdes, A., Erkan, A., Koç, A. (1999). Konsantre meyve suyu talebinin “tobit” modeli ile analizi, MPRA Paper No.8649.
• Porter, M. E., Stern, S. (2000). Measuring the “ideas” production function: evidence from international patent output, NBER Working Paper, No.7891.
• Ravśelj, D., Aristovnik, A. (2020). The impact of r&d expenditures on corporate performance: evidence from Slovenian and world r&d companies, Sustainability, 12(5), 1-20.
• Roper, S., Hewitt-Dundas, N. (2015). Knowledge stocks, knowledge flows and innovation: evidence from matched patents and innovation panel data, Research Policy, 44, 1327-1340.
• Şahin, M. T., Altuğ, F. (2017). Türkiye’de yenilik faaliyetlerinde yenilikçi uzmanlaşma eğilimleri: İstanbul, Ankara ve İzmir bölgeleri imalat sanayi patent göstergeleri, Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi, 15(2), 157-166.
• Thomas, V.J., Sharma, S., Jain, S. K. (2011). Using patents and publications to assess r&d efficiency in the states of the USA, World Patent Information, 33, 4-10.
• Tung, L. T., Binh, Q. M. Q. (2022). The impact of r&d expenditure on firm performance in emerging markets: evidence from the Vietnamese listed companies, Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 30(2), 447-465.
• Türedi, S. (2016). The relationship between r&d expenditures, patent applications and growth: a dynamic panel causality analysis for OECD countries, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(1), 39-48.
• Ülkü, H. (2004). R&d, innovation, and economic growth: an empirical analysis. IMF Working Paper, WP/04/185.
• Wakelin, K. (2001). Productivity growth and r&d expenditure in UK manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 30, 1079-1090.
• Wang, J., Tsai, K. (2003). Productivity growth and r&d expenditure in Taiwan’s manufacturing firms. NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper No 9724.
• Weiyu, Z., Othman, A., Guli, T. (2022). Role of technological acquisition and r&d expenditure in innovative investment, Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-14.
• Yagi, M., Managi, S. (2018). Shadow price of patent stock as knowledge stock: time and country heterogeneity, Economic Analysis And Policy, 60, 43-61.
• Yu, G. J., Hong, K. (2016). Patents and r&d expenditure in explaining stock price movements. Finance Research Letters, 19, 197-203.
• Revenue Administration, www.gib.gov.tr.