The Mediating Role of Citizenship Fatigue in The Effect Of Emotional Stability on Thriving at Work

Öz

This study aims to determine the mediating role of citizenship fatigue in the relationship between emotional stability and thriving at work among banking sector employees. To achieve this aim, data were collected from 291 banking sector employees. The findings indicate that while emotional stability positively influences thriving at work, citizenship fatigue exerts a negative influence. Moreover, it was found that emotional stability reduces citizenship fatigue, thereby supporting employees’ learning and renewal processes. More importantly, the effect of emotional stability on thriving at work occurs indirectly through the mediator role of citizenship fatigue. These results demonstrate that the developmental processes individuals experience in the workplace are directly related not only to personal motivation and skills, but also to the effective use of psychological resources. Consequently, the findings underscore the importance for organizations to develop strategies that enable employees to manage these psychological resources efficiently

Anahtar Kelimeler

• emotional stability
• citizenship fatigue
• thriving at work

Duygusal Dengenin İşte Gelişime Etkisinde Vatandaşlık Yorgunluğunun Aracı Rolü

Öz

Araştırmada bankacılık sektörü çalışanlarında duygusal dengenin işte gelişime etkisinde vatandaşlık yorgunluğunun aracı rolünün belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda 291 bankacılık sektör çalışanından veriler toplanmıştır. Araştırmadan elde edilen bulgulara göre duygusal denge işte gelişimi olumlu yönde etkilerken, vatandaşlık yorgunluğu ise işte gelişimi olumsuz yönde etkilemektedir. Bununla birlikte, duygusal dengenin vatandaşlık yorgunluğunu azaltarak çalışanların öğrenme ve yenilenme süreçlerini desteklediği belirlenmiştir. Daha da önemlisi, duygusal dengenin işte gelişim üzerindeki etkisinin vatandaşlık yorgunluğu üzerinden dolaylı bir mekanizmayla gerçekleştiği ortaya konmuştur. Araştırma bulguları, bireylerin iş yaşamındaki gelişim süreçlerinin yalnızca bireysel motivasyon ve becerilerle değil, aynı zamanda psikolojik kaynakların etkin kullanımıyla da doğrudan ilişkili olduğunu göstermekte, örgütlerin çalışanlarının bu kaynakları verimli bir şekilde yönetmelerine olanak tanıyacak stratejiler geliştirmelerinin önemini vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• duygusal denge
• vatandaşlık yorgunluğu
• ,işte gelişim

Kaynakça

1. Abid, G., Contreras, F., Ahmed, S., & Qazi, T. (2019). Contextual factors and organizational commitment: Examining the mediating role of thriving at work. Sustainability, 11(17), 4686. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174686
2. Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150-169. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2893
3. Atalay, E. (2024). Dijitalleşme sürecinin bankacılık ve borsa üzerindeki yansımaları. Al Farabi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(1), 57-72. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/farabi/issue/86268/1565339
4. Bolino, M. C., Hsiung, H. H., Harvey, J., & LePine, J. A. (2015). “Well, I’m tired of tryin’!” Organizational citizenship behavior and citizenship fatigue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 56-74. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037583
5. Carmeli, A., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2009). Trust, connectivity, and thriving: Implications for innovative behaviors at work. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(3), 169-191. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01313.x
6. Carver, C. S., & Connor-Smith, J. (2010). Personality and Coping. Annual review of psychology, 61(1), 679-704. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100352
7. Chiaburu, D. S., Oh, I. S., Berry, C. M., Li, N., & Gardner, R. G. (2011). The five-factor model of personality traits and organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1140–1166. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024004
8. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.

9. De Clercq, D., Suhail, A., Azeem, M. U., & Haq, I. U. (2021). Citizenship pressure and job performance: roles of citizenship fatigue and continuance commitment. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 59(3), 482-505. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12241
10. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-¬50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
11. Goldberg, L. R. (2013). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. In Personality and Personality Disorders (pp. 34-47). Routledge.
12. Görgülü, B. D., & Kumova, F. (2023). Psikoterapistlerde duygusal tükenmişlikle başa çıkma mekanizmaları, kontrol odağı ve duygusal denge eğiliminin ilişkisi, Ulakbilge, 80(2023 Ocak), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.7816/ulakbilge-11-80-06
13. Güney Karaman, N. G., Dogan, T., & Coban, A. E. (2010). A study to adapt the big five inventory to Turkish. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2357-2359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.336
14. Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). New York City: Sage Publications.
15. Halbesleben, J. R., & Wheeler, A. R. (2015). To invest or not? The role of coworker support and trust in daily reciprocal gain spirals of helping behavior. Journal of Management, 41(6), 1628-1650. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312455246
16. Halbesleben, J. R., Neveu, J. P., Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., & Westman, M. (2014). Getting to the “COR” understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1334-1364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527130
17. Hennekam, S. (2017). Thriving of older workers. Personnel Review, 46(2), 297-313. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-07-2015-0195
18. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
19. Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.44.3.513
20. Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested‐self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology, 50(3), 337-421. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00062
21. Hussain, Z., Farid, H., Liu, X., & Abbass Shaheen, W. (2022). Unveiling the effects of stressors on task performance: The role of thriving at work and resilience. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 896505. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.896505
22. İçerli, L., & Arsu, Ş. U. (2019). Beş faktör kişilik özelliklerinin kariyer değerleri üzerindeki etkisi: Üniversite öğrencileri üzerine bir araştırma. İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(8), 21-45. https://doi.org/10.25204/iktisad.429513
23. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). Guilford Press.
24. John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory – versions 4a and 5. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/t07550-000
25. Judge, T. A., & Ilies, R. (2002). Relationship of personality to performance motivation: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 797-807. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.797
26. Karadeniz, G., & Uzunbacak, H. H. (2023). Adaptation of citizenship fatigue scale into Turkish culture: The study of reliability and validity. Sosyal Mucit Academic Review, 4(4), 558-576. https://doi.org/10.54733/smar.1377965
27. Karadeniz, G., Uzunbacak, H. H., & Karababa, A. (2023). Vatandaşlık yorgunluğu: Kavramsal bir çerçeve. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(4), 40-56. https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1210292
28. Kleine, A. K., Rudolph, C. W., & Zacher, H. (2019). Thriving at work: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(9-10), 973-999. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2375
29. Leguina, A. (2015). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Int. J. Res. Method Educ., 38, 220–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2015.1005806
30. Liu, X., & Yu, K. (2019). Emotional stability and citizenship fatigue: The role of emotional exhaustion and job stressors. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 254-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.033
31. Liu, Y., Xu, S., & Zhang, B. (2020). Thriving at work: how a paradox mindset influences innovative work behavior. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 56(3), 347-366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886319888267
32. Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 23(6), 695-706. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.165
33. Memon, M. A., Ting, H., Cheah, J. H., Thurasamy, R., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2020). Sample size for survey research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 4(2), i-xx. Erişim adresi: https://jasemjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Memon-et-al_JASEM_-Editorial_V4_Iss2_June2020.pdf
34. Mieg, H. A., Bedenk, S. J., Braun, A., & Neyer, F. J. (2012). How emotional stability and openness to experience support invention: A study with German independent inventors. Creativity Research Journal, 24(2-3), 200-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.677341
35. Niessen, C., Sonnentag, S., & Sach, F. (2011). Thriving at work – A diary study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(4), 468–487. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.763
36. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books.
37. Parker, S. K. (2014). Beyond motivation: Job and work design for development, health, ambidexterity, and more. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 661-691. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115208
38. Paterson, T. A., Luthans, F., & Jeung, W. (2014). Thriving at work: Impact of psychological capital and supervisor support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(3), 434-446. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1907
39. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600307
40. Porath, C., Spreitzer, G., Gibson, C., & Garnett, F. G. (2012). Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 250-275. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.756
41. Qiu, Y., Lou, M., Zhang, L., & Wang, Y. (2020). Organizational citizenship behavior motives and thriving at work: the mediating role of citizenship fatigue. Sustainability, 12(6), 2231. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062231
42. Ren, H., Yunlu, D. U., Shaffer, M., and Fodchuk, K. M. (2015). Expatriate success and thriving: the influence of job deprivation and emotional stability. J. World Bus. 50, 69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2014.01.007
43. Rongping, J., & Yiming, H. (2018). Are you tired of trying? A review of citizenship fatigue and future prospects. Foreign Economics & Management, 40(10), 81-93. https://doi.org/10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2018.10.007
44. Sazlaya, M. K., & Parlak, Ö. (2018). Beş faktör kişilik özelliklerinin iş yaşamında yalnızlık üzerine etkisinin incelenmesi. Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(1), 149-165. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/odusobiad/issue/36351/387009
45. Spreitzer, G., & Hwang, E. B. (2019). How thriving at work matters for creating psychologically healthy workplaces: Current perspectives and implications for the new world of work. Creating Psychologically Healthy Workplaces, 293-310. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788113427.00024
46. Spreitzer, G., Sutcliffe, K., Dutton, J., Sonenshein, S., & Grant, A. M. (2005). A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organization Science, 16(5), 537-549. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0153
47. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson.
48. Toksöz, D., Pala, T., & Çapar, G. (2020). İşte gelişim ölçeğini Türkçeye uyarlama çalışması. İzmir İktisat Dergisi, 35(1), 177-186. https://doi.org/10.24988/ije.202035113
49. Vittersø, J. (2001). Personality traits and subjective well-being: Emotional stability, not extraversion, is probably the important predictor. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(6), 903-914. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00192-6
50. Yeşiltaş, M. D. (2023). Algılanan yönetici koçluk davranışı ve işte gelişim: motivasyon ve cinsiyete ilişkin bir durumsal aracılık modeli. Ulakbilge Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(80), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.7816/ulakbilge-11-80-03