Araştırma Makalesi

Evaluation of Postoperative Development of Saphenous Vein Graft Incision Site Infections in Patients Undergoing Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Single Center Experience

Cilt: 17 Sayı: 3 2 Kasım 2022
PDF İndir
TR EN

Evaluation of Postoperative Development of Saphenous Vein Graft Incision Site Infections in Patients Undergoing Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Single Center Experience

Abstract

Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate surgical site infection patients developing saphenous vein graft incision site infection after isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery performed in the cardiovascular surgery clinic of our hospital in the last 12 years to reveal the causative microorganisms, risk factors, and clinical characteristics.
Material and Methods: A total of 34 surgical site infection patients (23 females, 11 males; mean age 68.0±9.0 years; range 51-86 years) who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery in the cardiovascular surgery clinic of our hospital between March 2009 and November 2020 and who postoperatively developed saphenous vein graft incision site infection were included in the study. The patients’ demographic data, underlying diseases, and preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative risk factors were analyzed retrospectively.
Results: In all isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgeries performed over a period of about 12 years, the rate of saphenous vein graft incision site surgical site infection was found to be 0.8%. Of these, 23 (67.6%) were evaluated as superficial incisional surgical site infection and 11 (32.4%) as deep incisional surgical site infection. In the patients who developed surgical site infection, the parameters of age, female sex, obesity, diabetes mellitus, smoking, emergency surgery, use of more than 1 saphenous vein graft, prolonged operation, cardiopulmonary bypass, and aortic clamp durations, intraoperative blood transfusion, length of stay in the intensive care unit, use of inotropes, and total length of hospital stay were all found to be significant. The microorganisms in purulent discharge cultures consisted of Gram-negative bacteria in 18 (53%), Gram-positive bacteria in 12 (35.3%), and fungi in 1 (2.9%). No pathogenic microorganism growth was observed in 5 (14.7%) patients. In the patients with surgical site infection, coagulase-negative staphylococci (17.6%) and Escherichia coli (17.6%) were the most frequently isolated agents.
Conclusion: Particular attention should be paid to surgical site infection in patients undergoing a cardiovascular surgery intervention. It should be noted that post coronary artery bypass graft surgery surgical site infection can be reduced by determining its risk factors, modifying surgical techniques, and postoperative close monitoring of patients. Follow-up and personal care are crucial after discharge and an empirical treatment approach should be determined when an infection occurs, taking into account that coagulase-negative staphylococci and E. coli were the two leading infectious agents in our hospital.

Keywords

Cardiovascular surgery , saphenous vein , graft , surgical site infection , Cardiovascular surgery, saphenous vein, graft, surgical site infection

Kaynakça

  1. Spadaccio C, Benedetto U. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the treatment of multivessel coronary disease: quo vadis? A review of the evidences on coronary artery disease. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;7:506-515.
  2. Figuerola-Tejerina A, Rodriguez-Caravaca G, Bustamante-Munguira J, San Roman-Montero JM, Duran-Poveda M. Epidemiological surveillance and surgical site ınfection and its risk factors in cardiac surgery: A prospective cohort study. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2016;69:842-848.
  3. Lopes RD, Hafley GE, Allen KB, Ferguson TB, Peterson ED, Harrington RA et al. Endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvesting in coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:235-244.
  4. Cove ME, Spelman DW, MacLaren G. Infectious complications of cardiac surgery. A clinical review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012;26:1094-1100.
  5. Lazar HL, Salm TV, Engelman R, Orgill D, Gordon S. Prevention and management of sternal wound infections. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152:962-972.
  6. Sharma M, Fakih MG, Berriel-Cass D, Meisner S, Saravolatz L, Khatib R. Harvest surgical site infection following coronary artery bypass grafting: risk factors, microbiology, and outcomes. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37:653-657.
  7. Swenne CL, Lindholm C, Borowiec J, Carlsson M. Surgical-site infections within 60 days of coronary artery by-pass graft surgery. J Hosp Infect. 2004;57:14-24.
  8. Fowler VG, O’Brien SM, Muhlbaier LH, Corey GR, Ferguson TB, Peterson ED. Clinical predictors of major infections after cardiac surgery. Circulation. 2005;112:358-365.
  9. O’Hara LM, Thom KA, Preas MA. Update to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection (2017): A summary, review, and strategies for implementation. Am J Infect Control. 2018;46:602-609.
  10. Bray GA, Heisel WE, Afshin A, Jensen MD, Dietz WH, Long M et al. The Science of Obesity Management: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement. Endocr Rev. 2018;39:79-132.

Kaynak Göster

AMA
1.Akyıldız Ö, Ulular Ö. Evaluation of Postoperative Development of Saphenous Vein Graft Incision Site Infections in Patients Undergoing Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Single Center Experience. KSÜ Tıp Fak Der. 2022;17(3):179-187. doi:10.17517/ksutfd.1037822