The Comparison of Color Doppler Ultrasonography and Indirect Computer Tomography Venography for the Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Thromboembolism

Betül Güney

doi:10.17517/ksutfd.673979

TR EN

The Comparison of Color Doppler Ultrasonography and Indirect Computer Tomography Venography for the Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Thromboembolism

Öz

Erciyes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi 2002 T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığına bağlı Sağlık Ocaklarında, Pratisyen Hekim 2002-2004 Tıpta uzmanlık: Erciyes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Radyoloji Bölümü 2005-2010 Kayseri Eğitim Araştirma Hastanelerinde, Radyoloji Uzman Doktor 2010-2015 Özel Melikgazi Hastanesi, Radyoloji Uzman Doktor 2015-2018 Halil Bayraktar Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksek Okulu, Dr. Öğretim Görevlisi 2019- halen devam ediyor

Anahtar Kelimeler

Pulmonary thromboembolism,Deep vein thrombosis,İndirect computer tomography venography,,color doppler ultrasonography

Kaynakça

1. Duwe KM, Shiau M, Budorick NE, Austin JH, Berkmen YM. Evaluation of the Lower Extremity Veins in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism:A Retrospective Comparison of Helical CT Venography and Sonography. AJR 2000; 175: 1525–1531..
2. Loud PA, Katz DS, Bruce DA, Klippenstein DL, Grossman ZD. Deep venous thrombosis with suspected pulmonary embolism: detection with combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography. Radiology 2001; 219: 498-502.
3. Anderson FA JR, Wheeler HB, Goldberg RJ, Hosmer DW, Patwardhan NA, Jovanovic B, Forcier A, Dalen JE. A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case-fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The Worcester DVT Study. Arch Intern Med. 1991 May;151(5): 933-8.
4. Loud PA, Katz DS, Klippenstein DL, Shah RD, Grossman ZD. Combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography in suspected thromboembolic disease: diagnostic accuracy for deep venous evaluation. AJR 2000; 174: 61-65.
5. Cham MD, Yankelevitz DF, Shaham D, Shah AA, Sherman L, Lewis A, Rademaker J, Pearson G, Choi J, Wolff W, Prabhu PM, Galanski M, Clark RA, Sostman HD, Henschke CI. Deep venous thrombosis: detection by using indirect CT venography. The Pulmonary Angiography-Indirect CT Venography Cooperative Group. Radiology. 2000 Sep; 216(3): 744-51.
6. Well PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the model’sutility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83:416-420
7. Sandler DA, Martin JF. Autopsy proven pulmonary embolism in hospital patients: Are we detecting enough deep vein thrombosis? J R Soc Med. 1989 Apr; 82(4): 203-5.
8. Kruit WH, De Boer AC, Sing AK, Van Roon F. The significance of venography in the management of patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism. J Intern Med. 1991 Oct; 230(4): 333-9.
9. Eze AR, Comerota AJ, Kerr RP, Harada RN, Domeracki F. Is venous duplex imaging an appropriate initial screening test for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism? Ann Vasc Surg. 1996 May; 10(3): 220-3
10. Öztürk A, Çelenk Ç, Belet Ü, Polat V, Akan H. Evaluation of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in thromboembolic disease by indirect CT venography and Doppler US Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology 2002; 8: 139-144

11. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Thorax 2003; 58: 470–83
12. Garg K, Mao J. Deep venous thrombosis: spectrum of findings and pitfalls in interpretation on CT venography. AJR 2001; 177: 319-323.
13. Baldt MM, Zontsich T, Stümpflen A, Fleischmann D, Schneider B, Minar E, Mostbeck GH. Deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity: efficacy of spiral CT venography compared with conventional venography in diagnosis. Radiology. 1996 Aug; 200(2): 423-8.
14. Katz DS, Loud PA, Bruce D, Gittleman AM, Mueller R, Klippenstein DL, Grossman ZD. Combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography: a comprehensive review. Radiographics. 2002 Oct; 22 Spec No: S3-19; discussion S20-4. Review.66
15. Guidelines on diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism.Task Force on Pulmonary Embolism, European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2000; 21: 1301-1336.
16. Kalva SP, Jagannathan JP, Hahn PF. et al. Venous thromboembolism: indirect CT venography during CT pulmonary angiography--should the pelvis be imaged? Radiology. 2008; 246: 605-611.
17. Taffoni MJ, Ravenel JG, Ackerman SJ. Prospective comparison of indirect CT venography versus venous sonography in ICU patients. AJR 2005;185:457-62.
18. Lim KE, Hsu WC, Hsu YY, Chu PH, Ng CJ. Deep venous thrombosis comparison of indirect multidetector CT venography and sonography of lower extremities in 26 patients. Clin Imaging 2004; 28: 439 – 444.
19. Goodman LR, Curtin JJ, Mewissen MW, Foley WD, Lipchik RJ, Crain MR, Sagar KB, Collier BD. Detection of pulmonary embolism in patients with unresolved clinical and scintigraphic diagnosis: helical CT versus angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Jun; 164(6): 1369-74.
20. PIOPED investigators. The value of the ventilation/ perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism: results of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED). JAMA 1990; 263: 2753-2759
21. Ghaye B, Nchimi A, Noukoua CT, Dondelinger RF. Does multi-detector row CT pulmonary angiography reduce the incremental value of indirect CT venography compared with single-detector row CT pulmonary angiography? Radiology. 2006 Jul; 240(1): 256-62. Epub 2006 May 23
22. Moser KM. Venous thromboembolism. Sate of the art. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990; 141: 235-249.
23. Huet Y, Lemaire F, Brun-Buisson C, et al. Hypoxemia in acute pulmonary embolism. Chest 1985; 88: 829-836.
24. Begemann PG, Bonacker M, Kemper J, Guthoff AE, Hahn KE, Steiner P, Adam G.Evaluation of the deep venous system in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism with multi-detector CT: a prospective study in comparison to Doppler sonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2003 May-Jun; 27(3): 399-409.103.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Betül Güney ^*
0000-0001-9378-0912
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

16 Ekim 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

20 Ocak 2020

Kabul Tarihi

9 Haziran 2020

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Cilt: 15 Sayı: 3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17517/ksutfd.673979

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA79AD64YE

APA

Güney, B. (2020). The Comparison of Color Doppler Ultrasonography and Indirect Computer Tomography Venography for the Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Thromboembolism. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(3), 47-53. https://doi.org/10.17517/ksutfd.673979

AMA

1.Güney B. The Comparison of Color Doppler Ultrasonography and Indirect Computer Tomography Venography for the Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Thromboembolism. KSÜ Tıp Fak Der. 2020;15(3):47-53. doi:10.17517/ksutfd.673979

Chicago

Güney, Betül. 2020. “The Comparison of Color Doppler Ultrasonography and Indirect Computer Tomography Venography for the Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Thromboembolism”. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 15 (3): 47-53. https://doi.org/10.17517/ksutfd.673979.

EndNote

Güney B (01 Ekim 2020) The Comparison of Color Doppler Ultrasonography and Indirect Computer Tomography Venography for the Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Thromboembolism. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 15 3 47–53.

IEEE

[1]B. Güney, “The Comparison of Color Doppler Ultrasonography and Indirect Computer Tomography Venography for the Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Thromboembolism”, KSÜ Tıp Fak Der, c. 15, sy 3, ss. 47–53, Eki. 2020, doi: 10.17517/ksutfd.673979.

ISNAD

Güney, Betül. “The Comparison of Color Doppler Ultrasonography and Indirect Computer Tomography Venography for the Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Thromboembolism”. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 15/3 (01 Ekim 2020): 47-53. https://doi.org/10.17517/ksutfd.673979.

JAMA

1.Güney B. The Comparison of Color Doppler Ultrasonography and Indirect Computer Tomography Venography for the Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Thromboembolism. KSÜ Tıp Fak Der. 2020;15:47–53.

MLA

Güney, Betül. “The Comparison of Color Doppler Ultrasonography and Indirect Computer Tomography Venography for the Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Thromboembolism”. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 15, sy 3, Ekim 2020, ss. 47-53, doi:10.17517/ksutfd.673979.

Vancouver

1.Betül Güney. The Comparison of Color Doppler Ultrasonography and Indirect Computer Tomography Venography for the Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Thromboembolism. KSÜ Tıp Fak Der. 01 Ekim 2020;15(3):47-53. doi:10.17517/ksutfd.673979

The Comparison of Color Doppler Ultrasonography and Indirect Computer Tomography Venography for the Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Thromboembolism

Pulmoner Tromboemboli Şüphesi Olan Hastalarda Derin Ven Trombozu Tanısında İndirekt Bilgisayarlı Tomografi Venografi İle Renkli Doppler Ultrasonografi Bulgularının Karşılaştırılması

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

The Comparison of Color Doppler Ultrasonography and Indirect Computer Tomography Venography for the Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Thromboembolism

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster