Araştırma Makalesi

Assessmentof Service and Social Conditions of 112 Ambulance Workers

Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2 15 Temmuz 2022
PDF İndir
TR EN

Assessmentof Service and Social Conditions of 112 Ambulance Workers

Öz

Objective: 112 Emergency Health Services (EHS) is crucial for preventing deaths and injuries with early intervention and significantly impacts survival. Many factors like shift working, occupational dissatisfaction, safety concern, and stress adversely affect 112 EHS workers. This study aimed to evaluate the working conditions, expectations, job satisfaction, service, and social conditions of 112 EHS staff working in Kahramanmaras to determine their difficulties and provide suggestions for more efficient working conditions. Material and Methods: This study was conducted with health workers working at 112 EHS in Kahramanmaras. A survey form was developed to investigate their service and social conditions. It was converted into an electronic survey containing 29 questions via Google Forms. Two hundred fifty-two health workers participated in the study by filling out the electronic survey. Results: The most important factors affecting workers’ job performance were job satisfaction/respect and salary level. Workers reported the majority of the cases encountered during a 24-hour shift were green zone patients.The average arrival time to the cases and the delivery time of the patients to the hospital are mostly within 0-10 minutes. Emergency room physicians’ approach and the lack of allied health personnel were the most common problems during patients’ delivery to the hospital. Most workers stated that protective measures on occupational safety in the EHS were insufficient and that they were subjected to physical assault. Conclusion: As a result of our study, it was determined that 112 employees experienced job dissatisfaction.This situation is the level of salary, lack of dignity, and fear of security.However, there are some deficiencies regarding the use and organization of 112 emergency health services. It is necessary to immediately improve 112 EHS workers’ working conditions and the coordination of EHS.

Anahtar Kelimeler

112, Ambulance, Emergency, Job satisfaction, Working conditions

Kaynakça

  1. Kobusingye OC, Hyder AA, Bishai D, Hicks ER, Mock C,Joshipura M. Emergency medical systems in low and middle-income countries: recommendations for action. Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83:626-631.
  2. Sofuoğlu T, Uçan ES, Çelikli S, Üstünkarlı N, Ersoy G. Hastane öncesi acil bakım hizmetleri: Paramedik. 1. baskı. İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi yayını. 2000:139-150.
  3. Breen N, Woods J, Bury G, Murphy A, Brazier H. A national census of ambulance response times to emergency calls in Ireland. J Accid Emerg Med. 2000;17:392-395.
  4. Güneri S, İlhan MN, Avcı E. Ankara 112 Acil Sağlık Hizmeti çalışanlarının çalışma koşulları ve iş memnuniyetinin değerlendirilmesi. Gazi Med J. 2011;22:1-5.
  5. İbrahim Ç, Oya K. İzmir ilinde çalışan ambulans ve acil bakım teknikerlerinde iş doyumunun ve buna etki eden faktörlerin incelenmesi. Akademik Acil Tıp Dergisi 2009;8(3):33-37.
  6. Blau G, Chapman S. Retrospectively Exploring the Importance of ıtems in the decision to leave the emergency medical services (EMS) profession and their relationships to life satisfaction after leaving ems and likelihood of returning to EMS. Journal of Allied Health. 2011;40:29-32.
  7. Duran A, Ocak T, Yorgun S, Koç D. 112 Ambulans servisinde çalışan memnuniyeti. Abant Med J. 2012;1(3):144-148.
  8. Kaur S, Sharma R, Talwar R, Verma A, Singh S. A study of job satisfaction and work environment perception among doctors in a tertiary hospital in Delhi. Indian J Med. 2009;63:139-144.
  9. De Gieter S, De Cooman R, Pepermans R, Jegers M. The Psychological Reward Satisfaction Scale: Developing and psychometric testing two refined subscales for nurses. J Adv Nurs. 2010;66:911-922.
  10. Gülhan KÇ, Onur K, Tuğba AT, Yunus EA, Ferhat İ, Alp S. 112 ile Acil Servise Getirilen Vakaların Değerlendirilmesi. Turkish Medical Journal. 2012;6:73-76.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Gedik, M. S., Hakkoymaz, H., Basan, N. M., Safi, Y., & Aksay, E. (2022). Assessmentof Service and Social Conditions of 112 Ambulance Workers. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(2), 20-28. https://doi.org/10.17517/ksutfd.900466
AMA
1.Gedik MS, Hakkoymaz H, Basan NM, Safi Y, Aksay E. Assessmentof Service and Social Conditions of 112 Ambulance Workers. KSÜ Tıp Fak Der. 2022;17(2):20-28. doi:10.17517/ksutfd.900466
Chicago
Gedik, Muhammed Semih, Hakan Hakkoymaz, Nuri Mehmet Basan, Yılmaz Safi, ve Erdem Aksay. 2022. “Assessmentof Service and Social Conditions of 112 Ambulance Workers”. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 17 (2): 20-28. https://doi.org/10.17517/ksutfd.900466.
EndNote
Gedik MS, Hakkoymaz H, Basan NM, Safi Y, Aksay E (01 Temmuz 2022) Assessmentof Service and Social Conditions of 112 Ambulance Workers. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 17 2 20–28.
IEEE
[1]M. S. Gedik, H. Hakkoymaz, N. M. Basan, Y. Safi, ve E. Aksay, “Assessmentof Service and Social Conditions of 112 Ambulance Workers”, KSÜ Tıp Fak Der, c. 17, sy 2, ss. 20–28, Tem. 2022, doi: 10.17517/ksutfd.900466.
ISNAD
Gedik, Muhammed Semih - Hakkoymaz, Hakan - Basan, Nuri Mehmet - Safi, Yılmaz - Aksay, Erdem. “Assessmentof Service and Social Conditions of 112 Ambulance Workers”. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 17/2 (01 Temmuz 2022): 20-28. https://doi.org/10.17517/ksutfd.900466.
JAMA
1.Gedik MS, Hakkoymaz H, Basan NM, Safi Y, Aksay E. Assessmentof Service and Social Conditions of 112 Ambulance Workers. KSÜ Tıp Fak Der. 2022;17:20–28.
MLA
Gedik, Muhammed Semih, vd. “Assessmentof Service and Social Conditions of 112 Ambulance Workers”. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 17, sy 2, Temmuz 2022, ss. 20-28, doi:10.17517/ksutfd.900466.
Vancouver
1.Muhammed Semih Gedik, Hakan Hakkoymaz, Nuri Mehmet Basan, Yılmaz Safi, Erdem Aksay. Assessmentof Service and Social Conditions of 112 Ambulance Workers. KSÜ Tıp Fak Der. 01 Temmuz 2022;17(2):20-8. doi:10.17517/ksutfd.900466