Araştırma Makalesi

Femur Boyun Kırığı Tanısı ile Yatan Hastalarda Beslenme Desteğini Önemsiyor muyuz?

Cilt: 17 Sayı: 3 2 Kasım 2022
PDF İndir
EN TR

Do We Care About Nutritional Support in Patients Hospitalized with a Diagnosis of Femoral Neck Fracture?

Abstract

Abstract
Objective: Femoral neck fractures (FNF) occur in the intracapsular region of the proximal femur. The incidence of fractures in the proximal femur increases with age. FNF’s cause high mortality and morbidity. Malnutrition is also one of the problems of these patients. In this study, it was aimed to reveal the importance of necessary nutritional follow-up in patients hospitalized in our hospital.
Material and Methods: Data of patients hospitalized in Kutahya Health Sciences University Evliya Celebi Training and Research Hospital with a diagnosis of FNF between 2017-2018 were retrospectively scanned from the patient file and the hospital automation system. Two hundred and twenty nine patients were included in the study. Hospitalization diagnosis, age and gender, albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and lymphocyte values of the patients were measured.
The nutritional risk score (NRS-2002) made for each patient in the automation system of our hospital was checked. For nutritional support, it was checked whether a consultation was requested from the nutrition support team (NST).
Results: The mean age of the patients included in the study was found to be 74 years. 79.3% were over 65 years old, while 20.97% were under 65. It was determined that 65.1% of the patients had albumin, 24.5% lymphocyte and 88.2% CRP values outside the normal range. There was a statistically significant negative correlation of 41% between the patients albumin and age variable (p<0.05). When looking at NRS-2002, 94.8% was seen as not calculated. NST consultation was not requested from any of the patients.
Conclusion: Considering the perioperative nutritional support of hip fracture patients can reduce morbidity and mortality and improve quality of life. In our study, we revealed the necessity of giving more importance to nutritional support.

Keywords

femur neck fracture , nutritional risk score , nutritional support team

Kaynakça

  1. Öztürk İ, Toker S, Ertürer E, Aksoy B, Seçkin F. Kalça kırığı nedeniyle ameliyat edilen 65 yaş üstü hastalarda mortaliteye etki eden risk faktörlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2008;42:16-21.
  2. Morey V.M, Song Y.D, Whang J.S, Kang Y.G, Kim T.K. Can serum albümin level and total lymphocyte count be surrogates for malnutrition to predict wound complications after total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplast 2016;31:1317–1321.
  3. Utku T. Enteral ve parenteral nutrisyonun takibi. Klinik Gelişim 2011;24:26-33.
  4. Kanis J, Oden A, Mc Closkey E, Johansson H, Wahl D, Cooper C. A systemic review of hip fracture incidence and probability of fracture worldwide. Osteoporos Int 2012;23:2239-2256.
  5. Nieves J.W, Formica C, Ruffing J, Zion M, Garrett P, Lindsay R et al. Males have larger skeletal size and bone mass than females, despite comparable body size. J Bone Miner Res 2005;20:529-535.
  6. Hedlund R, and Lindgren U. Trauma type, age, and gender as determinants of hip fracture. J Orthop Res 1987;5:242-246.
  7. Johnell O, J. Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporosis Int 2006;17:1726-1733.
  8. Johansen A, Maizura Mansor M, Beck S, Mahoney H, Thomas S. Outcome following hip fracture: post-discharge residence and long-term mortality. Age Ageing 2010;39:653-656.
  9. O'Leary L, Jayatilaka L, Leader R, Fountain J. Poor nutritional status correlates with mortality and worse postoperative outcomes in patients with femoral neck fractures. Bone Joint J 2021;103:164-169.
  10. Barsoum WK, Helfand R, Krebs V, Christopher W. Managing perioperative risk in the hip fracture patient. Cleve Clin J Med 2006;73:46-50.

Kaynak Göster

AMA
1.Yıldız E, Yıldız H, Arık Ö, Özyiğit F. Femur Boyun Kırığı Tanısı ile Yatan Hastalarda Beslenme Desteğini Önemsiyor muyuz? KSÜ Tıp Fak Der. 2022;17(3):55-62. doi:10.17517/ksutfd.951993