Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Tone-Burst ve Klik Uyarılı İşitsel Beyin Sapı Yanıtları ile İşitsel Uyarılmış Durgun Durum Yanıtları Sonuçlarının Karşılaştırılması

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 3, 68 - 71, 15.11.2018
https://doi.org/10.17517/ksutfd.419099

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, ileri-çok ileri
derecede sensörinöral işitme kaybı olan hastalarda, tone-burst ve klik İşitsel
Beyin Sapı (ABR) ile İşitsel Uyarılmış Durgun Durum (ASSR) sonuçlarını
karşılaştırdık.

Gereç ve Yöntemler: Yaşları 2 ay ile 53 yıl arasında
değişen, ileri-çok ileri derecede sensörinöral işitme kaybı olan, 30 kişilik
hasta grubunun toplam 60 kulağı çalışmaya alındı. Hastalara timpanogram ve
akustik refleks ölçümü, otoakustik emisyon, tone-burst ABR, Klik ABR ve ASSR testleri
yapıldı.

Bulgular: Tone-burst ABR ve
ASSR eşikleri arasında iyi bir korelasyon olduğu gözlendi.
Spearman
korelasyon katsayıları 500; 1000; 2000 ve 4000 Hz’ler için sırasıyla 0.612;
0.563; 0.564 ve 0.548 olarak bulundu (p<0.01).







Sonuç: ASSR, frekans spesifik ölçüm
yapabilen otomatik saf ses odyogram eğrisi oluşturarak işitme seviyesini
gösteren, çok kısa sürede objektif sonuç verebilen bir ölçüm yöntemidir.
Ayrıca, tone-burst ve klik ABR ile ASSR gibi
tüm testlerin birlikte kullanılması önerilir.

Kaynakça

  • Brookhouser PE, Gorga MP, Kelly WJ. Auditory brainstem response results as predictors of behavioral auditory thresholds in severe and profound hearing impairment. Laryngoscope 1990; 10: 803−10. 3. Kuwada S, Batra R, Maher VL. Scalp potentials of normal and hearing-impaired subjects in response to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones. Hear Res 1986; 21: 179−192.4. Lins OG, Picton TW, Boucher BL, Durieux-Smith A, Champagne SC, Moran LM, Perez-Abalo MC, Martın V, Savıo G. Frequency- specific audiometry using steady state responses. Ear & Hearing. 1996; 17: 81–96.5. LJ Hood. Clinical Applications of the Auditory Brainstem Response, Singular Publishing Group Inc., San Diego, London, 1998; pp. 112–142.6. Collet L, Gallego S, Durrant JD, Truy E. Electrically evoked multiple auditory steady-state responses recorded in digisonic cochlear-implanted patients. Oral presentation. International Evoked Response Audiometry Study Group (IERASG). Vancouver, 2001.7. Foster M, Stevens J, Brennan S. Intra and intersubject variability in auditory steady-state response amplitude with high modulation rates to 1000 Hz amplitude modulated and tone pip stimuli. Int J Audiol. 2013 Jul; 52(7): 507-12.8. Luts H, Desloovere C, Kumar A, Vandermeersch E, Wouters J. Objective assesment of frequency-specific hearing threshold in babies. Int J Pediatric Otorhinolaryngol 2004; 68: 915-926.9. Vander Werff KR, Brown CJ, Gienapp BA, Schmidt Clay KM. Comparison of auditory steady-state response and auditory brainstem response threshols in children. J Am Acad Audiol. 2002; 13: 227-235.10. Johnson TA, Brown CJ. Threshold prediction using the auditory steady-state response and the tone burst auditory brain stem response: a within-subject comparison. Ear Hear. 2005; 26: 559-76.11. Aoyagi M, Suzuki Y, Yokota M, Furuse H, Watanabe T, Ito T. Reliability of 80-Hz amplitude-modulation-following response detected by phase coherence. Audiology & Neurootology, 1999; 4: 28–37.12. Kosmider D. Auditory brainstem response and the steadystate evoked potential as predictors of the behavioral audiogram. Unpublished master's thesis. The University of Melbourne, Department of Otolaryngology, Audiology and Speech Sciences. 1997.

A Comparison of the Results Measured by Audotory Steady State Responses and Using Frrequency-Spesific Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 3, 68 - 71, 15.11.2018
https://doi.org/10.17517/ksutfd.419099

Öz

Objective: In this study, we compared the results
of Auditory Brainstem Responses (tone-burst and klik ABR) and Auditory Aware
Static State Responses (ASSR) in patients with sensorineural hearing loss at
advanced and very advanced.

Material and Methods: A total of 60 ears of a 30-patient
group with sensorineural hearing loss between 2 months and 53 years of age were
included in the study. Patient's tympanogram and acoustic reflex measurement,
otoacoustic emission, tone-burst ABR and ASSR tests were performed.

Results: There was a good correlation between
tone-burst ABR and ASSR thresholds. Spearman's correlation coefficients were
found 500; 1000; 2000 and 4000 Hz,; 0.612 ,0.563; 0.564 and 0.548 respectively
(p <0.01).







Conclusion: ASSR is a measurement method which can
produce a frequency specific measurement, which gives better results at high
frequencies, produces a pure sound audiogram curve shows hearing level and it
is an objective measurement method which give results in a very short time.
Additionaly, we recommended use
combination of all tests such as tone-burst ABR and ASSR.

Kaynakça

  • Brookhouser PE, Gorga MP, Kelly WJ. Auditory brainstem response results as predictors of behavioral auditory thresholds in severe and profound hearing impairment. Laryngoscope 1990; 10: 803−10. 3. Kuwada S, Batra R, Maher VL. Scalp potentials of normal and hearing-impaired subjects in response to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones. Hear Res 1986; 21: 179−192.4. Lins OG, Picton TW, Boucher BL, Durieux-Smith A, Champagne SC, Moran LM, Perez-Abalo MC, Martın V, Savıo G. Frequency- specific audiometry using steady state responses. Ear & Hearing. 1996; 17: 81–96.5. LJ Hood. Clinical Applications of the Auditory Brainstem Response, Singular Publishing Group Inc., San Diego, London, 1998; pp. 112–142.6. Collet L, Gallego S, Durrant JD, Truy E. Electrically evoked multiple auditory steady-state responses recorded in digisonic cochlear-implanted patients. Oral presentation. International Evoked Response Audiometry Study Group (IERASG). Vancouver, 2001.7. Foster M, Stevens J, Brennan S. Intra and intersubject variability in auditory steady-state response amplitude with high modulation rates to 1000 Hz amplitude modulated and tone pip stimuli. Int J Audiol. 2013 Jul; 52(7): 507-12.8. Luts H, Desloovere C, Kumar A, Vandermeersch E, Wouters J. Objective assesment of frequency-specific hearing threshold in babies. Int J Pediatric Otorhinolaryngol 2004; 68: 915-926.9. Vander Werff KR, Brown CJ, Gienapp BA, Schmidt Clay KM. Comparison of auditory steady-state response and auditory brainstem response threshols in children. J Am Acad Audiol. 2002; 13: 227-235.10. Johnson TA, Brown CJ. Threshold prediction using the auditory steady-state response and the tone burst auditory brain stem response: a within-subject comparison. Ear Hear. 2005; 26: 559-76.11. Aoyagi M, Suzuki Y, Yokota M, Furuse H, Watanabe T, Ito T. Reliability of 80-Hz amplitude-modulation-following response detected by phase coherence. Audiology & Neurootology, 1999; 4: 28–37.12. Kosmider D. Auditory brainstem response and the steadystate evoked potential as predictors of the behavioral audiogram. Unpublished master's thesis. The University of Melbourne, Department of Otolaryngology, Audiology and Speech Sciences. 1997.
Toplam 1 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Hüseyin Öztarakçı Bu kişi benim

Saime Sağıroğlu 0000-0003-2608-7274

Mehmet Akif Kılıç Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 15 Kasım 2018
Gönderilme Tarihi 27 Nisan 2018
Kabul Tarihi 11 Eylül 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

AMA Öztarakçı H, Sağıroğlu S, Kılıç MA. Tone-Burst ve Klik Uyarılı İşitsel Beyin Sapı Yanıtları ile İşitsel Uyarılmış Durgun Durum Yanıtları Sonuçlarının Karşılaştırılması. KSÜ Tıp Fak Der. Kasım 2018;13(3):68-71. doi:10.17517/ksutfd.419099