The consequences of housewives' gender perceptions in Turkey: Self-alienation and Burnout

Öz

In this study, it is aimed to determine the levels of self-alienation and burnout among housewives in the context of gender perceptions. In this context, the study was carried out with descriptive, cross-sectional and relational design. The study was conducted with 368 housewives living in Turkey. Personal information form, gender perception scale (GPS), self-alienation scale (SAS) and housewives burnout scale (CUBAC) were used to data collection. In the analysis of the data, SPSS package program was used and descriptive statistics were made with Linear Regression. In line with the analyzes, it was determined that the mean age of the women was 40.53±10.14, the mean number of children was 2.25±1.62, and the mean private time allotted to herself in a day was 2.08±2.01. In addtion, it was found that 65% of women got married in traditional way, 32% of women was only responsibile person in home for housework, 34% of women need psychological support, and 33% of women define theirselves as responsible. According to the findings, the mean score of GPS was 95.61±16.12, CUBAC was 54.68±14.28, and SAS was 69.19±10.65. It has been determined that the gender perceptions of housewives are directly related to their burnout and self-alienation levels. It was determined that these women experienced severe burnout and self-alienation especially as a result of their gender perceptions due to the expectations in the society they lived in.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Housewife
• Gender perception
• Burnout
• Self-alienation

Türkiye'de ev kadınlarının cinsiyet algılarının sonuçları: Kendine yabancılaşma ve Tükenmişlik

Öz

Bu çalışmada ev hanımlarının kendine yabancılaşma ve tükenmişlik düzeylerinin toplumsal cinsiyet algıları bağlamında incelenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Bu bağlamda çalışma tanımlayıcı, kesitsel ve ilişkisel tasarımla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma Türkiye'de yaşayan 368 ev kadını ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Verilerin toplanmasında kişisel bilgi formu, Toplumsal cinsiyet Algısı Ölçeği (TCAÖ), Kendine Yabancılaşma Ölçeği (KYÖ) ve Ev Hanımları Tükenmişlik Ölçeği (EHTÖ) kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde SPSS paket programı kullanılmış olup, Linear Regresyon ile tanımlayıcı istatistikler yapılmıştır. Analizler doğrultusunda kadınların yaş ortalamasının 40,53±10,14, çocuk sayısı ortalamasının 2,25±1,62, kendilerine günlük ayırdığı ortalama özel zamanın ise 2,08±2,01 olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca kadınların %65'inin geleneksel şekilde evlendiği, %32'sinin evde ev işlerinden tek sorumlu kişi olduğu, kadınların %34'ünün psikolojik desteğe ihtiyaç duyduğu ve kadınların %33'ünün kendisini “sorumluluk sahibi” olarak tanımladığı belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgulara göre CAÖ puan ortalamasının 95,61±16,12, EHTÖ puan ortalamasının 54,68±14,28 ve KYÖ puan ortalamasının 69,19±10,65 oldu tespit edilmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda, ev hanımlarının cinsiyet algılarının tükenmişlik ve kendine yabancılaşma düzeyleriyle doğrudan ilişkili olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bu kadınların özellikle, yaşadıkları toplumdaki beklentilerden dolayı cinsiyet algıları sonucunda ciddi bir tükenmişlik ve kendine yabancılaşma yaşadıkları belirlendi.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ev hanımı
• Toplumsal cinsiyet algısı
• Tükenmişlik
• Kendine yabancılaşma

Kaynakça

1. Abrahams, N., Devries, K., Watts, C., Pallitto, C., Petzold, M., Shamu, S., & García-Moreno, C. (2014). Worldwide prevalence of non-partner sexual violence: a systematic review. The Lancet, 383(9929), 1648-1654.
2. Aldossari, M., & Chaudhry, S. (2021). Women and burnout in the context of a pandemic. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(2), 826-834.
3. Altınova, H. H., & Duyan, V. (2013). The validity and reliability of perception of gender scale. Society and Social Work, 24(2), 9-22.
4. Antoniou, A. S., Ploumpi, A. & Ntalla M. (2013). Occupational stress and professional burnout in teachers of primary and secondary education: The role of coping strategies. Scientific Research, 4(3A), 349-355.
5. Artz, B., Kaya, I., & Kaya, O. (2022). Gender role perspectives and job burnout. Review of Economics of the Household, 20(2), 447-470.
6. Bal, H. (2014). Sosyolojide yöntem araştırma teknikleri (1st ed.). Bursa; Sentez Publication.
7. Baltar, F., & Brunet, I. (2012). Social research 2.0: Virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook. Internet Research, 22(1), 55-74.
8. Başar, F., & Demirci, N. (2015). Gender inequality and violence. Journal of Women’s Health Nursing, 2(1), 41-52.

9. Başerer, D., & Başerer, Z. (2019). Akademisyenlerin tükenmişlik ve öz yeterlik düzeyleri. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 17(1), 1-19.
10. Bilgin, R., Emhan, A. & Bez, Y. (2011). Job satisfaction, burnout and depression in social workers: A field study in Diyarbakır. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences; 10(38), 210-228.
11. Bolton C. (1972). Alienation and action: a study of peace-group members, American Journal of Sociology, 78(3), 537–561.
12. Bozkur, B., & Sahin, F. A. (2022). Relationships among traditional gender roles, acceptance of external influence and self-alienation: The mediator role of internalized sexism. International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(4), 43-53.
13. Bullough, A., Guelich, U., Manolova, T. S., & Schjoedt, L. (2022). Women’s entrepreneurship and culture: gender role expectations and identities, societal culture, and the entrepreneurial environment. Small Business Economics, 58(2), 985-996.
14. Butler, J. (2007). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge
15. Connell, R. (2013). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. John Wiley & Sons.
16. Coşkun, A., & Özdilek, R. (2012). Gender inequality: Reflections on the nurse’s role in women’s health. Journal of Education and Research in Nursing, 9(3), 30-39.
17. Çakır, H. (2016). Kadınların sınıfı: Ücretli ev emeği ve kadın öznelliğinin inşası. International Journal of Euroasian Research, 4(8), 266-284.
18. David, E. J. R., & Derthick, A. O. (2014). What is internalized oppression, and so what? In E. J. R. David (Ed.), Internalized oppression: The psychology of marginalized groups (pp. 1–30). Springer.
19. de la Rubia, J. M., Ramírez, M. T. G., & Hernández, R. L. (2010). Factor structure of the STAXI-2-AX and its relationship to burnout in housewives. The Spanish journal of psychology, 13(1), 418-430.
20. Dean, D. G. (1961). Alienation: Its meaning and measurement. American sociological review, 753-758.
21. Diekman, A. B., Steinberg, M., Brown, E. R., Belanger, A. L., & Clark, E. K. (2017). A goal congruity model of role entry, engagement, and exit: Understanding communal goal processes in STEM gender gaps. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(2), 142-175.
22. Dökmen, Z. Y. (2010). Toplumsal Cinsiyet–Sosyal Psikolojik Açıklamalar. İstanbul, Remzi Publication. Durak, E. Ş., & Durak, M. (2020). Psychometric evaluation of the Turkish version of the housewives burnout questionnaire (CUBAC). AYNA Clinical Psychology Journal, 7(2), 128-145.
23. Durak, M., Senol-Durak, E., & Karaköse, S. (2022). Psychological distress and anxiety among housewives: The mediational role of perceived stress, loneliness, and housewife burnout. Current Psychology, 1-12.
24. Ecevit, Y. (2011). Toplumsal cinsiyet sosyolojisi. Eskişehir: Anadolu University Publications.
25. Ersöz, A. G. (2010). Gender roles of women in turkish proverbs and idioms. Gazi Türkiyat Türkoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(6), 167-182.
26. Esen, E., Soylu, Y., Siyez, D. M., & Demirgürz, G. (2017). Üniversite öğrencilerinde toplumsal cinsiyet algısının toplumsal cinsiyet rolü ve cinsiyet değişkenlerine göre incelenmesi. E-International Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 46-63.
27. Fazeli, E., Golmakani, N., Taghipour, A., & Shakeri, M. T. (2015). The relationship between demographic factors and gender role attitudes in women referring to mashhad health care centers in 2014. Journal of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, 3(1), 276-284.
28. Freudenberger. (1974). Staff burnout. Journal of Social Issues, 30(1).
29. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Harvard University Press.
30. Goldstein-Gidoni, O. (2019). The Japanese corporate family: The marital gender contract facing new challenges. Journal of Family Issues, 40(7), 835-864.
31. Güçlü, İ., Muş, E., & Can, E. (2015). The effects of terrorism on society and social life. Turkiye Klinikleri Forensic Medicine-Special Topics, 1(2):5- 14.
32. Güğercin, U. & Aksay, B. (2017). Turkish adaptation of Dean’s alienation scale: A validity and reliability study. International Journal of Management Economics and Business, 13(1), 137-154.
33. Howard, L. M., Ehrlich, A. M., Gamlen, F., & Oram, S. (2017). Gender-neutral mental health research is sex and gender biased. The Lancet Psychiatry, 4(1), 9-11.
34. Işıkhan, V. (2016). Çalışanlarda tükenmişlik sendromu. In; Akciğer kanserinde destek tedavisi, Ankara, TÜSAD Eğitim Kitapları Serisi.
35. Kaplan V., Kul Uçtu A. (2022). Examining the relationship between the gender perception and psychosocial health status of pregnant women. Medical Records, 4(3), 410-417.
36. Kaplan, V. (2021a). Gender sensitive psychiatry and Feminist therapy. Cyprus Turkish Journal of Psychiatry and Psychology, 3(3), 211-216.
37. Kaplan, V. (2021b). The burnout and loneliness levels of housewives in home-quarantine during COVID-19 pandemic. Cyprus Turkish Journal of Psychiatry and Psychology, 3(2), 115-122.
38. Kaplan, V. (2023). Mental health states of housewives: An evaluation in terms of self-perception and codependency. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 21(1), 666-683.
39. Karakaya, H. (2018). Perception of gender, religion and women. Journal of Analytic Divinity, 2(2), 36-62.
40. Karaköse, S. & Ulusoy, A. (2022). Housewife burnout and somatization: Predictors of depression, Cyprus Turkish Journal of Psychiatry and Psychology, 4(1), 94-102
41. Kesen, H. (2022). The possibility of becoming a mother by staying a woman: A research on motherhood discourse in feminist policy and Amargi journals. Marmara University Journal of Women and Gender Studies, 6(1), 31-44.
42. Kiani, G., Bahrami, H., & Taremian, F. (2009). Study of the attitude toward gender role on submit gender egalitarianism among university students and employees in Zanjan (2008). Journal of Advances in Medical and Biomedical Research, 17(66), 71-78.
43. Kibaroğlu, S., & Ersoy, A.F. (2019). Alienation of spouses in marriage: Qualitative research. Eurasian Journal of Researches in Social and Economics, 6(5), 407-417.
44. Koçak, O., & Gürsoy, G. M. (2018). The relationship between emotional labor and burnout. Hak İş Uluslararası Emek ve Toplum Dergisi, 7(17), 161-181.
45. Korkmaz, H. (2022). Reflection of traditional culture codes/patriarchal structure on family life in the modern era. Antakiyat, 5(1), 54-71.
46. Lyonette, C., & Crompton, R. (2015). Sharing the load? Partners' relative earnings and the division of domestic labour. Work, Employment & Society, 29(1), 23–40.
47. Marx, K. (1976). The notion of alienation. In L. A. Coser & B. Rosenberg (Ed.) Sociological theory (pp. 397-401). New York: MacMillan.
48. Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422. Miettinen, A., Basten, S., & Rotkirch, A. (2011). Gender equality and fertility intentions revisited: Evidence from Finland. Demographic research, 24(20), 469-496.
49. Muluneh, M. D., Stulz, V., Francis, L., & Agho, K. (2020). Gender based violence against women in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(3), 903.
50. Neff, K. D., & Harter, S. (2002). The authenticity of conflict resolutions among adult couples: Does women's other-oriented behavior reflect their true selves?. Sex Roles, 47(9), 403-417.
51. Pawlett, W. (2013). Violence, Society and Radical Theory: Bataille, Baudrillard and Contemporary Society. London, Routledge
52. Pines, A. & Aronson, E. (1988). Career Burnout; Causes Cures. New York, The Free Pres, A Division of Macmillan, Inc.
53. Ramírez, M. T. G., Hernández, R. L., & de la Rubia, J. M. (2009). Cuestionario de burnout para amas de casa (CUBAC): Evaluación de sus propiedades psicométricas y del modelo secuencial de burnout. Universitas Psychologica, 8(2), 533-543.
54. Schneider, M. C., & Bos, A. L. (2019). The application of social role theory to the study of gender in politics. Political Psychology, 40, 173-213.
55. Schneider, M. C., Holman, M. R., Diekman, A. B., & McAndrew, T. (2016). Power, conflict, and community: How gendered views of political power influence women’s political ambition: Power, conflict, and community. Political Psychology, 37(4), 515-531.
56. Seeman M. (1983). Alienation motifs in contemporary theorizing: The hidden continuity of the classic themes, Social Psychology Quarterly, 46(3):171–184.
57. Sezgin, D. (2015). Health and medicalization in gender perspective. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, 18(1), 153-186.
58. Speizer, I. S. (2010). Intimate partner violence attitudes and experience among women and men in Uganda. Journal of interpersonal violence, 25(7), 1224-1241.
59. Tekin, N., & Demirel Değirmenci, S. (2022). The relationship among men, women and society in patriarchal culture. Mediterranean Journal of Humanities, 12, 187-198.
60. Tekir, Ö., Çevik, C., Arık, S., & Çetin, G. (2016). Examining health workers' burnout, job satisfaction levels and life satisfaction. The Journal of Kırıkkale University Faculty of Medicine, 18(2), 51-63.
61. Tire, O. (2017). Women’s poverty in Turkey in terms of gender roles. Mavi Atlas, 5(1), 97–112
62. Vatandaş, C. (2007). Toplumsal cinsiyet ve cinsiyet rollerinin algılanışı. Istanbul Journal of Sociological Studies, (35), 29-56.
63. Vo, K., Forder, P. M., Tavener, M., Rodgers, B., Banks, E., Bauman, A., & Byles, J. E. (2015). Retirement, age, gender and mental health: Findings from the 45 and Up Study. Aging & Mental Health, 19(7), 647-657.
64. WHO (2001). Strengthening mental health promotion. Geneva, World Health Organization.
65. Yılmaz, S. (2018). Burnout that women who work in home services experience in their work and family lives: Fatsa pattern. Istanbul University Journal of Women’s Studies, 17, 70-90.