From Social Reproduction Theory Perspective Georgian Migrant Domestic Workers in Unye/ORDU | Toplumsal Yeniden Üretim Teorisi Perspektifinden Unye/Ordu’da Gürcü Göçmen Ev-işçileri

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 170 - 187, 30.11.2020

Fatma Özlem Tezcek

https://doi.org/10.33708/ktc.787083

Öz

Historically, capitalist social production and reproduction relations have close interaction with patriarchal gender hierarchies. This interaction has been transformed dramatically. Especially, the interaction between patriarchal gender roles and capitalist reproduction relations has been examined and debated by the distinct branches of feminist movement. In this paper, I will investigate this interaction via activities of migrant women domestic workers in Turkey which, I believe, represent essential features of the recent global dynamics of capitalism such as informalization, feminization of un/under-paid work force, feminization of immigration, globalization of domestic works. I will introduce the results of my field research about life and working conditions among migrant domestic workers in Ünye, Ordu Province of Turkey, in the Black Sea region. I have conducted semi-structured, face to face interviews with a certain number of Georgian migrant women. This method is consistent with many of the qualitative approaches pioneered and adopted by feminist researchers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Woman, Migration, Social REproduction, Georgian Domestic Workers

Toplumsal Yeniden Üretim Teorisi Perspektifinden Unye/Ordu’da Gürcü Göçmen Ev-işçileri | From Social Reproduction Theory Perspective Georgian Migrant Domestic Workers in Unye/ORDU

Öz

Tarihsel olarak kapitalist üretim ve yeniden üretim ilişkileri, ataerkil toplumsal cinsiyet hiyerarşileri ile yakın etkileşim içindedir. Bu etkileşim dramatik bir şekilde değişim göstermektedir. Özellikle ataerkil toplumsal cinsiyet rolleri ile kapitalist yeniden-üretim ilişkileri arasındaki etkileşim feminist hareketin çeşitli oluşumları tarafından incelenmekte ve tartışılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’de bu etkileşimi temsil ettiğini düşündüğüm somut bir örnek olan Gürcistanlı, göçmen ev-içi işçilerin yaşamlarını, çalışma süreçlerini inceleyeceğim. Bu incelemenin; enformalleşme, ücretsiz/ücretli işin kadınlaşması, göçün kadınlaşması, ev-içi işçilerin küreselleşmesi gibi küresel kapitalizmin güncel görünümleriyle yakın ilişki içinde olduğunu düşünüyorum. Çalışmada, Ordu ili Unye ilçesinde çalışan Gürcistanlı, göçmen ev-içi işçilerin yaşam ve çalışma koşulları hakkında yaptığım araştırmanın sonuçlarını sunacağım. Araştırmada Gürcistanlı, göçmen ev-işçisi kadınlarla yarı-yapılandırılmış, yüz-yüze, derinlemesine görüşmeler düzenlenmiştir. Bu yöntemin niteliksel araştırma yöntemlerini uygulayan birçok feminist araştırmacı tarafından kullanıldığı tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kadın, Göç, Toplumsal Yeniden Üretim, Gürcü Ev-İşçileri

Kaynakça

• Anderson, B. (2002). Doing the Dirty Work? The Global Politics of Domestic Labour. London: New York: Zed Books (2002).
• Arat-Koç, S. (2006). “Whose Social Reproduction? Transnational Motherhood and Challenges to Feminist Political Economy,” in Kate Bezanson and Meg Luxton, eds. Social Reproduction: Feminist Political Economy Challenges Neo-liberalism, McGill-Queen’s University Press (2006), pp. 75-92.
• Bezanson, K. and Luxton M. (2006).“Introduction,” in Kate Bezanson and Meg Luxton, eds. Social Reproduction: Feminist Political Economy Challenges Neo-Liberalism, McGill-Queen’s University Press (2006), pp. 3-10.
• Bhattacharya, T. (2017). “How Not to Skip Class: Social Reproduction of Labor and the Global Working Class,” in Tithi Bhattacharya, eds. Social Reproduction Theory, Pluto Press (2017), pp. 68-93.
• Bircan, I. (2013). Ev Hizmetlerinde Çalışan Göçmen Kadınların Sağlık Sorunları ve Sağlık Hİzmetlerinden Yararlanma Deneyimleri, (2013), Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul (in Turkish).
• Castles, S. and Miller, M. (1998). The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World. Guilford Press (1998).
• Chang, G. (2000). Disposable Domestics, Immigrant Women Workers in the Global Economy. South End Press: Cambridge: Massachusetts (2000).
• Constable, N. (2007). Maid to Order in Hong Kong, Stories of Migrant Workers. Cornell University Press: Ithaca and London (2007).
• Duffy, M. (2007). “Doing the Dirty Work: Gender, Race, and Reproductive Labor in Historical Perspective”. Gender and Society. Vol. 21, No. 3 (Jun. 2007), pp. 313-336.
• Ehrenreich, B. and Hochschild. A.R. (2003). Global Woman: Nannies, Maids, and Sex Workers in the New Economy (2003). New York: Metropolitan Books.
• Eisenstein, H. (2009). Feminism Seduced: How Global Elites Use Women’s Labor and Ideas to Exploit the World. Paradigm Publishers (2009).
• Elson, D. (1998). “The Economic, the Political and the Domestic: Business, States and Households in the Organisation of Production”. New Political Economy (1998). 3 (2).
• Elson, D. (1996). “Appraising Recent Developments in the World Market for Nimble Fingers.” In A. Chhachhi and R. Pittin. Eds. Confronting State, Capital and Patriarchy: Women Organizing in the Process of Industrialization. London: MacMillan (1996).
• Etiler, N. and Lordoğlu. K. (2010). “Göçmenlerin Sağlık Sorunları: Ev Hİzmetlerinde Bir Alan Araştırması”. Sosyal Haklar Ulusal Sempozyumu II, Denizli 4-5-6 Kasım 2010. Pamukkale Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Çalışma Ekonomisi ve Endüstri İlişkileri Bölümü,(2010) İstanbul: s.93-118 (in Turkish).
• Federici, S. (2006). “The Reproduction of Labor-Power in the Global Economy, Marxist Theory and the Unfinished Feminist Revolution,” Globalizations 3 (2006): 13.
• Fraser, N. (2017). “Crisis of Care?”: On the Social-Reproductive Contradictions of Contemporary Capitalism”, in Tithi Bhattacharya. Eds. Social Reproduction Theory. Foreword by Lisa Vogel, pp.21-36, Pluto Press (2017).
• Frazer, N. (2009). “Feminism, Capitalism and the Cunning of History”. New Left Review 56 (2009), pp. 97-117
• Gökbayrak, Ş. (2009). “Refah Devletinin Dönüşümü ve Bakım Hİzmetlerinin Görünmez Emekçileri Göçmen Kadınlar”. Çalışma ve Toplum. 2009/2, pp. 55-81(in Turkish).
• Kümbetoğlu, Belkıs. Sosyolojide ve Antropolojide Niteliksel Yöntem ve Araştırma. Bağlam Yayınları, (2008).
• ILO. (2019). “Zero Tolerance for Contract Substitution”. Open Working Group on Labour Migration & Recruitment Policy Brief 4, (2019) http://mfasia.org/migrantforumasia/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/4-Policy-Brief-Zero-Tolerance-for-Contract-Substitution.pdf, (12.07.2019).
• ILO.(2015). “ILO global Estimates on Migrant Workers: Results and Methodology- Special focus on migrant domestic workers”. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/documents/publication/wcms_436343.pdf (2015). (31.07.2018).
• Kaska, S. (2005-2006). “The New International Migration and Migrant Women in Turkey: The Case of Moldovan Domestic Workers” (2005-2006). Migration Research Program at the Koç University (MireKoc). Kofman, E. (2014). “Gendered migrations, social reproduction and the household in Europe”. Dialectical Anthropology. Vol. 38, No. 1, Special Theme Focus - Dialectics of Migration (Part 2) (March 2014), pp. 79-94.
• Laslett, B. and Brenner, J. (1989) “Gender and Social Reproduction: Historical Perspectives”. Annual Review of Sociology 15 (1989).
• Luxton, M. (2006). “Feminist Political Economy and Social Reproduction,” in Kate Bezanson and Meg Luxton, eds. Social Reproduction: Feminist Political Economy Challenges Neo-Liberalism, McGill-Queen’s University Press (2006), pp. 11-44.
• Ministery of Foreign Affairs of Georgia (2020). Visa Information for Georgia Citizens. https://mfa.gov.ge/MainNav/ConsularInformation/VisaInfoGeorgian/%E1%83%97%E1%83%A3%E1%83%A0%E1%83%A5%E1%83%94%E1%83%97%E1%83%98%E1%83%A1-%E1%83%A0%E1%83%94%E1%83%A1%E1%83%9E%E1%83%A3%E1%83%91%E1%83%9A%E1%83%98%E1%83%99%E1%83%90.aspx (31.08.2020).
• Ministry of Culture and Tourism (MCT), Tourism Statistics, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018: Ankara.
• Sadunashvili,T.(2016). “Georgian Migration to Turkey Between 1990 and 2012”. İstanbul Bilgi University, Faculty Social Sciences and Humanites, Department of International RElations, for the Degree of Master of Arts, Academic Advisor Prof. Dr. Ayhan Kaya. (2016).
• Teeple Hopkins, C. (2017) “Mostly Work, Little Play: Social Reproduction, Migration and Paid Domestic Work on Montreal,” Tithi Bhattacharya, eds. Social Reproduction Theory. Foreword by Lisa Vogel. pp.131-147 (2017), Pluto Press.
• Toksöz, G. and Unlütürk, Ç. (2003). “Is Migration Feminized? A Gender- and Ethnicity-Based Review of the Literature on Irregular Migration to Turkey,” in Elitok, Paçacı, Seçil and Straubhaar, Thomas. Eds. Turkey, Migration and the EU: Potentials, Challenges and Opportunities. Hamburg University Press: Series Edition: HWWI Vol.5:85-111 (2003).
• Torosyan, K, Gerber, T. and Gonalons-Pons, P. (2016) “Migration, Household Tasks, and Gender: Evidence from the Republic of Georgia”. International Migration Review, Wiley Blackwell. vol. 50(2), pages 445-474, June (2016).
• Zurabishvili, T. and Zurabishvili,T. (2010). “The Feminization of Labor Migration from Georgia: The Case of Tiatini”. Laboratorium. (2010).1:73–83.
• Turkish Statistical Institute. 2004-2016. Social Structure and Sexuality Statistics. www.tuik.gov.tr (in Turkish).
• Ulukan, N. And Ulukan U. (2012) “Kriz ve Göç: Türkiye Gürcistan Nüfus Hareketleri Üzerine Bir Tartışma”. Discussion Paper. No. 2012/97. Turkish Economic Association. Ankara (in Turkish).
• UN (2019). International Migration 2019. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/publications/migrationreport/docs/InternationalMigration2019_Report.pdf (31.08.2020).
• Ünlütürk-Ulutaş, Ç. (2010). “Ev-içi İşyeri: Ev Hizmetleri, Ücretli Emek ve Göçmen Kadın Emeği”, in Saniye Dedeoğlu ve Melda Yaman Öztürk. Eds. Kapitalizm, Ataerkillik ve Kadın Emeği: Türkiye Örneği. Birinci Basım: Sosyal Araştırmalar Vakfı (2010): İstanbul (in Turkish).
• Vogel, L. (2013) Marxism and the Oppression of Women, Toward a Unitary Theory. Haymarket Books: Chicago: IL (2013).