The Relationship Between Teachers’ Workaholism and Burnout Levels and Its Examination in Relation to Some Variables

Öz

Background. Workaholic tendencies cause employees to develop negative attitudes toward their jobs (Keown, 2008) and to experience burnout (Andreassen, Ursin, and Eriksen, 2007). Burnout adversely affects work of employees (Maslach, Jackson, and Leiter, 1996). Therefore, it might be suggested that workaholic tendencies accompanied by burnout could decrease productivity of employees and organizational efficiency. It is critical to examine such negative effects, particularly in teaching profession which requires high motivation. Purpose. The purpose of this study is to examine whether there is a correlation between workaholic tendencies and burnout levels of teachers. Method. Survey method was used for this study. The study group consists of 227 teachers from schools in central districts of Ankara. 73,1 % of participants were female and 26,4 were male; 19,8 % were younger than 31, 56,8 were between 31-40 and 23,3 % were higher than 40. Turkish form of Workaholism Battery (Ersoy-Kart, 2005) which originally developed by Spence & Robbins (1992) and Turkish form of Maslach Burnout Inventory (Ergin, 1982) which was originally developed by Maslach & Jackson (1981) were to measure workaholic tendencies and burnout levels of participants. SPSS 13.00 was used for statistical analyses. In accordance with purpose of study, percentage, mean, standard deviation, parametric (MANOVA) and non-parametric variation tests (Kruskal Wallis H-test), and Person Correlation Coefficient test were employed. Results and discussion. It was seen that workaholic tendencies and burnout levels of male and female teachers did not significantly differ from each other. In the literature, it is likely to have supporting research results about workaholic tendencies (Bardakçı, 2007; Oğuz and Akın, 2008). There are conflicting results reported as for differences in burnout levels by gender. Such a variation in the literature might be interpreted as the fact that variation in teacher burnout by gender may be moderated some other contextual variables. Older teachers, compared to younger teachers, have more workaholic tendencies, which might be interpreted as teachers who have worked for many years gradually adopt their profession. The reason for such a difference might be due to the fact that young teachers spend more time in out work activities. On the other hand, young teachers experience more burnout than older teachers. There was a similar result in Konert's study (1997). Some other studies show that older teachers experience more burnout (Angerer, 2000; Avşaroğlu et al., 2005). Kırılmaz et al. (2003) report that age is not a significant factor in burnout levels of teachers. It is possible to have contradictory findings in the literature about the differential effects of age on burnout. The perceptions of teachers about workaholic tendencies and burnout do not significantly differ by educational background. Despite the insignificant difference, means scores suggest that teachers with postgraduate education have more workaholic tendencies and experience more burnout than others. However, it is not reasonable to make any interpretations for this case since the difference is not significant. There is a moderate, significant negative correlation between workaholic tendencies and burnout levels of teachers. In Bonebright's study (2001) on the effect of workaholic tendencies on stress, burnout and productivity, it was shown that workaholics experienced more burnout than other employees. In the literature, there are studies which report workaholic tendencies have a positive correlation with burnout, as indicated by Bonebright's research (2001) (Andreassen et al., 2007; Moorhead and Griffin, 1992). From this aspect, the result of the present study differs from the literature. In fact, it is not an expected result for the study to show a negative correlation between workaholic tendencies as a self-damaging behavioral syndrome and a phenomenon with negative effects like burnout. This case might have been caused by a measurement error or a cultural difference in the way burnout or workaholic tendencies are perceived. It might be suggested that the reason for the unexpected case here should be examined by further research. Teaching is a profession with a high level of burnout (Meade, 1996; Thorton, Peltier and Hill, 2005) and burnout negatively affects not only individuals, but also organizations (Angerer, 2000) and teacher relationships with students (Karakelle and Canpolat, 2008). It could be said that attempts to prevent teachers from experiencing burnout will be much contributive to attain goals in the education system. Measures such as administrative support for teachers and mentorship, awareness of teacher capacity, developing creative learning environment for teachers and less student number in classrooms are suggested to prevent teacher burnout (Gates, 2007). Teachers work load,, pays and benefits as well as working conditions should be further examined in relation to teacher burnout and teacher workaholic tendencies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• teacher workaholism , teacher burnout , relationship between workaholism and burnout.

Öğretmenlerin İşkoliklik ve Tükenmişlik Düzeylerinin İlişkisi ve Çeşitli Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi

Öz

Bu araştırmanın temel amacı, öğretmenlerin işkoliklik ve tükenmişlik düzeyleri arasında ilişki olup olmadığını incelemektir. Bu amaçla öğretmenlerin işkoliklik ve tükenmişlik düzeyleri kendi algılarına dayalı olarak belirlenmiş, işkoliklik ve tükenmişlik düzeylerinin bağımsız değişkenlere göre fark gösterme durumu incelenmiş ve son olarak da işkoliklik ve tükenmişlik arasındaki ilişki sınanmıştır. Çalışma grubu Ankara ili merkez ilçelerinde görev yapan 227 öğretmenden oluşmaktadır. Araştırma sonuçları öğretmenlerin işkoliklik ve tükenmişlik düzeylerinin cinsiyete ve öğrenim durumuna göre faklılaşmadığını, yaş değişkeninin ise fark oluşturan bir etken olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca öğretmenlerin işkoliklik ve tükenmişlik düzeyleri arasında negatif ve anlamlı bir ilişki tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• öğretmelerde işkoliklik , öğretmenlerde tükenmişlik , işkoliklik tükenmişlik ilişkisi.

Kaynakça

1. Andreassen, C. S., Ursin, H., & Eriksen, H. R. (2007). The relationship between strong motivation to work, “workaholism”, and health. Psychology and Health, 22 (5), 615–629.
2. Angerer, J. (2000). Job burnout. Journal of Employment Counseling, 40(3), 98-101.
3. Avşaroğlu, S., Deniz, M. E. ve Kahraman, A. (2005). Teknik öğretmenlerde yaşam doyumu iş doyumu ve mesleki tükenmişlik düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14, 115-129.
4. Bardakçı, S. (2007). Eğitim yöneticilerinin internet kullanımına ilişkin tutumlarının işkoliklik eğilimleri üzerine etkilerinin belirlenmesi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Tokat.
5. Başol, G. ve Altay, M. (2009). Eğitim yöneticisi ve öğretmenlerin mesleki tükenmişlik düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 15(58), 191-216.
6. Bibou-Nakou, I., Stogiannidou, A., & Kiosseoglou, G. (1999). The relation between teacher burnout and teachers’ attributions and practices regarding school behaviour problems. School Psychology International, 20(2), 209-217.
7. Bonebright, C. A. (2001). The relationship of workaholism with stres, burnout and productivity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Iowa, USA.
8. Burke, R. J. (2000). Workaholism in organizations: The role of personal beliefs and fears. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 13(1), 53–64.

9. Burke, R. J., Greenglass, E. R., & Schwarzer, R. (1996). Predicting teacher burnout over time: Effects of work stress, social support, and self- doubts on burnout and its consequences. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 9, 261-275.
10. Burke R. J., Matthiesen, S. B., & Pallasen, S. (2006). Personality correlates of workaholism. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1223– 1233.
11. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2006). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. (6. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
12. Ergin, C. (1992). Doktor ve hemşirelerde tükenmişlik ve maslach tükenmişlik ölçeğinin uyarlanması. VII. Ulusal Psikoloji Kongresi Bilimsel Çalışmaları El Kitabı, 143–154.
13. Ersoy-Kart, M. (2005). Reliability and validity of the Workaholism Battery (Work-Bat): Turkish form. Social Behavior & Personality, 33(6), 609–618.
14. Gates, C. H. (2007). Factors related to burnout in North Carolina public school teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. UMI Number: 3293618.
15. Griffiths, M. (2005). Workaholism is stil a useful construct. Addiction Research and Theory. 13(2), 97-100.
16. Gündüz, B. (2005). İlköğretim öğretmenlerinde tükenmişlik. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(1), 152-166.
17. Jensen, S. A. (2007). Relationship between personality and job burnout among special education theachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Capella University, UMI number: 3274598.
18. Jonstone, A., & Jonston, L. (2005). The relationship between organizational climate, occupational type and workaholism. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 34(3), 181–188.
19. Karakelle, S. Ve Canpolat, S. (2008). Tükenmişlik düzeyi yüksek ilköğretim öğretmenlerinin öğrencilere yaklaşım biçimlerinin incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 33(147), 106-120.
20. Keown, L. A. (2008). Time escapes me: Workaholics and time perception. Canadian Social Trends. Statistics Canada - Catalogue No: 11–008.
21. Kırılmaz, A. Y., Çelen, Ü. ve Sarp, N. (2003). İlköğretimde çalışan bir öğretmen grubunda “tükenmişlik durumu” araştırması. İlköğretim- Online 2(1), 2–9. http://www.ilkogretim-online.org.tr adresinden 21.08.2009 tarihinde alınmıştır.
22. Konert, E. (1997). The relationship among middle school teacher burnout, stress, job satisfaction, and coping skills. Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, 1997. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58-11A, 4143.
23. Lynley, H. W., Mcmillan, L. H. W., O'Driscoll, M. P., & Brady, E. C. (2004). The impact of workaholism on personal relationships. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 32(2), 171–186.
24. Machlowitz, M. M. (1978). Determining the effects of workaholism. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Yale University. USA.
25. Maslach, C. (1993). Burnout: A multidimensional perspective. In W.B. Schaufeli, C. Maslach, & T. Marek (eds.). Professional burnout: Recent development in theory and research (pp. 19-32). NY: Taylor & Francis.
26. Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 2, 99-113.
27. Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. P. (1996). The Maslach burnout inventory (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
28. Meade, J. (1996). Burnout. Teacher Magazine, 8(1), 38-42.
29. Moorhead, G., & Griffin, R.W. (1992). Organizational behavior: Managing people and organizations. (3rd Edition). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
30. Morgan, G. (1998). Yönetim ve örgüt teorilerinde metafor. Çeviren: Gündüz Bulut. İstanbul: MESS Yayınları No: 280.
31. Oğuz, E. ve Akın, U. (2008). Öğretmenlerin işkoliklik düzeyleri ile evlilik uyumları arasındaki ilişki. International Conference on Educational Sciences. 23–25 June. Eastern Mediterranean University. Famagusta, Noth Cyprus.
32. Robinson, B. E. (1998). The workaholic family: A clinical perspective. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 26(1), 65–75.
33. Robinson, B. E., Carroll, J. J., & Flowers, C. (2001). Marital estrangement, positive affect, and locus of control among spouses of workaholics and spouses of nonworkaholics: A national study. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 29, 397–410.
34. Rottier, J., Kelly, W., and Tomhave, W. K. (1983). Teacher burnout-small and rural school style. Education, 104(1), 72-79.
35. Schwarzer, R., Schmitz, G. S., & Tang, C. (2000). Teacher burnout in Hong Kong and Germany: A cross cultural valididation of Maslach Burnout Inventory. Anxiety, Stres, and Coping, 13, 309-326.
36. Snir, R., & Zohar, D. (2008). Workaholism as discretionary time investment at work: An experience-sampling study. Applied Psychology: An Internatıonal Revıew, 57(1), 109–127.
37. Spence, J. T., & Robbins, A. S. (1992). Workaholism: definition, measurement, and preliminary results. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58(1), 160–178.
38. Sünbül, A. M. (2003). An analysis of relations among locus of control, burnout and job satisfaction in Turkish high school teachers. Australian Journal of Education, 47(1), 58-73.
39. Tatman, A. W., Hovestadt, A. J., Yelsma, P., Fenell, P., David, L., & Canfield, B. S. (2006). Work and family conflict: An often overlooked issue in couple and family therapy. Contemporary Family Therapy. 28(1), 39–51.
40. Temel, A. (2006). Organizasyonlarda işkolizm ve işkolik çalışanlar. İş, Güç Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 8(2), 104–127.
41. Thorton, B., Peltier, G., & Hill, G. (2005). Do future teachers choose wisely: A study of pre-service teachers’ personality preference profiles. College Student Journal, 39(3), 489-497.
42. Topaloğlu, M., Koç, H. ve Yavuz, E. (2007). Öğretmenlerin mesleki tükenmişlik düzeylerinin belirlenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Kamu-İş, 9(3), 31-52.
43. Vodanovich, S. J., Piotrowski, C., & Wallace J. C. (2007). The relationship between workaholism and health: A report of negative findings. Organization Development Journal, 25(1), 70–75.