BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Classroom Discipline Approaches and Its Relation with Teacher Burnout

Yıl 2005, Cilt: 44 Sayı: 44, 549 - 568, 01.05.2005

Öz

The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a significant difference between teachers perceptions of discipline approaches in the classroom and the grade they teach, their gender, marital status, the number of children they have, the years they have, their preference to teaching, number of students, and socio-economic level of the school they work. Besides, it is also to reveal the relationship between classroom discipline a approaches and their burnout level. This study is carried out with 331 teachers selected from the first level of various primary schools at lower, medium, and upper socio-economic levels. In this study, “The teachers perceptions of discipline approaches in the classroom, questionnaire” prepared by the researcher and “Teacher Burnout Scale” developed by Seidman and Zager (1986-87) has been utilized. Findings illustrated that teachers variables such as number of children, they have educational experience, preference to teaching, number of students and socio- economic level of school are important variables at determining teachers discipline approaches in the classroom. Summary The education system is the only institution in which the majority of children participates and spends most of their time in their growth period. Unfortunately, these institutions, which have prior obligations in providing help and determining bad treatments, they sometimes cause bad psychological treatments emotional crisis. The burnout in teachers bring a lot of negative effects together with them into the education systems, one of the biggest effect is in the behavioral attitudes they use in student discipline. The burnout includes loss of interest to people they serve (Maslach, 1981). It starts slow and insidiously. Even though it happens suddenly, the burnout is a continual progress (Freudenberger and Richelson, 1994). Beside of providing knowledge, the teacher acquires students' desired behaviors. For this reason they have to demonstrate sample behavior and provide good communication (Hargreaves and Woods, 1984). Possessing good ordered and creative discipline intelligence is one of the characteristics a successful educator must have. Educators must obtain some personal characteristics in order to overcome this hard duty. As an effective classroom manager the teacher is expected to, prepare the class for education, determine manner and teach classroom rules, organize and ensure education and acquire students in providing conformable behaviors. The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a significant difference between teachers' perceptions of discipline approaches in the classroom and the grade they teach, their gender, marital status, the number of children they have, the years they have, their preference to teaching, number of students, and socio-economic level of the school they work. Besides, it is also to reveal the relationship between classroom discipline an approaches and their burnout level. This study is carried out with 331 teachers selected from the first level of various primary schools at lower, medium, and upper socio-economic levels. However, statically procedures were done by the data which were collected from 166 teachers. In the research it was determined that there was a reasonable relation between the teachers perceptions of discipline approaches and the number of children, the years they have, their preference to teaching, number of students, and socio-economic level of the school. The results show that the proportion of teachers with strict discipline approaches were higher than those; without children, working between 1-5 years, choosing the job unwillingly, working in crowded classes with 66-80 students and in sub social economic leveled schools. In spite of this, it was realized that the proportion of teachers with democratic discipline approaches were higher than those possessing two children, working more than 21 years, choosing the job willingly, working in classer with 20-35 students and working in upper social economic leveled schools. Perceptions of discipline approaches with perceived administrative support, coping with job-related stress, career satisfaction and attitudes towards students, when the sub scale points are compared it is realized that the arithmetic average of each four sub scales reveal that burnout levels of teachers with strict perceptions of discipline are higher than those with democratic perceptions. The strong relation between the variables put for word the prior necessity to reduce the burnout of teachers and to reduce or elevate strict discipline approaches. Some of the precautions are, to reduce the number of students in classes, improve working conditions and not giving responsibility of classes which are hard to control to inexperienced teachers.

Kaynakça

  • Adams, A.T. (2000). The status of school discipline and violence. Annals of American Academy of Political & Social Science, 567, 140-157.
  • Aydın, A. (1998). Sınıf Yönetimi, Ankara: Anı.
  • Başar, H. (1997). Sınıf Yönetimi, Ankara: Önder Matbaacılık.
  • Beemsterber, J. and Baum,B.H. (1984). Burnout: definitions and health care management. Social Working Healt Care, 10(1).
  • Brissie, J, Hoover-Dempsey, K. & Bassler, O. (1988). Individual, situational contributors to teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Research, 82 (2), 106-112.
  • Burden, P. R. (1995). Classroom Management and Discipline: Methods to Facilitate Cooperation and Instruction, Londra:Longman.
  • Çınar, İ. (1999). Eğitim ve Şiddet, Çağdaş Eğitim, 24(254), 42-46.
  • Dreikurs, R., Grunwald, B. and Pepper, F. (1982). Maintaining sanity in the classroom: Classroom management techniques. NY: Harper Row.
  • Edwards, C. H. (1993).Classroom Discipline and Management, NY: Macmillan
  • Enochs, I.G., Schamann, L.C. and Bigss, I. M. (1995). The relationship of pupil control to preservice elementary science teacher self-efficacy and outcome expectancy. Science Teacher Education, 79 (1), 63-75.
  • Erden, M.(1998). Öğretmenlik Mesleğine Giriş, İstanbul: Alkım Yayınları.
  • Ergin,C. (1994). Doktor ve hemşirelerde tükenmişlik ve Maslach tükenmişlik ölçeğinin uyarlanması. R.Bayraktar, İ.Dağ (Ed), VII. Ulusal Psikoloji Kongresi Bilimsel Çalışmaları Ankara: Meteksan A.Ş. 143-154.
  • Erkman, F. (1991). Çocukların duygusal ezimi. Çocuk İstismarı ve İhmali. E. Konanç, İ. Gürkaynak, A. Eğemen (Ed). Ankara: Gözde Repro Ofset, 163- 169.
  • Evertson, C. M. and Emmer, E. T. (1982). Effective management at the beginning of the school year in junior high classes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 24 (4), 485-498.
  • Evertson, C. M.and Harris, A. H. (1992). What we know about managing classrooms. Educational Leadership, 19 (7), 71-78.
  • Evertson, C. M., Emmer, E. T. and Anderson, L. (1980). Effective classroom management at the begining of the school year. The Elementary School Journal, 80 (7), 219-231.
  • Freudenberger,N.J. and Richelson,G. (1994). Tükenmeye rağmen nasıl yaşanabilir? N.Hisli Şahin (Ed.), Stresle Başa Çıkma, Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları: 2, 64-67.
  • Friedman, I.A. (1991). High- and low- burnout schools: School culture aspects of teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Research, 84 (6), 325-333.
  • Friedman, I.A. (1993). Burnout in teachers: The concept and its unique core meaning. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 53 (4), 1035-1044.
  • Guglielmi, R.S. and Tatrow K. (1998). Occupational stress, burnout, and health in teachers: A methodogical and theoretical analysis. Review of Educational Research,. 68 (1), 61-99.
  • Güven, S. (1998). “Sınıf öğretmenlerinin sınıf yönetimi ve disiplini konusundaki yeterlilikleri ve eğitim ihtiyaçları”. Öğretmen Dünyası, 226, 26-28
  • Hargreaves, A. and Woods, P. (1984). Classrooms and Stafirooms. Open University.
  • Hoy, W.K. and Woolfolk, A.E. (1993). Teachers sense of efficacy and the organizational health of schools. The Elementary School Journal, 93 (4), 355- 372.
  • Maslach, C. (1981). Burnout: A social psychological analysis. The Burnout Syndrome. J.W. Jones(Ed). Pask Ridge I: London House Press.
  • Merrett, F. and Wheldall, K. (1998). Which classroom behaviors do primary school teachers say they find most troublesome? Educational Review, 10 (2), 87-92.
  • Motowidlo, S.J., Packard, J.S. and Manning M.R. (1986). Occupational stress: Its causes and consequences for job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 7 (4), 618-629.
  • Nelson, L. (1987). Positive discipline. New York: Ballantine Books.
  • Özyürek, M. (1996). Sınıfta Davranış Yönetimi, Uygulamalı Davranış Analizi. Ankara: Karatepe Yayınları.
  • Poctor, P. (1984). Teacher expections: A model for school improvement. The Elementary School Journal, 84 (4), 469-481.
  • Russell, D.W., Altmaier, E. and Van Velzen, D. (1987). Job related stress, social support, and burnout among classroom teachers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 7 (2), 269-274.
  • Schwab, R.L.,Jackson, S.E.& Schuler, R.S.(1986). Toward an understanding of the burnout phenomenon. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71 (4), 630-640.
  • Seidman, S.A. and Zager, J. (1991). A study of coping behaviors and teacher burnout. Work and Stress, 5, 205-216.
  • Tan, M. (1990). Eğitimde bedensel ceza. A.Ü.Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 23 (2), 545-556.
  • Tan, M. (1991). Öğretmen dayağı, E. Konanç, İ. Gürkaynak, A. Egemen (Ed.) Çocuk İstismarı ve İhmali, Ankara:Gözde Repro Ofset, 55-64.
  • Tulley, M. and Chıu, L. H. (1995). Student teachers and classroom discipline. The Journal of Educational Research, 88 (3), 164-171.
  • Tümkaya, S. (1996). Öğretmenlerdeki tükenmişlik, görülen pikolojik belirtiler ve başa çıkma davranışları. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Adana.
  • Veeman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54 (2), 143-178.
  • Veeman, S. and Reamaekers, J. (1995). Long-term effects of a staff development programme on effective instruction and classroom management for teachers in multigrade classes. Educational Studies, 21 (2), 167-184.

Öğretmenlerin Sınıf İçi Disiplin Anlayışları ve Tükenmişlikle İlişkisi

Yıl 2005, Cilt: 44 Sayı: 44, 549 - 568, 01.05.2005

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı; öğretmenlerin sahip oldukları sınıf içi disiplin anlayışları ile cinsiyet, medeni durum, çocuk sayısı, çalışma yılı, işi isteyerek seçip seçmeme durumu, öğrenci sayısı ve görev yaptıkları okulun sosyo-ekonomik düzeyine bağlı bir faklılaşma olup olmadığını belirlemek, ayrıca sınıf içi disiplin anlayışları ile tükenmişlik düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkiyi tespit etmektir. Çalışma, Adana içindeki alt, orta ve üst sosyo-ekonomik düzeydeki çeşitli ilköğretim okullarının I. Kademesinde görev yapan toplam 331 öğretmenle yürütülmüştür. Araştırmada, araştırmacı tarafından hazırlanan “Öğretmenlerin Sınıf İçi Disiplin Anlayışları Anketi” ile Seidman ve Zager tarafından (1986–87) geliştirilen “Öğretmen Tükenmişliği Ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Araştırma bulguları, öğretmenlerin sahip oldukları sosyo-demografik özelliklerden; çocuk sayısı, çalışma yılı, işi isteyerek seçip seçmeme, öğrenci sayısı ve okulların sosyo-ekonomik düzeyi gibi değişkenlerin sınıf içi disiplin anlayışı ile ilişkisi olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.

Kaynakça

  • Adams, A.T. (2000). The status of school discipline and violence. Annals of American Academy of Political & Social Science, 567, 140-157.
  • Aydın, A. (1998). Sınıf Yönetimi, Ankara: Anı.
  • Başar, H. (1997). Sınıf Yönetimi, Ankara: Önder Matbaacılık.
  • Beemsterber, J. and Baum,B.H. (1984). Burnout: definitions and health care management. Social Working Healt Care, 10(1).
  • Brissie, J, Hoover-Dempsey, K. & Bassler, O. (1988). Individual, situational contributors to teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Research, 82 (2), 106-112.
  • Burden, P. R. (1995). Classroom Management and Discipline: Methods to Facilitate Cooperation and Instruction, Londra:Longman.
  • Çınar, İ. (1999). Eğitim ve Şiddet, Çağdaş Eğitim, 24(254), 42-46.
  • Dreikurs, R., Grunwald, B. and Pepper, F. (1982). Maintaining sanity in the classroom: Classroom management techniques. NY: Harper Row.
  • Edwards, C. H. (1993).Classroom Discipline and Management, NY: Macmillan
  • Enochs, I.G., Schamann, L.C. and Bigss, I. M. (1995). The relationship of pupil control to preservice elementary science teacher self-efficacy and outcome expectancy. Science Teacher Education, 79 (1), 63-75.
  • Erden, M.(1998). Öğretmenlik Mesleğine Giriş, İstanbul: Alkım Yayınları.
  • Ergin,C. (1994). Doktor ve hemşirelerde tükenmişlik ve Maslach tükenmişlik ölçeğinin uyarlanması. R.Bayraktar, İ.Dağ (Ed), VII. Ulusal Psikoloji Kongresi Bilimsel Çalışmaları Ankara: Meteksan A.Ş. 143-154.
  • Erkman, F. (1991). Çocukların duygusal ezimi. Çocuk İstismarı ve İhmali. E. Konanç, İ. Gürkaynak, A. Eğemen (Ed). Ankara: Gözde Repro Ofset, 163- 169.
  • Evertson, C. M. and Emmer, E. T. (1982). Effective management at the beginning of the school year in junior high classes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 24 (4), 485-498.
  • Evertson, C. M.and Harris, A. H. (1992). What we know about managing classrooms. Educational Leadership, 19 (7), 71-78.
  • Evertson, C. M., Emmer, E. T. and Anderson, L. (1980). Effective classroom management at the begining of the school year. The Elementary School Journal, 80 (7), 219-231.
  • Freudenberger,N.J. and Richelson,G. (1994). Tükenmeye rağmen nasıl yaşanabilir? N.Hisli Şahin (Ed.), Stresle Başa Çıkma, Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları: 2, 64-67.
  • Friedman, I.A. (1991). High- and low- burnout schools: School culture aspects of teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Research, 84 (6), 325-333.
  • Friedman, I.A. (1993). Burnout in teachers: The concept and its unique core meaning. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 53 (4), 1035-1044.
  • Guglielmi, R.S. and Tatrow K. (1998). Occupational stress, burnout, and health in teachers: A methodogical and theoretical analysis. Review of Educational Research,. 68 (1), 61-99.
  • Güven, S. (1998). “Sınıf öğretmenlerinin sınıf yönetimi ve disiplini konusundaki yeterlilikleri ve eğitim ihtiyaçları”. Öğretmen Dünyası, 226, 26-28
  • Hargreaves, A. and Woods, P. (1984). Classrooms and Stafirooms. Open University.
  • Hoy, W.K. and Woolfolk, A.E. (1993). Teachers sense of efficacy and the organizational health of schools. The Elementary School Journal, 93 (4), 355- 372.
  • Maslach, C. (1981). Burnout: A social psychological analysis. The Burnout Syndrome. J.W. Jones(Ed). Pask Ridge I: London House Press.
  • Merrett, F. and Wheldall, K. (1998). Which classroom behaviors do primary school teachers say they find most troublesome? Educational Review, 10 (2), 87-92.
  • Motowidlo, S.J., Packard, J.S. and Manning M.R. (1986). Occupational stress: Its causes and consequences for job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 7 (4), 618-629.
  • Nelson, L. (1987). Positive discipline. New York: Ballantine Books.
  • Özyürek, M. (1996). Sınıfta Davranış Yönetimi, Uygulamalı Davranış Analizi. Ankara: Karatepe Yayınları.
  • Poctor, P. (1984). Teacher expections: A model for school improvement. The Elementary School Journal, 84 (4), 469-481.
  • Russell, D.W., Altmaier, E. and Van Velzen, D. (1987). Job related stress, social support, and burnout among classroom teachers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 7 (2), 269-274.
  • Schwab, R.L.,Jackson, S.E.& Schuler, R.S.(1986). Toward an understanding of the burnout phenomenon. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71 (4), 630-640.
  • Seidman, S.A. and Zager, J. (1991). A study of coping behaviors and teacher burnout. Work and Stress, 5, 205-216.
  • Tan, M. (1990). Eğitimde bedensel ceza. A.Ü.Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 23 (2), 545-556.
  • Tan, M. (1991). Öğretmen dayağı, E. Konanç, İ. Gürkaynak, A. Egemen (Ed.) Çocuk İstismarı ve İhmali, Ankara:Gözde Repro Ofset, 55-64.
  • Tulley, M. and Chıu, L. H. (1995). Student teachers and classroom discipline. The Journal of Educational Research, 88 (3), 164-171.
  • Tümkaya, S. (1996). Öğretmenlerdeki tükenmişlik, görülen pikolojik belirtiler ve başa çıkma davranışları. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Adana.
  • Veeman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54 (2), 143-178.
  • Veeman, S. and Reamaekers, J. (1995). Long-term effects of a staff development programme on effective instruction and classroom management for teachers in multigrade classes. Educational Studies, 21 (2), 167-184.
Toplam 38 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Yrd. Doç. Dr. Songül Tümkaya Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Mayıs 2005
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2005 Cilt: 44 Sayı: 44

Kaynak Göster

APA Tümkaya, Y. D. D. S. (2005). Öğretmenlerin Sınıf İçi Disiplin Anlayışları ve Tükenmişlikle İlişkisi. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 44(44), 549-568.
AMA Tümkaya YDDS. Öğretmenlerin Sınıf İçi Disiplin Anlayışları ve Tükenmişlikle İlişkisi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi. Mayıs 2005;44(44):549-568.
Chicago Tümkaya, Yrd. Doç. Dr. Songül. “Öğretmenlerin Sınıf İçi Disiplin Anlayışları Ve Tükenmişlikle İlişkisi”. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi 44, sy. 44 (Mayıs 2005): 549-68.
EndNote Tümkaya YDDS (01 Mayıs 2005) Öğretmenlerin Sınıf İçi Disiplin Anlayışları ve Tükenmişlikle İlişkisi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi 44 44 549–568.
IEEE Y. D. D. S. Tümkaya, “Öğretmenlerin Sınıf İçi Disiplin Anlayışları ve Tükenmişlikle İlişkisi”, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, c. 44, sy. 44, ss. 549–568, 2005.
ISNAD Tümkaya, Yrd. Doç. Dr. Songül. “Öğretmenlerin Sınıf İçi Disiplin Anlayışları Ve Tükenmişlikle İlişkisi”. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi 44/44 (Mayıs 2005), 549-568.
JAMA Tümkaya YDDS. Öğretmenlerin Sınıf İçi Disiplin Anlayışları ve Tükenmişlikle İlişkisi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi. 2005;44:549–568.
MLA Tümkaya, Yrd. Doç. Dr. Songül. “Öğretmenlerin Sınıf İçi Disiplin Anlayışları Ve Tükenmişlikle İlişkisi”. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, c. 44, sy. 44, 2005, ss. 549-68.
Vancouver Tümkaya YDDS. Öğretmenlerin Sınıf İçi Disiplin Anlayışları ve Tükenmişlikle İlişkisi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi. 2005;44(44):549-68.