Üniversite öğrencilerinin okuma motivasyonu okuma başarılarını yordamakta mıdır?

Öz

Bugüne kadar ilk ve ortaokul öğrencilerinin okuma motivasyonu ve okuma başarısı arasındaki etkileşim üzerine çok sayıda araştırma yapılmış olmasına rağmen, üniversite öğrencilerinin okuma motivasyonu ve okuma başarısı arasındaki etkileşim üzerine daha az araştırma yapılmıştır. Bu nedenle, bu çalışmanın katılımcılarını Türkiye’deki bir devlet üniversitesinin İngiliz dili eğitimi programında öğrenim gören üniversite öğrencileri oluşturmaktadır. Bu nicel durum çalışması, üniversite öğrencilerinin (N = 43) okuma motivasyonlarının okuma başarılarını yordayıp yordamadığını incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu çalışma katılımcıların okuma motivasyonlarının ve okuma başarılarının dört ay boyunca değişip değişmediğini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Veriler, iki kez Okuma Motivasyonu Ölçeği ve okuma öncesi ve sonrası test uygulanarak toplanmış; veriler eşleştirilmiş örneklemler t-testi ve doğrusal regresyon analizi yapılarak analiz edilmiştir. Sonuçlar katılımcıların okuma motivasyonlarında ve okuma başarılarında bir artış olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca, elde edilen artışın katılımcıların okuma öncesi ve sonrası motivasyonlarında ve okuma öncesi ve sonrası başarılarında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir değişime yol açtığını ortaya koymuştur. Buna ek olarak, elde edilen sonuçlar okuma motivasyonunun okuma başarısını yordamadığını gösterirken, okuma motivasyonunun alt boyutu olan bireyin okuma etkinliğini benliğinin bir parçası olarak görmesinin okuma başarısını istatiksel olarak anlamlı şekilde artırabileceğini göstermektedir. Bu çalışmanın sonuçları doğrultusunda, gelecek çalışmalara yol gösterebilecek çeşitli çıkarımlar ve öneriler sunulmuş; ayrıca üniversitelerde okuma dersi veren öğretim elemanlarına, öğrencilerin okuma motivasyonu ile okuma başarısı arasındaki ilişkiye dikkat çekici nitelikte önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• nicel durum çalışması
• okuma başarısı
• okuma motivasyonu
• üniversite öğrencileri

Etik Beyan

Araştırma Etiği Bu araştırmanın planlanmasından, uygulanmasına, verilerin toplanmasından verilerin analizine kadar olan tüm süreçte “Yükseköğretim Kurumları Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği Yönergesi” kapsamında uyulması belirtilen tüm kurallara uyulmuştur. Yönergenin ikinci bölümü olan “Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiğine Aykırı Eylemler” başlığı altında belirtilen eylemlerden hiçbiri gerçekleştirilmemiştir. Bu çalışmanın yazım sürecinde bilimsel, etik ve alıntı kurallarına uyulmuş; toplanan veriler üzerinde herhangi bir tahrifat yapılmamış ve bu çalışma herhangi başka bir akademik yayın ortamına değerlendirme için gönderilmemiştir. Katılımcılara çalışma hakkında bilgi verilmiş ve bilgilendirilmiş gönüllü olur/onam formu imzalatılmıştır. Etik kurul izin bilgileri Etik değerlendirmeyi yapan kurul adı: Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Araştırma ve Yayın Etik Kurulu Etik değerlendirme kararının tarihi: 01.01.2021 Etik değerlendirme belgesi sayı numarası: 902-01-FR 006

Does college students’ reading motivation predict their reading achievement?

Öz

Although a great deal of research into the interplay between primary and secondary school students’ reading motivation and reading achievement has been carried out to date, less has been conducted on the one between college students’ reading motivation and reading achievement. To address this gap, the present study was conducted with college students majoring in English Language Teaching at a public university in Türkiye. This quantitative case study sets out to examine if college students’ (N = 43) reading motivation and reading achievement change over four months. In addition, it aims at examining if their reading motivation predicts reading achievement. The data was collected by administering a motivation for reading scale twice and a pre- and post-reading test, which was analyzed performing paired samples t-test and linear regression analysis. The results demonstrated that there was an increase in participants’ reading motivation and reading achievement. Also, this increase marked a statistically significant change in participants’ pre- and post-reading motivation and pre- and post-reading achievement. Additionally, while the overall construct of reading motivation did not predict their reading achievement, the sub-dimension ‘reading as part of self’ significantly predicted reading achievement. Drawing upon the conclusions of this study, several implications and recommendations for future studies are presented; moreover, specific recommendations are offered to attract the attention of university reading teachers to college students’ reading motivation and achievement.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• college students
• quantitative case study
• reading achievement
• reading motivation

Etik Beyan

Research Ethics All the rules stated in the "Higher Education Institutions Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Directive" were followed in the entire process from the planning, implementation, data collection to the analysis of the data. None of the actions specified under the second section of the Directive, "Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Actions" have been carried out. During the writing process of this study, scientific, ethical and citation rules were followed; no falsification was made on the collected data and this study was not sent to any other academic media for evaluation. The participants were informed about the purpose of the study and their consent was obtained through their signatures on the participant consent form. Research ethics committee approval information Name of the ethics committee: Social and Human Sciences Research and Publication Ethics Board of the Hatay Mustafa Kemal University Date of the decision: 01.01.2021 Document issue number: 902-01-FR 006

Kaynakça

1. Aarnouetse, C. & Schellings, G. (2003). Learning reading strategies by triggering reading motivation. Educational Studies, 29(4), 387-409. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569032000159688
2. Akbari, H., Ghonsooly, B., Ghazanfari, M., & Ghapanchi, Z. (2019). Enriching the construct structure of l2 reading motivation: Learners’ attitudes in focus. Reading Psychology, 40(4), 371-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2019.1614126
3. Albashtawi, A. H. (2019). Improvement of EFL students’ academic reading achievement through the cognitive academic language learning approach (CALLA). Reading Psychology, 40(8), 679–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2019.1658669
4. Alireza, A., & Karimnia, A. (2018). Investigating Iranian medical students’ second language reading motivation. Reading Psychology, 39(7), 623-646. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2018.1482851
5. Barber, A. T., & Klauda, S. L. (2020). How reading motivation and engagement enable reading achievement: Policy implications. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(1), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732219893385
6. Boerma, I. E., Mol, S. E., & Jolles, J. (2016). Teacher perceptions affect boys’ and girls’ reading motivation differently. Reading Psychology, 37(4), 547-569. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2015.1072608
7. Bozack, A. R., & Salvaggio, A. N. (2013). Relational effects of reading motivation and academic achievement among adolescent boys. Reading Psychology, 34(6), 507-522. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2012.660302 Bråten, I., Johansen, R. P., & Strømsø, H. I. (2017). Effects of different ways of introducing a reading task on intrinsic motivation and comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 40(1), 17-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12053 Brown, C. A., Danvers, K., & Doran, D. T. (2016). Student perceptions on using guided reading questions to motivate student reading in the flipped classroom. Accounting Education, 25(3), 256-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2016.1165124
8. Cartwright, K. B., Marshall, T. R., & Wray, E. (2016). A longitudinal study of the role of reading motivation in primary students’ reading comprehension: Implications for a less simple view of reading. Reading Psychology, 37(1), 55–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2014.991481

9. Cartwright, K. B., Lee, S. A., Barber, A. T., DeWyngaert, L. U., Lane, A. B., & Singleton, T. (2019). Contributions of executive function and cognitive intrinsic motivation to university students’ reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(3), 345-369. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.273
10. Clinton, V. (2015). Examining associations between reading motivation and inference generation beyond reading comprehension skill. Reading Psychology, 36(3), 473-498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2014.892040
11. Çam, E., & Baştuğ, M. (2025). A Reading Comprehension Program for Primary School Students. Reading Psychology, 46(1), 43-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2024.2425090
12. Dammert, M., Matos, L., Gargurevich, R., Vansteenkiste, M., & Haerens, L. (2025). Teachers’ motivating style, students’ basic psychological needs, academic reading motivation, and engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2025.2575473
13. Davis, M. H., Tonks, S. M., Hock, M., Wang, W., & Rodriguez, A. (2018). A review of reading motivation scales. Reading Psychology, 39, 121-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2017.1400482 Dhanapala, K. V., & Hirakawa, Y. (2016). L2 reading motivation among Sri Lankan university students. Reading Psychology, 37(2), 202-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2015.1025163
14. Didion, L., Toste, J. R., & Filderman, M. J. (2020). Teacher professional development and student reading achievement: a meta-analytic review of the effects. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(1), 29-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2019.1670884
15. Duncan, S. (2009). ‘What are we doing when we read?’ – Adult literacy learners’ perceptions of reading. Research in Post‐Compulsory Education, 14(3), 317-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596740903139420
16. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage Publications Ltd.
17. Förster, N., & Souvignier, E. (2014). Learning progress assessment and goal setting: Effects on reading achievement, reading motivation and reading self-concept. Learning and Instruction, 32, 91-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.02.002
18. Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. CUP.
19. Giambona, F., & Porcu, M. (2015). Student background determinants of reading achievement in Italy. A quantile regression analysis. International Journal of Educational Development, 44, 95-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.07.005
20. Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol. 3 (p. 403–422). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
21. Hebbecker, K., Förster, N., & Souvignier, E. (2019). Reciprocal effects between reading achievement and intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(5), 419-436. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2019.1598413
22. Huang, S. (2013). Factors affecting middle school students’ reading motivation in Taiwan. Reading Psychology, 34(2), 148-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2011.618799
23. Huang, J., Lee, J. K. L., & Yeung, S. S. S. (2020). Predicting reading motivation and achievement: The role of family and classroom environments in Greater China. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101642
24. Kambara, H., & Lin, Y. C. (2024). Investigating reading motivation in Latinx college students: qualitative insights from bilingual readers. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(5), 1746-1761. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2021.2021212
25. Kambara, H., Lin, Y. C., & Adachi, S. (2022). Self-construal predicts reading motivation: A comparison between Hispanic American and Japanese college students. Social Psychology of Education, 25(2), 593-623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09698-3
26. Kanonire, T., Lubenko, J., & Kuzmina, Y. (2020). The effects of intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation on reading performance in elementary school. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 36(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2020.1822961
27. Kheang, T., Chin, P., & Em, S. (2024). Reading motivation to promote students’ reading comprehension: A review study. International Journal of Languages and Culture, 4(1), 1-8. 4760870. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4760870
28. Lerkkanen, M. K. (2018). The influence of instructional practices on reading motivation in Finland. In P. O. Garcia and P. B. Lind (Eds.), Reading achievement and motivation in boys and girls (pp.65-79). Springer.
29. Lin, Y. (2025). A reflection of learners’ motivation to read, self-assessment, critical thinking, and academic well-being in extensive and intensive reading offline instruction: A focus on self-determination theory. Learning and Motivation, 89, 102093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102093
30. Liu, Y., & Wen, H. (2025). The reciprocal effects among autonomy support, intrinsic motivation, and reading achievement: a self-determination theory perspective. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2025.2549749
31. Ma, L., & Zhao, Z. (2025). Reading Motivation and Reading Comprehension Achievement Among English Majors in China: A Descriptive Correlational Study. Heliyon, 11(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42427
32. Matsumura, L. C., Garnier, H. E., & Spybrook, J. (2012). Literacy coaching to improve student reading achievement: A multi-level mediation model. Learning and Instruction, 25, 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.001
33. McBreen, M., & Savage, R. (2021). The impact of motivational reading instruction on the reading achievement and motivation of students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 1125-1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09584-4
34. McGeown, S. P., Norgate, R., & Warhurst, A. (2012). Exploring intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation among very good and very poor readers. Educational Research, 54(3), 309-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2012.710089
35. Miller, R. (2015). Learning to love reading: A self-study on fostering students’ reading motivation in small groups. Studying Teacher Education, 11(2), 103-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2015.1045771
36. Monteiro, V. (2013). Promoting reading motivation by reading together. Reading Psychology, 34(4), 301-335. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2011.635333
37. Neugebauer, S. R. (2013). A daily diary study of reading motivation inside and outside of school: A dynamic approach to motivation to read. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 152-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.011
38. Ölmez, F. (2015). An investigation into the relationship between L2 reading motivation and reading achievement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 597-603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.561
39. Quirk, M., Swami, S., Loera, G., & Garcia, S. (2020). Latinx Adolescents’ Reading Motivation Profiles and Associations with Higher Education Aspirations. Literacy Research and Instruction, 59(3), 218-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2020.1752862
40. Retelsdorf, J., Köller, O., & Möller, J. (2011). On the effects of motivation on reading performance growth in secondary school. Learning and Instruction, 21(4), 550–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.11.001
41. Retelsdorf, J., Köller, O., & Möller, J. (2013). Reading achievement and reading self-concept e Testing the reciprocal effects model. Learning and Instruction, 29, 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.004
42. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
43. Schaffner, E., & Schiefele, U. (2016). The contributions of intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation to the development of reading competence over summer vacation. Reading Psychology, 37(6), 917-941. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2015.1133465
44. Schaffner, E., Philipp, M., & Schiefele, U. (2016). Reciprocal effects between intrinsic reading motivation and reading competence? A cross-lagged panel model for academic track and nonacademic track students. Journal of Research in Reading, 39(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12027
45. Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Möller, J., & Wigfield, A. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(4), 427-463. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.030
46. Schiefele, U., Stutz, F., & Schaffner, E. (2016). Longitudinal relations between reading motivation and reading comprehension in the early elementary grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.031
47. Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (2007). Dimensions of reading motivation: Development of an adult reading motivation scale. Reading psychology, 28(5), 469-489. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710701568991
48. Smith, J. K., Smith, L. F., Gilmore, A., & Jameson, M. (2011). Students' self-perception of reading ability, enjoyment of reading and reading achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 202-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.04.010
49. Soemer, A., & Schiefele, U. (2018). Reading amount as a mediator between intrinsic reading motivation and reading comprehension in the early elementary grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.06.006
50. Spōrer, N., & Schünemann, N. (2014). Improvements of self-regulation procedures for fifth graders’ reading competence: analyzing effects on reading comprehension, reading strategy performance, and motivation for reading. Learning and Instruction, 33, 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.05.002
51. Stoffelsma, L., & Spooren, E. (2017). Improving the academic reading proficiency of university students in Ghana: An Educational Design Research approach. Language Matters, 48(1), 48-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/10228195.2017.1296017
52. Taboada, A., & Buehl, M. M. (2012). Teachers’ conceptions of reading comprehension and motivation to read. Teachers and Teaching, 18(1), 101-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2011.622559
53. Türkel, A., Özdemir, E. E., & Akbulut, S. (2019). Examining reading cultures of pre-service teachers: a case study from an education faculty in Turkey. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 7(2), 197-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.7n.2p.197
54. Unrau, N. J., & Schlackman, J. (2006). Motivation and its relationship with reading achievement in an urban middle school. Journal of Educational Research, 100(2), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.2.81-101
55. Van den Branden, K. (2000). Does negotiation of meaning promote reading comprehension? A study of multilingual primary school classes. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(3), 426-443. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.35.3.6
56. Wigfield, A. (1997). Reading motivation: A domain-specific approach to motivation. Educational Psychologist, 32(2), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3202_1
57. Xu, H., & Durgunoğlu, A. Y. (2020). Motivational factors underlying different levels of reading comprehension of English language learners. TESOL Journal, 11(1),1-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.448
58. Wigfield, A., Gladstone, J. R., & Turci, L. (2015). Beyond cognition: Reading motivation and reading comprehension. Child Development Perspectives, 10(3), 190-195. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12184
59. Zhang, J., Li, M., Yee, D., Park, B. J., Bohrnstedt, G., & Broer, M. (2020). Reading motivation, reading achievement, and reading achievement gaps: Evidence from the NAEP 2015 reading assessment AIR-NAEP working paper 2020-01. American Institutes for Research. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED610318.pdf