Antecedents and outcomes of faculty members’ perceived organisational justice: A systematic review of studies from Turkey

Öz

Systematic literature review, which basically includes the investigation, analysis and synthesis of previous studies on a particular subject, is recognised as a useful research method that could make significant contributions to the literature and practitioners through enabling a holistic and critical perspective on the subject. Using this method, the present study aims to synthesise faculty members’ organisational justice perception and its relation to several other organisational variables through the analysis of previous studies conducted on justice perceptions of faculty members in Turkish universities in the last two decades. Organisation justice is defined as the beliefs and perceptions of employees regarding how fairly they were treated in the workplace. Organisation justice explains many positive-negative behavioural outcomes that is vital for the organisation, and is considered to be especially significant for organisations employing highly-educated workforce like faculty members. Although studies that investigate faculty members’ justice perception in Turkish higher education context exist, there is a lack of studies that systematically analyses draws a holistic picture of the concept. The present study, which was conducted to address this void, included 23 studies that investigated faculty members’ justice perception as a dependent, an independent and/or a mediating variable and were published in peer-reviewed journals between 2000-2020 were included in the study. In particular, the level of faculty members’ justice perception, its relationship with demographic variables as well as other variables that could predict or were influenced by their justice perceptions were analysed in the light of the previous findings. Based on this analysis, a broad picture of the existing evidence was drawn and conclusions were generated on the gaps and uncertainties regarding the existing research on faculty members’ justice perception in Turkey. Implications were also made for future studies in this regard. in particular. Methods and methods of the study and data collection tools should be mentioned.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• organisational justice
• faculty member
• university

Öncel ve çıktılarıyla akademisyenlerde örgütsel adalet algısı: Türkiye’de yapılmış çalışmaların sistematik analizi

Öz

Sistematik literatür analizi, belirli bir konu üzerine önceden yapılmış araştırmaların taranması, incelenmesi ve sentezlenmesi sonucu konu ile ilgili bütüncül ve eleştirel sonuçlar ortaya koyan ve bu yönüyle literatüre ve uygulayıcılara katkıda bulunabilecek bir araştırma yöntemi olarak kabul görmektedir. Bu yöntemle gerçekleştirilmiş mevcut çalışma, özellikle örgütsel adalet algısının çeşitli örgütsel değişkenlerle ilişkilerini son yirmi yılda Türkiye’de akademisyenlerin örgütsel adalet algısı üzerine yapılmış araştırmalar üzerinden irdelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Örgütsel adalet, işgörenlerin, örgüt işleyişinde kendilerine ne derece adaletli davranıldığı ile ilgili algı ve inançlarını ifade etmektedir. Örgütün amaçlarına ulaşmasında önemli etkileri olan pek çok olumlu-olumsuz örgütsel davranışla ilişkilendirilen örgütsel adalet algısının özellikle akademisyenler gibi eğitim düzeyi yüksek işgörenlerin çalıştığı örgütlerde çok daha önemli etkileri olabildiği düşünülmektedir. Ülkemizde akademisyenlerin adalet algısını araştıran çalışmalar olmakla birlikte, bu çalışmaların bulgularını bütüncül olarak ortaya koyan sistematik bir araştırmaya rastlanmamıştır. Bu boşluğu doldurarak alanyazına katkısı olabileceği düşünülen bu araştırmaya akademisyenlerde örgütsel adalet algısını bağımlı, bağımsız ve/veya aracı değişken olarak incelemiş ve 2000-2020 yılları arasında hakemli dergilerde yayınlanmış toplam 23 çalışma dâhil edilmiştir. Analiz sürecinde akademisyenlerin adalet algı düzeyi ve demografik değişkenlerle ilişkisine yönelik veriler ile örgütsel adalet algısının öncelleri ve çıktılarına yönelik bulgular sentezlenmiştir. Araştırmada elde edilen bulgular ışığında Türkiye’de akademide örgütsel adalet algısının mevcut durumuna yönelik bir çerçeve çizilmiş, belirsizlikler ve eksiklikler belirtilmiş, ayrıca gelecek araştırmalara yön verebilecek önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• örgütsel adalet
• akademisyen
• üniversite

Kaynakça

1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. L. Berkowitz (Ed.) içinde, Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol.2) (ss. 267-299). Academic Press.
2. Alfy, S. E., & David, S. A. (2017). Investigating organisational justice in higher education in UAE. International Journal of Management in Education, 11(2), 163-187. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMIE.2017.083355
3. Aryee, S., & Chay, Y. W. (2001). Workplace justice, citizenship behavior, and turnover intentions in a union context: Examining the mediating role of perceived union support and union instrumentality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 154. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.1.154
4. Barsky, A., Kaplan, S. A., & Beal, D. J. (2011). Just feelings? The role of affect in the formation of organizational fairness judgments. Journal of Management, 37(1), 248-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310376325
5. Beugre, C.D. (1998). Managing fairness in organizations. Greenwood Publishing Group.
6. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Ed.) içinde, Research on negotiations in organizations (Vol. 1) (ss. 43–55). JAI Press.
7. Brockner, J. (2002). Making sense of procedural fairness: How high procedural fairness can reduce or heighten the influence of outcome favorability. Academy of Management Review, 27, 58–76. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.5922363
8. Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278-321. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2958

9. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425
10. Colquitt, J. A., & Greenberg, J. (2003). Organizational justice: A fair assessment of the state of the literature. J. Greenberg (Ed.) içinde, Organizational behavior: The state of the science (ss. 165–210). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
11. Colquitt, J. A., Greenberg, J., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2005). What is organizational justice? A historical overview. J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Ed.) içinde, Handbook of organizational justice (ss. 3–56). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
12. Colquitt, J. A. (2012). Organisational justice. W. J. Kowlowski (Ed.) içinde, The Oxford handbook of organisational psychology (Vol. 1) (ss. 526-547). Oxford University Press.
13. Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Rodell, J. B., Long, D. M., Zapata, C. P., Conlon, D. E., & Wesson, M. J. (2013). Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(2), 199. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031757
14. Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z. S., Bobocel, D. R., & Rupp, D. E. (2001). Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(2), 164-209. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1791
15. Cropanzano, R., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. C. Cooper & I. Robertson (Ed.) içinde, International review of industrial and organizational psychology (ss. 317-372). Wiley.
16. Ertürk, A. (2007). Increasing organizational citizenship behaviors of Turkish academicians: Mediating role of trust in supervisor on the relationship between organizational justice and citizenship behaviors. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 257-270. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733089
17. Folger, R., & Greenberg, J. (1985). Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 3(1), 141-183.
18. Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399-432. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639001600208
19. Greenberg, J. (1996). The quest for justice on the job: Essays and experiments. Sage Publications.
20. Gürbüz, S. (2007). Yöneticilerin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışlarının iş tatmini ve algıladıkları örgütsel adalet ile ilişkisi (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
21. Hnat, H.B., Mahony, D., Fitzgerald, S. and Crawford, F. (2015). Distributive justice and higher education resource allocation: perceptions of fairness. Innovative Higher Education, 40(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-014-9294-3
22. Hoy, W.K. and Tarter, C.J. (2004). Organizational justice in schools: no justice without trust. The International Journal of Educational Management, 18(4), 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540410538831
23. Karadal, H., & Erdem, A. T. (2016). The analysis of perceptions of organizational justice, organizational citizenship and organizational trust: A case study of Selçuk University. Social Sciences, 1, 409-420. http://dx.doi.org/10.17740/eas.soc.2016.MSEMP-33
24. Leventhal G.S. (1980) What Should Be Done with Equity Theory?. K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis R.H. içinde, Social exchange (ss. 27-55). Springer.
25. Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J., & Fry, W. R. (1980). Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. Justice and Social Interaction, 3(1), 167-218.
26. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
27. Miller, B. K., Konopaske, R., & Byrne, Z. S. (2012). Dominance analysis of two measures of organizational justice. Journal of Managerial Psychology 27(3), 264-282. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941211205817
28. Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 845. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.845
29. Moorman, R. H., Niehoff, B. P., & Organ, D. W. (1993). Treating employees fairly and organizational citizenship behavior: Sorting the effects of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and procedural justice. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6(3), 209-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01419445
30. Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 527-556. https://doi.org/10.5465/256591
31. Nowakowski, J. M., & Conlon, D. E. (2005). Organizational justice: Looking back, looking forward. International Journal of Conflict Management, 16, 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022921
32. Patrick, H. A., Mammen, A. S., & Margaret D, S. (2014). Organisational justice in higher educational institutions. NHRD Network Journal, 7(4), 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974173920140406
33. Pinder, C. C., & Harlos, K. P. (2001). Employee silence: Quiescence and acquiescence as responses to perceived injustice. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 20, 331-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-7301(01)20007-3
34. Samancı, S., & Basım, H. N. (2018). Akademisyenlerin örgütsel adalet algıları ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları: psikolojik sermayenin aracılık rolü. Business & Economics Research Journal, 9(2), 363-380. https://doi.org/10.20409/berj.2018.110
35. Sert, M. (2013). Örgütsel adalet, örgütsel bağlılık ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ilişkisi üzerine bir meta analizi (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Kara Harp Okulu Savunma Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
36. Taşlıyan, M., Hırlak, B., Çiftçi, G. E., & Yılmaz, Ö. İ. (2017). Farklılık yönetiminin örgütsel adalet algısı ve örgütsel özdeşleşme üzerine etkisi: İç Anadolu ve Akdeniz bölgesinde yer alan üniversitelerde karşılaştırmalı bir araştırma. Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD), 9(16), 1-19.
37. Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Ülbeği, İ. D. (2016). Örgütsel adaletin meta analiz yöntemiyle incelenmesi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 25(2), 101-112.
39. Wasti A. ve Fiş¸ A. M. (2010). Örgüt kültüründe sıkılık-esneklik boyutu ve kurumsal girişimciliğe etkisi. Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10, 11–32.
40. Whitman, D. S., Caleo, S., Carpenter, N. C., Horner, M. T., & Bernerth, J. B. (2012). Fairness at the collective level: A meta-analytic examination of the consequences and boundary conditions of organizational justice climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(4), 776. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0028021