MEDYADA ŞİDDET KONUSUNDA BAZI SORULAR

Öz

Kaynakça

1. Feshbach, S. (1956). The catharsis hypothesis and some consequences of interaction with aggressive and neutral play objects. Journal of Personality, 24, 449-462.
2. Goranson, R. E. (1970). Media violence and aggresive behavior. A review ofthe experimental research. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental psychology. New York: Academic Press.
3. Graydon, S. (1994). Violence and sexism in the media: Countering the popular curriculum. Women's Voices, 1, 1.[Online] Available: http://www.mediaawareness.ca/eng/issues/violence/resource/docs/graydon.htm
4. Groebel, J. (1998). The UNESCO global study on media violence. PPU. Children and peace. [Online] Available: http://www.ppu.org.uk/chidren/media_survey1- e.html
5. Huston, A. C. & Wright, J. C. (1992). Television and socialization of young children. [Online] Available: http://www.cyfc.umn.edu/television.html
6. Kalin, K. (1997). Television, violence and children. Master ofscience, syhthesis paper. Technologyand Administration, College of Education, University of Oregon. [Online] Available: http://interact.uoregon.edu/medialit/mlr/readings/articles/kalin.html
7. Martinez, A. (1992, May). Scientific knowledge about television violence. Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunication Commission, 38-39.
8. Szatlik, K. (2001). Childen's shows and what parents can do. Why is there vio1ence on TV? Violence on TV desentizing of America. [Online] Available: http://www.ridgenet.org/szatlik/tvrating.htm

9. Walsh, B. (1997). Our Problem is defining violence: The statistics are frightening. [Online] Available: http://interact.uoregon.edu/MediaLit/mlr/readings/articles/defining.html
10. Zilman, D., Johnson, R. C. & Hanrahan, 1. (1973). Pacifying effect ofhappy ending of communications ınvolving aggression. Psychological reports. 32. 967-970.