COMMUNICATION AND META-COMMUNICATION IN ENGINEERING

Öz

COMMUNICATION AND META-COMMUNICATION IN ENGINEERING

Öz

This paper examines and focuses on some issues and questions relating to how the use of meta-communication concept in “Software Engineering Process”. In addition, the role of IT project communication and the project management tools which can be regarded as vital for “Software Engineering”, primarily the internet, email, printed materials and the categories by which development team interacts are also investigated. In the field of “Software Engineering” the perception of the role of socio-cognitive engineering SCE is continuously increasing. Today, the focus is especially on the identification of human and organization decisional errors caused by software developers and managers under high-risk conditions, as evident by analyzing reports on failed IP projects In this paper, more detailed aspects of the cognitive decision-making and its possible human errors and organizational vulnerability are presented. The formal TOGA-based network model for cognitive decision-making enables to indicate and analyze nodes and arcs in which Software developers and managers errors may appear. As the nature of human errors depends on the specific properties of the decision-maker and the decisional context of IT project processes, a classification of decision-making using is suggested. Several types of initial situations of decision-making useful for the diagnosis of Software developers’ errors are considered. The developed models can be used for training the IT project management executive staff.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Engineering Science, knowledge building, communications systems, expressing, formulas, defect prevention, socio-cognitive modeling, software engineering, IT, IT project processes TOGA meta-theory, socio-cognitive engineering, project communications management

Kaynakça

1. Alexander, G. O. (1972). Instructional Meta-communication and Self-Directed Learning. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Annual Convention (Atlanta, Georgia, April 19-22, 1972). Retrieved April 5, 2009. Available http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=tr ue&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED063737&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=n o&accno=ED063737
2. Anderson, R. D. (2007). Inquiry as an organizing theme. In Abell, S. K., & Lederman, N. G. (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 807–830). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Inc. Ouated from Neakrase Baptiste, H. P., Neakrase, J. J., & Ryan, A. N. (2011). Relevant issues that challenge the designingof transformative, liberating online science courses . In Kurubacak, G., & Volkan Yuzer, T. (Eds.), Handbook of research on transformative online education and liberation: Models for socialequality. Hershey, PA: IGI Global Publishing.
3. Anderson, M., Embrey, D., Hodgkinson, C., Hunt, P., Kinchin, B., Morris, P., & Rose, M. (2001). The human factors implications for flight safety of recent developments in the airline industry, a research study for the JAA: Final report, Version 2. Icon International Services Limited: London, UK. Retrieved on 6.10.2005, available from http://www.clearlycultural.com/geert-hofstede-cultural-dimensions/power-distance-index
4. Baptiste, H. P., Neakrase, J. J., Ryan, A. (2011). Relevant issues that challenge the designing of transformative, liberating on-line science education. In Gülsün Kurubacak & T. Volkan Yüzer (eds), Handbook of research on transformative on-line and liberation: models for social equality, pp. 47-66.
5. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. University of Chicago Press. pp. 247-248 and 289. ISBN 978-0-226-03905-3
6. Carver, J. & Walia. (2014).Integrating Software Engineering and Human Error Models To Improve Software Quality, 2014. Retrieved on 21.10.2015 and also available from http://humanerrorinse.org
7. FURO at Robotworld: human-robotmetacommunication and mediastudies. https://www.google.com.tr/search?q=FUro+Robot&biw=1113&bih=594&tbm=isch&tbo= u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0CBkQsARqFQoTCOLN2bTg6sgCFerzcgod1eQOBQ#img rc=6wyM3LTng89R-M%3A available from, rertieved on 28.10.2015.
8. Chesher, C. (2012). FURO at Robotworld: human-robotmetacommunication and mediastudies University of Sydney, Paper presented at ANZCA Conference, Adelaide, July.

9. Clearly Cultural, (2009). Making sense of cross cultural communication: Power Distance Index. Culture and how it Affects Communication in the Cockpit, Retrieved on 6.10.2005 available from http://www.clearlycultural.com/geert-hofstede-cultural- dimensions/power-distance-index
10. Cooper J. & Robinson, P. (1998). Small-group instruction in science: Astatus report and agenda for the future. Journal of College Science, 27(383-388).
11. Demiray, U. (2009). Meta-communication for Knowledge Building Process in Distance Education From Point of Meta Cognitive Structural Collaborated Model, paper presented at European Humanities University Centre for Advanced Studies and Education, May 21-22, 2009, Vilnius, Lithuania.
12. Demiray, U. (2010). “Meta-communication Concept And Knowledge Building Process in Distance Education: From Point of Meta Cognitive Structural Collaborated Model”, Chapter V, in T. Volkan Yuzer Gulsun Kurubacak (eds) in Transformative Learning and Online Education: Aesthetics, Dimensions and Concepts, Information Science Reference (IGI Global), Hershey PA, USA, pp. 65-88, ISBN13: 9.781.615.209.859, DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61520-985-9, 2010, USA.
13. Demiray, U., Kurubacak, G. and T., Yuzer, V. (2012). Meta-communication for Reflective Online Conversations: Models for Distance Education. Anadolu University, Turkey, 2012. 320 pages.
14. Flight Safety Foundation, (2003, March-April). The human factors implications for flight safety of recent developments in the airline industry. Flight Safety Digest, 22 1-92. Retrieved on 6.10.2005, available from Flight Safety Foundation http://flightsafety.org
15. Gadomski, A M. Global TOGA Meta-Theory [online]. Rome: ENEA, 1997. Last upıdated 2008-05. Retrieved on 31.9.31.2015. Also available from http://erg4146.casaccia.enea.it/wwwerg26701/Gad-toga.htm
16. Gadomski, A. M. (1993) Ontology according to the TOGA Meta-theory [online]. e-Page on the Meta-Knowledge Engineering Server. Rome: ENEA, 2002-07. Last updated 2004- 07. Retrieved on 31.9.31.2015. Also available from http://info.casaccia.enea.it/hiscs/MKEServer/erg4146.casaccia.enea.it/Ont-know.htm
17. Gadomski, A. M. (1993) TOGA: A Methodoılogical and Conceptual Pattern for Modeling Abstract Intelligent Agent [online]. “1st International Round-Table on Abstract Intelligent Agent”, 25-27 January 1993, Rome, Pub. ENEA. Retrieved on 6.10.2015. And also available from http://erg4146.casaccia.enea.it/wwwerg26701/AIA-toga3.pdf
18. Gadomski, A. M. (1993) Ontology and Knowledge: Meta-ontological Perspective According to the TOGA Meta-theory (online). e-Pages of the Meta-Knowledge Engineering Server. Rome: ENEA, 2002-07. Last updated 2007-03. Retrieved on on 6.10.2015. Also availablefrom http://erg4146.casaccia.enea.it/Ont-know.htm
19. Gadomski, A. M. (1997). Global TOGA Meta-Theory, http://erg4146.casaccia.enea.it/wwwerg26701/Gad-toga.htm
20. Gaitros, D. A. (2004). Common Mistakes in Large Software Development Projects. Crosstalk, The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, 17(3), 21-25.
21. http://psychcentral.com/lib/meta-communication-what-i-said-isnt-what-i-meant Retrieved on on 6.10.2015.
22. http://www.meta-communication.readwithhelp.com Retieved on 6.10.2015
23. http://psychcentral.com/lib/meta-communication-what-i-said-isnt-what-i-meant Retieved on 8.10.2015. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/20140503151654-23626116-effective-communication-model Retrieved on 6.10.2015 http://aviationsafety.net Retrieved on 16.10.2015 http://www.theairlinepilots.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=853&sid=f89e81f7e590ee23685aaec 0ae85941d Retrieved on 21.9.2015
24. Han, J., & Kamber, M. (2006). Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques (2nd ed.). Boston: Elsevier
25. Ingrid T. M., (2013). Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza, Carla Faria Leitão (2013). Meta- communication and Semiotic Engineering: Insights from a Study with Mediated HCI, Design, User Experience, and Usability. Design Philosophy, Methods, and Tools, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 80(12), Springer, 2013, pp 115-124.
26. Istifci, I. & Demiray, U. (2011). Role and function of meta-communication concept as non- verbal communication for teaching English as a foreign language. Paper presented at 2nd International Conference Issues of State Language Teaching: Problems and Challenges. Batumi, Georgia, July 14-15, 2011.
27. Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
28. McLean, R. S. (1999). Communication Widgets for Knowledge Building in Distance Education. Computer Support for Collaborative Learning Proceedings of the 1999 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning 1999, Palo Alto, California December 12-15.
29. Meandzija, B. (1990). Integration through meta-communication. INFOCOM '90, 9th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communication Societies. The Multiple Facets of Integration. Proceedings vol.2, IEEE. pp702-709.
30. Mehrabian, A. (1967). Interference of attitudes from non-verbal communication in two channels. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31, 248-52. (Quated from Veliyeva, N. “Universals of Nonverbal Communication-Body Language. Available from http://changingminds.org/explanations/behaviors/body_language/mehrabian.htm and http://yazikiliteratura.narod.ru/lin74.htm Retrieved on 20.09.2015
31. Michel, J.-B., Shen, Y. K., Aiden, A. P., Veres, A., Gray, M. K., Team, T. G. B., et al. (2010). Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Boks, available from http://www.sciencemagorg/content/early/2010/12/15/science.1199644.full.pdf Retrieved September 17, 2015
32. Pennycook, A. (1985). Actions speak louder than words: Paralanguage, communication, and education. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 259–282.
33. Pereira, R., Baranauskas, M. C. C., & Almeida, L. D., (2011). The value of value identification in web applications. In: Proceedings of IADIS International Conference on WWW/Internet (ICWI2011), pp.37-44.
34. Pereira, R. & Maria C. C. (2015). A value-oriented and culturally informed approach to the design of interactive systems. Int. J.Human-ComputerStudies, 80(2015), pp.66–82.
35. Robert E. Park, David A. Gaitros (2004). Common Errors in Large Software Development Projects. Software Engineering Technology, 2004. http://static1.1.sqspcdn.com/static/f/702523/9291796/1289013040087/200403- Gaitros.pdf?token=Jsr3BQ70W9M67ifDOAc1RRgjZ78%3D
36. Robot FURO. Retrieved on 19.10.2015 and also avaiable from https://www.google.com.tr/search?q=robot+FURO&biw=1113&bih=594&tbm=isch&tbo= u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0CBkQsARqFQoTCIG3jbL928gCFYqPcgodeZMJUw
37. SWEBOK 3.0 (2014) Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge Version 3.0, IEEE. Retrieved on 19.9.2015 and also available from http://www.swebok.org
38. Tam, L. & Duly, J. (2005). Beyond the West: Cultural Gaps in Aviation Human Factors Research. Proceedings of the Mini-Conference on Human Factors in Complex Sociotechnical Systems. Retrieved on 19.9.2015, available from http://www.sjhfes.org/miniconference/PDFs/01-Tam.pdf
39. Tobin, K., Briscoe, C., & Holman, J. R. (1990). Overcoming constraints to effective elementary science teaching. Science Education, 74(4), 409-420.
40. Ulrich, W. (2001). A Philosophical Staircase for Information Systems Definition, Design and Development. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 3(2001), 55- 84.
41. Veliyeva, N. (2011).“Universals of Nonverbal Communication-Body Language. Retrieved on 20.08.2015 and available from http://yazikiliteratura.narod.ru/lin74.htm
42. Wikipedia (2015).Meta-communication, Retrieved on 20.08.2015 and available from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta-communication
43. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44. Woessner. K. (2009). I Think My Professor is a Democrat: Considering Whether Students Recognize and React to Faculty Politics. PS: Political Science & Politics, 42, pp 343- 352.
45. Yetim, Fahri (2004). A Meta-communication Model for Reflective Practitioners. Available from http://www.ics.uci.edu/~redmiles/chiworkshop/papers/Yetim.pdf Retrieved on 20.08.2015