MEDYADA ŞİDDET KONUSUNDA BAZI SORULAR

Yıl 2002, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 1, 45 - 50, 01.01.2002

Yaprak İşçibaşı

Kaynakça

• Feshbach, S. (1956). The catharsis hypothesis and some consequences of interaction with aggressive and neutral play objects. Journal of Personality, 24, 449-462.
• Goranson, R. E. (1970). Media violence and aggresive behavior. A review ofthe experimental research. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental psychology. New York: Academic Press.
• Graydon, S. (1994). Violence and sexism in the media: Countering the popular curriculum. Women's Voices, 1, 1.[Online] Available: http://www.mediaawareness.ca/eng/issues/violence/resource/docs/graydon.htm
• Groebel, J. (1998). The UNESCO global study on media violence. PPU. Children and peace. [Online] Available: http://www.ppu.org.uk/chidren/media_survey1- e.html
• Huston, A. C. & Wright, J. C. (1992). Television and socialization of young children. [Online] Available: http://www.cyfc.umn.edu/television.html
• Kalin, K. (1997). Television, violence and children. Master ofscience, syhthesis paper. Technologyand Administration, College of Education, University of Oregon. [Online] Available: http://interact.uoregon.edu/medialit/mlr/readings/articles/kalin.html
• Martinez, A. (1992, May). Scientific knowledge about television violence. Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunication Commission, 38-39.
• Szatlik, K. (2001). Childen's shows and what parents can do. Why is there vio1ence on TV? Violence on TV desentizing of America. [Online] Available: http://www.ridgenet.org/szatlik/tvrating.htm
• Walsh, B. (1997). Our Problem is defining violence: The statistics are frightening. [Online] Available: http://interact.uoregon.edu/MediaLit/mlr/readings/articles/defining.html
• Zilman, D., Johnson, R. C. & Hanrahan, 1. (1973). Pacifying effect ofhappy ending of communications ınvolving aggression. Psychological reports. 32. 967-970.