Türkiye Dijital Kamusal Alanında Suriyeliler Söyleminin Bir Eleştirisi

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 31 Sayı: 1, 77 - 93, 14.10.2023

Şükrü Şimdi

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, dijital kamusal alanda (DPS) “Suriyeliler” i çevreleyen söylem aracılığıyla ortaya çıkan yeni ırkçılık olgusunu yeni medya ekolojisi bağlamında incelemektir. Bu çalışma, yeni ırkçılık paradigmasının da işaret ettiği gibi, özellikle dijital alanlarda göçmen karşıtı söylemin yaygın olduğu önermesine dayanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada ele alınan temel soru, “Suriyeliler” söyleminin DPS'de hangi bağlam(lar)da kullanıldığıdır. Veriler, Twitter'da 7750 tweet, hashtag ve yorum, YouTube'da 294 video içeriği ve yorumu, 285 Facebook gönderisi ve Instagram'da 38.600 yorum/içeriği kapsayan amaçlı örnekleme yoluyla toplanmıştır. Söylem merkezli çevrimiçi etnografi, 15 Aralık 2020 ile 10 Şubat 2021 tarihleri arasında Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram ve TikTok platformlarında gerçekleştirilmiştir. Türk milliyetçiliğine eklemli yeni ırkçılık, DPS'de büyük bir yoğunlukta olduğu görüldü. Dışlayıcı yorumlar ve tartışmalar, gayri resmi İslami milliyetçilik ile Suriyeli göçmenlerin kesiştiği noktaya ve Türk milliyetçi söyleminin onları nasıl dışladığına ve damgaladığına ulaşıldı.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Türk milliyetçiliği, İslami kardeşlik söylemi, göçmen karşıtı söylem, etnik kategorizasyon, Suriyeliler, Turkish nationalism, Islamic-brotherhood discourse, anti-immigrat discourse, ethnic categorization, Syrians.

A Critique of Discourse of Syrians in Turkish Digital Public Sphere

Öz

The aim of the present research is to investigate the phenomenon of new racism expressed through the discourse surrounding "Syrians" in the digital public sphere (DPS) within the context of the new media ecology. This study is premised on the proposition that anti-immigrant discourse in digital spaces is particularly prevalent, as indicated by the new racism paradigm. The core question addressed in this study is the context in which the discourse of "Syrians" is employed in the DPS. The data was collected through purposive sampling, encompassing 7750 tweets, hashtags, and comments on Twitter, 294 video contents and comments on YouTube, 285 Facebook posts, and 38,600 comments/contents on Instagram. The discourse-centered online ethnography was conducted across Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok platforms between December 15, 2020, and February 10, 2021. The findings of the research reveal that the anti-immigrant discourse towards Syrians, which embodies a new form of racism embedded in Turkish nationalism, was expressed with great intensity in the DPS. The exclusionary comments and discussions have shed light on the intersection of informal Islamic nationalism and Syrian immigrants and on how Turkish nationalist discourse excludes and stigmatizes them.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Turkish nationalism, Islamic-brotherhood discourse, anti-immigrat discourse, ethnic categorization, Syrians.

Kaynakça

• Akçam, T. (2008). Türk Ulusal Kimliği Üzerine Tezler, In; Tanıl Bora and Murat Gültekin. Modern Türkiye’de Siyasi Düşünce. (3. Baskı). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
• Anderson, B. (1991). İmagined Community, London ve New York, Verso.
• Androutsopoulos, J. (2008). Potentials and Limitations of Discourse-Centred Online Ethnography, language@internet, Retrieved 06 January 2020 from https://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2008/1610.
• Fernández, M., A. (2017): Platformed racism: the mediation and circulation of an Australian race-based controversy on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube, Information, Communication & Society.
• Balibar, E. (1991). Racism and Nationalism, (C. Turner, Çev.). Balibar, E. ve Wallerstein, I. Race, Nation, Class Ambigious Identities içinde (243- 291), London, New York: Verso.
• Bennett W. L, Livingston S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication.33(2):122-139.
• Billig M (1995) Banal Nationalism. London: Sage.
• Bimber B, Gil de Zúñiga H. (2020). The unedited public sphere. New Media & Society. 22(4):700-715.
• Bozdağ, Ç. (2019). Bottom-up natinalism and discrimination on social media: An analysis of the citizenship debate about refugees in Turkey, European Journal of Cultural Studies, p. 1- 19. Erişim 22 Mayıs 2020, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1367549419869354.
• Dahlgren, P. (2005) The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation, Political Communication, 22:2, 147-162.
• Datts, M. (2020). Social Media, Populism, and Migration. Media and Communication, 8(4), Pages: 73-83.
• De Blasio, E, Marianne, K., Wolf J. S., and Michele S. (2020). The Ongoing Transformation of the Digital Public Sphere: Basic Considerations on a Moving Target, Media and Communication, 8(4), Pages 1–5.
• Ekman, M. (2019). Anti-immigration and racist discourse in social media. European Journal of Communication, 34(6), 606–618. doi:10.1177/0267323119886151.
• Eriksen, T., H. (1993). Formal and informal nationalism, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 16:1, 1-25.
• Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis, (First Published: 1995). London: Routledge.
• Filibeli, E., T., Ertuna, C. (2021). Sarcasm Beyond Hate Speech: Facebook Comments on Syrian Refugees in Turkey. International Journal of Communication, 15(2021), 2236- 2259.
• Habermas, J. (2006). Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research. Communication Theory, 16(4), 411–426.doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x.
• Hine, C. (2000). Virtual Ethnography, London: Sage.
• Hine, C. (2017). From Virtual Ethnography to the Embedded, Embodied, Everyday Internet, Edt: Hjorth L., Heather H., Anne G., ve Genevieve B. İn The Routhledge Companion Digital Ethnography, New York; Routledge (pp. 21-29).
• KhosraviNik, M., Zia, M. (2015). Persian Nationalism, Identity and Anti-Arab Sentiments in Iranian Facebook Discourses: Critical Discourse Analysis and Social Media Communication. Occupy, 13(4), 755–780.
• Kreis R. (2017). #refugeesnotwelcome: Anti-refugee discourse on Twitter. Discourse & Communication. 11(5):498-514.
• Ozduzen, O., Korkut, U., & Ozduzen, C. (2020). “Refugees are not welcome”: Digital racism, online place-making and the evolving categorization of Syrians in Turkey. New Media & Society.
• Özkırımlı, U. (2008). Türkiye’de Gayriresmi Milliyetçilik ve Popüler Milliyetçilik, In; Tanıl Bora and Murat Gültekin. Modern Türkiye’de Siyasi Düşünce. (3. Baskı). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
• Pere, M. Carlos, R., C, Jaume, S. (2019). “Active audiences and social discussion on the digital public sphere. Review article”. El profesional de la información.
• Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J, Hjorth, L, Lewis, T., Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital Ethnography Principles and Practice, London: Sage.
• Polat, R. K. (2018). Religious solidarity, historical mission and moral superiority: construction of external and internal “others” in AKP’s discourses on Syrian refugees in Turkey. Critical Discourse Studies, 1–17.doi:10.1080/17405904.2018.1500925.
• Pond, P., Lewis J. (2017). Riots and Twitter: connective politics, social media and framing discourses in the digital public sphere, Information, Communication & Society, DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1366539.
• Saraçoğlu, C., Belangar D. (2019). Loss and xenophobia in the city: contextualizing anti- Syrian sentiments in İzmir, Turkey, Patterns of Prejudice, 363- 383. Erişim 30 Mayıs 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2019.1615779.
• Schlesinger P. (2020). After the post-public sphere. Media, Culture & Society. 42(7-8):1545-1563.
• Unger J, Wodak R, KhosraviNik M. (2016). Critical Discourse Studies and Social Media Data. In: David Silverman, ed. Qualitative Research (4.Print). London: SAGE.
• Van Dijk, T. (2018). Discourse and Migration, Z. Barrero, ve E. Y. Yalaz, (Ed.). Qualitative Research in European Migration Studies içinde (227- 247). Erişim 29 Mayıs 2020, http://www.springer.com/series/13502.
• Voloder, L. (2013). Secular citizenship and Muslim belonging in Turkey: migrant perspectives, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36:5, 838-856.
• Wodak, R. (2001) The discourse historical approach. In: Wodak R and Meyer M (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. London: Sage, pp.63-95.