Nursing students' health beliefs regarding skin cancer: A descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study

Öz

Objective: This study aimed to assess the health beliefs of nursing students concerning skin cancer. Methods: The research was conducted between April 1, 2025 and July 1, 2025, among students studying at the Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing at a state university in Istanbul, Türkiye. Results: According to the Health Belief Model Scale for Skin Cancer, the mean score for perceived susceptibility was 25.48±3.54, perceived severity was 16.31±2.58, perceived benefits was 22.68±3.77, perceived barriers was 14.85±3.53, and self-efficacy was 22.96±3.78. Female students had higher scores for perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, and self-efficacy compared to male students. Students with blue/green or hazel eyes scored higher on perceived severity than those with black eyes. Students who had received prior information about skin cancer demonstrated higher scores in perceived susceptibility and self-efficacy. Those who performed skin self-examinations had higher scores in perceived susceptibility, perceived barriers, and self-efficacy. Furthermore, students who used sunscreen scored higher in perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, and self-efficacy compared to those who did not use sunscreen. In the multiple regression analysis, female gender and prior knowledge of skin cancer were identified as significant predictors of perceived susceptibility scores. Additionally, female gender and having fair skin were found to be positive predictors of perceived severity scores Conclusion: The health beliefs of nursing students regarding skin cancer were found to be at a moderate level. Female gender, prior knowledge about skin cancer, and having fair skin were identified as significant predictors of these health beliefs.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Nursing
• students
• skin cancer
• health belief model

Etik Beyan

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Marmara University Faculty of Health Sciences Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Approval date and number: 02/27/2025/38).

Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin deri kanserine ilişkin sağlık inançları: Tanımlayıcı ve analitik bir kesitsel çalışma

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmada hemşirelik bölümü öğrencilerinin deri kanserine ilişkin sağlık inançlarının belirlenmesi amacındı. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Araştırma 1 Nisan 2025-1 Temmuz 2025 tarihleri arasında Türkiye’de İstanbul’da bir devlet üniversitesinin Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Hemşirelik Bölümünde öğrenim gören öğrencilerde yürütüldü. Bulgular: Deri kanserine yönelik sağlık inanç modeli ölçeğine göre; algılanan duyarlılık puan ortalaması 25,48±3,54, algılanan ciddiyet 16,31±2,58, algılanan yarar 22,68±3,77, algılanan engel 14,85±3,53 ve öz yeterlilik puan ortalaması 22,96±3,78 saptandı. Kadın öğrencilerin algılanan duyarlılık, algılanan ciddiyet, algılanan yarar ve öz yeterlilik puanları erkeklerden yüksek saptandı. Mavi/yeşil ve ela göz rengini sahip öğrencilerin algılanan ciddiyet puanı siyah göz rengine sahip öğrencilerden yüksek bulundu. Deri kanseri ilgili önceden bilgi alan öğrencilerin algılanan duyarlılık ve öz yeterlilik puanları yüksek saptandı. Kendi kendine deri muayenesi yapan öğrencilerin algılanan duyarlılık, algılanan engel ve öz yeterlilik puanları daha yüksek olduğu bulundu. Güneş koruyucu krem kullanan öğrencilerin algılanan duyarlılık, algılanan ciddiyet, algılanan yarar ve öz yeterlilik puanları kullanmayan öğrencilere göre yüksek belirlendi. Çoklu regresyon analizinde, Kadın cinsiyet ve önceden deri kanseri hakkında bilgi almak, algılanan duyarlılık puanının anlamlı yordayıcısı olduğu görüldü. Kadın cinsiyet ve açık tenli olmak, algılanan ciddiyet puanının pozitif yordayıcısı olduğu belirlendi. Sonuç: Öğrencilerin deri kanserine yönelik sağlık inançları orta düzeyde bulundu. Kadın cinsiyet, deri kanseri hakkında bilgi almak ve açık tenli olmak deri kanseri sağlık inançlarının anlamlı yordayıcı olduğu görüldü.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• hemşirelik
• öğrenciler
• deri kanseri
• sağlık inanç modeli

Etik Beyan

Çalışmanın etik onayı Marmara Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Girişimsel Olmayan Klinik Araştırmalar Etik Kurulu’ndan (Onay tarihi ve sayısı: 27.02.2025/38) alınmıştır.

Kaynakça

1. Referans1 Khan NH, Mir M, Qian L, et al. Skin cancer biology and barriers to treatment: Recent applications of polymeric micro/nanostructures. J Adv Res. 2022;36:223-247. doi:10.1016/j.jare.2021.06.014
2. Referans2 Abubakar M. Overview of skin cancer and risk factors. International Journal of General Practice Nursing. 2024;2(3):42-56.
3. Referans3 Leiter U, Keim U, Garbe C. Epidemiology of Skin Cancer: Update 2019. In: Reichrath J, ed. Sunlight, Vitamin D and Skin Cancer. Springer International Publishing; 2020:123-139.
4. Referans4 Jones OT, Ranmuthu CKI, Hall PN, Funston G, Walter FM. Recognising Skin Cancer in Primary Care. Adv Ther. 2020;37(1):603-616. doi:10.1007/s12325-019-01130-1
5. Referans5 Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018. Eur J Cancer. 2018;103:356-387. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2018.07.005
6. Referans6 Alonso-Belmonte C, Montero-Vilchez T, Arias-Santiago S, Buendía-Eisman A. Current State of Skin Cancer Prevention: A Systematic Review. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2022;113(8):T781-T791. doi:10.1016/j.ad.2022.04.018
7. Referans7 Davids LM, Kleemann B. The Menace of Melanoma: A Photodynamic Approach to Adjunctive Cancer Therapy. In: Guy Huynh Thien D, ed. Melanoma. IntechOpen; 2013:Ch. 22.
8. Referans8 Global Cancer Observatory (GLOBOCAN).2025. https://gco.iarc.who.int/media/globocan/factsheets/populations/900-world-fact-sheet.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2025.

9. Referans9 Katkat Çelik E, Baykal Selcuk L, Ersöz Ş, Aksu Arıca D, Yaylı S, Ferhatosmanoğlu A. Trends of skin cancer incidence in Turkey: A hospital-based study. Turkish Journal of Dermatology. 2023;17(4)doi:10.4103/tjd.tjd_104_23
10. Referans10 Guerra KC, Zafar N, Crane JS. Skin Cancer Prevention. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing.; 2025.
11. Referans11 Perez M, Abisaad JA, Rojas KD, Marchetti MA, Jaimes N. Skin cancer: Primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention. Part I. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;87(2):255-268. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2021.12.066
12. Referans12 Adana F, Koçak AN. The knowledge and behavior of university students about skin cancer and sun protection: Cross-sectional research. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences. 2021;24(4):486-495. doi:10.17049/ataunihem.616340
13. Referans13 Baghani M, Robati RM, Mozafari N, et al. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice toward Skin Cancer among Patients of Dermatology Clinics and Medical Students/General Practitioners. J Skin Cancer. 2024;2024(1):9081896. doi:10.1155/2024/9081896
14. Referans14 Aksoy H, Demir Uyan D, Dağcıoğlu K, et al. Fifth and Sixth Grade Medical Faculty Students’ Awareness About Melanoma: A Descriptive Study. Turkish Journal of Family Practice. 2022;26(1):6-11. doi:10.54308/tahd.2022.29392
15. Referans15 Dogan ES, Caydam OD. A Scale Development Study: Health Belief Model Scale in Skin Cancer among Turkish University Students. Saudi J Nurs Health Care. 2021;4(8):205-213. doi:10.36348/sjnhc.2021.v04i08.001
16. Referans16 Petitt EK, Taylor RA, Yu X. Use of a Clinic-Based Skin Cancer Prevention Bundle to Promote Sun-Protective Behaviors in Patients at Moderate to High Risk for Skin Cancer. Journal of the Dermatology Nurses' Association. 2021;13(1):38-48. doi:10.1097/jdn.0000000000000590
17. Referans17 Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods. 2007;39(2):175-191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
18. Referans18 Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
19. Referans19 Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge; 1988.
20. Referans20 Dogan ES, Caydam OD. Knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs regarding skin cancer among health sciences students in Turkey: A cross-sectional study. Sao Paulo Med J. 2024;142(6):e2024089. doi:10.1590/1516-3180.2024.0089.13052024
21. Referans21 Nahar VK, Wilkerson AH, Ghafari G, et al. Skin cancer knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and prevention practices among medical students: A systematic search and literature review. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2018;4(3):139-149. doi:10.1016/j.ijwd.2017.10.002
22. Referans22 Ugurlu Z, Işık SA, Balanuye B, Budak E, Elbaş NÖ, Kav S. Awareness of Skin Cancer, Prevention, and Early Detection among Turkish University Students. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2016/01/01/ 2016;3(1):93-97. doi:10.4103/2347-5625.170969
23. Referans23 Shelestak D, Lindow K. Beliefs and Practices Regarding Skin Cancer Prevention. Journal of the Dermatology Nurses' Association. 2011;3(3):150-155. doi:10.1097/JDN.0b013e31821f3f43
24. Referans24 Jeihooni AK, Rakhshani T. The Effect of Educational Intervention Based on Health Belief Model and Social Support on Promoting Skin Cancer Preventive Behaviors in a Sample of Iranian Farmers. J Cancer Educ. 2019;34(2):392-401. doi:10.1007/s13187-017-1317-1
25. Referans25 Dogan ES, Caydam OD. Effect of planned visual education on university students’ attitudes and beliefs regarding skin cancer: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Sao Paulo Med J. 2025;143(4):e2024252. doi:10.1590/1516-3180.2024.0252.R1.14022025
26. Referans26 Yılmaz M, Yavuz B, Subasi M, et al. Skin cancer knowledge and sun protection behavior among nursing students. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2015;12(1):69-78. doi:10.1111/jjns.12049
27. Referans27 Erkin Ö, Aygün Ö. Effects of an Education Intervention on Nursing Students' Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Skin Self-Examination and Skin Cancer Risks. J Nurs Res. 2020;28(1). doi:10.1097/jnr.0000000000000326
28. Referans28 Fuentes-Lara C, Zeler I, Moreno Á, De Troya-Martín M. Sun behavior: exploring the health belief model on skin cancer prevention in Spain. Journal of Public Health. doi:10.1007/s10389-024-02335-7
29. Referans29 Maleki A, Daniali SS, Shahnazi H, Hassanzadeh A. Application of the Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) in Teaching Skin Cancer Prevention Behaviors in Male Students. J Cancer Educ. 2023;38(2):497-504. doi:10.1007/s13187-022-02145-z
30. Referans30 Haney MO, Bahar Z, Beser A, Arkan G, Cengiz B. Psychometric Testing of the Turkish Version of the Skin Cancer and Sun Knowledge Scale in Nursing Students. J Cancer Educ. 2018;33(1):21-28. doi:10.1007/s13187-016-1041-2
31. Referans31 Brokalaki H, Patelarou E, Vardavas C, Elefsiniotis IS, Giakoumidakis KA, Brokalaki E. Current patterns of the sun protection measures adopted by nurses and the risk factors influencing their compliance. Open Journal of Nursing. 2011;1(3):43-50. doi:10.4236/ojn.2011.13006
32. Referans32 Mirzaei-Alavijeh M, Gharibnavaz H, Jalilian F. Skin Cancer Prevention: Psychosocial Predictors of Sunscreen Use in University Students. J Cancer Educ. 2020;35(1):187-192. doi:10.1007/s13187-019-01579-2
33. Referans33 Pearlman RL, Patel V, Davis RE, et al. Effects of health beliefs, social support, and self-efficacy on sun protection behaviors among medical students: testing of an extended health belief model. Arch Dermatol Res. 2021;313(6):445-452. doi:10.1007/s00403-020-02123-9