PREVALENCE AND CHARACTERISTICS OF PALATINE TONSILLOLITHS IN CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGES: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

Öz

Introduction: Palatine tonsilloliths are calcified structures that
develop in enlarged tonsillar crypts. These structures are also
common incidental findings that can be clinically related to
halitosis and tonsillar abscess. The aim of this study is to clarify the
prevalence and imaging characteristics of palatine tonsilloliths by
using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).
Material and Methods: Three hundred and sixty-six CBCT scans
were retrospectively evaluated with regard to presence and
characteristics of tonsilloliths.
Results: Palatine tonsilloliths’ detection rate was found 20.4%
without statistically significant gender prediliction (56% in female,
44% in male patients). The mean age of tonsilloliths patients was
33.3 years. The size of the tonsilloliths ranged from 0.3 mm to 5
mm. No statistically significant difference between the left and
right sides was detected with regard to tonsilloliths presence.
Conclusion: Palatine tonsilloliths are common forms of soft tissue
calcifications. CBCT is a very helpful imaging modality in
identifying the true location of tonsilloliths.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tonsillolith
• tonsillar calculi
• Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
• palatine tonsil

Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi Görüntülerinde Palatin Tonsillolitin Prevelans ve Özellikleri: Retrospektif Bir Çalışma

Öz

Giriş: Palatin tonsillolitler genişlemiş olan tonsiller
kriptalarında gelişen kalsifiye yapılardır. Bu yapılar aynı
zamanda halitozis ve tonsiller abse ile klinik olarak ilişkili
olabilen rastlantısal bulgulardır. Bu çalışmanın amacı Konik
Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi (KIBT) kullanarak palatin
tonsillolitlerin prevelansını ve radyolojik özelliklerini
göstermektir.
Gereç ve Yöntem: 366 adet KIBT görüntüsü tonsillolit varlığı
ve özellikleri açısından retrospektif olarak değerlendirilmiştir.
Bulgular: Palatin tonsillolit %20,4 oranında izlenirken
istatistiksel olarak cinsiyet açısından herhangi bir fark
izlenmemiştir (%56 kadın, %44 erkek). Tonsillolit izlenen
hastaların ortalama yaşı 33,3’tür. Tonsillolitlerin boyutu 0,3 mm
ile 5 mm arasındadır. Tonsillolit varlığı bakımından sol ve sağ
taraf için istatistiksel olarak bir fark saptanmamıştır.
Sonuç: Palatin tonsillolitler yumuşak doku kalsifikasyonlarının
sık görülen türleridir. Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi,
tonsillolitlerin gerçek yerinin tespitinde oldukça yardımcı bir
görüntüleme yöntemidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tonsillolit
• bademcik taşı
• Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi
• palatin tonsil

Kaynakça

1. REFERENCES 1) Kajan ZD, Sigaroudi AK, Mohebbi M. Prevalence and patterns of palatine and adenoid tonsilloliths in cone-beam computed tomography images of an Iranian population. Dent Res J. 2016; 13(4): 315–321.
2. 2) Chan J, Rashid M, Karagama Y. An unusual case of a tonsillolith. Case Rep Med. 2012;2012:587503. doi: 10.1155/2012/587503.
3. 3) Silvestre Donat FJ, Mocholi AP, Estelles Ferriol E, Martinez Mihi V. Giant tonsillolith: report of a case. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2005;10(3):239-242.
4. 4) Moura MD, Madureira DF, Noman-Ferreira LC, Abdo EN, Aquiar EG, Freire AR. Tonsillolith: a report of three clinical cases. Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal.2007; 12(2): E130-E133.
5. 5) Çakur B, Yıldırım E, Demirtaş Ö. An investigation of relationshıp between tonsıllolith and carotid artery calcifıcation on panoramic radiography. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 2014; 24(1): 1-5.
6. 6) Pruet CW, Duplan DA. Tonsil concretions and tonsilloliths. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1987; 20 (2): 305–309.
7. 7) Mandel L. Multiple bilateral tonsilloliths: case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 66 (1): 148–150.
8. 8) Siber S, Hat J, Brakus I, et al. Tonsillolithiasis and orofacial pain. Gerodontology. 2012; 29 (2): e1157–e1160.

9. 9) Howerton WB Jr, Mora MA. Use of cone beam computed tomography in dentistry. Gen Dent. 2007;55(1):54-57.
10. 10) Stoodley P, Debeer D, Longwell M, et al. Tonsillolith: not just a stone but a living biofilm. Otolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg., 2009; 141(3):316-321. 11) Yousef H, Hazem Y, Omar M, Ahmad M, Farghaly TM. Tonsıllar calcification, computed tomography and clinical findings, a case study. Med. J. Ca iro Univ.2012; 80(1):427-434.
11. 12) Mesolella M, Cimmino M, Martino MD, Criscuoli G, Albanese L, Galli V. Tonsillolith: case report and review of the literatüre. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2004; 24(5):302-307.
12. 13) Takahashi A, Sugawara C, Kudoh T, et al. Prevalence and imaging characteristics of palatine tonsilloliths detected by CT in 2,873 consecutive patients. Scientific World Journal. 2014;2014:940960. doi: 10.1155/2014/940960.
13. 14) Caldas MP, Neves EG, Manzi FR, De Almeida SM, Boscolo FN, Haiter-Neto F. Tonsillolith –report of an unusual case. British Dental Journal . 2007; 202 (5): 265-267.
14. 15) Takahashi A, Sugawara C, Kudoh T, et al. Prevalence and imaging characteristics of palatine tonsilloliths evaluated on 2244 pairs of panoramic radiographs and CT images. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21(1):85-91.
15. 16) Aspestrand F, Kolbenstvedt A. Calcifications of the palatine tonsillary region: CT demonstration. Radiology 1987;165:479-480.
16. 17) Fauroux MA, Mas C, Tramini P, Torres JH. Prevalence of palatine tonsilloliths: A retrospective study on 150 consecutive CT examinations. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013; 42: 201-204.
17. 18) Mısırlıoglu M, Nalcacı R, Adısen MZ, Yardımcı S. Bilateral and pseudobilateral tonsilloliths: Three dimensional imaging with cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Science in Dentistry 2013; 43: 163-169.