Araştırma Makalesi

Determining the optimum voluntary waiting period and synchronization protocol in Simmental cows

Cilt: 16 Sayı: 3 30 Eylül 2023
PDF İndir
TR EN

Determining the optimum voluntary waiting period and synchronization protocol in Simmental cows

Öz

The objective of the present study was to compare four different synchronization protocols at the end of various voluntary waiting period (VWP) and evaluate the effect of parity and milk yield on pregnancy rates with synchronization in Simmental cows. All animals were randomly allocated into four synchronization groups and one control group. Parity, milk yield (≤23 kg/d; >23 kg/d), and days in milk (DIM; 45-60, 61-90, >90 days) were compared according to synchronization protocols. Ovsynch (Group I; n=81), Ovsynch+Progesterone (Group II; n=30), G6G (Group III; n=66), 2xG6G (Group IV; n=45), and a control group (n=35) were designed for the study. The parity significantly affected the pregnancy rates in the primiparous cows, especially in Group II (P<0.05). The pregnancy rates between synchronization and control groups did not differ significantly (P>0.05). There was no significant difference between milk yield and pregnancy rates (P>0.05). In conclusion, the synchronization of Simmental cows with Ovsynch, Ovsynch+Progesterone, G6G, or 2xG6G did not affect pregnancy rates across various DIM. These data suggest that the suitable VWP could be planned according to the farm’s economic and local market targets, with veterinarians able to choose a protocol based on practicality, effectiveness and cost, as well as the specific requirements of the herd.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Destekleyen Kurum

No support was received during this study.

Kaynakça

  1. Arbel, R., Bigun, Y., Ezra, E., Sturman, H., Hojman, D. (2001). The effect of extended calving intervals in high lactating cows on milk production and profitability. Journal of Dairy Science, 84, 600–608.
  2. Astiz, S., Fargas, O. (2013). Pregnancy per AI differences between primiparous and multiparous high-yield dairy cows after using Double Ovsynch or G6G. Theriogenology, 79, 1065-1070.
  3. Ben Salem, M., Djemali, M., Kayouli, C., Majdoup. (2006). A review of environmental and management factors affecting the reproductive performance of Holstein-Friesian dairy herds in Tunisia. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 18, 53.
  4. Bo, G.A., de la Mata, J.J., Baruselli, P.S., Menchaca, A. (2016). Alternative programs for synchronizing and resynchronizing ovulation in beef cattle. Theriogenology, 86, 388-396.
  5. Butler, S.T., Cummins, S.B., Herlihy, M.M., Hutchinson, I.A., Moore, S.G. (2019). Optimizing productive and reproductive performance in the grazing cow. Bioscientifica Proceedings, 8, 179-191.
  6. Fleming, A., Ebdalla, E.A., Maltecca, C., Baes, C.F. (2018). Invited review: Reproductive and genomic technologies to optimize breeding strategies for genetic progress in dairy cattle. Archives Animal Breeding, 61, 43–57.
  7. Fricke, P.M., Giordano, J.O., Valenza, A., Amundson, V.C., Carvalho, P.D. (2014). Reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows managed for first service using timed artificial insemination with or without detection of estrus using an activity-monitoring system. Journal of Dairy Science, 97, 2771-2781.
  8. Giordano, J.O., Fricke, P.M., Guenther, J.N., Lopes Jr, G., Herlihy, M.M., Nascimento, A.B., Wiltbank, MC. (2012). Effect of progesterone on magnitude of the luteinizing hormone surge induced by two different doses of GnRH in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 95, 3781–3793.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Veteriner Bilimleri

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Eylül 2023

Gönderilme Tarihi

12 Nisan 2023

Kabul Tarihi

21 Ağustos 2023

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2023 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA
Kara, U., Düzer, M., Hızlı, H., & Baki Acar, D. (2023). Determining the optimum voluntary waiting period and synchronization protocol in Simmental cows. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal, 16(3), 401-409. https://doi.org/10.30607/kvj.1282056
AMA
1.Kara U, Düzer M, Hızlı H, Baki Acar D. Determining the optimum voluntary waiting period and synchronization protocol in Simmental cows. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal. 2023;16(3):401-409. doi:10.30607/kvj.1282056
Chicago
Kara, Uğur, Mehmet Düzer, Hatice Hızlı, ve Duygu Baki Acar. 2023. “Determining the optimum voluntary waiting period and synchronization protocol in Simmental cows”. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal 16 (3): 401-9. https://doi.org/10.30607/kvj.1282056.
EndNote
Kara U, Düzer M, Hızlı H, Baki Acar D (01 Eylül 2023) Determining the optimum voluntary waiting period and synchronization protocol in Simmental cows. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal 16 3 401–409.
IEEE
[1]U. Kara, M. Düzer, H. Hızlı, ve D. Baki Acar, “Determining the optimum voluntary waiting period and synchronization protocol in Simmental cows”, Kocatepe Veterinary Journal, c. 16, sy 3, ss. 401–409, Eyl. 2023, doi: 10.30607/kvj.1282056.
ISNAD
Kara, Uğur - Düzer, Mehmet - Hızlı, Hatice - Baki Acar, Duygu. “Determining the optimum voluntary waiting period and synchronization protocol in Simmental cows”. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal 16/3 (01 Eylül 2023): 401-409. https://doi.org/10.30607/kvj.1282056.
JAMA
1.Kara U, Düzer M, Hızlı H, Baki Acar D. Determining the optimum voluntary waiting period and synchronization protocol in Simmental cows. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal. 2023;16:401–409.
MLA
Kara, Uğur, vd. “Determining the optimum voluntary waiting period and synchronization protocol in Simmental cows”. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal, c. 16, sy 3, Eylül 2023, ss. 401-9, doi:10.30607/kvj.1282056.
Vancouver
1.Uğur Kara, Mehmet Düzer, Hatice Hızlı, Duygu Baki Acar. Determining the optimum voluntary waiting period and synchronization protocol in Simmental cows. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal. 01 Eylül 2023;16(3):401-9. doi:10.30607/kvj.1282056

Cited By