Araştırma Makalesi

Effect of Shilajit on Freezing Rooster Semen

Cilt: 17 Sayı: 4 3 Ocak 2025
PDF İndir
EN TR

Effect of Shilajit on Freezing Rooster Semen

Öz

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are created in excess during the cryopreservation process, which speeds up the rate of lipid peroxidation (LPO). This negatively impacts spermatozoa functions and reduces their capacity to fertilize. The spermatozoon plasma membrane consists of significant amounts of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), which can be easily oxidized by ROS and produce harmful agents that are toxic to cells. The plasma membrane of rooster spermatozoa contains high concentrations of polyunsaturated fatty acids and very small amounts of mitochondria, cytoplasm, and cytoplasmic antioxidants. Cryopreservation of rooster semen has been associated with adverse effects, including increased lipid peroxidation, structural damage in the mitochondria and acrosomal area, changes in the integrity and permeability of the spermatozoon plasma membrane, and severe damage to DNA. In the study, semen taken from 20 Plymouth Rock roosters were pooled to eliminate individual differences. By adding 5 μg/mL, 10 μg/mL, 15 μg/mL, 20 μg/mL and 25 μg/mL shilajit to Beltsville Poultry Semen Extender diluent, 5 experimental and 1 control groups were formed and frozen in 0.25 mL straws. After thawing in a water bath at 37oC, spermatologic parameters were analyzed with the CASA system. Viability evaluations were made with eosin – nigrosin stain and morphological evaluations were made with Hancock method. Sperm DNA integrity was examined with the COMET assay. As a result, it was concluded that the addition of 10, 15, 20 μg/mL shilajit to rooster semen extender improves semen quality parameters and DNA integrity of semen after cryopreservation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Destekleyen Kurum

Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi

Proje Numarası

PYO.VET.1904.21.005

Kaynakça

  1. Alvarez, J. G., & Storey, B. T. (1992). Evidence for increased lipid peroxidative damage and loss of superoxide dismutase activity as a mode of sublethal cryodamage to human sperm during cryopreservation. Journal of andrology, 13(3), 232-241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.1992.tb00306.x Bilodeau, J. F., Chatterjee, S., Sirard, M. A., & Gagnon, C. (2000). Levels of antioxidant defenses are decreased in bovine spermatozoa after a cycle of freezing and thawing. Molecular Reproduction and Development: Incorporating Gamete Research, 55(3), 282-288.
  2. Blesbois, E., Grasseau, I., & Seigneurin, F. (2005). Membrane fluidity and the ability of domestic bird spermatozoa to survive cryopreservation. Reproduction, 129(3), 371-378.
  3. Chatterjee, S., de Lamirande, E., & Gagnon, C. (2001). Cryopreservation alters membrane sulfhydryl status of bull spermatozoa: protection by oxidized glutathione. Molecular Reproduction and Development: Incorporating Gamete Research, 60(4), 498-506.
  4. Fraser, L., & Strzezek, J. (2004). The use of comet assay to assess DNA integrity of boar spermatozoa following liquid preservation at 5 degrees C and 16 degrees C. Folia Histochemica et Cytobiologica, 42(1), 49-55. Ghosal, S. (1990). Chemistry of shilajit, an immunomodulatory Ayurvedic rasayan. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 62(7), 1285-1288.
  5. Gliozzi, T., Zaniboni, L., Iaffaldano, N., & Cerolini, S. (2017). Spermatozoa DNA and plasma membrane integrity after pellet optimized processing for cryopreservation in meat type chicken breeders. British poultry science, 58(5), 578-584.
  6. Gliozzi, T. M., Zaniboni, L., & Cerolini, S. (2011, 2011/06/01/). DNA fragmentation in chicken spermatozoa during cryopreservation. Theriogenology, 75(9), 1613-1622. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.01.001
  7. Gundogan, M., Yeni, D., Avdatek, F., & Fidan, A. (2010). Influence of sperm concentration on the motility, morphology, membrane and DNA integrity along with oxidative stress parameters of ram sperm during liquid storage. Animal reproduction science, 122(3-4), 200-207.
  8. Halliwell, B., & Gutteridge, J. M. (2015). Free radicals in biology and medicine. Oxford university press, USA. Hughes, C. M., Lewis, S. E., McKelvey-Martin, V. J., & Thompson, W. (1996). A comparison of baseline and induced DNA damage in human spermatozoa from fertile and infertile men, using a modified comet assay. MHR: Basic science of reproductive medicine, 2(8), 613-619.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Veteriner Bilimleri (Diğer)

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

12 Aralık 2024

Yayımlanma Tarihi

3 Ocak 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

4 Eylül 2024

Kabul Tarihi

12 Kasım 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 17 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA
Nizam, M. Y., & Selcuk, M. (2025). Effect of Shilajit on Freezing Rooster Semen. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal, 17(4), 393-400. https://doi.org/10.30607/kvj.1543825
AMA
1.Nizam MY, Selcuk M. Effect of Shilajit on Freezing Rooster Semen. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal. 2025;17(4):393-400. doi:10.30607/kvj.1543825
Chicago
Nizam, Mustafa Yiğit, ve Murat Selcuk. 2025. “Effect of Shilajit on Freezing Rooster Semen”. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal 17 (4): 393-400. https://doi.org/10.30607/kvj.1543825.
EndNote
Nizam MY, Selcuk M (01 Ocak 2025) Effect of Shilajit on Freezing Rooster Semen. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal 17 4 393–400.
IEEE
[1]M. Y. Nizam ve M. Selcuk, “Effect of Shilajit on Freezing Rooster Semen”, Kocatepe Veterinary Journal, c. 17, sy 4, ss. 393–400, Oca. 2025, doi: 10.30607/kvj.1543825.
ISNAD
Nizam, Mustafa Yiğit - Selcuk, Murat. “Effect of Shilajit on Freezing Rooster Semen”. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal 17/4 (01 Ocak 2025): 393-400. https://doi.org/10.30607/kvj.1543825.
JAMA
1.Nizam MY, Selcuk M. Effect of Shilajit on Freezing Rooster Semen. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal. 2025;17:393–400.
MLA
Nizam, Mustafa Yiğit, ve Murat Selcuk. “Effect of Shilajit on Freezing Rooster Semen”. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal, c. 17, sy 4, Ocak 2025, ss. 393-00, doi:10.30607/kvj.1543825.
Vancouver
1.Mustafa Yiğit Nizam, Murat Selcuk. Effect of Shilajit on Freezing Rooster Semen. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal. 01 Ocak 2025;17(4):393-400. doi:10.30607/kvj.1543825

Cited By