Araştırma Makalesi

Comparison of Quality Characteristics of Bone-In and Boneless Chicken Thighs

Cilt: 18 Sayı: 4 24 Aralık 2025
PDF İndir
EN TR

Comparison of Quality Characteristics of Bone-In and Boneless Chicken Thighs

Öz

In this study, the quality characteristics of bone-in and boneless chicken thighs supplied from five different companies were comparatively analyzed. The samples were assessed based on their physical, chemical, microbiological, and sensory attributes. Physicochemical analyses revealed that bone-in products exhibited higher fat content, ash content, and water-holding capacity, whereas boneless products demonstrated higher pH levels (p<0.05). Color analysis showed that bone-in products had significantly higher L* values, indicating lighter coloration, whereas boneless products displayed higher b* values (p<0.05), indicating greater yellowness. In microbiological evaluations, Salmonella spp. and serotypes were found at higher rates, especially in the products of 3rd company. In the sensory analyses, panelists generally rated the boneless products with higher scores. The findings reveal significant quality differences attributable to both product type and manufacturer. They also highlight that improvements in hygiene, packaging, and production processes are critical for ensuring product safety and enhancing consumer satisfaction.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. AOAC (2016). Official methods of analysis of the association of official analytical chemists, 20th ed.; AOAC International: Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
  2. Arkfeld, E. K., Wilson, K. B., Overholt, M. F., Harsh, B. N., Lowell, J. E., Hogan, E. K., ... & Boler, D. D. (2016). Pork loin quality is not indicative of fresh belly or fresh and cured ham quality. Journal of Animal Science, 94(12), 5155-5167.
  3. Augustyńska-Prejsnar, A., Hanus, P., Ormian, M., Kačániová, M., Sokołowicz, Z., & Topczewska, J. (2023).The effect of temperature and storage duration on the quality and attributes of the breast meat of hens after their laying periods. Foods, 12(4340).
  4. Baldi, G., Soglia, F., & Petracci, M. (2020). Current status of poultry meat abnormalities. Meat and Muscle Biology, 4(2).
  5. Barido, F. H., & Lee, S. K. (2021). Changes in proteolytic enzyme activities, tenderness-related traits and quality properties of spent hen meat affected by adenosine 5′-monophosphate during cold storage. Poultry Science, 100(5), 101056.
  6. Barido, F. H., Kim, H. J., Shin, D. J., Kwon, J. S., Kim, H. J., Kim, D., ... & Jang, A. (2022). Physicochemical characteristics and flavor-related compounds of fresh and frozen-thawed thigh meats from chickens. Foods, 11(19), 3006.
  7. Cantalejo, M. J., Zouaghi, F., & Pérez-Arnedo, I. (2016). Combined effects of ozone and freeze-drying on the shelf-life of broiler chicken meat. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 68, 400-407.
  8. Cardona, M., Izquierdo, D., Barat, J. M., & Fernández-Segovia, I. (2023). Intrinsic and extrinsic attributes that influence choice of meat and meat products: techniques used in their identification. European Food Research and Technology, 249, 2485–2514.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Veteriner Gıda Hijyeni ve Teknolojisi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

24 Aralık 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

1 Ağustos 2025

Kabul Tarihi

10 Kasım 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA
Çetin, R. Ü., Ektik Sezen, N., Kilci, Z., & Tavşanlı, H. (2025). Comparison of Quality Characteristics of Bone-In and Boneless Chicken Thighs. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal, 18(4), 367-375. https://doi.org/10.30607/kvj.1755969
AMA
1.Çetin RÜ, Ektik Sezen N, Kilci Z, Tavşanlı H. Comparison of Quality Characteristics of Bone-In and Boneless Chicken Thighs. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal. 2025;18(4):367-375. doi:10.30607/kvj.1755969
Chicago
Çetin, Ramazan Ülkü, Nisanur Ektik Sezen, Zeynep Kilci, ve Hakan Tavşanlı. 2025. “Comparison of Quality Characteristics of Bone-In and Boneless Chicken Thighs”. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal 18 (4): 367-75. https://doi.org/10.30607/kvj.1755969.
EndNote
Çetin RÜ, Ektik Sezen N, Kilci Z, Tavşanlı H (01 Aralık 2025) Comparison of Quality Characteristics of Bone-In and Boneless Chicken Thighs. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal 18 4 367–375.
IEEE
[1]R. Ü. Çetin, N. Ektik Sezen, Z. Kilci, ve H. Tavşanlı, “Comparison of Quality Characteristics of Bone-In and Boneless Chicken Thighs”, Kocatepe Veterinary Journal, c. 18, sy 4, ss. 367–375, Ara. 2025, doi: 10.30607/kvj.1755969.
ISNAD
Çetin, Ramazan Ülkü - Ektik Sezen, Nisanur - Kilci, Zeynep - Tavşanlı, Hakan. “Comparison of Quality Characteristics of Bone-In and Boneless Chicken Thighs”. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal 18/4 (01 Aralık 2025): 367-375. https://doi.org/10.30607/kvj.1755969.
JAMA
1.Çetin RÜ, Ektik Sezen N, Kilci Z, Tavşanlı H. Comparison of Quality Characteristics of Bone-In and Boneless Chicken Thighs. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal. 2025;18:367–375.
MLA
Çetin, Ramazan Ülkü, vd. “Comparison of Quality Characteristics of Bone-In and Boneless Chicken Thighs”. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal, c. 18, sy 4, Aralık 2025, ss. 367-75, doi:10.30607/kvj.1755969.
Vancouver
1.Ramazan Ülkü Çetin, Nisanur Ektik Sezen, Zeynep Kilci, Hakan Tavşanlı. Comparison of Quality Characteristics of Bone-In and Boneless Chicken Thighs. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal. 01 Aralık 2025;18(4):367-75. doi:10.30607/kvj.1755969