Leghorn Melezlerine Ait Bazı Yumurta Kalite Özellikleri Ve Kuluçka Performansları

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 4, 500 - 506, 31.12.2022

Hasan Keskin , Emre Arslan , Mustafa Garip , Cahit Özcan

https://doi.org/10.30607/kvj.1166930

Cited By: 1

Öz

Bu çalışma Leghorn ırkı tavuklar ile beş farklı genotipin melezlemesi sonucunda elde edilecek yavruların kuluçka performansı ve bazı yumurta kalite özelliklerini incelemek için yapılmıştır. Çalışmanın deneyi Selçuk Üniversitesi Prof. Dr. Hümeyra Özgen Çiftliğinde gerçekleştirildi. Her bir genotipe ait bir erkek yirmi dişi hayvan olacak şekilde planlanan çalışmada toplamda her sürüden 186 yumurta incelendi. Yerli ırkımız olan Denizli ve lokal olarak yetiştiriciği artan Aracuana, Brahma, Cornish ırkları ile yapılan birleştirmelerde kuluçka sonuçlarında olumsuzluk bulunmamıştır. Yumurta kalite özellikleri incelendiğinde ise F1 genotipler arasında yumurta ağırlığı bakımından farkın önemsiz olduğu ve ortalama 46.91-51.54 g arasında değiştiği tespit edildi. F2 kuşağı incelendiğinde ise yumurta ağırlığının genotip grupları arasında farklılık gösterdiği ve ağırlık ortalamalarının 57.6-67.14 g arasında değiştiği tespit edildi. Ayrıca aynı kuşakta genotipin kabuk mukavemeti ve kabuk ağırlığı değerlerine etkisi önemli, Haugh Unit ve sarı yüksekliğine etkisi ise önemsiz bulundu. Sonuç olarak, düşük verim performansına sahip genotiplerin ticari önemi olan genotiplerle melezlemeleri gelecek nesiller için alternatif üretim sistemlerine bir genotip kazandırılabileceği sonucuna varıldı.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Genotip, kuluçka randımanı, leghorn, melezleme, yumurta kalitesi

Destekleyen Kurum

Selçuk Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Koordinatörlüğü

Proje Numarası

15401072

Teşekkür

Bu çalışmada Selçuk Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Koordinatörlüğü'ne 15401072 Proje No'lu “Yerel Tavuk Irkları İle Çiftleştirilmiş Leghorn Tavukların Kuluçka ve Büyüme Özellikleri” başlıklı çalışma ile bu çalışmaya katkılarından dolayı teşekkür ederiz.

Some Egg Quality Characteristics and Hatching Performances of Leghorn Hybrids

Öz

This study examined the hatchability performance of the offspring and some egg quality characteristics, which will be obtained from crossing Leghorn breed chickens and five different genotypes. The study's experiment was carried out in the Prof. Dr. Hümeyra Özgen Research and Application Farm in Selcuk University. In the present study, which was designed to have one male and twelve females belonging to each genotype, a total of 186 eggs from each flock were examined. No adverse results were found in the incubation results of the crosses made with our local breed Denizli and Araucana, Brahma, and Cornish breeds, whose breeders increased locally. When egg quality characteristics were examined, the difference in egg weight between F1 genotypes was insignificant and ranged between 46.91-51.54 g on average. When the F2 generation was investigated, egg weight differed between genotype groups, and the average weights ranged between 57.6-67.14 g. In addition, the effect of genotype on egg shell strength values were found to be significant. In addition, the effect of genotype on egg shell strength and shell weight values were found to be significant. However, the effect on the Haugh Unit and yellow height were insignificant in the same generation. As a result, hybridizing genotypes with low yield performance with commercially important genotypes could provide a genotype for alternative production systems for future generations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Egg quality, genotype, hatching efficiency, hybridization, leghorn

Proje Numarası

15401072

Kaynakça

• Alabi OJ, Ngambi J, Norris D, Mabelebele M. Effect of Egg Weight on Hatchability and Subsequent Performance of Potchefstroom koekoek Chicks. Asian J Anim Vet Adv. 2012; 7 (8): 718-725.
• Alewi M, Melesse A. Evaluating the growth performance of local kei chickens and their f1-crosses with Rhode Island Red and Fayoumi breeds in watershed areas of guraghe administrative zone, Southern Ethiopia. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 2013; 16(1): 39-50.
• Bamidele O, Sonaiya EB, Adebambo OA, Dessie T. On-station performance evaluation of improved tropically adapted chicken breeds for smallholder poultry production systems in Nigeria. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2020; 52(4): 1541-1548.
• Burton FG, Tullett SG. A comparison of the effects of eggshell porosity on the respiration and growth of domestic fowl, duck and turkey embryos. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 1983; 75(2): 167-174.
• Çetin S, Gürcan İS. Kahverengi ve beyaz yumurtacı hibrit tavuk yemlerine istiridye kabuğu ilavesinin yumurta kabuk kalitesine ve serum kalsiyum düzeyine etkileri. Lalahan Hay. Araşt. Enst. Derg. 2006; 46(2): 23-31.
• Drabik K, Karwowska M, Wengerska K, Próchniak T, Adamczuk A, Batkowska J. The variability of quality traits of table eggs and eggshell mineral composition depending on hens’ breed and eggshell color. Animals. 2021; 11(5): 1204.
• Ewa VU, Otuma MO, Omeje SI. Interrelationship of external egg quality traits of four inbred line chicken stains. Trop. J. Anim. Sci. 2005; 8: 23-26.
• Ledur MC, Fairfull RW, McMillan I, Gowe RS, Asselstine L. Genetic effects of ageing on fertility and hatchability in the first laying cycle of three White Leghorn strains and their two-way crosses. Br. Poult. Sci. 2000; 41(5): 552-561.
• Narushin VG, Romanov MN. Egg physical characteristics and hatchability. World's Poult. Sci. J. 2002; 58(3): 297-303. Peebles ED, Brake J. Relationship of eggshell porosity to stage of embryonic development in broiler breeders. Poult. Sci. 1985; 64(12): 2388-2391.
• Peebles ED, Marks HL. Effects of selection for growth and selection diet on eggshell quality and embryonic development in Japanese quail. Poult. Sci. 1991; 70(7): 1474-1480.
• Peebles ED, Doyle SM, Zumwalt CD, Gerard PD, Latour MA, Boyle CR, Smith TW. Breeder age influences embryogenesis in broiler hatching eggs. Poult. Sci. 2001; 80(3): 272-277.
• Putra WPB, Ridho M, Nugraha I. Breeds characterization in three Turkish laying chicken breeds based on egg characteristics Indonesian. J. Agric. Res. 2021; 4(2): 130-141.
• Reis LH, Gama LT, Soares MC. Effects of short storage conditions and broiler breeder age on hatchability, hatching time, and chick weights. Poult. Sci. 1997; 76(11): 1459-1466.
• Sirri F, Zampiga M, Soglia F, Meluzzi A, Cavani C, Petracci M. Quality characterization of eggs from Romagnola hens, an Italian local breed. Poult. Sci. 2018; 97(11):4131-4136.
• Wilson HR. Crack your hatchability problems. International Hatchery Practice, 1991; 29-39.
• Wolc A, Olori VE. Genetics of hatchability-egg quality from the perspective of a chick. In 6th European Poultry Genetics Symposium, World Poultry Science Association, Bedlewo, Poland, 2009.
• Wondmeneh E, Dawud I, Adey M. Comparative Evaluation of Fertility and Hatchability of Horro, Fayoumi, Lohmann Silver and Potchefstroom Koekoek Breeds of. Asian J. Poult. Sci. 2011; 5(3):124-129.
• Yaman MA, Usman Y, Fitri CA, Latif H. Increase in egg production, egg quality and immunity of local chicken resulted by cross-breeding. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 2020; Vol. 425, No. 1, p. 012043. IOP Publishing.