Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Comparison of İn-Vitro Digestibility of Commonly Used Forage and Concentrate Feeds in Dairy Buffalo, Cow and Sheep by Using Daisy Incubator

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 1, 7 - 11

Aamır Iqbal , Ümit Özçınar , Vitalii Bomko , İbrahim Sadi Çetingül , Eyup Eren Gultepe , İsmail Bayram

https://doi.org/10.30607/kvj.1419628

Öz

In this study was evaluated in-vitro true dry matter (DM) digestibility of 8 different feedstuffs by using in vitro system. Eight different feeds were grouped as roughage and concentrate and tested by using Buffalo, cow and sheep inoculums.. The experiment was replicated on three different timelines for all feeds and the three inoculum sources. The incubation time for the digestibility was 48 hours for each species inoculum. In the study, rumen fluids from different animals did not have a significant effect on the in vitro true? dry matter (DM) digestibility of different feedstuffs during the 48-hour incubation period (P>0.05). The pellet wheat bran showed the lowest mean value in sheep among all feedstuffs. It was concluded that the daisy incubator method could be used to predict the true digestibility of different feedstuffs in different species animals.

Anahtar Kelimeler

DAISY feed Concentrate ruminants dry matter digestibility

Etik Beyan

The study was conducted at the Afyon Kocatepe University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, and Central Laboratory for Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Diseases. All procedures were approved by the local ethics committee (AKUHADYEK-495337002-07 no., Date 14/01/2019).

Proje Numarası

AKUHADYEK-495337002-07 no., Date 14/01/2019

Kaynakça

  • Ajila, C. M., Brar, S. K., Verma, M., Tyagi, R. D., Godbout, S., & Valéro, J. R. (2012). Bio-processing of agro-byproducts to animal feed. Crit Rev Biotechnol, 32(4), 382-400. https://doi.org/10.3109/07388551.2012.659172
  • Allen, M. S., & Piantoni, P. (2014). Carbohydrate nutrition: managing energy intake and partitioning through lactation. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract, 30(3), 577-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2014.07.004
  • Besle, J.-M., Cornu, A., & Jouany, J.-P. (1994). Roles of structural phenylpropanoids in forage cell wall digestion. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 64(2), 171-190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740640206
  • Cone, J. W., Cliné-Theil, W., Malestein, A., & van 't Klooster, A. T. (1989). Degradation of starch by incubation with rumen fluid. A comparison of different starch sources. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 49(2), 173-183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740490206
  • Conrad, H. R., Pratt, A. D., & Hibbs, J. W. (1964). Regulation of Feed Intake in Dairy Cows. I. Change in Importance of Physical and Physiological Factors with Increasing Digestibility1. Journal of Dairy Science, 47(1), 54-62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(64)88581-7
  • Cotanch, K. W., Grant, R. J., Van Amburgh, M., Zontini, A. M., Fustini, M., Palmonari, A., & Formigoni, A. (2014). Applications of uNDF in ration modeling and formulation. 114-131.
  • Devendra, C., & Sevilla, C. C. (2002). Availability and use of feed resources in crop–animal systems in Asia. Agricultural Systems, 71(1), 59-73.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00036-1
  • Fox, D. G., Tedeschi, L. O., Tylutki, T. P., Russell, J. B., Van Amburgh, M. E., Chase, L. E., Pell, A. N., & Overton, T. R. (2004). The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System model for evaluating herd nutrition and nutrient excretion. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 112(1), 29-78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2003.10.006
  • Getachew, G., Blümmel, M., Makkar, H. P. S., & Becker, K. (1998). In vitro gas measuring techniques for assessment of nutritional quality of feeds: a review. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 72(3), 261-281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00189-2
  • Hogan, J. P., & Flinn, P. C. (1999). An assessment by in vivo methods of grain quality for ruminants. http://hdl.handle.net/2123/2272
  • Holden, L. A. (1999). Comparison of methods of in vitro dry matter digestibility for ten feeds. J Dairy Sci, 82(8), 1791-1794. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75409-3
  • Huhtanen, P., Nousiainen, J., & Rinne, M. (2006). Recent developments in forage evaluation with special reference to practical applications. Agricultural and Food Science, 15(3), 293-323. https://doi.org/10.2137/145960606779216317
  • Kendall, C., Leonardi, C., Hoffman, P. C., & Combs, D. K. (2009). Intake and milk production of cows fed diets that differed in dietary neutral detergent fiber and neutral detergent fiber digestibility. J Dairy Sci, 92(1), 313-323. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1482
  • Krizsan, S. J., & Huhtanen, P. (2013). Effect of diet composition and incubation time on feed indigestible neutral detergent fiber concentration in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci, 96(3), 1715-1726. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5752
  • Mabjeesh, S. J., Cohen, M., & Arieli, A. (2000). In Vitro Methods for Measuring the Dry Matter Digestibility of Ruminant Feedstuffs: Comparison of Methods and Inoculum Source. Journal of Dairy Science, 83(10), 2289-2294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75115-0
  • Michalet-Doreau, B., & Ould-Bah, M. Y. (1992). In vitro and in sacco methods for the estimation of dietary nitrogen degradability in the rumen: a review. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 40(1), 57-86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(92)90112-J
  • Nocek, J. E. (1988). In situ and Other Methods to Estimate Ruminal Protein and Energy Digestibility: A Review. Journal of Dairy Science, 71(8), 2051-2069. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79781-7
  • Nousiainen, J., Ahvenjärvi, S., Rinne, M., Hellämäki, M., & Huhtanen, P. (2004). Prediction of indigestible cell wall fraction of grass silage by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 115(3), 295-311. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.03.004
  • Odum, H., Odum, E., & Brown, M. (2018). Agricultural systems. In Environment and Society in Florida (pp. 243-252). https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203757222-26
  • Richards, C. J., Pedersen, J. F., Britton, R. A., Stock, R. A., & Krehbiel, C. R. (1995). In vitro starch disappearance procedure modifications. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 55(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00790-T
  • Rojas-Downing, M. M., Nejadhashemi, A. P., Harrigan, T., & Woznicki, S. A. (2017). Climate change and livestock: Impacts, adaptation, and mitigation. Climate Risk Management, 16, 145-163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2017.02.001
  • Tylutki, T. P., Fox, D. G., Durbal, V. M., Tedeschi, L. O., Russell, J. B., Van Amburgh, M. E., Overton, T. R., Chase, L. E., & Pell, A. N. (2008). Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System: A model for precision feeding of dairy cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 143(1), 174-202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.05.010
  • Van Amburgh, M. E., Collao-Saenz, E. A., Higgs, R. J., Ross, D. A., Recktenwald, E. B., Raffrenato, E., & Foskolos, A. (2015). The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System: Updates to the model and evaluation of version 6.5. Journal of Dairy Science, 98(9), 6361-6380.
  • Van Soest, P. J. (1994). Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant (2 ed.). Cornell University Press.
  • Vanzant, E. S., Cochran, R. C., & Titgemeyer, E. C. (1998). Standardization of in situ techniques for ruminant feedstuff evaluation. J Anim Sci, 76(10), 2717-2729. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.76102717x

Sütçü Manda, İnek ve Koyunlarda Yaygın Olarak Kullanılan Kaba ve Konsantre Yemlerin İn-Vitro Sindirilebilirliğinin Daisy İnkübatör Kullanılarak Karşılaştırılması

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 1, 7 - 11

Aamır Iqbal , Ümit Özçınar , Vitalii Bomko , İbrahim Sadi Çetingül , Eyup Eren Gultepe , İsmail Bayram

https://doi.org/10.30607/kvj.1419628

Öz

Bu araştırmada, manda, inek ve koyunlarda in vitro sistem kullanılarak 8 farklı yem maddesinin in vitro gerçek (NDF) sindirilebilirliği değerlendirilmiştir. Yemler, kaba ve konsantre olarak gruplandırıldı ve manda, sığır ve koyun rumen sıvıları kullanılarak test edildi. Araştırmada, tüm yemler için, üç tekerrür, üç farklı inokulum kaynağı (rumen sıvısı) kullanıldı. Sindirilebilirlik için inkubasyon süresi her tür rumen sıvısı için 48 saatti. Araştırmada, farklı hayvanlara ait rumen sıvılarının, 48 saatlik inkubasyon süresi boyunca yem maddelerinin in vitro gerçek? kuru madde sindirilebilirliği üzerinde önemli bir etkisi olmamıştır (P>0.05). Pelet buğday kepeği, sindirilebilirlik değeri açısından, diğer yem maddelerine göre koyunlarda en düşük değeri vermiştir. Sonuç olarak, in vitro sindirilebilirlik deneme yönteminin, farklı hayvan türlerinde yemlerin gerçek sindirilebilirliğini tahmin etmek için kullanılabileceği kanısına varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

DAISY yem ruminant kuru madde sindirilebilirlik

Proje Numarası

AKUHADYEK-495337002-07 no., Date 14/01/2019

Kaynakça

  • Ajila, C. M., Brar, S. K., Verma, M., Tyagi, R. D., Godbout, S., & Valéro, J. R. (2012). Bio-processing of agro-byproducts to animal feed. Crit Rev Biotechnol, 32(4), 382-400. https://doi.org/10.3109/07388551.2012.659172
  • Allen, M. S., & Piantoni, P. (2014). Carbohydrate nutrition: managing energy intake and partitioning through lactation. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract, 30(3), 577-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2014.07.004
  • Besle, J.-M., Cornu, A., & Jouany, J.-P. (1994). Roles of structural phenylpropanoids in forage cell wall digestion. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 64(2), 171-190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740640206
  • Cone, J. W., Cliné-Theil, W., Malestein, A., & van 't Klooster, A. T. (1989). Degradation of starch by incubation with rumen fluid. A comparison of different starch sources. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 49(2), 173-183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740490206
  • Conrad, H. R., Pratt, A. D., & Hibbs, J. W. (1964). Regulation of Feed Intake in Dairy Cows. I. Change in Importance of Physical and Physiological Factors with Increasing Digestibility1. Journal of Dairy Science, 47(1), 54-62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(64)88581-7
  • Cotanch, K. W., Grant, R. J., Van Amburgh, M., Zontini, A. M., Fustini, M., Palmonari, A., & Formigoni, A. (2014). Applications of uNDF in ration modeling and formulation. 114-131.
  • Devendra, C., & Sevilla, C. C. (2002). Availability and use of feed resources in crop–animal systems in Asia. Agricultural Systems, 71(1), 59-73.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00036-1
  • Fox, D. G., Tedeschi, L. O., Tylutki, T. P., Russell, J. B., Van Amburgh, M. E., Chase, L. E., Pell, A. N., & Overton, T. R. (2004). The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System model for evaluating herd nutrition and nutrient excretion. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 112(1), 29-78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2003.10.006
  • Getachew, G., Blümmel, M., Makkar, H. P. S., & Becker, K. (1998). In vitro gas measuring techniques for assessment of nutritional quality of feeds: a review. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 72(3), 261-281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00189-2
  • Hogan, J. P., & Flinn, P. C. (1999). An assessment by in vivo methods of grain quality for ruminants. http://hdl.handle.net/2123/2272
  • Holden, L. A. (1999). Comparison of methods of in vitro dry matter digestibility for ten feeds. J Dairy Sci, 82(8), 1791-1794. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75409-3
  • Huhtanen, P., Nousiainen, J., & Rinne, M. (2006). Recent developments in forage evaluation with special reference to practical applications. Agricultural and Food Science, 15(3), 293-323. https://doi.org/10.2137/145960606779216317
  • Kendall, C., Leonardi, C., Hoffman, P. C., & Combs, D. K. (2009). Intake and milk production of cows fed diets that differed in dietary neutral detergent fiber and neutral detergent fiber digestibility. J Dairy Sci, 92(1), 313-323. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1482
  • Krizsan, S. J., & Huhtanen, P. (2013). Effect of diet composition and incubation time on feed indigestible neutral detergent fiber concentration in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci, 96(3), 1715-1726. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5752
  • Mabjeesh, S. J., Cohen, M., & Arieli, A. (2000). In Vitro Methods for Measuring the Dry Matter Digestibility of Ruminant Feedstuffs: Comparison of Methods and Inoculum Source. Journal of Dairy Science, 83(10), 2289-2294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75115-0
  • Michalet-Doreau, B., & Ould-Bah, M. Y. (1992). In vitro and in sacco methods for the estimation of dietary nitrogen degradability in the rumen: a review. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 40(1), 57-86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(92)90112-J
  • Nocek, J. E. (1988). In situ and Other Methods to Estimate Ruminal Protein and Energy Digestibility: A Review. Journal of Dairy Science, 71(8), 2051-2069. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79781-7
  • Nousiainen, J., Ahvenjärvi, S., Rinne, M., Hellämäki, M., & Huhtanen, P. (2004). Prediction of indigestible cell wall fraction of grass silage by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 115(3), 295-311. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.03.004
  • Odum, H., Odum, E., & Brown, M. (2018). Agricultural systems. In Environment and Society in Florida (pp. 243-252). https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203757222-26
  • Richards, C. J., Pedersen, J. F., Britton, R. A., Stock, R. A., & Krehbiel, C. R. (1995). In vitro starch disappearance procedure modifications. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 55(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00790-T
  • Rojas-Downing, M. M., Nejadhashemi, A. P., Harrigan, T., & Woznicki, S. A. (2017). Climate change and livestock: Impacts, adaptation, and mitigation. Climate Risk Management, 16, 145-163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2017.02.001
  • Tylutki, T. P., Fox, D. G., Durbal, V. M., Tedeschi, L. O., Russell, J. B., Van Amburgh, M. E., Overton, T. R., Chase, L. E., & Pell, A. N. (2008). Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System: A model for precision feeding of dairy cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 143(1), 174-202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.05.010
  • Van Amburgh, M. E., Collao-Saenz, E. A., Higgs, R. J., Ross, D. A., Recktenwald, E. B., Raffrenato, E., & Foskolos, A. (2015). The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System: Updates to the model and evaluation of version 6.5. Journal of Dairy Science, 98(9), 6361-6380.
  • Van Soest, P. J. (1994). Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant (2 ed.). Cornell University Press.
  • Vanzant, E. S., Cochran, R. C., & Titgemeyer, E. C. (1998). Standardization of in situ techniques for ruminant feedstuff evaluation. J Anim Sci, 76(10), 2717-2729. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.76102717x
Toplam 25 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Hayvan Sağlığı Ekonomisi ve İşletmeciliği, Veteriner Bilimleri (Diğer)
Bölüm ARAŞTIRMA MAKALESİ
Yazarlar

Aamır Iqbal 0000-0003-4473-2329

Ümit Özçınar 0000-0002-1143-1215

Vitalii Bomko 0000-0002-7803-2454

İbrahim Sadi Çetingül 0000-0002-7608-6176

Eyup Eren Gultepe 0000-0002-2404-1232

İsmail Bayram 0000-0002-9993-7092

Proje Numarası AKUHADYEK-495337002-07 no., Date 14/01/2019
Erken Görünüm Tarihi 13 Mart 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi
Gönderilme Tarihi 14 Ocak 2024
Kabul Tarihi 6 Aralık 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Iqbal, A., Özçınar, Ü., Bomko, V., Çetingül, İ. S., vd. (2025). Comparison of İn-Vitro Digestibility of Commonly Used Forage and Concentrate Feeds in Dairy Buffalo, Cow and Sheep by Using Daisy Incubator. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal, 18(1), 7-11. https://doi.org/10.30607/kvj.1419628
AMA Iqbal A, Özçınar Ü, Bomko V, Çetingül İS, Gultepe EE, Bayram İ. Comparison of İn-Vitro Digestibility of Commonly Used Forage and Concentrate Feeds in Dairy Buffalo, Cow and Sheep by Using Daisy Incubator. kvj. Mart 2025;18(1):7-11. doi:10.30607/kvj.1419628
Chicago Iqbal, Aamır, Ümit Özçınar, Vitalii Bomko, İbrahim Sadi Çetingül, Eyup Eren Gultepe, ve İsmail Bayram. “Comparison of İn-Vitro Digestibility of Commonly Used Forage and Concentrate Feeds in Dairy Buffalo, Cow and Sheep by Using Daisy Incubator”. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal 18, sy. 1 (Mart 2025): 7-11. https://doi.org/10.30607/kvj.1419628.
EndNote Iqbal A, Özçınar Ü, Bomko V, Çetingül İS, Gultepe EE, Bayram İ (01 Mart 2025) Comparison of İn-Vitro Digestibility of Commonly Used Forage and Concentrate Feeds in Dairy Buffalo, Cow and Sheep by Using Daisy Incubator. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal 18 1 7–11.
IEEE A. Iqbal, Ü. Özçınar, V. Bomko, İ. S. Çetingül, E. E. Gultepe, ve İ. Bayram, “Comparison of İn-Vitro Digestibility of Commonly Used Forage and Concentrate Feeds in Dairy Buffalo, Cow and Sheep by Using Daisy Incubator”, kvj, c. 18, sy. 1, ss. 7–11, 2025, doi: 10.30607/kvj.1419628.
ISNAD Iqbal, Aamır vd. “Comparison of İn-Vitro Digestibility of Commonly Used Forage and Concentrate Feeds in Dairy Buffalo, Cow and Sheep by Using Daisy Incubator”. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal 18/1 (Mart 2025), 7-11. https://doi.org/10.30607/kvj.1419628.
JAMA Iqbal A, Özçınar Ü, Bomko V, Çetingül İS, Gultepe EE, Bayram İ. Comparison of İn-Vitro Digestibility of Commonly Used Forage and Concentrate Feeds in Dairy Buffalo, Cow and Sheep by Using Daisy Incubator. kvj. 2025;18:7–11.
MLA Iqbal, Aamır vd. “Comparison of İn-Vitro Digestibility of Commonly Used Forage and Concentrate Feeds in Dairy Buffalo, Cow and Sheep by Using Daisy Incubator”. Kocatepe Veterinary Journal, c. 18, sy. 1, 2025, ss. 7-11, doi:10.30607/kvj.1419628.
Vancouver Iqbal A, Özçınar Ü, Bomko V, Çetingül İS, Gultepe EE, Bayram İ. Comparison of İn-Vitro Digestibility of Commonly Used Forage and Concentrate Feeds in Dairy Buffalo, Cow and Sheep by Using Daisy Incubator. kvj. 2025;18(1):7-11.

13520    13521       13522   1352314104

14105         14106        14107       14108