BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

CONCILIATIVE NEED FOR HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF RELATIVIST CLAIMS IN RELATION TO UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS

Yıl 2015, , 1 - 16, 29.10.2016
https://doi.org/10.20978/ijlp.45253

Öz

The meanings, the values and the limits changes from culture to culture. But as the international law becomes more responsive to the demands for rights of individual, this initiative also means a challenge to the validity of certain state practices re¬flecting geographical and cultural particularities.

CONCILIATIVE NEED FOR HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF RELATIVIST CLAIMS IN RELATION TO UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS

Yıl 2015, , 1 - 16, 29.10.2016
https://doi.org/10.20978/ijlp.45253

Öz

The meanings, the values and the limits changes from culture to culture. But as the international law becomes more responsive to the demands for rights of individual, this initiative also means a challenge to the validity of certain state practices re¬flecting geographical and cultural particularities.

In this paper, it will be tried to observe basic claims of both universality and relativism, after that what preventions can be taken to provide the misuse of relativism will be suggested, in the manner of reconciling both ways of thinking in an acceptable order while emphasizing on preventing the core of human rights.

Toplam 0 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Muhammed Çaprak

Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Ekim 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2015

Kaynak Göster

APA Çaprak, M. (2016). CONCILIATIVE NEED FOR HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF RELATIVIST CLAIMS IN RELATION TO UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS. International Journal of Legal Progress, 1(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.20978/ijlp.45253
AMA Çaprak M. CONCILIATIVE NEED FOR HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF RELATIVIST CLAIMS IN RELATION TO UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS. International Journal of Legal Progress. Temmuz 2016;1(2):1-16. doi:10.20978/ijlp.45253
Chicago Çaprak, Muhammed. “CONCILIATIVE NEED FOR HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF RELATIVIST CLAIMS IN RELATION TO UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS”. International Journal of Legal Progress 1, sy. 2 (Temmuz 2016): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.20978/ijlp.45253.
EndNote Çaprak M (01 Temmuz 2016) CONCILIATIVE NEED FOR HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF RELATIVIST CLAIMS IN RELATION TO UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS. International Journal of Legal Progress 1 2 1–16.
IEEE M. Çaprak, “CONCILIATIVE NEED FOR HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF RELATIVIST CLAIMS IN RELATION TO UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS”, International Journal of Legal Progress, c. 1, sy. 2, ss. 1–16, 2016, doi: 10.20978/ijlp.45253.
ISNAD Çaprak, Muhammed. “CONCILIATIVE NEED FOR HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF RELATIVIST CLAIMS IN RELATION TO UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS”. International Journal of Legal Progress 1/2 (Temmuz 2016), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.20978/ijlp.45253.
JAMA Çaprak M. CONCILIATIVE NEED FOR HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF RELATIVIST CLAIMS IN RELATION TO UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS. International Journal of Legal Progress. 2016;1:1–16.
MLA Çaprak, Muhammed. “CONCILIATIVE NEED FOR HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF RELATIVIST CLAIMS IN RELATION TO UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS”. International Journal of Legal Progress, c. 1, sy. 2, 2016, ss. 1-16, doi:10.20978/ijlp.45253.
Vancouver Çaprak M. CONCILIATIVE NEED FOR HARMFUL CONSEQUENCES OF RELATIVIST CLAIMS IN RELATION TO UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS. International Journal of Legal Progress. 2016;1(2):1-16.