Güvenlik Paradigmasının Dönüşümü ve 21.Yüzyılda Uluslararası Güvenliğin Yeni Gündemi

Orhan Çifçi

doi:10.36484/liberal.1335666

EN TR

Abstract

In the 21st century, international security agenda has formed a completely new appearance with the developments in global politics. For many years, international security has been evaluated in the context of state sovereignty and military power, with a realism-centered and traditionalist perspective. With the end of the Cold War, however, international security has undergone a paradigm shift and it has evolved into an area where human security, migration, pandemics, transnational crimes, ethnic conflicts and many other issues are given priority. In this article, firstly, the transformation of the security paradigm is explained within the scope of the debates between international security theories. In the following parts, threats against the continuity of liberal international order, technology-security relationship and environmental threats are analyzed and the article discusses how and in which aspects these issues have shaped the new agenda of international security in the 21st century.

Keywords

International Security , Security Paradigm , Liberal International Order , Technology , Environmental Threats

Güvenlik Paradigmasının Dönüşümü ve 21.Yüzyılda Uluslararası Güvenliğin Yeni Gündemi

Öz

21. Yüzyılda uluslararası güvenliğin gündemi küresel politikada yaşanan gelişmeler çerçevesinde bütünüyle yeni bir görünüm kazanmıştır. Uzun yıllardır realizm merkezli ve geleneksel bir yorumlamayla devlet egemenliği ve askerî güç bağlamında değerlendirilen uluslararası güvenlik Soğuk Savaş’ın sonuyla beraber bir paradigma değişimi geçirerek devletin yanında birey güvenliği, göç, salgın hastalıklar, ulus ötesi suçlar, etnik çatışmalar ve diğer birçok konunun öncelik verildiği bir alana evrilmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, güvenlik kavramına ilişkin paradigma değişimine ve ortaya çıkan yeni tehdit formlarıyla 21. yüzyılda uluslararası güvenliğin gündemine açıklık getirmektir. Bu çerçevede, çalışmada ilk olarak uluslararası güvenlik teorileri arasındaki tartışmalar ekseninde güvenlik paradigmasının dönüşümü açıklanmıştır. Çalışmanın devamında, mevcut güvenlik gündeminin en önemli üç maddesi olarak sınıflandırılabilecek liberal uluslararası düzenin krizi ve düzenin devamlılığına karşı ortaya çıkan tehditler, teknoloji-güvenlik ilişkisi ve çevresel tehdit konularının 21. yüzyılda uluslararası güvenliğin gündemini nasıl ve hangi yönleriyle şekillendirdiği tartışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Uluslararası Güvenlik , Güvenlik Paradigması , Liberal Uluslararası Düzen , Teknoloji , Çevresel Tehditler

Kaynakça

Atlantic Council. (2023). Central Bank Digital Currency Tracker. Erişim Adresi: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/cbdctracker/. Erişim Tarihi: 24.02.2023.
Axelrod, R., & Keohane, R. O. (1985). Achieving cooperation under anarchy: strategies and institutions. World Politics, 38 (1), 226-254.
Ayoob, M. (1995). The third world security predicament: state making, regional conflict, and the international system. Boulder, CO: Lynne R.
Barkawi, T. ve Laffey M. (2006). The post-colonial moment in security studies. Review of International Studies, 32 (2), 329-352.
Boulanin, V., Brockmann, K. ve Richards, L. (2020). Responsible Artificial Intelligence Research And Innovation For International Peace And Security. Stockholm: SIPRI.
Brauch, H. G. (2008). Güvenliğin yeniden kavramsallaştırılması. Uluslararası İlişkiler, 5 (18), 1-47.
Bremmer, I. (2021). The technopolar moment: how digital power will reshape the global order. Foreign Affairs, 100 (6), 112-128.
Buzan, B. (1983). People, states and fear: national security problem in international relations. Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press.
Buzan, B. (1991). New patterns of global security in the twenty-first century. International Affairs, 67 (3), 431-451.
Buzan, B. (1997). Rethinking security after the cold war. Cooperation and Conflict, 32 (1), 5-28.

Buzan, B., Waever, O. and de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: a new framework for analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Buzan, B. ve Wæver, O. (2003). Regions and powers: the structure of international security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barry, B. ve Hansen, L. (2009). Evolution of international security studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cha, V. D. (2000). Globalization and the study of international security. Journal of Peace Research, 37 (3), 391-403.
Chin, W. (2019). Technology, war and the state: past, present and future. International Affairs, 95 (4), 765-783.
Chipman, J. (1992). The Future of strategic studies: beyond even grand strategy. Survival, 34 (1), 109-131.
Dedeoğlu, B. (2004). Yeniden güvenlik topluluğu: Benzerliklerin karşılıklı bağımlılığından farklılıkların birlikteliğine. Uluslararası İlişkiler, 1 (4), 1-21.
Doyle, M. (1986). Kant: liberalism and world politics. American Political Science Review, 80 (4), 1151-1169.
Dunn, F.S. (1950) War and the minds of men. New York: Harper.
Elliot, L. (2015). Robots threaten 15m UK jobs, says Bank of England’s chief economist. The Guardian. Erişim Adresi: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/nov/12/robots-threaten-low-paid-jobs-says-bank-of-england-chief-economist. Erişim Tarihi: 27.05. 2023.
Ford, M. ve Hoskins A. (2022). Radical war: data, attention and control in the twenty-first century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fukuyama, F. (1991). Liberal democracy as a global phenomenon. Political Science and Politics, 24 (4), 659-664. Galtung, J. (1964). An editorial. Journal of Peace Research, 1 (1), 1-4.
Global Terrorism Index. (2023). Sydney: Institute for Economics and Peace.
Haas, M.L. (2005). The ideological origins of great power politics, 1789–1989. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Herz, J. (1950). Idealist internationalism and the security dilemma. World Politics, 2 (2), 157–80.
Herszenhorn, D. M. (2021). Biden says Russia, China ‘didn’t show up’ on climate change commitments. Politico. Erişim Adresi: https://www.politico.eu/article/biden-says-russia-china-didnt-show-up-on-climate-change-commitments/. Erişim Tarihi: 01.06.2023.
Kaplan, R. (1994). Coming Anarchy. The Atlantic.
Kay, S. (2004). Globalization, power and security. Security Dialogue, 35 (1), 9-25.
Keohane, R. O. ve Nye, J. (1977). Power and interdependence: world politics in transition. Londra: Pearson.
Keohane, R. O. (1988) International institutions: two approaches. International Studies Quarterly, 32 (4), 379–96.
Kingsley, P. (2018). Trump’s immigration remarks outrage many, but others quietly agree. New York Times. Erişim Adresi: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/12/world/europe/trump-immigration-outrage.html. Erişim Tarihi: 01.06.2023.
Kissinger, H. (1957). Nuclear weapons and foreign policy. New York: Harper and Row.
Klare, M. (2018). The Challenges of Emerging Technologies. Arms Control Association. Erişim Adresi: https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2018-12/features/challenges-emerging-technologies. Erişim Tarihi: 24.04.2023.
Krauthammer, C. (1990/1991). The Unipolar Moment. Foreign Affairs, 70 (1), 23-33.
Layne, C. (1993). The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers Will Rise. International Security, 17 (4), 5-51.
Layne, C. (1994). Kant or cant: the myth of the democratic peace. International Security, 19 (2), 5–49.
Lynn-Jones, S. (1999). Realism and security studies. Craig A. Snyder (Ed.). Contemporary security and strategy içinde (s.17-44) London: Red Globe Press London.
Maizland, L. (2022). Global climate agreements: successes and failures. Council on Foreign Relations. Erişim Adresi: https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/paris-global-climate-change-agreements#chapter-title-0-2. Erişim Tarihi: 14.05.2023.
Malik, S. (2015). Challenging orthodoxy. Peter Hough, Shahin Malik, Andrew Moran ve Bruce Pilbeam (Ed.). International security studies: theory and practice içinde (s.31-43). New York: Routledge.
Malik, S. (2015). Constructing security. Peter Hough, Shahin Malik, Andrew Moran ve Bruce Pilbeam (Ed.). International security studies: theory and practice içinde (s.72-84). New York: Routledge.
Matthews, J.T. (1989). Redefining security. Foreign Affairs, 68 (2), 162-177.
Mcdonald, M. (2008). Constructivism. Paul D. Williams (Ed.). Security studies: an introduction içinde (s.59-72). Londra: Routledge.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (1990). Back to the future: instability in Europe after cold war. International Security, 15 (1), 5-56.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (1994). The false promise of international institutions. International Security, 19 (3), 5–49.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (1995). A realist reply. International Security, 20 (1), 82-93.
Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking preferences seriously: a liberal theory of international politics. International Organization, 51 (4), 513–553.
Morrison, W. M. (2019). China’s Economic Rise: History, Trends, Challenges, and Implications for the United States. Washington: Congressional Research Service.
NASA. (2023). How Do We Know Climate Change Is Real?. Erişim Adresi: https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/. Erişim Tarihi: 08.05.2023.
Nye, J. ve Lynn-Jones S. (1988). International security studies: a report of a conference on the state of the field. International Security, 12 (4), 5-27.
Osgood, R. (1957). Limited war: the challenge to American strategy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Owen, J. (1994). How liberalism produces democratic peace. International Security, 19 (2), 87-125.
Patrick, S. M. (2021). The international order isn’t ready for the climate crisis: the case for a new planetary politics. Foreign Affairs, 100 (6), 166-177.
Pişleag, T. (2016). Security between national and international. Relationes Internationales, 9 (2), 69-75.
Rosato, S. (2003). The flawed logic of democratic peace theory. The American Political Science Review, 97 (4), 585–602.
Ryan, Mick. (2022). War Transformed: The Future of Twenty-First-Century Great Power Competition and Conflict. Maryland: US Naval Institute Press.
Sagan S.D. (2016). Ethics, technology & war. Daedalus, 145 (4), 6–11.
Sayler, K. (2022). Emerging military technologies: background and issues for congress. Washington: Congressional Research Service.
SIPRI. (2023). World military expenditure reaches new record high as European spending surges. Erişim Adresi: https://www.sipri.org/media/press-release/2023/world-military-expenditure-reaches-new-record-high-european-spending-surges. Erişim Tarihi: 22.06.2023.
Smoke, R. (1975). National security affairs. Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby (Ed.). Handbook of political science içinde (s.247-362). Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
Statista. (2023). Number of social media users worldwide from 2017 to 2027. Erişim Adresi: https://www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-of-worldwide-social-network-users/. Erişim Tarihi: 10.04.2023.
The US National Ocean Service. (2023). How does climate change affect coral reefs?. https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/coralreef-climate.html. Erişim Tarihi: 7 Mayıs 2023.
The World Bank. (2023). Food security update. Washington: The World Bank.
Tuner, G. (2014). Is global collapse imminent?. Melbourne: Sustainable Society Institute.
UNCDF. (2020). The Role of Cybersecurity and Data Security in the Digital Economy. New York: United Nations.
UNDP. (2022). New Threats to Human Security in the Anthropocene: Demanding Greater Solidarity. New York: United Nations.
Walker, T.C. ve Rousseau D.L. (2010). Liberalism: a theoretical and empirical assessment. Myriam Dunn Cavelty ve Thierry Balzacq (Ed.). Routledge handbook of security studies içinde (s.22-31). Londra: Routledge.
Walt, S.M. (1991). The renaissance of security studies. International Studies Quarterly, 35 (2), 211-239.
Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of international politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Waltz, K. (1988). The origins of war in neorealist theory. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18 (4), 615-628.
Weiss, G. (2021). The new art of war: the origins, theory, and future of conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wolhforth, W.C. (2010). Realism and Security Studies. Myriam Dunn Cavelty ve Victor Mauer (Ed.). Routledge handbook of security studies içinde (s.9-20) Londra: Routledge.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Uluslararası Siyaset

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Orhan Çifçi ^*
0000-0002-5746-4258
Türkiye

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

15 Nisan 2024

Yayımlanma Tarihi

20 Mart 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

31 Temmuz 2023

Kabul Tarihi

4 Ocak 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 1970 Sayı: 113

DOI

https://doi.org/10.36484/liberal.1335666

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA54NM96BL

APA

Çifçi, O. (2024). Güvenlik Paradigmasının Dönüşümü ve 21.Yüzyılda Uluslararası Güvenliğin Yeni Gündemi. Liberal Düşünce Dergisi, 113, 143-170. https://doi.org/10.36484/liberal.1335666

Cited By

Almanya’nın Kamu Güvenliği Politikaları: Strateji Belgeleri Üzerinden Bir İnceleme

Liberal Düşünce Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.36484/liberal.1683028

DİJİTAL DÖNÜŞÜM EKSENİNDE KENT GÜVENLİĞİ: TÜRKİYE'DE KURUMSAL YAPILANMA, STRATEJİLER VE POLİSİYE UYGULAMALARIN ANALİZİ

Yalvaç Akademi Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.57120/yalvac.1803933

Abstract

Keywords

Güvenlik Paradigmasının Dönüşümü ve 21.Yüzyılda Uluslararası Güvenliğin Yeni Gündemi

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster

Cited By

Almanya’nın Kamu Güvenliği Politikaları: Strateji Belgeleri Üzerinden Bir İnceleme

DİJİTAL DÖNÜŞÜM EKSENİNDE KENT GÜVENLİĞİ: TÜRKİYE'DE KURUMSAL YAPILANMA, STRATEJİLER VE POLİSİYE UYGULAMALARIN ANALİZİ