Understanding the Rise of the Far Right in the European Union: A Lévi-Straussian Perspective on Political Culture
Öz
The structuralist framework of Claude Lévi-Strauss is used in this study to examine the emergence of far-right populist movements in six European Union (EU) member states: France, Germany, Italy, Hungary, Sweden, and Portugal. The study uses qualitative methods at the macro level and manual document analysis at the micro level to uncover the symbolic underpinnings of far-right speech by looking at party manifestos and programs. The results demonstrate that these movements use binary oppositions -such as us against them, natural versus artificial, and clean versus dirty -to generate political meaning. These oppositions are consistent with structuralist beliefs about myth and cultural codes. Far-right parties portray their leaders as heroes in stories of catastrophe and rebirth, and they portray themselves as defenders of a mythologized national identity. Within these symbolic systems, discourses on Islamophobia, Euroskepticism, and anti-immigration serve as cultural myths as well as policy stances. The study concludes that far-right populism is best understood as a cultural response to structural transformation, for which the theory of Lévi-Strauss offers a compelling analytical tool.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Levi-Strauss, European Union, Political Culture, Far Right, Populist Leadership, Document Analysis
Etik Beyan
Makalenin İngilizce dil düzenlemesi ve revizyonu sırasında “DeepL Translator” ve “Grammarly” adlı çevrimiçi yazılımlar kullanılmıştır.
Kaynakça
- Brubaker, R. (2017). Why populism?. Theory and Society, 46, 357-385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-017-9301-7
- Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00184
- Caramani, D., & Manucci, L. (2019). National past and populism: the re-elaboration of fascism and its impact on right-wing populism in Western Europe. West European Politics, 42(6), 1159-1187. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1596690
- Cemal, H. (2012). 1915: Ermeni Soykırımı (2nd ed.). İstanbul: Everest Yayınları.
- Chueri, J. (2022). What distinguishes radical right welfare chauvinism? Excluding different migrant groups from the welfare state. Journal of European Social Policy, 33(1), 84-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/09589287221128441
- Coi, G. (2024, May 24). Mapped: Europe’s rapidly rising right. POLITICO. Retrieved from https://www.politico.eu/article/mapped-europe-far-right-government-power-politics-eu-italy-finalnd-hungary-parties-elections-polling/
- Commission of the European Communities. (2007). On a European agenda for culture in a globalizing world. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52007DC0242
- Delanty, G. (1995). Inventing Europe: idea, identity, reality. London, UK: Macmillan.
- Delanty, G. (2003). Europe and the idea of “Unity in Diversity.” In R. Lindahl (Ed.). Whither Europe? Borders, boundaries, frontiers in a changing world (pp. 25-42). Sweeden: CERGU. Retrieved from https://www.gu.se/sites/default/files/2020-12/Whither%20Europe-bok.pdf
- Eatwell, R. (Ed.). (1997). Europe of the ‘nation-states’? Concepts and theories. In R. Eatwell (Ed.). European political cultures: conflict or convergence? (pp. 233-251). London, UK: Routledge.