Richard Cantillon: İktisadî Teorinin Doğuşu

Yıl 2015, Sayı: 80, 157 - 171, 01.12.2015

Mark Thornton Ünsal Çetin

Öz

Hayatî öneme sahip birçok Avusturyacı vukuf İrlandalı banker Richard Cantillon’un (16801-1734) iktisadında ve bâki kalan yegâne yayınlanmış eseri Essai sur la Nature du Commerce en General isimli çalışmasında bulunmaktadır.2 Cantillon’un Avusturyacı iktisadın gelişimi üzerinde önemli bir tesir olduğu ve Avusturya Okulu’nun bir üyesi addedilebileceği aşikâr görünüyor. Carl Menger, The Principles of Economics’in (İktisadın İlkeleri) yayınlanmasından evvel kütüphanesinde Essai’nin bir kopyasına sahipti.

Kaynakça

• Bordo, Michael D. 1983. “Some Aspects of the Monetary Economics of Richard Cantillon.” Journal of Monetary Economics 12, no. 2 (Ağustos): 235-58.
• Brewer, Antony. 1992. Richard Cantillon: Pioneer of Economic Theory. Londra: Routledge.
• ————. 1988. “Cantillon and the Land Theory of Value.” History of Political Economy 20, no. 1 (Bahar): 1-14.
• ————. 1988. “Cantillon and Mercantilism.” History of Political Economy 20, no. 3 (Güz): 447-60.
• Cantillon, Richard. [1755] 1959. Essai sur la Nature du Commerce en General [and other essays]. Editör ve çeviren Henry Higgs, Londra: Frank Cass.
• Hayek, F. A. [1931] 1991. “Richard Cantillon (c. 1680-1734).” Introduction to Richard Cantillon, Essai sur la Nature Commerce en General, çeviren Grete Heinz, yeniden basım Hayek, Economic History. Cilt 3. The Collected Works of F. A. Hayek. Editörler W.W. Bartley
• III, and Stephen Kresge, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• ————. [1931] 1985. “Richard Cantillon,” çeviren Michael O. Suilleabhain, Journal of Libertarian Studies 7, no. 2 (Güz): 217-48.
• Hebert, Robert F. 1985. “Was Richard Cantillon an Austrian Economist?” Journal of Libertarian Studies 7, no. 2 (Güz): 269-80.
• ————. 1981. “Richard Cantillon’s Early Contributions to Spatial Economics.” Economica 48, no. 189 (Şubat): 71-77.
• Higgs, Henry. 1892. “Cantillon’s Place in Economics.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 6: 436- 56.
• ————. 1891. “Richard Cantillon.” Economic Journal 1: 262-91.
• Hone, Joseph. 1944. “Richard Cantillon, Economist-Biographical Note.” Economic Journal 54: 96-100.
• Hülsmann, Jörg Guido. 1997. “Cantillon As A Proto-Austrian: Further Evidence.” Çalışma makalesi.
• Liggio, Leonard P. 1985. “Richard Cantillon and the French Economists: Distinctive French Contributions to J. B. Say.” Journal of Libertarian Studies 7, no. 2 (Güz): 295-304.
• Murphy, Antoin E. 1986. Richard Cantillon: Entrepreneur and Economist. New York: Oxford Universty Press.
• ————. 1985. “Richard Cantillon: Banker and Economist.” Journal of Libertarian Studies 7, no. 2 (Güz): 185-216.
• ————. 1984. “Richard Cantillon: An Irish Banker in Paris.” Hermathena 135: 45-74.
• O’Mahony, David. 1985. “Richard Cantillon- A Man of His Time: A Comment on Tarascio.” Journal of Libertarian Studies 7, no. 2 (Güz): 259-68.
• Prendergast, Renee. 1991. “Cantillon and the Emergence of the Theory of Profit.” History of Political Economy 23 (Güz): 419-29.
• Salerno, Joseph T. 1985. “The Influence of Cantillon’s Essai on the Methodology of J. B. Say.” Journal of Libertarian Studies 7, no. 2 (Güz): 305-16.
• ————. 1978. “Comment on the French Liberal School.” Journal of Libertarian Studies 2, no. 3 (Kış): 65-68.
• Schumpeter, Joseph. [1914] 1991. Epochen der Dogmen-und Methodengeschichte, Grundriz der Sozialökonomik. 1’inci basım. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr. Cilt 1, Kısım 1, s. 143, F. A. Hayek tarafından iktibas (1991). ss. 258-59.
• Spengler, Joseph J. 1954. “Richard Cantillon: First of the Moderns I.” Journal of Political Economy 62, no. 4 (Ağustos): 281-95.
• ————. 1954. “Richard Cantillon: First of the Moderns II.” Journal of Political Economy 62, no. 5 (Ekim): 406-24.
• Tarascio, Vincent J. 1985. “Cantillon’s Essai: A Current Perspective.” Journal of Libertarian Studies 7, no. 2 (Güz): 249-58.
• ————. 1981. “Cantillon’s Theory of Population Size and Distribution.” Atlantic Economic Journal 9, no. 2 (Temmuz): 12-18.
• Waddell, D. A. G. 1958. “Charles Davenant (1656-1714): A Biographical Sketch.” Economic History Review 2’inci seri, 11, no. 1: 279-88.